Systemic dexmedetomidine is not as efficient as perineural dexmedetomidine in prolonging an ulnar nerve block

Background

We tested the joint hypotheses that both perineural and systemic dexmedetomidine prolong the duration of an ulnar nerve block (UNB) compared with ropivacaine alone and that systemic dexmedetomidine is noninferior compared with perineural dexmedetomidine in block prolongation.

Methods

We performed bilateral UNBs in 22 healthy volunteers on two separate days. On the first day, each arm was randomized to either 4 mL ropivacaine 5 mg/mL+1 mL dexmedetomidine 100 µg/mL (Perineural) or 4 mL ropivacaine 5 mg/mL+1 mL saline (Systemic). On the subsequent treatment day, each arm was randomized to 1 mL of saline plus 4 mL of ropivacaine at either 7.5 mg/mL(HiRopi) or 5 mg/mL (NoDex). The primary outcome measure was the duration of sensory block assessed by mechanical discrimination.

Results

Mean sensory block duration was longer in both the Perineural (14.4 hours, 95% CI 13.1 to 15.6) and Systemic treatments (9.2 hours, 95% CI 8.6 to 9.8) compared with the NoDex treatment (7.1 hours, 95% CI 6.6 to 7.6) (p<0.0001 for both). Systemic dexmedetomidine was inferior (not noninferior) compared with perineural dexmedetomidine, as the 95% CI of the difference (mean difference 5.2 hour, 95% CI 4.2 to 6.1) exceeded the noninferiority limit of 3.6 hour. Onset time did not differ among the groups. The other test modalities demonstrated similar block durations as the primary outcome.

Conclusions

Adding dexmedetomidine perineurally to ropivacaine doubles the duration of an UNB. Systemic dexmedetomidine also prolongs the duration of UNB, but has less of an effect compared with the perineural route.

Trial registration number

NCT03222323.

Does dexamethasone have a perineural mechanism of action? A paired, blinded, randomized, controlled study in healthy volunteers

BACKGROUND

Dexamethasone prolongs block duration. Whether this is achieved via a peripheral or a central mechanism of action is unknown. We hypothesized that perineural dexamethasone added as an adjuvant to ropivacaine prolongs block duration compared with ropivacaine alone, by a locally mediated effect when controlled for a systemic action.

METHODS

We performed a paired, blinded, randomized trial, including healthy men. All subjects received bilateral blocks of the saphenous nerve with ropivacaine 0.5%, 20 ml mixed with dexamethasone 2 mg in one leg and saline in the other, according to randomization. The primary outcome was the duration of sensory block assessed by temperature discrimination in the saphenous nerve distribution. Secondary outcomes were sensory block assessed by mechanical discrimination, pain response to tonic heat stimulation, and warmth and heat pain detection thresholds.

RESULTS

We included 20 subjects; one had a failed block and was excluded from the paired analysis. Block duration was not statistically significantly longer in the leg receiving dexamethasone when assessed by temperature discrimination (primary outcome, estimated median difference 1.5 h, 95% confidence interval -3.5 to 0, P=0.050). For all other outcomes, the duration was statistically significantly longer in the leg receiving dexamethasone, but the median differences were <2.0 h. Individual subject analysis revealed that only eight subjects had a block prolongation of at least 2 h in the leg receiving dexamethasone perineurally.

CONCLUSION

Perineural administration of dexamethasone 2 mg showed a modest and inconsistent effect of questionable clinical relevance on block duration.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT01981746.

Effect of a high-dose target-controlled naloxone infusion on pain and hyperalgesia in patients following groin hernia repair: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Background

Central sensitization is modulated by the endogenous opioid system and plays a major role in the development and maintenance of pain. Recent animal studies performed following resolution of inflammatory pain showed reinstatement of tactile hypersensitivity induced by administration of a mu-opioid-antagonist, suggesting latent sensitization is mediated by endogenous opioids. In a recent crossover study in healthy volunteers, following resolution of a first-degree burn, 4 out of 12 volunteers developed large secondary areas of hyperalgesia areas after a naloxone infusion, while no volunteer developed significant secondary hyperalgesia after the placebo infusion. In order to consistently demonstrate latent sensitization in humans, a pain model inducing deep tissue inflammation, as used in animal studies, might be necessary. The aim of the present study is to examine whether a high-dose target-controlled naloxone infusion can reinstate pain and hyperalgesia following recovery from open groin hernia repair and thus consistently demonstrate opioid-mediated latent sensitization in humans.

Methods/Design

Patients submitted to unilateral, primary, open groin hernia repair will be included in this randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover study. The experimental days take place 6–8 weeks after surgery, time-points at which patients are expected to be almost pain- free. Prior to administration of naloxone or placebo, the primary outcome (a summated measure of pain: at rest, during transition from supine to standing position, and evoked by pressure algometry) and the secondary outcomes (secondary hyperalgesia/allodynia, pressure pain thresholds, assessed at the surgical site and at the mirror-site in the contralateral groin, and, opioid withdrawal symptoms) will be assessed. These assessments will be repeated at each step of the target-controlled infusion of placebo or naloxone at estimated median (95 % CI) plasma concentrations of 344 ng/ml (130;567), 1059 ng/ml (400;1752) and 3196 ng/ml (1205;5276).

Discussion

We aim to demonstrate opioid-mediated latent sensitization in a post-surgical setting, using pain as a clinical relevant variable. Impairment of the protective endogenous opioid system may play an important role in the transition from acute to chronic pain. In order to sufficiently block the endogenous opioid system, a high-dose target-controlled naloxone-infusion is used, in accordance with recent findings in animal studies.

Trial registration number

EUDRACT: 2015-000793-36 (Registration date: 16 February 2015)

Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01992146 (Registration date: 12 December 2014)

Pregabalin and dexamethasone improves post-operative pain treatment after tonsillectomy

BACKGROUND

Post-tonsillectomy pain can be severe. We investigated the analgesic effect from combinations of paracetamol, pregabalin and dexamethasone in adults undergoing tonsillectomy.

METHODS

In this randomized double-blind study, 131 patients were assigned to either group A (paracetamol+placebo), group B (paracetamol+pregabalin+placebo) or group C (paracetamol+pregabalin+dexamethasone). Pre-operatively, patients received either paracetamol 1000 mg, pregabalin 300 mg, dexamethasone 8 mg or placebo according to their allocation. Post-operative pain treatment included paracetamol 1000 mg 4× and ketobemidone 2.5 mg p.n. Ketobemidone consumption, pain scores [visual analogue scale (VAS)], nausea, sedation, dizziness, number of vomits and consumption of ondansetron were recorded 2, 4 and 24 h after the operation. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The mean 24-h VAS-pain score at rest was reduced in group C (P<0.003) vs. group A. The mean 24-h VAS-pain scores during swallowing were reduced in group B (P=0.009) and group C (P<0.003) vs. group A. Consumption of ketobemidone (1-4 h post-operatively) was lower in group B (P=0.003) and group C (P=0.003) vs. group A. The mean 24-h dizziness score was higher in group B (P<0.003) and C (P=0.003) vs. group A. Other parameters including re-operation for post-tonsillectomy bleeding were not different between groups.

CONCLUSION

Pregabalin and pregabalin+dexamethasone reduced post-operative pain scores and consumption of ketobemidone following tonsillectomy. Dizziness was increased with pregabalin.

Continuous adductor-canal-blockade for adjuvant post-operative analgesia after major knee surgery: preliminary results

Because both the saphenous nerve and in part the obturator nerve are traversing the adductor canal of the thigh, we hypothesised that repeated administration of a local anaesthetic (LA) into this aponeurotic space could be a useful option for post-operative analgesia after knee replacement surgery. A systematic search of the literature pertinent to the blockade of the saphenous and/or obturator nerves for pain relief after knee surgery was conducted. Further, pain and opioid requirements were evaluated in eight patients receiving a continuous blockade of the saphenous and obturator nerve (adductor-canal-blockade) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Finally, we performed cross-sectional MR scans of the adductor canal after injection of ropivacaine 30ml in one patient. The systematic literature search revealed only one controlled study, where selective blockade of the saphenous nerve was investigated for the purpose of clinical pain relief after knee arthroscopy. We located no studies reporting on saphenous and/or obturator nerve block for pain relief after TKA. Preliminary findings in eight patients demonstrated that a continuous adductor-canal-blockade for 48h after TKA was associated with low mean pain scores at rest and low mean requirements for supplemental morphine. MR scans in one patient demonstrated that 30ml of LA filled the adductor canal, including the distal part, where the posterior branch of the obturator nerve joins the vessels and the saphenous nerve. Continuous adductor-canal-blockade may be a valuable adjunct for post-operative analgesia after major knee surgery. These preliminary results should be confirmed in randomised, controlled trials.

The transversus abdominis plane block: a valuable option for postoperative analgesia? A topical review

The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is a newly described peripheral block involving the nerves of the anterior abdominal wall. The block has been developed for post-operative pain control after gynaecologic and abdominal surgery. The initial technique described the lumbar triangle of Petit as the landmark used to access the TAP in order to facilitate the deposition of local anaesthetic solution in the neurovascular plane. Other techniques include ultrasound-guided access to the neurovascular plane via the mid-axillary line between the iliac crest and the costal margin, and a subcostal access termed the 'oblique subcostal' access. A systematic search of the literature identified a total of seven randomized clinical trials investigating the effect of TAP block on post-operative pain, including a total of 364 patients, of whom 180 received TAP blockade. The surgical procedures included large bowel resection with a midline abdominal incision, caesarean delivery via the Pfannenstiel incision, abdominal hysterectomy via a transverse lower abdominal wall incision, open appendectomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Overall, the results are encouraging and most studies have demonstrated clinically significant reductions of post-operative opioid requirements and pain, as well as some effects on opioid-related side effects (sedation and post-operative nausea and vomiting). Further studies are warranted to support the findings of the primary published trials and to establish general recommendations for the use of a TAP block.

Pregabalin and dexamethasone in combination with paracetamol for postoperative pain control after abdominal hysterectomy. A randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Multimodal analgesia may be important for optimal postoperative pain treatment and facilitation of early mobilization and recovery. We investigated the analgesic effect of pregabalin and dexamethasone in combination with paracetamol after abdominal hysterectomy.

METHODS

One hundred and sixteen patients were randomly assigned to either group A (paracetamol+placebo x 2), group B (paracetamol+pregabalin+placebo) or group C (paracetamol+pregabalin+dexamethasone). According to randomization and preoperatively, patients received paracetamol 1000 mg, pregabalin 300 mg, dexamethasone 8 mg or placebo. General anaesthesia was performed. Postoperative pain treatment was paracetamol 1000 mg x 4 and patient-controlled intravenous morphine, 2.5 mg bolus. Nausea was treated with ondansetron. Morphine consumption, pain score (visual analogue scale) at rest and during mobilization, nausea, sedation, dizziness, number of vomits and consumption of ondansetron were recorded 2, 4 and 24 h after the operation. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The 24-h morphine consumption and pain score, both at rest and during mobilization, were not significantly different between treatment groups. The mean nausea score (P=0.002) was reduced in group C vs. A. The number of vomits was significantly reduced in both group B (P=0.041) and C (P=0.001) vs. A. Consumption of ondansetron was reduced in group C vs. A and B (P<0.001). Other side effects were not different between groups.

CONCLUSION

Combinations of paracetamol and pregabalin, or paracetamol, pregabalin and dexamethasone did not reduce morphine consumption and pain score compared with paracetamol alone for patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy. Dexamethasone reduced nausea, vomiting and use of ondansetron.

Pilot clinical trial of gabapentin to decrease postoperative delirium in older patients

In this randomized pilot clinical trial, the authors tested the hypothesis that using gabapentin as an add-on agent in the treatment of postoperative pain reduces the occurrence of postoperative delirium. Postoperative delirium occurred in 5/12 patients (42%) who received placebo vs 0/9 patients who received gabapentin, p = 0.045. The reduction in delirium appears to be secondary to the opioid-sparing effect of gabapentin.

CHF3381, a N-methyl-D-aspartate Receptor Antagonist and Monoamine Oxidase–A Inhibitor, Attenuates Secondary Hyperalgesia in a Human Pain Model

CHF3381 is a new low-affinity, noncompetitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist and reversible monoamine oxidase-A (MAO-A) inhibitor. The analgesic activity of CHF3381 was investigated in the heat-capsaicin human pain model and compared with those of gabapentin. Twenty-seven young, healthy male volunteers received a single oral dose of CHF3381 (500 mg), gabapentin (1,200 mg), or placebo in a randomized, double-blind, crossover study design. Measurements were done before and 135 to 145 minutes after treatment administration and included area of secondary hyperalgesia around the sensitized skin of the forearm (45 degrees C for 5 minutes followed by topical capsaicin for 30 minutes), area of secondary hyperalgesia after thermal sensitization of the thigh (45 degrees C for 3 minutes), heat pain detection thresholds (degrees C), and pain on a visual analogue scale after long thermal stimulation (45 degrees C for 1 minute). Compared with placebo, both gabapentin and CHF3381 significantly reduced the area of secondary hyperalgesia on the dominant forearm. Median (and interquartile range) percent values over baseline were 86% after placebo (69% to 100%), 56% (41% to 76%) after gabapentin (P < .001), and 67% (49% to 88%) after CHF3381 (P < .009). Both drugs also significantly decreased the area of secondary hyperalgesia on the dominant thigh. The other pain variables were not significantly affected. Adverse events, mainly fatigue and dizziness, were mild to moderate.

PERSPECTIVE

This article presents the antihyperalgesic effect of CHF3381, a new NMDA receptor antagonist and reversible MAO-A inhibitor, in a human pain model and might guide the proper selection of CHF3381 doses to be used in Phase 2 studies in patients with neuropathic pain.

The effect of gabapentin on post-operative pain following tonsillectomy in adults

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study was to investigate whether a combination of rofecoxib and gabapentin could improve pain relief and reduce opioid requirements, compared with rofecoxib alone, during the first 5 days after tonsillectomy.

METHODS

In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 49 patients received gabapentin 1200 mg pre-operatively, followed by gabapentin 2 x 600 mg on the day of operation and gabapentin 3 x 600 mg for the next 5 days, or placebo. Both groups were given rofecoxib 50 mg daily. In the post-operative care unit, intravenous morphine was administered in doses of 2.5 mg on request. From 4 h to 5 days post-operatively, ketobemidone was offered as escape drug. Pain at rest and during swallowing, and side-effects, were assessed using a four-point verbal rating scale.

RESULTS

As a result of the global withdrawal of rofecoxib, the study had to be terminated prematurely. This report comprises the results from 22 patients in the gabapentin group and 27 patients in the placebo group. Gabapentin reduced ketobemidone requirements during the first 24 h post-operatively [4.5 mg (standard deviation, 3.0 mg) in the placebo group vs. 2.0 mg (standard deviation, 2.0 mg) in the gabapentin group; P < 0.003]. Gabapentin induced more dizziness (P < 0.002), gait disturbance (P < 0.02) and vomiting (P < 0.05) during days 0-5 than placebo. No other statistically significant differences were observed.

CONCLUSION

Gabapentin reduced opioid requirements in the first 24 h after tonsillectomy. The benefits of the reduced opioid intake may be overshadowed by the drawbacks of side-effects.

Perioperative ketamine for acute postoperative pain

BACKGROUND

Postoperative pain management is often limited by adverse effects such as nausea and vomiting. Adjuvant treatment with an inexpensive opioid-sparing drug such as ketamine may be of value in giving better analgesia with fewer adverse effects.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of ketamine administered perioperatively in the treatment of acute postoperative pain in adults.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Studies were identified from MEDLINE (1966-2004), EMBASE (1980-2004), the Cochrane Library (2004) and by handsearching reference lists from review articles and trials. The manufacturer of ketamine (Pfizer) provided search results from their in-house database, PARDLARS.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of adult patients undergoing surgery, being treated with perioperative ketamine or placebo. Studies where ketamine was administered in addition to a basic analgesic (such as morphine or NSAID) in one study group, and compared with a group receiving the same basic analgesic (but without ketamine) in another group, were also included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two independent reviewers identified fifty five RCTs for potential inclusion. Quality and validity assessment was performed by two independent reviewers. In the case of discrepancy, a third reviewer was consulted. Patient reported pain intensity and pain relief was assessed using visual analogue scales or verbal rating scales and adverse effects data were collated.

MAIN RESULTS

Thirty-seven trials were included (2240 participants). Eighteen trials were excluded.Twenty-seven of the 37 trials found that perioperative subanaesthetic doses of ketamine reduced rescue analgesic requirements or pain intensity, or both. Quantitative analysis showed that treatment with ketamine reduced 24 hour PCA morphine consumption and postoperative nausea or vomiting (PONV). Adverse effects were mild or absent.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Ketamine in subanaesthetic dose (that is a dose which is below that required to produce anaesthesia) is effective in reducing morphine requirements in the first 24 hours after surgery. Ketamine also reduces postoperative nausea and vomiting. Adverse effects are mild or absent.

A qualitative systematic review of peri-operative dextromethorphan in post-operative pain

BACKGROUND

The N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, dextromethorphan (DM), has received interest as an adjunctive agent in post-operative pain management. Clinical trials have been contradictory. This systematic review aims to evaluate the available literature examining the analgesic efficacy of DM in post-operative patients.

METHODS

Twenty-eight randomized, double-blind, clinical studies, with 40 comparisons, including a variety of dosing regimens comparing DM treatment with placebo, were included. Meta-analysis was intended but deemed to be inappropriate because of the substantial difference in methodology and reporting between trials. The outcome measures (pain scores at rest, time to first analgesic request and supplemental analgesic consumption) were evaluated qualitatively by significant difference (P<0.05) as reported in the original investigations.

RESULTS

DM did not reduce the post-operative pain score with a clinically significant magnitude. The time to first analgesic request was significantly prolonged in most comparisons with DM. Significant decreases in supplemental opioid consumption were observed in the majority of parenteral DM studies and in about one-half of the oral studies. The decreases were of questionable clinical importance in most comparisons, although a relationship between a decrease in opioid consumption and opioid-related side-effects was established in some studies.

CONCLUSION

Based on the studies available, DM has the potential to be a safe adjunctive agent to opioid analgesia in post-operative pain management, but the consistency of the potential opioid-sparing and pain-reducing effect must be questioned. Consequently, it is not possible to recommend dose regimens or routine clinical use of DM in post-operative pain. The route of administration may be important for the beneficial effect.

Peri-operative ketamine for acute post-operative pain: a quantitative and qualitative systematic review (Cochrane review)

BACKGROUND

Post-operative pain management is usually limited by adverse effects such as nausea and vomiting. Adjuvant treatment with an inexpensive opioid-sparing drug such as ketamine may be of value in giving better analgesia with fewer adverse effects. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of ketamine administered peri-operatively in the treatment of acute post-operative pain in adults.

METHODS

Studies were identified from MEDLINE (1966-2004), EMBASE (1980-2004), the Cochrane Library (2004) and by hand searching reference lists from review articles and trials. The manufacturer of ketamine (Pfizer AS, Lysaker, Norway) provided search results from their in-house database, PARDLARS. Randomized and controlled trials (RCTs) of adult patients undergoing surgery, being treated with peri-operative ketamine, placebo or an active control were considered for inclusion.

RESULTS

Eighteen trials were excluded. Thirty-seven trials were included. Twenty-seven out of 37 trials found that peri-operative ketamine reduced rescue analgesic requirements or pain intensity, or both. Quantitative analysis showed that treatment with ketamine reduced 24-h patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) morphine consumption and post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Adverse effects were mild or absent.

CONCLUSION

In the first 24 h after surgery, ketamine reduces morphine requirements. Ketamine also reduces PONV. Adverse effects are mild or absent. These data should be interpreted with caution as the retrieved studies were heterogenous and the result of the meta-analysis can not be translated into any specific administration regimen with ketamine.

Intra-operative remifentanil might influence pain levels in the immediate post-operative period after major abdominal surgery

BACKGROUND

Remifentanil, a widely used analgesic agent in anaesthesia, has a rapid onset and short duration of action. In clinical settings, this requires an appropriate pain strategy to prevent unacceptable pain in the post-operative period. The aim of this study was to investigate whether remifentanil had any impact on post-operative pain and opioid consumption after major abdominal surgery.

METHODS

Fifty patients undergoing major abdominal surgery were randomized to receive either remifentanil 0.4 microg/kg/min or placebo intra-operatively, in addition to basic combined general and epidural anaesthesia, in this double-blind study. Patients received patient-controlled analgesia with morphine for 24 h post-operatively. Morphine consumption, assessment of pain at rest and during coughing, side-effects and levels of sensory block were recorded during the first 24 h post-operatively.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients receiving remifentanil and 18 patients receiving placebo completed the study. The median visual analogue scale (VAS) score at rest from 0 to 2 h was significantly increased in the remifentanil group [40 mm (27-61 mm)] vs. placebo [13 mm (3-35 mm)] (P < 0.05). No significant differences in morphine consumption, VAS score during coughing or adverse effects were observed between the groups.

CONCLUSION

The results are weak and difficult to interpret. They could indicate that a high dose of remifentanil added to otherwise sufficient combined general and epidural anaesthesia may induce opioid-induced hyperalgesia and/or clinically acute opioid tolerance after major abdominal surgery; however, as no significant differences could be observed between the groups after 2 h post-operatively, the clinical relevance of these observations is questionable.

Intravenous dextromethorphan to human volunteers: relationship between pharmacokinetics and anti-hyperalgesic effect

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of dextromethorphan (DM) 0.5 mg/kg administered intravenously (i.v.) on hyperalgesia and pain after a tissue injury in human volunteers, and to describe the relationship between pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data. The heat-capsaicin sensitisation model, a well-established experimental hyperalgesia model was induced in 24 healthy, male volunteers aged 21-35 years. The subjects received i.v. DM 0.5 mg/kg or isotonic saline on two separate study sessions. The primary outcome measure from 0 to 3 h was reduction in area of established secondary hyperalgesia. Secondary outcome measures were reduction in area of secondary hyperalgesia in response to brief thermal stimulation, heat pain detection thresholds and painfulness after tonic heat pain. Blood samples were collected throughout the study to describe the relationship between pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data. Intravenous DM 0.5 mg/kg significantly reduced areas of established secondary hyperalgesia with an average of 39% (P<0.05). Development of secondary hyperalgesia was substantially prevented by DM (P<0.05). No significant effect was seen on either heat pain detection thresholds or after tonic heat pain. The pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationship showed a large inter-subject variation with a mean delay in effect of nearly 2 h in relation to peak serum concentration. The results strongly indicate that DM is an anti-hyperalgesic drug. The delay in effect may be explained by several mechanisms and suggests that timing of DM administration is an essential factor for using the drug in clinical settings.

Reduction of opioid-related adverse events using opioid-sparing analgesia with COX-2 inhibitors lacks documentation: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

We have reviewed opioid-related adverse events in studies of opioid sparing with cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors compared with placebo in postoperative pain.

METHODS

Randomized, controlled trials were evaluated. Outcome measures were significant reduction in consumption of supplementary opioids with the COX-2 inhibitors and reported opioid-related adverse events (nausea, vomiting, constipation, dizziness, sedation, pruritus and/or urinary retention) 0-24 h after surgery.

RESULTS

Nineteen studies including 26 comparisons of four COX-2 inhibitors (rofecoxib, celecoxib, parecoxib and valdecoxib) were evaluated, in which significant opioid-sparing averaging about 35% with COX-2 inhibitors and opioid-related adverse events were reported. The trials were in general of high quality (median Oxford quality score 4) but the reporting quality of adverse events was poor. Opioid-related adverse events, i.e. vomiting, constipation and pruritus, were only significantly reduced with COX-2 inhibitors in four of the 26 comparisons. Quantitative analysis of combined data revealed a significantly reduced risk for only dizziness; the clinical relevance was minor as the number needed to treat (NNT) was about 33.

CONCLUSION

The limitation of this review is the lack of quality of data of adverse events from the original trials. Although supplementary opioid consumption in all trials was significantly reduced by on average 35% with the COX-2 inhibitors, it was only sporadically possible to demonstrate a clinically important reduction in opioid-related adverse events. Data did not support the common opinion that opioid-sparing with COX-2 inhibitors provides much clinical beneficial effect with respect to opioid-related adverse events. Future studies have to increase the awareness and proper reporting of adverse events in the postoperative period.

'Protective premedication': an option with gabapentin and related drugs? A review of gabapentin and pregabalin in in the treatment of post-operative pain

Substantial progress has been made during the last decades in our understanding of acute pain mechanisms, and this knowledge has encouraged the search for novel treatments. Of particular interest has been the observation that tissue injury initiates a number of modulations of both the peripheral and the central pain pathways, which convert the system from a 'physiological' to a 'pathological' mode of processing afferent information. Gabapentin, which binds to the alpha(2)delta subunit of the voltage-dependent calcium channel, is active in animal models of 'pathological' but not in models of 'physiological' pain. Consequently, attention has so far been focused on neuropathic pain as a target for the clinical use of gabapentin and analogues. Recently, several reports have indicated that gabapentin may have a place in the treatment of post-operative pain. This article presents a brief summary of the potential mechanisms of post-operative pain, and a systematic review of the available data of gabapentin and pregabalin for post-operative analgesia. It is concluded that the results with gabapentin and pregabalin in post-operative pain treatment published so far are promising. It is suggested that future studies should explore the effects of 'protective premedication' with combinations of various antihyperanalgesic and analgesic drugs for post-operative analgesia.

Effects of gabapentin on postoperative morphine consumption and pain after abdominal hysterectomy: a randomized, double-blind trial

BACKGROUND

Preliminary clinical studies have suggested that gabapentin may produce analgesia and reduce the need for opioids in postoperative patients. The aim of the present study was to investigate the opioid-sparing and analgesic effects of gabapentin administered during the first 24 h after abdominal hysterectomy.

METHODS

In a randomized, double-blind study, 80 patients received oral gabapentin 1200 mg or placebo 1 h before surgery, followed by oral gabapentin 600 mg or placebo 8, 16 and 24 h after the initial dose. Patients received patient-controlled analgesia with morphine at doses of 2.5 mg with a lock-out time of 10 min for 24 h postoperatively. Pain was assessed on a visual analogue scale (VAS) at rest and during mobilization, nausea, somnolence and dizziness on a four-point verbal scale, and vomiting as present/not present at 2, 4, 22 and 24 h postoperatively.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients in the gabapentin group, and 32 patients in the placebo group completed the study. Gabapentin reduced total morphine consumption from median 63 (interquartile range 53-88) mg to 43 (28-60) mg (P < 0.001). We observed a significant inverse association between plasma levels of gabapentin at 2 h postoperatively, and morphine usage from 0 to 2 h, and from 0 to 4 h postoperatively (R2 = 0.30, P = 0.003 and R2 = 0.24 P = 0.008, respectively). No significant differences in pain at rest or during mobilization, or in side-effects, were observed between groups.

CONCLUSION

Gabapentin in a total dose of 3000 mg, administered before and during the first 24 h after abdominal hysterectomy, reduced morphine consumption with 32%, without significant effects on pain scores. No significant differences in side-effects were observed between study-groups.

Appropriateness of leaving emergency medical service treated hypoglycemic patients at home: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Hypoglycemic patients treated by the emergency medical service (EMS) system are commonly left home. The criteria for leaving hypoglycemic patients at home and the appropriateness of the procedure remains, however, unvalidated. The present retrospective article addresses these questions.

METHODS

The Copenhagen physician-based mobile intensive care unit (MICU) responds to emergency calls in a two-tier rendezvous system. Its prehospital data from 1995 to 1998 were retrospectively incorporated into a clinical database and cross-referenced with clinical information from three Danish national registries, enabling identification of criteria for transportation of the patients to the hospital, and a detailed 72-h follow up on patients left at home.

RESULTS

The MICU treated 1148 hypoglycemic patients within the period, of which 84% were released at home. Treatment or no treatment before arrival of the MICU and level of consciousness following MICU treatment, were found to be strong predictors of a need for transportation to hospital; although other factors were implicated. Within the 72-h following MICU treatment less than 8% of the patients left at home needed secondary MICU or hospital treatment because of glucose regulatory problems, and less than 5% experienced secondary hypoglycemia. Less than 1% was admitted to hospital beds with recurrent hypoglycemia within 24 h. Poor compliance with the diabetic treatment instructions often appeared to be involved in cases of recurrent hypoglycemia. A delay in admission was not to blame for a serious secondary patient course in any of the cases.

CONCLUSION

The majority of patients with prehospital hypoglycemia may safely be treated and released at home in a physician-based EMS area.

Rectal and parenteral paracetamol, and paracetamol in combination with NSAIDs, for postoperative analgesia

BACKGROUND

We have reviewed the analgesic efficacies of rectal and parenteral paracetamol and tested the evidence for a possible additive analgesic effect of the combination of paracetamol with a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) in postoperative pain.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials were evaluated. Outcome measures were pain scores and demand for supplementary analgesia.

RESULTS

Eight studies compared rectal paracetamol with placebo. One study of single-dose administration of rectal paracetamol 40-60 mg kg(-1) and three studies of repeat dosing with 14-20 mg kg(-1) showed significant analgesic efficacy, while studies of a single dose of 10-20 mg kg(-1) were negative. Ten studies compared parenteral paracetamol with placebo and eight studies showed improved pain relief with paracetamol. Of the nine studies comparing paracetamol with a combination of paracetamol and an NSAID, six studies showed improved pain relief for the combination while only two of the six studies comparing an NSAID with a combination of an NSAID and paracetamol showed improved pain relief for the combination.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering the few studies available, evidence was found of a clinically relevant analgesic effect of rectal and parenteral paracetamol. Concurrent use of paracetamol and an NSAID was superior to paracetamol alone but no evidence was found of superior analgesic effect of the combination compared with the NSAID alone.

Effect of epidural bupivacaine vs combined epidural bupivacaine and morphine on gastrointestinal function and pain after major gynaecological surgery

In a double-blind study, we investigated the effects of postoperative epidural local anaesthetic, with or without addition of epidural morphine, on postoperative pain and gastrointestinal function in patients scheduled for radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy. Forty patients were randomized into two study groups: 48-h postoperative epidural 0.2% bupivacaine 8 ml h(-1) (bupi group) or 48-h postoperative epidural 0.2% bupivacaine/morphine 50 microg at 4 ml h(-1) (bupi/morph group). Patients were observed for at least 96 h after surgery. No differences in pain at rest, during cough or mobilization were observed. Patients in the bupi group requested a significant greater amount of supplementary analgesics, but times to first flatus and defaecation were reduced compared with patients in the bupi/morph group. Itching was a significant problem in patients in the bupi/morph group. No differences in postoperative nausea and vomiting, mobilization or time to discharge from hospital were observed between groups. The addition of morphine to postoperative epidural bupivacaine has only limited effect on pain relief and increases time to normalization of gastrointestinal function.

Effect of peri- and postoperative epidural anaesthesia on pain and gastrointestinal function after abdominal hysterectomy

In a double blind study we have investigated the effects of epidural local anaesthesia (LA), when added to general anaesthesia (GA) and postoperative paracetamol and NSAID, on postoperative pain and gastrointestinal function in patients undergoing open hysterectomy. Sixty patients were randomized into three study groups: GA, and postoperative paracetamol and NSAID (GA, n=20); GA, paracetamol, NSAID, intraoperative epidural lidocaine and 24-h postoperative epidural saline (Saline, n=20); or GA, paracetamol, NSAID, intraoperative epidural lidocaine and 24-h postoperative epidural bupivacaine (Bupi, n=20). Patients were observed for 72 h postoperatively. Pain at rest, during cough, and mobilization, request for supplementary morphine, and time to first postoperative flatus, was reduced in patients receiving 24-h postoperative epidural anaesthesia, compared with the two other groups. However, these effects of epidural LA, were not sustained beyond the period of infusion, and no differences in PONV, time to first postoperative defecation, mobilization or time to discharge from hospital were observed between groups. A 24 h postoperative epidural infusion with bupivacaine, when added to postoperative paracetamol and NSAID, reduces pain and opioid requirements, but has only limited effects on gastrointestinal function and patient recovery.

Effect of systemic adenosine on pain and secondary hyperalgesia associated with the heat/capsaicin sensitization model in healthy volunteers

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Adenosine is an endogenous compound that may have analgesic effects. Results from clinical trials are not consistent, however, and there is a need for large-scale, randomized, placebo-controlled studies to clarify the role of adenosine in the treatment of pain states, including acute nociceptive pain and pain involving central sensitization.

METHODS

The analgesic and antihyperalgesic effect of systemic adenosine on the heat/capsaicin sensitization model of experimental pain was investigated in 25 healthy human volunteers. Sensitization was produced by heating the skin to 45 degrees C for 5 minutes, followed by a 30-minute application of 0.075% capsaicin cream, and maintained by periodically reheating the sensitized skin to 40 degrees C for 5 minutes at 40-minute intervals. Subjects received intravenous adenosine 60 microg/kg/min or saline for 85 minutes. Areas of secondary hyperalgesia to von Frey hair and brush stimulation, heat-pain detection thresholds (HPDTs) in normal and sensitized skin, and painfulness of stimulation with 45 degrees C for 1 minute (LTS) in normal skin were quantified before, during, and after study drug infusion.

RESULTS

Systemic adenosine had no effect on the area of secondary hyperalgesia to von Frey hair or brush stimulation, HPDT in normal or sensitized skin, or painfulness of LTS in normal skin.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that adenosine has no effect on acute nociceptive pain induced by heat stimulation or on secondary hyperalgesia induced by heat/capsaicin sensitization in healthy volunteers.

Effect of naloxone on primary and secondary hyperalgesia induced by the human burn injury model

BACKGROUND

Opioid antagonists may change the responses in models of experimental hyperalgesia. This indicates a possible involvement of the endogenous opioid system in these models. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether activation of the endogenous opioid system could be demonstrated in the human burn injury model of cutaneous hyperalgesia, using an intravenous challenge with the non-selective opioid antagonist naloxone.

METHODS

We studied 25 healthy male volunteers aged 20-31 yrs in a randomised, double-blind, triple crossover design. A 25x50 mm rectangular burn injury was produced on the calf on 3 separate days, at least 1 week apart. Subjects received an intravenous bolus dose of naloxone 0.4 mg, 10 mg or placebo 3 h after induction of the burn injury.

RESULTS

Primary and secondary hyperalgesia was induced by the burn injury. Naloxone did not affect any of the measured variables: heat pain detection threshold in non-injured or injured tissue, pain produced by short or prolonged noxious heat in non-injured or injured tissue, secondary hyperalgesia elicited by pin prick or stroke, or pain produced by short or prolonged noxious mechanical stimulation in non-injured tissue. No significant adverse effects of naloxone were encountered.

CONCLUSIONS

Activation of an endogenous opioid response following induction of hyperalgesia in human volunteers by a burn injury could not be demonstrated with an intravenous naloxone challenge. These findings suggest that the endogenous opioid response is not a confounding factor in this model.

Effect of intravenous magnesium on pain and secondary hyperalgesia associated with the heat/capsaicin sensitization model in healthy volunteers

We investigated the effects of i.v. magnesium on secondary hyperalgesia following heat/capsaicin stimulation in human volunteers. Twenty-five volunteers were included in this double blind, randomized, crossover study. Sensitization was induced in the volunteers, who were then subjected to either i.v. saline or magnesium sulphate. No analgesic or antihyperalgesic effect could be demonstrated in sensitized skin during infusion of magnesium. In contrast, painfulness of thermal stimulation was increased in normal skin. These results suggest that i.v. magnesium has no important analgesic effects in clinically relevant doses.

Effect of remifentanil on pain and secondary hyperalgesia associated with the heat--capsaicin sensitization model in healthy volunteers

BACKGROUND

The heat--capsaicin sensitization model was developed as a noninvasive and noninjurious human experimental pain model. The sequential application of moderate intensity thermal and topical chemical stimuli produces stable and long-lasting areas of cutaneous secondary hyperalgesia. The aim of the present study was to validate the heat--capsaicin sensitization model as a tool for testing analgesic drug efficacy. Responsivity of model-associated measures was tested with remifentanil, a potent and ultrashort acting mu-opioid agonist.

METHODS

Sensitization was induced by heating forearm skin with a thermode at 45 degrees C for 5 min, immediately followed by application of 0.075% capsaicin cream for 30 min. Sensitization was rekindled four times at 40-min intervals with the thermode at 40 degrees C for 5 min. After each rekindling, areas of secondary hyperalgesia were measured, and the painfulness of thermal stimulation in normal skin with 45 degrees C for 1 min (long thermal stimulation [LTS]) was rated. Before and during the second rekindling, remifentanil 0.10 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) or saline-placebo was infused for 35 min.

RESULTS

Infusion of remifentanil reduced the areas of secondary hyperalgesia to 29--30% of baseline size compared with 75--83% during placebo. Similarly, remifentanil reduced the painfulness of LTS to 29% of baseline severity compared with 84% during placebo. Areas of secondary hyperalgesia and LTS painfulness returned to baseline levels by the time of the third rekindling, demonstrating rapid disappearance of remifentanil analgesia and possibly transient spontaneous opioid withdrawal hyperalgesia.

CONCLUSION

Using the heat-capsaicin sensitization model, opioid analgesia and suppression of secondary hyperalgesia was reliably demonstrated without skin injury.

The effect of systemic lidocaine on pain and secondary hyperalgesia associated with the heat/capsaicin sensitization model in healthy volunteers

Although effective in neuropathic pain, the efficacy of systemic lidocaine in non-neuropathic pain remains uncertain. We investigated the analgesic effect of systemic lidocaine on the heat/capsaicin sensitization model of experimental pain in 24 volunteers. Sensitization was produced by heating the skin to 45 degrees C for 5 min, followed by a 30-min application of 0.075% capsaicin cream, and maintained by periodically reheating the sensitized skin. Subjects received IV lidocaine (bolus 2 mg/kg, then infusion 3 mg. kg. h), or saline for 85 min. Areas of secondary hyperalgesia, heat pain detection thresholds, and painfulness of stimulation with 45 degrees C for 1 min (long thermal stimulation) were quantified. Systemic lidocaine reduced the area of secondary hyperalgesia to brush, but not to von Frey hair stimulation. Lidocaine did not alter heat pain detection thresholds or painfulness of long thermal stimulation in normal skin. We conclude that, at infusion rates in the low- to mid-antiarrhythmic range, lidocaine has no effect on acute nociceptive pain but does have a limited and selective effect on secondary hyperalgesia.

IMPLICATIONS

The efficacy of systemic lidocaine in nonneuropathic pain remains uncertain. This study investigates the effect of systemic lidocaine on experimental-induced hyperalgesia in 25 volunteers. Hyperalgesia was induced by using an experimental pain model that uses heat and capsaicin in combination. Systemic lidocaine showed a selective effect on secondary hyperalgesia.

Effect of oral ketamine on secondary hyperalgesia, thermal and mechanical pain thresholds, and sedation in humans

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Ketamine is an N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, and has been proven effective in alleviating secondary hyperalgesia in human subjects when injected intravenously. After oral ingestion, ketamine is metabolized into norketamine, which in vitro possesses NMDA receptor antagonistic effect. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of oral administration of ketamine on secondary hyperalgesia evoked by standardized tissue injury.

METHODS

Twenty-four male volunteers were included in the study. Each volunteer received the following treatment regimen, in randomized, double-blind, 3-way cross-over fashion: (A) placebo; (B) ketamine, 0.5 mg/kg; and (C) ketamine, 1.0 mg/kg. Standardized tissue injury was induced after study medication by heating the right calf with a rectangular thermode. The temperature was 47 degrees C, and heating time was 7 minutes. The following parameters were investigated: Pain during induction of the burn injury; heat-pain detection thresholds in the injured area and a corresponding noninjured area; secondary hyperalgesia surrounding the injured area on the calf; secondary hyperalgesia induced by heating an area on the thigh with 45 degrees C in 3 minutes; pressure-pain detection thresholds measured on the middle phalanx of the 4th left finger; pain during a 60-second thermal stimulation of 46 degrees C on undamaged skin on the left thigh; and side effects.

RESULTS

Some degree of sedation was observed after oral administration of ketamine. No effects on any of the other investigated parameters were observed.

CONCLUSION

Oral ketamine 0.5 or 1.0 mg/kg has no effect on secondary hyperalgesia or thermal or mechanical pain thresholds in human volunteers.

The effect of dextromethorphan, alone or in combination with ibuprofen, on postoperative pain after minor gynaecological surgery

BACKGROUND

Experimental studies have demonstrated that peripheral tissue injury may lead to hyperexcitability of nociceptive neurones in the dorsal horn, in part mediated by N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA)-receptor mechanisms. Sensitisation of dorsal horn neurones may be an important contributor to postoperative pain. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of the NMDA-receptor antagonist dextromethorphan on pain after minor gynaecological surgery, and to evaluate a potential additive effect with ibuprofen.

METHODS

In a double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 100 patients scheduled for elective termination of pregnancy were randomised to receive placebo, oral ibuprofen 400 mg, oral dextromethorphan 120 mg, or a combination of ibuprofen 400 mg and dextromethorphan 120 mg, 1 h before surgery. Pain and analgesic requirements were assessed 0.5, 1 and 2 h after operation.

RESULTS

We observed no effect of dextromethorphan on visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores or analgesic consumption, and no additive or synergistic analgesic effects between ibuprofen and dextromethorphan. Ibuprofen reduced pain scores compared with placebo, and analgesic consumption compared with both placebo and dextromethorphan. The combination of ibuprofen and dextromethorphan increased preoperative nausea compared with both placebo and ibuprofen, whereas no statistically significant side effects were observed with dextromethorphan alone.

CONCLUSION

No analgesic effects of oral dextromethorphan 120 mg on pain after surgical termination of labour, and no additive analgesic effects when combined with ibuprofen 400 mg, were observed. Ibuprofen reduced both VAS pain scores and analgesic consumption compared with placebo.

Subcutaneous infiltration with ammonium sulphate 10% does not prolong the local anaesthetic duration of lidocaine in humans

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study was to investigate whether a solution of ammonium sulphate and lidocaine had a prolonged duration of action compared with lidocaine alone after subcutaneous infiltration in human volunteers.

METHODS

In a double-blind, randomised, controlled trial 12 male volunteers had either 4 ml lidocaine 1% (40 mg) or a solution of 4 ml ammonium sulphate 10% and lidocaine 1% (40 mg) subcutaneously infiltrated in corresponding skin areas on the right and left calf. The duration of the local anaesthetic action of the test medications was assessed 1-6 h after the infiltrations using thresholds to mechanical (von Frey hairs) and thermal stimulation (heat detection thresholds: HDT, and heat pain detection thresholds: HPDT), and by calculation of areas under the curve (AUC) for electronic visual analogue scale (VAS) pain ratings (sampled at 2 Hz) during a heat stimulation on the test areas for 30 s with a 45 degrees C warm thermode.

RESULTS

At no assessment were thresholds to mechanical or thermal stimulation increased in favour of ammonium sulphate treated legs compared with control legs. On the contrary, HPDT were significantly lower in ammonium sulphate treated legs than control legs at the 3 h and 4 h assessment after infiltration (P<0.02). Similarly, the AUC for the VAS ratings was significantly higher in treatment legs compared with control legs 2 h and 3 h after infiltration (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

No improvement in local anaesthetic duration of ammonium sulphate 10% plus lidocaine 1% compared with lidocaine 1% alone was demonstrated early after subcutaneous infiltration in human volunteers.

Local infiltration with NSAIDs for postoperative analgesia: evidence for a peripheral analgesic action

BACKGROUND

In order to investigate the evidence for a peripheral analgesic effect of local infiltration with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in postoperative pain, we conducted a systematic review.

METHODS

Randomised controlled and double-blind trials were evaluated. Outcome measures were pain scores, the use of supplementary analgesics, and time to first analgesic request. Efficacy was estimated by significant difference (P<0.05) as reported in the original reports and by calculation of the weighted mean difference of pain scores between treatment groups.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies with data from 844 patients were considered appropriate for analysis. The NSAIDs were administered as intra-articular injections, as components of intravenous regional anaesthesia (IVRA), and by wound infiltration and were compared with systemic administration or placebo. In the four studies comparing intra-articular NSAIDs with systemic administration a statistically significant effect in favour of intraarticular NSAIDs was found. Only one study compared IVRA NSAID with systemic administration, showing a significant effect in favour of IVRA administration. No more than two of the five studies comparing intrawound NSAIDs with systemic administration showed significant effect after intrawound administration. Most of the studies comparing local infiltration with placebo showed significant effect in favour of local infiltration.

CONCLUSION

There is evidence for a clinically relevant peripheral analgesic action of intra-articular NSAIDs while results of IVRA and wound infiltration with NSAIDs in postoperative pain are inconclusive. Trials without a systemic control group were not considered to provide evidence for a local effect.

Effect of preoperative oral dextromethorphan on immediate and late postoperative pain and hyperalgesia after total abdominal hysterectomy

Dextromethorphan is a noncompetitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist known to inhibit wind-up and NMDA-mediated nociceptive responses of dorsal horn neurons. Experimental and clinical studies indicate that NMDA-receptor antagonists may potentiate the effect of analgesics such as morphine, local anesthetics and NSAIDs. Results from previous clinical studies of dextromethorphan in postoperative pain are conflicting, possibly related to administration of insufficient doses of the drug. Fifty patients scheduled for non-malignant elective abdominal hysterectomy in general anesthesia were randomized to receive oral dextromethorphan 150 mg, or placebo 1 h before surgery. The patients received patient-controlled analgesia with morphine for 24 h postoperatively as the only analgesic. Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) morphine consumption was reduced with 30% from 0-4 h after operation in patients receiving dextromethorphan compared with placebo (P=0.02); no differences were observed from 5-24 h postoperatively. There were no significant differences between groups for visual analogue scale scores at rest, during cough, or during mobilization, pressure pain detection thresholds, von Frey hair pain detection thresholds, or peak flow. At 24 h after operation, hyperalgesia to von Frey hair stimulation proximal to the surgical wound was easily detected in 23 of 25 patients receiving dextromethorphan, and in 22 of 25 patients receiving placebo, with no significant difference between groups. Pooled data from both groups showed a weak but significant correlation between the extent of hyperalgesia at 24 h after operation, and total 24 h postoperative PCA morphine consumption (Rs=0.28, P=0.05). Three months postoperatively, hyperalgesia was still detectable in 18 of 22 examined patients in the dextromethorphan group, and in 16 of 23 patients in the placebo group, without statistical differences between groups. There were no significant differences in side-effects (nausea, vomiting, sedation). In conclusion, oral dextromethorphan 150 mg reduced PCA morphine consumption immediately (0-4 h) after hysterectomy, without prolonged effects on pain or wound hyperalgesia. A positive correlation between the magnitude of wound hyperalgesia at 24 h after operation, and total 24 h postoperative PCA morphine consumption was demonstrated.

Local anesthetic infiltration for postoperative pain relief after laparoscopy: a qualitative and quantitative systematic review of intraperitoneal, port-site infiltration and mesosalpinx block

In a systematic review, we evaluated randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of peripheral local anesthetics (LA) compared with placebo or no treatment in the control of postoperative pain after laparoscopic surgery. A total of 41 trials with data from 2794 patients were considered appropriate for analysis. Of these 41 RCTs, 13 evaluated intraperitoneal LA after cholecystectomy, four RCTs assessed intraperitoneal LA after other procedures, eight RCTs evaluated port-site infiltration after various procedures, 12 RCTs evaluated mesosalpinx or fallopian tube block after sterilization, and four RCTs considered combined LA regimens. Outcome measures were pain scores, analgesic consumption, and time to first analgesic request. Efficacy was estimated by significant difference (P < 0.05), as reported in the original reports, and by calculation of the weighted mean difference of visual analog scale pain scores between treatment groups. Improved pain relief was observed in seven of the 13 RCTs of intraperitoneal LA after cholecystectomy and in four RCTs of other procedures. A statistically significant weighted mean difference of -13 mm visual analog scale (95% confidence intervals [CI]: -20 to -6) in favor of the treatment groups was observed after cholecystectomy. Three of eight trials of port-site infiltration showed significant differences but questionable clinical importance and validity in two; weighted mean difference was not statistically significant between treatment groups (95% CI -9 to 1). All RCTs of mesosalpinx or fallopian tube block after sterilization showed improved pain relief with a statistically significant weighted mean difference of -19 mm (95% CI -25 to -14) in favor of treatment groups. Data of combined regimens were positive, however, sparse. We conclude that there was evidence for a statistically significant but clinically questionable, important effect of intraperitoneal LA for postoperative pain control. There was evidence for a significant but short-lasting effect of mesosalpinx/fallopian tube block after sterilization, but there was a lack of evidence for any important effect of port-site infiltration. Data from combined regimens were too sparse for conclusions.

IMPLICATIONS

A systematic review summarizes, through transparent methodology, available information from randomized, controlled trials to produce the best available evidence-based estimate of a "true" clinical effect of an intervention. This systematic review confirms intraperitoneal and mesosalpinx local anesthetic block, not port-site infiltration, to have some impact on postoperative pain after laparoscopy.

Effect of continuous epidural 0.2% ropivacaine vs 0.2% bupivacaine on postoperative pain, motor block and gastrointestinal function after abdominal hysterectomy

We have investigated the effect of 24-h postoperative continuous epidural infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine or 0.2% bupivacaine 8 ml h-1 on pain, request for supplementary analgesics, motor block and gastrointestinal function, in a double-blind, randomized study in 60 patients undergoing open hysterectomy. There were no significant differences between groups in pain, number of patients requesting supplementary analgesics, motor block, ability to walk or time to first flatus or stool. In the subgroup of patients who received supplementary analgesics, patients in the ropivacaine group received significantly more ketorolac than patients in the bupivacaine group. Time to discharge from hospital was similar with ropivacaine and bupivacaine.

Epidural local anaesthetics versus opioid-based analgesic regimens on postoperative gastrointestinal paralysis, PONV and pain after abdominal surgery

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal paralysis, nausea and vomiting, and pain, are major clinical problems following abdominal surgery. Anaesthetic and analgesic techniques that reduce pain and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and prevent or reduce postoperative ileus, may reduce postoperative morbidity, duration of hospitalisation and hospital costs.

OBJECTIVES

To compare effects of postoperative epidural local anaesthetic with regimens based on systemic or epidural opioids, on postoperative gastrointestinal function, postoperative pain, PONV and surgical/anaesthetic complications.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Trials were identified by computerised searches of the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, MEDLINE, EMBASE and by checking the reference lists of trials and review articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing the effects of postoperative epidural local anaesthetic with systemic or epidural opioids.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Collected data included treatment in active (local anaesthetic) and control (opioid based) groups, time to first postoperative stool, time to first postoperative flatus, gastric emptying measured by the paracetamol absorption test, duration of the passage of barium sulphate, pain assessments, use of supplementary analgesics, nausea, vomiting and surgical/anaesthetic complications.

MAIN RESULTS

Most studies in this review involved a small number of patients. Furthermore half of the studies indicated a poor level of methodology in particular regarding blinding and report of withdrawals. Heterogeneity of included studies was substantial. Results consistently showed reduced time to return of gastrointestinal function in the epidural local anaesthetic group compared with groups receiving systemic or epidural opioid (37 hours and 24 hours, respectively). Postoperative pain was comparable. Two studies compared the effect of epidural local anaesthetic with a combination of epidural local anaesthetic and opioid on gastrointestinal function. One study favoured epidural local anaesthetic and one study was indifferent. A meta analysis of five of eight studies comparing the effect of epidural local anaesthetic with a combination of epidural local anaesthetic and opioid on postoperative pain, yielded a reduction in VAS pain scores (0-100 mm) on the first postoperative day of 15 mm, in favour of the combination. No significant differences in PONV were observed between epidural local anaesthetic and opioid based regimens.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Administration of epidural local anaesthetics to patients undergoing laparotomy reduce gastrointestinal paralysis compared with systemic or epidural opioids, with comparable postoperative pain relief. Addition of opioid to epidural local anaesthetic may provide superior postoperative analgesia compared with epidural local anaesthetics alone. The effect of additional epidural opioid on gastrointestinal function is so far unsettled. Randomized, controlled trials comparing the effect of combinations of epidural local anaesthetic and opioid with epidural local anaesthetic alone on postoperative gastrointestinal function and pain are warranted.

[Incisional local anesthesia as postoperative pain control after abdominal surgery. A qualitative, systematic review]

A qualitative systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCT) of incisional local anaesthesia for the control of postoperative pain after open abdominal operations was performed. Twenty-six studies with data from 1211 patients were considered appropriate for analysis. RCT considered inguinal herniotomy, hysterectomy, cholecystectomy and a variety of surgical procedures. Outcome measures were pain scores, supplementary analgesics and time to first analgesic request. Efficacy was estimated by significant difference (p < 0.05) as reported in the original investigation. All trials of herniotomy showed a 2-7 hour lasting, clinically relevant, improved pain relief. Five of eight cholecystectomy trials showed significant differences but in three studies of questionable clinical importance and validity. In other procedures results were inconsistent and in some cases of minor clinical importance. Except for herniotomy there is a lack of evidence for effect of incisional local anaesthesia on postoperative pain and further standardized studies are needed before recommendations can be made.

A systematic review of intra-articular local anesthesia for postoperative pain relief after arthroscopic knee surgery

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

In a systematic review, we have evaluated double-blind, randomized, controlled trials of intra-articular local anesthesia compared with placebo or no treatment in the control of postoperative pain after arthroscopic knee surgery.

METHODS

Outcome measures were pain scores, supplementary analgesics, and time to first analgesic request. Efficacy was estimated by significant difference (P < .05) as reported in the original reports and by calculation of the weighted mean difference of pain scores between treatment groups.

RESULTS

Twenty studies with data from 895 patients were considered appropriate for analysis. Twelve of these 20 studies showed improved pain relief after intra-articular local anesthesia in at least one of the considered pain parameters, whereas the eight other studies were without such improvements. In ten of the positive studies, pain scores were significantly lower in the treatment groups compared with the control groups with visual analog scale (VAS) score reductions of between 10 and 35 mm early (1-4 hours) postoperatively. Quantitative analysis with calculation of the weighted mean difference in VAS confirmed a statistically significant but minor clinically important effect on postoperative pain scores. In nine studies, the consumption of supplementary analgesics was reduced 10-50% during observation periods of up to 4 hours; however, in most cases, the analgesic requirements were small to moderate. Only in two of six studies, where time to first analgesic request was evaluated, a significant prolongation of pain relief was observed as lasting between 30 and 50 minutes.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a weak evidence for a reduction of postoperative pain after intra-articular local anesthesia in patients undergoing arthroscopic knee surgery, which although being sinall to moderate and of short duration, may be of clinical significance in day-case surgery.

The effect of naloxone on ketamine-induced effects on hyperalgesia and ketamine-induced side effects in humans

BACKGROUND

The (NMDA) receptor plays a significant role in wind-up and spinal hypersensitivity and is involved in the occurrence of secondary hyperalgesia. Ketamine is an NMDA-receptor antagonist and has proven effective in alleviating secondary hyperalgesia in humans. Although it is disputed, the actions of ketamine have been ascribed not only to NMDA receptor antagonism, but also to opioid receptor agonism. A study therefore was designed in which the abolishment of a previously demonstrated effect of ketamine on secondary hyperalgesia was sought by pretreatment with naloxone.

METHODS

Twenty-five volunteers were subjected to three treatment regimens. A standardized first-degree burn injury was induced. On appearance of primary and secondary hyperalgesia, one of the following infusion schemes was applied in a randomized, double-blind, cross-over fashion: (1) infusion of naloxone (0.8 mg/15 min followed by 0.4 mg/h), succeeded by infusion of ketamine (0.3 mg x kg(-1) x 15 min(-1) followed by 0.3 mg x kg(-1) x h(-1)); (2) infusion of placebo, succeeded by infusion of ketamine (0.3 mg x kg(-1) x 15 min(-1) followed by 0.3 mg x kg(-1) x h(-1)); and (3) infusion of placebo, succeeded by infusion of placebo. Heat-pain detection thresholds, magnitude of secondary hyperalgesia around the burn injury, and side effects were determined.

RESULTS

Ketamine reduced secondary hyperalgesia. Naloxone did not affect the action of ketamine. The magnitudes of side effects were equal if the subjects received ketamine, regardless of preceding infusion of naloxone.

CONCLUSIONS

In this experimental setting, opioid receptor blockade does not inhibit ketamine-induced reductions of secondary hyperalgesia.

Effect of i.v. ketamine in combination with epidural bupivacaine or epidural morphine on postoperative pain and wound tenderness after renal surgery

We studied 60 patients undergoing operation on the kidney with combined general and epidural anaesthesia, in a double-blind, randomized, controlled study. Patients were allocated to receive a preoperative bolus dose of ketamine 10 mg i.v., followed by an i.v. infusion of ketamine 10 mg h-1 for 48 h after operation, or placebo. During the first 24 h after surgery, all patients received 4 ml h-1 of epidural bupivacaine 2.5 mg ml-1. From 24 to 48 h after operation, patients received epidural morphine 0.2 mg h-1 preceded by a bolus dose of 2 mg. In addition, patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with i.v. morphine (2.5 mg, lockout time 15 min) was offered from 0 to 48 h after operation. Patients who received ketamine felt significantly more sedated at 0-24 h, but not at 24-48 h after operation, compared with patients who received placebo (P = 0.002 and P = 0.127, respectively). There were no significant differences in pain (VAS) at rest, during mobilization or cough, PCA morphine consumption, sensory block to pinprick, pressure pain detection threshold assessed with an algometer, touch and pain detection thresholds assessed with von Frey hairs, peak flow or side effects other than sedation. The power of detecting a reduction in VAS scores of 20 mm in our study was 80% at the 5% significance level. We conclude that we were unable to demonstrate an (additive) analgesic or opioid sparing effect of ketamine 10 mg h-1 i.v. combined with epidural bupivacaine at 0-24 h, or epidural morphine at 24-48 h after renal surgery.

A qualitative systematic review of incisional local anaesthesia for postoperative pain relief after abdominal operations

In a qualitative systematic review, we have evaluated randomized controlled trials (RCT) of incisional local anaesthesia compared with placebo or no treatment in the control of postoperative pain after open abdominal operations. Twenty-six studies with data from 1211 patients were considered appropriate for analysis. Five RCT considered inguinal herniotomy, four hysterectomy, eight cholecystectomy and nine studies a variety of surgical procedures. Outcome measures were pain scores, supplementary analgesics and time to first analgesic request. Efficacy was estimated by significant difference (P < 0.05), as reported in the original investigation. All studies of herniotomy showed a 2-7-h duration of clinically relevant improved pain relief. Results of hysterectomy studies were inconclusive, with two being negative. Five of the cholecystectomy studies showed significant differences but questionable clinical importance and validity in three. In various other procedures results were inconsistent and in some of minor clinical importance. Except for herniotomy, there was a lack of evidence for effect of incisional local anaesthesia on postoperative pain and further standardized studies are needed before recommendations can be made.

[Reliability of the epidural test dose]

Complications associated with epidural anaesthesia include accidental intravascular or subarachnoid epidural catheter misplacement resulting in systemic toxicity and total spinal block, respectively. Epidural test doses are used routinely to prevent these events. It is not known whether the use of test doses improves the safety of epidural anaesthesia. The reliability of the epinephrine test dose in terms of detecting intravascular injection is impaired in elderly patients, patients receiving beta-blockers, patients undergoing vascular surgery, patients under general anaesthesia, and in women in labour. The ability of the epidural test dose to detect subarachnoid injection remains unknown. Studies are needed to determine 1) the reliability of the epidural test dose among different groups of patients, 2) the safety of the test dose, and 3) the incidence of epidural catheter misplacements.

Effect of systemic N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist (dextromethorphan) on primary and secondary hyperalgesia in humans

Dextromethorphan is a non-competitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist known to inhibit wind-up and central hyperexcitability of dorsal horn neurones. We studied 24 healthy, unmedicated male volunteers, aged 21-28 yr, in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Burn injuries were produced on the medial surface of the dominant calf with a 25 x 50 mm rectangular thermode. On three separate days, at least 1 week apart, subjects were given oral dextromethorphan 60 mg, 120 mg or placebo. Dextromethorphan reduced the magnitude of secondary hyperalgesia to pinprick but not to stroke. Dextromethorphan had no influence on primary hyperalgesia, pain during prolonged noxious heat stimulation or heat pain detection thresholds in undamaged skin. Side effects were frequent but clinically acceptable. The effects of dextromethorphan were in agreement with experimental studies indicating that dextromethorphan is a NMDA receptor antagonist. The effects of dextromethorphan in the burn injury model were similar to those of ketamine and distinct from those of local anaesthetics and opioids.