Perioperative Nivolumab and Chemotherapy in Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Approximately 20% of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receive a diagnosis of stage III disease. There is no current consensus regarding the most appropriate treatment for these patients.

METHODS

In this open-label, phase 2 trial, we randomly assigned patients with resectable stage IIIA or IIIB NSCLC to receive neoadjuvant nivolumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy (experimental group) or chemotherapy alone (control group), followed by surgery. Patients in the experimental group who had R0 resections received adjuvant treatment with nivolumab for 6 months. The primary end point was a pathological complete response (0% viable tumor in resected lung and lymph nodes). Secondary end points included progression-free survival and overall survival at 24 months and safety.

RESULTS

A total of 86 patients underwent randomization; 57 were assigned to the experimental group and 29 were assigned to the control group. A pathological complete response occurred in 37% of the patients in the experimental group and in 7% in the control group (relative risk, 5.34; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.34 to 21.23; P = 0.02). Surgery was performed in 93% of the patients in the experimental group and in 69% in the control group (relative risk, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.74). Kaplan-Meier estimates of progression-free survival at 24 months were 67.2% in the experimental group and 40.9% in the control group (hazard ratio for disease progression, disease recurrence, or death, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.88). Kaplan-Meier estimates of overall survival at 24 months were 85.0% in the experimental group and 63.6% in the control group (hazard ratio for death, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.19 to 0.98). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred in 11 patients in the experimental group (19%; some patients had events of both grades) and 3 patients in the control group (10%).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with resectable stage IIIA or IIIB NSCLC, perioperative treatment with nivolumab plus chemotherapy resulted in a higher percentage of patients with a pathological complete response and longer survival than chemotherapy alone. (Funded by Bristol Myers Squibb and others; NADIM II ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03838159; EudraCT number, 2018-004515-45.).

SEOM-GECP-GETTHI Clinical Guidelines for the treatment of patients with thymic epithelial tumours (2021)

Thymic epithelial tumours (TET) represent a heterogeneous group of rare malignancies that include thymomas and thymic carcinoma. Treatment of TET is based on the resectability of the tumour. If this is considered achievable upfront, surgical resection is the cornerstone of treatment. Platinum-based chemotherapy is the standard regimen for advanced TET. Due to the rarity of this disease, treatment decisions should be discussed in specific multidisciplinary tumour boards, and there are few prospective clinical studies with new strategies. However, several pathways involved in TET have been explored as potential targets for new therapies in previously treated patients, such as multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitors with antiangiogenic properties and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). One third of patient with thymoma present an autoimmune disorders, increasing the risk of immune-related adverse events and autoimmune flares under ICIs. In these guidelines, we summarize the current evidence for the therapeutic approach in patients with TET and define levels of evidence for these decisions.

Resistance to Targeted Therapies in Renal Cancer: The Importance of Changing the Mechanism of Action

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a complex disease characterized by mutations in several genes. Loss of function of the von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) tumour suppressor gene is a very common finding in RCC and leads to up-regulation of hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-responsive genes accountable for angiogenesis and cell growth, such as platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Binding of these proteins to their cognate tyrosine kinase receptors on endothelial cells promotes angiogenesis. Promotion of angiogenesis is in part due to the activation of the phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT/mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway. Inhibition of this pathway decreases protein translation and inhibits both angiogenesis and tumour cell proliferation. Although tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) stand as the main first-line treatment option for advanced RCC, eventually all patients will become resistant to TKIs. Resistance can be overcome by using second-line treatments with different mechanisms of action, such as inhibitors of mTOR, c-MET, programmed death 1 (PD-1) receptor, or the combination of an mTOR inhibitor (mTORi) with a TKI. In this article, we briefly review current evidence regarding mechanisms of resistance in RCC and treatment strategies to overcome resistance with a special focus on the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway.

Two biomarker-directed randomized trials in European and Chinese patients with nonsmall-cell lung cancer: the BRCA1-RAP80 Expression Customization (BREC) studies

BACKGROUND

In a Spanish Lung Cancer Group (SLCG) phase II trial, the combination of BRCA1 and receptor-associated protein 80 (RAP80) expression was significantly associated with outcome in Caucasian patients with nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The SLCG therefore undertook an industry-independent collaborative randomized phase III trial comparing nonselected cisplatin-based chemotherapy with therapy customized according to BRCA1/RAP80 expression. An analogous randomized phase II trial was carried out in China under the auspices of the SLCG to evaluate the effect of BRCA1/RAP80 expression in Asian patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligibility criteria included stage IIIB-IV NSCLC and sufficient tumor specimen for molecular analysis. Randomization to the control or experimental arm was 1 : 1 in the SLCG trial and 1 : 3 in the Chinese trial. In both trials, patients in the control arm received docetaxel/cisplatin; in the experimental arm, patients with low RAP80 expression received gemcitabine/cisplatin, those with intermediate/high RAP80 expression and low/intermediate BRCA1 expression received docetaxel/cisplatin, and those with intermediate/high RAP80 expression and high BRCA1 expression received docetaxel alone. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

Two hundred and seventy-nine patients in the SLCG trial and 124 in the Chinese trial were assessable for PFS. PFS in the control and experimental arms in the SLCG trial was 5.49 and 4.38 months, respectively [log rank P = 0.07; hazard ratio (HR) 1.28; P = 0.03]. In the Chinese trial, PFS was 4.74 and 3.78 months, respectively (log rank P = 0.82; HR 0.95; P = 0.82).

CONCLUSION

Accrual was prematurely closed on the SLCG trial due to the absence of clinical benefit in the experimental over the control arm. However, the BREC studies provide proof of concept that an international, nonindustry, biomarker-directed trial is feasible. Thanks to the groundwork laid by these studies, we expect that ongoing further research on alternative biomarkers to elucidate DNA repair mechanisms will help define novel therapeutic approaches.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT00617656/GECP-BREC and ChiCTR-TRC-12001860/BREC-CHINA.

Phase II study of sunitinib as first-line treatment of urothelial cancer patients ineligible to receive cisplatin-based chemotherapy: baseline interleukin-8 and tumor contrast enhancement as potential predictive factors of activity

BACKGROUND

A strong rationale supports the role of antiangiogenic drugs in urothelial cancer. This trial was designed to assess the activity of sunitinib as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer ineligible for cisplatin and to explore molecular and imaging variables predictive of clinical benefit.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a multicenter phase II trial with sunitinib 50 mg daily in 4/2-week schedule. Eligibility criteria were as follows: creatinine clearance 30-60 ml/min, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Pperformance Sstatus of one or less, and adequate hepatic and hematologic function. Twelve circulating cytokines were evaluated at baseline and sequentially using Luminex xMAP(®) (Austin, TX). Baseline and treatment-related changes in perfusion were evaluated in a patient subgroup using contrast-enhanced computed tomography.

RESULTS

On intention-to-treat analysis, 38 patients showed 3 (8%) partial responses (PRs) and 19 (50%) presented with stable disease (SD), 17 (45%) of them ≥3 months. Clinical benefit (PR + SD) was 58%. Median time to progression (TTP) was 4.8 months and median overall survival 8.1 months. Toxicity was consistent with previous reports for sunitinib. Low interleukin-8 (IL-8) baseline levels were significantly associated with increased TTP. Baseline tumor contrast enhancement with >40 Hounsfield units was associated with clinical benefit.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the potential role of the angiogenic pathway as a therapy target in urothelial cancer. Baseline IL-8 serum levels and contrast enhancement of lesions warrant further study.

Risk assessment model for first-cycle chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in patients with solid tumours

LÓPEZ-POUSA A., RIFÀ J., CASAS DE TEJERINA A., GONZÁLEZ-LARRIBA J.L., IGLESIAS C., GASQUET J.A. & CARRATO A. (2010) European Journal of Cancer CareRisk assessment model for first-cycle chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in patients with solid tumours

Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia, the major dose-limiting toxicity of chemotherapy, is directly associated with concomitant morbidity, mortality and health-care costs. The use of prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factors may reduce the incidence and duration of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia, and is recommended in high-risk patients. The objective of this study was to develop a model to predict first-cycle chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (defined as neutropenia grade ≥3, with or without body temperature ≥38°C) in patients with solid tumours. A total of 1194 patients [56% women; mean age 58 ± 12 years; 94% Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status ≤1] with solid tumours were included in a multi-centre non-interventional prospective cohort study. A predictive logistic regression model was developed. Several factors were found to influence chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. Higher ECOG status values increased toxicity (ECOG 2 vs. 0, P= 0.003; odds ratio 3.12), whereas baseline lymphocyte (P= 0.011; odds ratio 0.67) and neutrophil counts (P= 0.026; odds ratio 0.90) were inversely related to neutropenia occurrence. Sex and treatment intention also significantly influenced chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (P= 0.012). The sensitivity and specificity of the model were 63% and 67% respectively, and the positive and negative predictive values were 17% and 94% respectively. Once validated, this model should be a useful tool for clinical decision making.

Patient-reported outcomes in a phase III, randomized study of sunitinib versus interferon-{alpha} as first-line systemic therapy for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma in a European population

Background: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact on the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of sunitinib versus interferon-alpha (IFN-α) treatment in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).

Patients and methods: In all, 304 mRCC patients (European cohort) were randomized 1 : 1 to receive sunitinib (50 mg/day for 4 weeks, followed by 2 weeks off) or IFN-α (9 million units s.c. injection three times/week). The following questionnaires were completed (days 1 and 28 per cycle): Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G), the FACT-Kidney Symptom Index and the EuroQol Group's EQ-5D self-report questionnaire (EQ-5D). Results correspond to an ongoing trial with progression-free survival time as primary end point, and patients were still being followed up. Data were analyzed using repeated measures mixed effects models (MEMs) that allow the inclusion of initial differences and uncompleted repeated measures, with the assumption of data missing at random. Six-cycle results were included.

Results: Results consistently showed that patients in sunitinib group experienced statistically significantly milder kidney-related symptoms, better cancer-specific HRQoL and general health status (in social utility scores) during the study period as measured by these patient-reported outcome end points. No statistical differences between groups were found on the FACT-G physical well-being subscale or the EQ-5D VAS values.

Conclusions: Results from MEM showed the sunitinib's benefit on HRQoL compared with IFN-α.

Combination therapy with gefitinib, an epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with advanced solid tumors

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to investigate the tolerability, pharmacokinetic interaction and antitumor activity of gefitinib ("Iressa", ZD1839), an orally active, selective epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, combined with gemcitabine and cisplatin in chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced solid tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was an open-label feasibility trial evaluating two doses of gefitinib (250 and 500 mg/day) in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin. Gefitinib was administered daily from day 2 onwards. Gemcitabine 1250 mg/m(2) was given on days 1 and 8 and cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) on day 1 for up to six 3-week cycles. Patients could then continue to receive gefitinib monotherapy.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients were entered, nine at each gefitinib dose level. Two patients developed dose-limiting toxicity: one grade 3 convulsion (250 mg/day dose group) and one grade 3 rash (500 mg/day dose group). The most frequently occurring adverse events in the combination phase were vomiting (17 patients), asthenia (16), nausea (14), diarrhea (14) and skin rash (13). The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were vomiting (seven patients), asthenia (six), thrombocytopenia (six), diarrhea (five) and anorexia (five). Pharmacokinetic analyses showed no apparent pharmacokinetic interaction between gefitinib and cisplatin or gemcitabine, with the exception of a possible small increase in the geometric mean exposure to gemcitabine seen on day 8 of therapy when given alone with the higher dose of gefitinib. Of 17 evaluable patients, nine had confirmed partial responses, seven had stable disease and one had progressive disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination therapy of gefitinib with cisplatin and gemcitabine had a manageable and predictable safety profile, no major effect on exposure to any of the three drugs and antitumor activity.

Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus a cisplatin-based triplet versus nonplatinum sequential doublets in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a Spanish Lung Cancer Group phase III randomized trial

PURPOSE

To compare the survival benefit obtained with cisplatin plus gemcitabine, a cisplatin-based triplet, and nonplatinum sequential doublets in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Stage IIIB to IV NSCLC patients were randomly assigned to receive cisplatin 100 mg/m2 day 1 plus gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m2 days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks for six cycles (CG); cisplatin 100 mg/m2 day 1 plus gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 and vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks for six cycles (CGV); or gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 plus vinorelbine 30 mg/m2 days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks for three cycles, followed by vinorelbine 30 mg/m2 days 1 and 8 plus ifosfamide 3 g/m2 day 1, every 3 weeks for three cycles (GV-VI).

RESULTS

Five hundred fifty-seven patients were assigned to treatment (182 CG, 188 CGV, 187 GV-VI). Response rates were significantly inferior for the nonplatinum sequential doublet (CG, 42%; CGV, 41%; GV-VI, 27%; CG v GV-VI, P =.003). No differences in median survival or time to progression were observed. Toxicity was higher for the triplet: grade 3 to 4 neutropenia (GC, 32%; CGV, 57%; GV-VI, 27%; P <.05); neutropenic fever (CG, 4%; CGV, 19%; GV-VI, 5%; P <.0001); grade 3 to 4 thrombocytopenia (CG, 19%; CGV, 23%; GV-VI, 3%; P =.0001); and grade 3 to 4 emesis (GC, 22%; GCV, 32%; GV-VI, 6%; P <.0001).

CONCLUSION

On the basis of these results, CG remains a standard regimen for first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC.

Phase II trial of paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

Given the cisplatin-related myelotoxicity and nonhematologic toxicities, we were prompted to undertake a study of the noncisplatin combination of paclitaxel plus gemcitabine to evaluate the efficacy, tolerance, and survival of this combination in patients with locally advanced and metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients received gemcitabine 2,000 mg/m(2) and paclitaxel 150 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle, for a maximum of eight cycles.

RESULTS

Between December 1997 and June 1998, 89 untreated NSCLC patients were enrolled; 30 (34%) had stage IIIB disease (23 with malignant pleural effusion and seven without), and 59 (66%) had stage IV disease. Eighty-six percent of patients had a performance status of 0 or 1. The median number of cycles administered was four (range, one to eight cycles). The mean dose-intensity for both paclitaxel and gemcitabine was nearly 100%. Hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities were mild. Thirty-eight patients received second-line chemotherapy after completion of the study. The overall intent-to-treat response rate was 32.2%, with a higher response rate for stage IIIB patients (43.3%) than for stage IV patients (26.3%). Overall median survival was 9.9 months, and 1-year survival was 38.8% (14.2 months for stage IIIB and 7.7 months for stage IV; P =.007). Median survival was 10.2 months for patients with a performance status of 0 or 1 and 4.8 months for patients with a performance status of 2 (P =.007).

CONCLUSION

A biweekly paclitaxel/gemcitabine regimen was well tolerated, with an acceptable response rate and a reasonable median survival time, especially in patients with good performance status. It merits further exploration in future studies.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of interferon as adjuvant therapy in high-risk melanoma patients in Spain

In the randomised clinical trial E1684, the administration of interferon (IFN) alpha-2b resulted in prolonged disease-free and overall survival in high-risk melanoma patients following surgical resection. However, and considering the cost and toxicity of IFN, the convenience of its widespread use should be evaluated. The aim of this study was to analyse the cost-effectiveness ratio of adjuvant therapy with IFN alpha-2b in melanoma patients versus an untreated control group. A Markov model was used to compare two hypothetical cohorts of 1000 patients aged 50 years, according to the clinical outcome of the E1684 study. The cohort of patients treated with IFN alpha-2b has an increased overall survival of 1.90 years during the patient's lifetime. The incremental discounted cost per life year gained of IFN versus observation is 9015 Euros according to the projection generated by the model. The sensitivity analysis demonstrated that changes in the most relevant study end-points do not modify the study outcome. In conclusion, in high-risk melanoma patients following surgical resection, the cost-effectiveness of IFN alpha-2b (at a dose of 20 MU/m2/day, 5 days per week for one month, followed by 10 MU/m2 TIW, up to one complete year of therapy) versus an untreated control group is within the limits established in health economics to determine if adoption of a new treatment is economically justified and is comparable with other interventions in which cost-effectiveness is acceptable to the National Health System.

Phase I-II study of paclitaxel, cisplatin, and gemcitabine in advanced transitional-cell carcinoma of the urothelium. Spanish Oncology Genitourinary Group

PURPOSE

To determine the maximum-tolerated dose and the antitumor activity of a combination of paclitaxel, cisplatin, and gemcitabine in advanced transitional-cell carcinoma (TCC) of the urothelium.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with measurable, previously untreated, locally advanced or metastatic TCC and with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status < or = 2 and creatinine clearance > or = 55 mL/min were eligible. Cisplatin was given on day 1 at a fixed dose of 70 mg/m(2). Paclitaxel and gemcitabine were given on days 1 and 8 at increasing dose levels. Cycles were repeated every 21 days to a maximum of six cycles.

RESULTS

Sixty-one patients were registered. In phase I, 15 patients were entered at four different dose levels. Dose-limiting toxicity consisted of early onset (after the first cycle) grade 2 asthenia (two of six patients) and grade 3 asthenia (one of six patients) at dose level 4. A paclitaxel dose of 80 mg/m(2) and gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) was recommended for phase II, and 46 additional patients were entered at this level for a total of 49 patients. Main nonhematologic toxicity was grade 2 asthenia in 18 patients, with early onset in five patients, and grade 3 in four patients. Grade 3/4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 27 (55%) and 11 (22%) patients, respectively. Overall, febrile neutropenia was seen in 11 patients, and one toxic death occurred because of neutropenic sepsis. The combination was active at all dose levels. In total, 58 of 61 eligible patients were assessable for response; 16 complete responses (27.6%) and 29 partial responses (50%) were observed for an overall response rate of 77.6% (95% confidence interval, 60% to 98%). The median survival time (MST) available for the phase I part of the study is 24.0 months. MST has not been reached for the whole group with the current follow-up.

CONCLUSION

This combination of paclitaxel, cisplatin, and gemcitabine is feasible and highly active in patients with advanced TCC of the urothelium. Further evaluation of this regimen in patients with TCC is warranted.

Gemcitabine/paclitaxel-based three-drug regimens in advanced urothelial cancer

Transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the urothelium is a highly chemosensitive tumour. Combination chemotherapy can provide both palliation and a modest survival advantage in patients with advanced disease. At present, the combination of cisplatin, methotrexate, doxorubicin and vinblastine (M-VAC) is the most widely used for advanced TCC with an overall response rate of 40-72% in phase II, and 35-45% in phase III studies, and a median survival of approximately 12 months. These modest results and the unsuccessful attempts to increase efficacy with dose intensive M-VAC schedules have prompted the identification of new active agents in TCC, such as the taxanes and gemcitabine. The overall response rates for two-drug regimens of cisplatin-paclitaxel, carboplatin-paclitaxel and cisplatin-gemcitabine range from 63 to 72%, 14 to 65% and 42 to 66%, respectively. The overall response rates for platinum-paclitaxel-gemcitabine three-drug regimens range from 58 to 80%. The potential clinical benefit of these new three-drug combinations in the treatment of TCC needs to be tested in future phase III studies.

Paclitaxel resistance in non-small-cell lung cancer associated with beta-tubulin gene mutations

PURPOSE

The mechanisms that cause chemoresistance in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients have yet to be clearly elucidated. Paclitaxel is a tubulin-disrupting agent that binds preferentially to beta-tubulin. Tubulins are guanosine triphosphate (GTP)-binding proteins. Beta-tubulin is a GTPase, whereas alpha-tubulin has no enzyme activity. We reasoned that polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and DNA sequencing of the beta-tubulin gene could reveal more information regarding the connection between beta-tubulin mutations and primary paclitaxel resistance.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Constitutional genomic DNA and paired tumor DNA were isolated from 49 biopsies from 43 Spanish and six American stage IIIB and IV NSCLC patients who had been treated with a 3-hour, 210 mg/m(2) paclitaxel infusion and a 24-hour, 200 mg/m(2) infusion, respectively. Oligonucleotides specific to beta-tubulin were designed for PCR amplification and sequencing of GTP- and paclitaxel-binding beta-tubulin domains.

RESULTS

Of 49 patients with NSCLC, 16 (33%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 20.7% to 45.3%) had beta-tubulin mutations in exons 1 (one patient) or 4 (15 patients). None of the patients with beta-tubulin mutations had an objective response, whereas 13 of 33 (39.4%; 95% CI, 22.8% to 56%; P = 0.01) patients without beta-tubulin mutations had complete or partial responses. Median survival was 3 months for the 16 patients with beta-tubulin mutations and 10 months for the 33 patients without beta-tubulin mutations (P =.0001).

CONCLUSION

We have identified beta-tubulin gene mutations as a strong predictor of response to the antitubulin drug paclitaxel; these mutations may represent a novel mechanism of resistance and should be examined prospectively in future trials of taxane-based therapy in NSCLC.

Randomized phase III study of gemcitabine-cisplatin versus etoposide-cisplatin in the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

We conducted a randomized trial to compare gemcitabine-cisplatin with etoposide-cisplatin in the treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The primary end point of the comparison was response rate.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 135 chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced NSCLC were randomized to receive either gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) days 1 and 8 or etoposide 100 mg/m2 IV days 1 to 3 along with cisplatin 100 mg/m2 IV day 1. Both treatments were administered in 21-day cycles. One hundred thirty-three patients were included in the intent-to-treat analysis of response.

RESULTS

The response rate (externally validated) for patients given gemcitabine-cisplatin was superior to that for patients given etoposide-cisplatin (40.6% v 21.9%; P = .02). This superior response rate was associated with a significant delay in time to disease progression (6.9 months v 4.3 months; P = .01) without an impairment in quality of life (QOL). There was no statistically significant difference in survival time between both arms (8.7 months for gemcitabine-cisplatin v 7.2 months for etoposide-cisplatin; P = .18). The overall toxicity profile for both combinations of drugs was similar. Nausea and vomiting were reported more frequently in the gemcitabine arm than in the etoposide arm. However, the difference was not significant. Gemcitabine-cisplatin produced less grade 3 alopecia (13% v 51%) and less grade 4 neutropenia (28% v 56% ) but more grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia (56% v 13%) than did etoposide-cisplatin. However, there were no thrombocytopenia-related complications in the gemcitabine arm.

CONCLUSION

Compared with etoposide-cisplatin, gemcitabine-cisplatin provides a significantly higher response rate and a delay in disease progression without impairing QOL in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Superiority of sequential versus concurrent administration of paclitaxel with etoposide in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: comparison of two Phase II trials

Paclitaxel and etoposide are two chemotherapy agents with broad cytotoxic activity and different mechanisms of action and resistance. Preclinical studies of their combined cytotoxicity have yielded conflicting results. We performed two sequential Phase II trials using different sequence schedules of paclitaxel and etoposide as first-line treatment in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Forty-four patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC were included between July 1995 and September 1996. All patients received etoposide at 100 mg/m2, given as an i.v. infusion on days 1, 2, and 3. The first 20 patients (part A) also received paclitaxel at 175 mg/m2 as a 3-h infusion on day 1, immediately prior to etoposide. The subsequent 24 patients (part B) were given the same paclitaxel dose, but on day 4. Grade 3-4 granulocytopenia was seen in 70% of the patients in part A and in 37% of those in part B (P = 0.04). Twenty-five % of the courses in part A and 4% of the courses in part B were associated with granulocyte nadir < or =500/microl (P = 0.00006). No responses were observed in part A, although disease was stabilized in 14 patients (70%). In part B, there were two complete responses and seven partial responses, for an overall response rate of 37.5% (95% confidence interval, 21-58%). In conclusion, toxicity and antitumor activity of the paclitaxel/etoposide combination may be sequence dependent. Our findings suggest that etoposide followed by paclitaxel is well tolerated and has greater activity in NSCLC than concurrent administration.

Neoadjuvant therapy with cisplatin/fluorouracil vs cisplatin/UFT in locally advanced squamous cell head and neck cancer

This study compared the activity and toxicity of fluorouracil (5-FU)/ cisplatin with the combination tegafur and uracil (UFT)/cisplatin in the neoadjuvant treatment of locally advanced-stage III or IV (MO)-head and neck cancer. A total of 67 patients were randomly assigned to treatment with cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on day 1 followed by either a continuous infusion of 5-FU 1,000 mg/m2/day on days 2 through 6 (group 1) or oral administration of UFT 300 mg/m2/day on days 2 through 20 (group 2). Both treatments were repeated every 21 days for four cycles. Responding patients received locoregional standard radiotherapy (50 to 70 Gy) after chemotherapy. Group 1 was comprised of 34 patients, 30 of whom were men, with a median age of 57.5 years; 79% of this group had a Karnofsky performance status of 90% to 100%; 70% had a squamous and 29% an undifferentiated histology. The majority (85%) had stage IV disease. Of the 33 patients in group 2, 29 were men. The median age was 56 years. Most (88%) had a performance status of 90% to 100%. More patients had a squamous than an undifferentiated histology (82% vs 18%) and most (88%) had stage IV disease. Overall response in group 1 was 73% (21% complete) compared with 79% (18% complete) in group 2. At a median follow-up of 84 months, no significant differences have emerged in overall survival, 15 vs 37 months, or time to progression, 8.5 vs 14.5 months, for groups 1 and 2, respectively. Toxicity was also similar, except for phlebitis, which occurred significantly more often in group 1 (71% vs 9%). Cisplatin/UFT was as effective as the classic cisplatin/5-FU regimen and has the advantages of outpatient oral administration and a lower incidence of phlebitis.

A sequence-dependent paclitaxel/etoposide phase II trial in patients with non-small cell lung cancer

Studies conducted by the Spanish Lung Cancer Group indicate that cisplatin- or carboplatin-based chemotherapy can yield a 25% response rate, 9-month median survival time, and 30% 1-year survival rate in patients with stage III and IV non-small cell lung cancer. Phase II trials of single-agent paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) have an almost 30% response rate in non-small cell lung cancer. Based on these results, we decided to examine whether the sequence-dependent effects of paclitaxel/etoposide influence treatment outcome (antitumor response) and toxicity. In vitro data show a paradoxical antagonist rather than additive effect. In the first part of our study (part A), paclitaxel and etoposide were administered at the same time. In the second part (part B), etoposide preceded paclitaxel. In both parts, patients with previously untreated stage IIIB or IV non-small cell lung cancer with good performance status were eligible. In part A, etoposide (fixed dose, 100 mg/m2) on days 1, 2, and 3 was administered by 30-minute infusion; paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) was given by a 3-hour infusion on day 1. In part B, the etoposide dose and schedule were the same, but paclitaxel (same dose) was administered on day 4. Treatment in both parts was repeated every 21 days for a maximum of 10 cycles. In part A, 18 patients were entered and no objective responses were observed. In part B, 21 patients were accrued, 17 of whom had sufficient follow-up for response assessment. Seven objective responses were achieved (two complete and five partial responses, for an objective response rate of 41%). Seven patients had no change and three had progressive disease. Frequency and severity of side effects were not significantly different in either part of the study. However, grade 4 neutropenia was observed in 10 (59%) patients and one (5%) patient in parts A and B of the trial, respectively. Nonhematologic toxicity was slight. In conclusion, paclitaxel cytotoxicity is abrogated when it is given concurrently with etoposide. When etoposide precedes paclitaxel, a more effective paclitaxel/etoposide schedule is attained.

Single-agent paclitaxel by 3-hour infusion in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer: links between p53 and K-ras gene status and chemosensitivity

Currently available cytotoxic drugs are only moderately active in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and prolong survival only slightly. In two published trials, single-agent paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) was reported to have significant activity in NSCLC, with response rates of 21% and 24%. Treatment-limiting hypersensitivity reactions, however, were noted in a phase I trial of paclitaxel given as a 3-hour infusion at doses > or = 190 mg/m2. We report the results of a phase II trial of paclitaxel given by 3-hour intravenous infusion at 210 mg/m2 every 3 weeks in an outpatient setting. The study was conducted simultaneously at three centers and included chemotherapy-naive patients with unresectable locoregional or metastatic NSCLC. The study objectives were to evaluate response rate, the potential link between p53 and K-ras gene mutations and increased paclitaxel resistance, and toxicity. Sixty-two patients were eligible for this study. All patients were premedicated with dexamethasone 20 mg given orally or intravenously 12 and 6 hours before paclitaxel infusion and cimetidine 300 mg and diphenhydramine 50 mg, both given 60 minutes prior to initiation of paclitaxel infusion. Of the 62 patients who were initially enrolled, 50 (44 men and six women) were evaluable for toxicity at interim analysis; 47 of these patients were evaluable for response. Twenty-four had squamous cell carcinoma, 20 had adenocarcinoma, and six had undifferentiated large cell carcinoma. The median age was 61 years (age range, 36 to 75 years). The median Zubrod performance status was 1 (range, 0 to 2). Seventeen (36%) patients achieved either partial or complete response. Among 24 patients with squamous cell carcinoma, eight (33%; 95% confidence interval, 15% to 61%) had a partial response. Seven (41%; 95% confidence interval, 18% to 64%) of 17 patients with adenocarcinoma had a partial or complete response. Tissue blocks were obtained for analysis of K-ras and p53 gene mutations by means of polymerase chain reaction followed by single-strand conformation polymorphism assay. Our findings indicate that mutations are associated with a poor clinical course and may be prognostic of paclitaxel resistance. Paclitaxel was well tolerated. None of the patients experienced allergic reactions. Granulocytopenia was generally mild. Therapy was interrupted in only two patients because of the development of grade 3 neuropathy. In our experience, paclitaxel is one of the most active cytotoxic drugs targeting NSCLC.

Single agent Taxol, 3-hour infusion, in untreated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Currently, only a few chemotherapeutic agents have consistently produced single agent response rates greater than 15% in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Taxol has been reported in two phase II studies to have significant activity in NSCLC with response rates of 21% and 24%. Schedule infusion of 24 hours has been used to reduce allergic reactions. The study reported here was a phase II trial of Taxol given by 3-hour intravenous infusions at a 210 mg/m2 dose every three weeks in outpatients setting. It was conducted simultaneously at three centers on chemotherapy-naïve patients medicated with unresectable stage III or metastatic NSCLC. Sixty-two patients were initially enrolled; all were premedicated with dexametasone (20 mg), cimetidine (330 mg) and diphenilhydramine (50 mg), given prior to initiation of paclitaxel infusion. Fifty patients were evaluated for toxic effects and 47 for response. Sixteen partial responses (34) and one complete response (2%) were observed, for an overall response rate of 36% (95% confidence internal, 22% to 50%). Taxol was well-tolerated and none of the patients experienced allergic reaction. Granulocytopenia was generally mild. Therapy was interrupted in only two patients because of the development of grade 3 neuropathy. In our experience Taxol is one of the most active cytotoxic drugs targeting non-small-cell lung cancer.