Narvaez J, Chang M, Ing J, De Chance D, Narvaez JJ. Simplified, Readily Available Method for the Treatment of Band Keratopathy With Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid.
Cornea 2021;
40:1360-1362. [PMID:
34481414 PMCID:
PMC8423137 DOI:
10.1097/ico.0000000000002635]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2020] [Revised: 10/13/2020] [Accepted: 11/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE
To compare 3 methods for creating ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) solution using readily available Vacutainer tubes for the treatment of band keratopathy.
METHODS
All 3 protocols used commercially available Vacutainer blood collection tubes coated with K2EDTA. An osmometer was used to measure and compare the concentration of EDTA created using 3 different protocols. The time required for preparation of the solution was measured and compared to evaluate its efficiency for everyday clinical use. In addition, volume of EDTA solution obtained was measured for method 1. The most promising protocol for clinical use was then used for treatment of a series of patients.
RESULTS
Average osmolarity was 532, 285, and 422 for methods 1, 2, and 3, respectively (ANOVA P < 0.01, all Tukey honestly significant difference P < 0.01). For the respective mixtures, average concentration was 65, 35, and 52 mg/mL, and average time to create solution was 189, 38, and 83 seconds (ANOVA P < 0.01, all Tukey honestly significant difference P < 0.01). The most promising, method 3, was found to be safe and effective in removing calcium from the corneal stroma in a series of 5 patients with 6 eyes treated. It also yielded 25% more solution for clinical use than method 1.
CONCLUSIONS
Method 3 using a single 10-mL Vacutainer tube with 18 mg of K2-EDTA had the best balance of effective concentration of EDTA, time to preparation, and simplicity of methodology, when compared with previously published methods 1 and 2. It also yielded a greater final volume of solution.
Collapse