1
|
Trimmer JT, Kisiangani J, Peletz R, Stuart K, Antwi-Agyei P, Albert J, Khush R, Delaire C. The Impact of Pro-Poor Sanitation Subsidies in Open Defecation-Free Communities: A Randomized, Controlled Trial in Rural Ghana. Environ Health Perspect 2022; 130:67004. [PMID: 35674667 PMCID: PMC9176208 DOI: 10.1289/ehp10443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2021] [Revised: 04/26/2022] [Accepted: 05/09/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND According to the World Health Organization/United Nations International Children's Fund Joint Monitoring Program, 494 million people practice open defecation globally. After achieving open defecation-free (ODF) status through efforts such as Community-Led Total Sanitation (CLTS), communities (particularly vulnerable households) may revert to open defecation, especially when toilet collapse is common and durable toilets are unaffordable. Accordingly, there is increasing interest in pro-poor sanitation subsidies. OBJECTIVES This study determined the impacts of a pro-poor sanitation subsidy program on sanitation conditions among the most vulnerable households and others in the community. METHODS In 109 post-ODF communities in Northern Ghana, we conducted a cluster randomized controlled trial to evaluate a pro-poor subsidy program that identified the most vulnerable households through community consultation to receive vouchers for durable toilet substructures. We surveyed households to assess toilet coverage, quality, and use before and after the intervention and tracked program costs. RESULTS Overall, sanitation conditions deteriorated substantially from baseline to endline (average of 21 months). In control communities (not receiving the pro-poor subsidy), open defecation increased from 25% (baseline) to 69% (endline). The subsidy intervention attenuated this deterioration (open defecation increased from 25% to only 54% in subsidy communities), with the greatest impacts among voucher-eligible households. Noneligible households in compounds with subsidized toilets also exhibited lower open defecation levels owing to in-compound sharing (common in this context). CLTS followed by the subsidy program would benefit more households than CLTS alone but would cost 21-37% more per household that no longer practiced open defecation or upgraded to a durable toilet. DISCUSSION Sanitation declines, often due to toilet collapse, suggest a need for approaches beyond CLTS alone. This subsidy program attenuated declines, but durable toilets likely remained unaffordable for noneligible households. Targeting criteria more closely aligned with sanitation inequities, such as household heads who are female or did not complete primary education, may help to generate greater and more sustainable impacts in Northern Ghana and, potentially, other contexts facing toilet collapse and limited market access. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP10443.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Prince Antwi-Agyei
- University of Energy and Natural Resources, Sunyani, Ghana
- NHance Development Partners Ltd., Kumasi, Ghana
| | - Jeff Albert
- Aquaya Institute, San Anselmo, California, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Delaire C, Peletz R, Haji S, Kones J, Samuel E, Easthope-Frazer A, Charreyron E, Wang T, Feng A, Mustafiz R, Faria IJ, Antwi-Agyei P, Donkor E, Adjei K, Monney I, Kisiangani J, MacLeod C, Mwangi B, Khush R. How Much Will Safe Sanitation for all Cost? Evidence from Five Cities. Environ Sci Technol 2021; 55:767-777. [PMID: 33356187 DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.0c06348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Global sustainable development goals call for universal access to safely managed sanitation by 2030. Here, we demonstrate methods to estimate the financial requirements for meeting this commitment in urban settings of low-income countries. Our methods considered two financial requirements: (i) the subsidies needed to bridge the gap between the willingness-to-pay of low-income households and actual market prices of toilets and emptying services and (ii) the amounts needed to expand the municipal waste management infrastructure for unserved populations. We applied our methods in five cities- Kisumu, Malindi, Nakuru in Kenya; Kumasi in Ghana; and Rangpur in Bangladesh and compared three to five sanitation approaches in each city. We collected detailed cost data on the sanitation infrastructure, products, and services from 76 key informants across the five cities, and we surveyed a total of 2381 low-income households to estimate willingness-to-pay. We found that the total financial requirements for achieving universal sanitation in the next 10 years and their breakdown between household subsidies and municipal infrastructure varied greatly between sanitation approaches. Across our study cities, sewerage was the costliest approach (total financial requirements of 16-24 USD/person/year), followed by container-based sanitation (10-17 USD/person/year), onsite sanitation (2-14 USD/person/year), and mini-sewers connecting several toilets to communal septic tanks (3-5 USD/person/year). Further applications of our methods can guide sanitation planning in other cities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rachel Peletz
- The Aquaya Institute, P.O. Box 1603, San Anselmo, California 94979, United States
| | - Salim Haji
- The Aquaya Institute, P.O. Box 1603, San Anselmo, California 94979, United States
| | - Joan Kones
- The Aquaya Institute, P.O. Box 21862-00505, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Edinah Samuel
- The Aquaya Institute, P.O. Box 21862-00505, Nairobi, Kenya
| | | | | | | | - Andy Feng
- Oliver Wyman, New York, New York 10036, United States
| | - Razin Mustafiz
- D2 Technologies Limited, House 7, Road 5, Block F, Banani, Dhaka 1213, Bangladesh
| | - Ismat Jabeen Faria
- D2 Technologies Limited, House 7, Road 5, Block F, Banani, Dhaka 1213, Bangladesh
| | - Prince Antwi-Agyei
- University of Energy and Natural Resources, Sunyani, Ghana
- NHance Development Partners Limited, P.O. Box 214ST 46 Stadium, Kumasi, Ghana
| | - Emmanuel Donkor
- NHance Development Partners Limited, P.O. Box 214ST 46 Stadium, Kumasi, Ghana
| | - Kwaku Adjei
- NHance Development Partners Limited, P.O. Box 214ST 46 Stadium, Kumasi, Ghana
| | - Isaac Monney
- NHance Development Partners Limited, P.O. Box 214ST 46 Stadium, Kumasi, Ghana
| | | | - Clara MacLeod
- The Aquaya Institute, P.O. Box 21862-00505, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Brian Mwangi
- The Aquaya Institute, P.O. Box 21862-00505, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Ranjiv Khush
- The Aquaya Institute, P.O. Box 1603, San Anselmo, California 94979, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Peletz R, Kisiangani J, Ronoh P, Cock-Esteb A, Chase C, Khush R, Luoto J. Assessing the Demand for Plastic Latrine Slabs in Rural Kenya. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2019; 101:555-565. [PMID: 31392946 PMCID: PMC6726948 DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.18-0888] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2018] [Accepted: 06/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Improving access to safe and affordable sanitation facilities is a global health priority that is essential for meeting the United Nation's Sustainable Development Goals. To promote the use of improved sanitation in rural and low-income settings, plastic latrine slabs provide a simple option for upgrading traditional pit latrines. The International Finance Corporation/World Bank Selling Sanitation program estimated that plastic slabs would have a 34% annual growth, with a market size of US$2.53 million in Kenya by 2017. In this study, we examined the commercial viability of these plastic latrine slabs in rural Kenya by evaluating a financing and distribution model intervention, documenting household slab sales to date, and assessing consumer exposure and perceptions. We also determined household willingness to pay through a real-money auction with 322 households. We found that no households in our study area had purchased the plastic slabs. The primary barriers to slab sales were limited marketing activities and low demand compared with the sales price: households were willing to pay an average of US$5 compared with a market price of US$16. Therefore, current household demand for the plastic latrine slabs in rural Kenya is too low to support commercial distribution. Further efforts are required to align the price of plastic latrine slabs with consumer demand in this setting, such as additional demand creation, product financing, and public sector investment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Jill Luoto
- Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, California
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kumpel E, Delaire C, Peletz R, Kisiangani J, Rinehold A, De France J, Sutherland D, Khush R. Measuring the Impacts of Water Safety Plans in the Asia-Pacific Region. IJERPH 2018; 15:E1223. [PMID: 29890783 PMCID: PMC6025033 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15061223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2018] [Revised: 05/28/2018] [Accepted: 06/07/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
This study investigated the effectiveness of Water Safety Plans (WSP) implemented in 99 water supply systems across 12 countries in the Asia-Pacific region. An impact assessment methodology including 36 indicators was developed based on a conceptual framework proposed by the Center for Disease Control (CDC) and before/after data were collected between November 2014 and June 2016. WSPs were associated with infrastructure improvements at the vast majority (82) of participating sites and to increased financial support at 37 sites. In addition, significant changes were observed in operations and management practices, number of water safety-related meetings, unaccounted-for water, water quality testing activities, and monitoring of consumer satisfaction. However, the study also revealed challenges in the implementation of WSPs, including financial constraints and insufficient capacity. Finally, this study provided an opportunity to test the impact assessment methodology itself, and a series of recommendations are made to improve the approach (indicators, study design, data collection methods) for evaluating WSPs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Kumpel
- Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, USA.
- The Aquaya Institute, P.O. Box 21862-00505, Nairobi, Kenya.
| | | | - Rachel Peletz
- The Aquaya Institute, P.O. Box 5502, Santa Cruz, CA 95063, USA.
| | | | | | | | - David Sutherland
- World Health Organization, Regional Office for South East Asia, New Delhi 110002, India.
| | - Ranjiv Khush
- The Aquaya Institute, P.O. Box 5502, Santa Cruz, CA 95063, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kisiangani J, Baliddawa J, Marinda P, Mabeya H, Choge JK, Adino EO, Khayeka-Wandabwa C. Determinants of breast cancer early detection for cues to expanded control and care: the lived experiences among women from Western Kenya. BMC Womens Health 2018; 18:81. [PMID: 29859095 PMCID: PMC5984781 DOI: 10.1186/s12905-018-0571-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2016] [Accepted: 05/18/2018] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
Background Estimately, 70–80% of cancer cases are diagnosed in late stages in Kenya with breast cancer being a common cause of mortality among women where late diagnosis is the major ubiquitous concern. Numerous studies have focused on epidemiological and health policy dynamics essentially underestimating the determining factors that shape people’s choices and cues to health care service uptake. The study sought to evaluate the knowledge, attitude and health seeking behavior towards breast cancer and its screening in a quest to explain why women present for prognosis and treatment when symptomatic pointers are in advanced stages, impeding primary prevention strategies. Methods Eight focus groups (6–10 members per group) and four key informant interviews were conducted among adult participants from rural and urban settings. Sessions were audio-recorded and transcribed. A thematic analysis of the data was based on the concepts of the health belief model. Data analysis was conducted using NVIVO10. Results Most women perceived breast cancer as a fatal disease and conveyed fear of having early screening. Rural women preferred self-prescribed medications and the use of alternative medicine for long periods before presenting for professional care on suspicion that the lump is cancerous. Accessibility to equipped health facilities, lack of information to establish effective follow-up treatment and low-income status were underscored as their major health seeking behavior barriers whereas, urban women identified marital status as their main barrier. Key informant interviews revealed that health communication programs emphasized more on communicable diseases. This could in part explain why there is a high rate of misconception and suspicion about breast cancer among rural and urban women in the study setting. Conclusions Creating breast cancer awareness alongside clear guidelines on accessing screening and treatment infrastructure is critical. It was evident, a diagnosis of breast cancer or lump brings unexpected confrontation with mortality; fear, pain, cultural barriers, emotional and financial distress. Without clear referral channels to enable those with suspicious lumps or early stage disease to get prompt diagnosis and treatment, then well-meaning awareness will not necessarily contribute to reducing morbidity and mortality. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12905-018-0571-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joyce Kisiangani
- The Aquaya Institute, Nairobi, 00505, Kenya.,School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology and disease control, Moi University, P.O. Box 3900, Eldoret, Kenya
| | - Joyce Baliddawa
- School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology and disease control, Moi University, P.O. Box 3900, Eldoret, Kenya
| | - Pamela Marinda
- Department of Food Science and Nutrition, School of Agricultural Sciences, The University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Hillary Mabeya
- Gynocare Fistula Centre, Eldoret Hospital Lane, P.O. BOX 2326-30100, Eldoret, Kenya
| | - Joseph K Choge
- University of Kabianga, P.O. Box 2030-20200, Kericho, Kenya
| | | | - Christopher Khayeka-Wandabwa
- School of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology (SPST), Health Science Platform, Tianjin University, 92 Weijin road, Nankai District, Tianjin, 300072, People's Republic of China. .,African Population and Health Research Center (APHRC), P .O. Box 10787-00100, Nairobi, Kenya.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Delaire C, Peletz R, Kumpel E, Kisiangani J, Bain R, Khush R. How Much Will It Cost To Monitor Microbial Drinking Water Quality in Sub-Saharan Africa? Environ Sci Technol 2017; 51:5869-5878. [PMID: 28459563 PMCID: PMC5463268 DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b06442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2016] [Revised: 04/04/2017] [Accepted: 05/01/2017] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
Abstract
Microbial water quality monitoring is crucial for managing water resources and protecting public health. However, institutional testing activities in sub-Saharan Africa are currently limited. Because the economics of water quality testing are poorly understood, the extent to which cost may be a barrier to monitoring in different settings is unclear. This study used cost data from 18 African monitoring institutions (piped water suppliers and health surveillance agencies in six countries) and estimates of water supply type coverage from 15 countries to assess the annual financial requirements for microbial water testing at both national and regional levels, using World Health Organization recommendations for sampling frequency. We found that a microbial water quality test costs 21.0 ± 11.3 USD, on average, including consumables, equipment, labor, and logistics, which is higher than previously calculated. Our annual cost estimates for microbial monitoring of piped supplies and improved point sources ranged between 8 000 USD for Equatorial Guinea and 1.9 million USD for Ethiopia, depending primarily on the population served but also on the distribution of piped water system sizes. A comparison with current national water and sanitation budgets showed that the cost of implementing prescribed testing levels represents a relatively modest proportion of existing budgets (<2%). At the regional level, we estimated that monitoring the microbial quality of all improved water sources in sub-Saharan Africa would cost 16.0 million USD per year, which is minimal in comparison to the projected annual capital costs of achieving Sustainable Development Goal 6.1 of safe water for all (14.8 billion USD).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Emily Kumpel
- The
Aquaya Institute, PO Box 21862, Nairobi, Kenya
| | | | - Robert Bain
- Division
of Data, Research and Policy, UNICEF, 3 UN Plaza, New York, New York 10017, United States
| | - Ranjiv Khush
- The
Aquaya Institute, 12
E Sir Francis Drake Blvd, Suite E, Larkspur, California 94939 United States
| |
Collapse
|