Enfortumab Vedotin With or Without Pembrolizumab in Cisplatin-Ineligible Patients With Previously Untreated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Cancer

PURPOSE

Patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer (la/mUC) who are ineligible for cisplatin-based therapy have limited first-line (1L) treatment options and significant need for improved therapies. Enfortumab vedotin (EV) and pembrolizumab (Pembro) individually have shown a survival benefit in urothelial cancer in second-line + la/mUC settings. Here, we present data from the pivotal trial of EV plus Pembro (EV + Pembro) in the 1L setting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In Cohort K of the EV-103 phase Ib/II study, cisplatin-ineligible patients with previously untreated la/mUC were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive EV as monotherapy or in combination with Pembro. The primary end point was confirmed objective response rate (cORR) per blinded independent central review. Secondary end points included duration of response (DOR) and safety. There were no formal statistical comparisons between treatment arms.

RESULTS

The cORR was 64.5% (95% CI, 52.7 to 75.1) and 45.2% (95% CI, 33.5 to 57.3) for patients treated with EV + Pembro (N = 76) and EV monotherapy (N = 73), respectively. The median DOR was not reached for the combination and was 13.2 months for monotherapy; 65.4% and 56.3% of patients who responded to the combination and monotherapy, respectively, maintained a response at 12 months. The most common grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) in patients treated with the combination were maculopapular rash (17.1%), fatigue (9.2%), and neutropenia (9.2%). EV TRAEs of special interest (any grade) in the combination arm included skin reactions (67.1%) and peripheral neuropathy (60.5%).

CONCLUSION

EV + Pembro showed a high cORR with durable responses as 1L treatment in cisplatin-ineligible patients with la/mUC. Patients who received EV monotherapy had a response and safety profile consistent with previous studies. Adverse events for EV + Pembro were manageable, with no new safety signals observed.

SPAZO2 (SOGUG): Outcomes of patients treated with pazopanib as first line in mRC according to gender in real world

623

Background: Treatment of mRC is not affected by gender, studying possible differences in a real-world study, could increase the knowledge of toxicity and possible prognostic factors. Methods: SPAZO2 (NCT03091465) was a retrospective real-world study to analyze the effectiveness of 1st-line pazopanib and subsequent therapies in mRC. Data from 530 pt treated outside CT were collected in 50 spanish centers, and externally monitored. Ineligibility criteria: ECOG > 1, pure nonclear-cell, Hgb < 9 g/dl, renal failure, severe cardiovascular disease, chronic liver disease, or recent neoplasia Results: 530 pt were included, 67.2% men (M), mean age was 66.2 years (26-92). There were no significant differences (M vs W) in the age > 75 (24.7 vs 24.1%), clear cell carcinoma (77.2 vs 79.9%), nephrectomy (72.5 vs 68.4%), IMDC (favourable: 15.2 vs 12.1%, intermediate: 59.3 vs 64.4%, poor: 25.6 vs 23.6%), metastases (lymph nodes: 46.1 vs 43.1%, lung: 69,7 vs 67,2 %, liver: 16 vs 20.1%, bone: 27 vs 24.1%, skin/soft tissues: 1.1 vs 3,4% and CNS: 4,8% vs 6.3%). Discontinuation due to toxicity or comorbidities was 12.4 vs 9.8%. There were no differences in the second lines received (57.9 vs 56.9%), neither response, PFS and OS (table). Median follow up was 39 mo. The gender has no prognostic value when adjusted for the prognostic groups of IMDC (HR of PFS 0.96, CI 95% 0.78-1.2, HR of OS: 0.92, CI 95% 0.72-1.14). Only diarrhea and elevation of uric acid were higher in the men group. Conclusions: Pazopanib was safe and effective in both groups with similar outcome. Women had less diarrhea and less increased uric acid. There were not differences in OS or PFS. In IMDC subgroup analysis, there is a trend towards a better evolution or PFS in the poor prognosis women subgroup. Clinical trial information: NCT03091465. [Table: see text]