1
|
Alzate-Ángel JC, Avilés-Vergara PA, Arango-Londoño D, Concha-Eastman A, Garcés-Hurtado A, López-Carvajal L, Minotta IL, Ortega-Lenis D, Quintero G, Reina-Bolaños S, Reina-Bolaños CA, Roa P, Sánchez-Orozco M, Tovar-Acero C, Arbeláez-Montoya MP. How has research on the effectiveness and safety of COVID-19 vaccination been evaluated: a scope review with emphasis on CoronaVac. Front Public Health 2024; 12:1321327. [PMID: 38660359 PMCID: PMC11040685 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1321327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2023] [Accepted: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction The control of the COVID-19 epidemic has been focused on the development of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2. All developed vaccines have reported safety and efficacy results in preventing infection and its consequences, although the quality of evidence varies depending on the vaccine considered. Different methodological designs have been used for their evaluation, which can influence our understanding of the effects of these interventions. CoronaVac is an inactivated vaccine, and it has been assessed in various studies, including clinical trials and observational studies. Given these differences, our objective was to explore the published information to answer the question: how has the efficacy/effectiveness and safety of CoronaVac been evaluated in different studies? This is to identify potential gaps and challenges to be addressed in understanding its effect. Methods A scoping review was carried out following the methodology proposed by the Joanna Briggs Institute, which included studies carried out in humans as of 2020, corresponding to systematic reviews, clinical trials, analytical or descriptive observational studies, in which the effectiveness and/or safety of vaccines for COVID19 were evaluated or described. There were no age restrictions for the study participants. Results The efficacy/effectiveness and safety of this vaccine was assessed through 113 studies. Nineteen corresponded to experimental studies, 7 of Phase II, 5 of Phase IV, and 4 were clinical trials with random assignment. Although some clinical trials with random assignment have been carried out, these have limitations in terms of feasibility, follow-up times, and with this, the possibility of evaluating safety outcomes that occur with low frequencies. Not all studies have used homogeneous methods of analysis. Both the prevention of infection, and the prevention of outcomes such as hospitalization or death, have been valued through similar outcomes, but some through multivariate analysis of dependencies, and others through analysis that try to infer causally through different control methods of confounding. Conclusion Published information on the evaluation of the efficacy/effectiveness and safety of the CoronaVac is abundant. However, there are differences in terms of vaccine application schedules, population definition, outcomes evaluated, follow-up times, and safety assessment, as well as non-standardization in the reporting of results, which may hinder the generalizability of the findings. It is important to generate meetings and consensus strategies for the methods and reporting of this type of studies, which will allow to reduce the heterogeneity in their presentation and a better understanding of the effect of these vaccines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Paula A. Avilés-Vergara
- Grupo de Enfermedades Tropicales y Resistencia Bacteriana, Universidad del Sinú, Montería, Colombia
| | - David Arango-Londoño
- Grupo de investigación EMAP - Estadística y Matemáticas Aplicadas, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Cali, Colombia
| | | | | | - Liliana López-Carvajal
- Grupo de Investigación Clínica - PECET (GIC-PECET), Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia
| | - Ingrid L. Minotta
- Grupo de Investigación en Economía, Gestión y Salud, ECGESA. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Cali, Colombia
| | - Delia Ortega-Lenis
- Departamento de Salud pública y Epidemiología, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Cali, Colombia
| | | | | | - Carlos A. Reina-Bolaños
- Grupo de Epidemiología, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia
- Grupo de Investigación, Secretaría de Salud Distrital, Cali, Colombia
| | - Pablo Roa
- Grupo de Investigación, Secretaría de Salud Distrital, Cali, Colombia
| | | | - Catalina Tovar-Acero
- Grupo de Enfermedades Tropicales y Resistencia Bacteriana, Universidad del Sinú, Montería, Colombia
| | - María P. Arbeláez-Montoya
- Grupo de Epidemiología, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia
- Grupo de Investigación Clínica - PECET (GIC-PECET), Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Álvarez-Moreno CA, Alzate-Ángel JC, De La Hoz-Siegler IH, Bareño A, Mantilla M, Sussman O, Valderrama-Beltrán S, Rodriguez JY, Arévalo L, Andrade-Sierra J, Padilla M, Reveiz L. Clinical and epidemiological characteristics of mpox: A descriptive cases series in Colombia. Travel Med Infect Dis 2023; 53:102594. [PMID: 37211342 PMCID: PMC10197478 DOI: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2023.102594] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2023] [Revised: 04/03/2023] [Accepted: 05/16/2023] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Colombia is the fifth most affected country by the global monkeypox outbreak and the second in LAC after Brazil. We describe the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of 521 patients with mpox in the country. METHODS We conducted an observational analysis of laboratory-confirmed Mpox cases between June 29 and November 16, 2022. RESULTS Most cases were young men living with HIV. The clinical evolution was primarily benign, with two deaths reported. We found some differences between women and men regarding their BMI, presence of lymphadenopathies, localization of lesions, and the antecedent of HIV infection. CONCLUSION Although it seems that the epidemic curve for this outbreak of Mpox is decreasing not only in Colombia but globally, it could remain endemic. Therefore, it is necessary to maintain very close surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Adriana Bareño
- Centro Medico Teusaquillo, EPS Sanitas, Bogotá, Colombia
| | | | | | - Sandra Valderrama-Beltrán
- Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Grupo de Investigación en Enfermedades Infecciosas, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Jose Y Rodriguez
- Centro de Investigaciones Microbiologicas del Cesar (CIMCE), Valledupar, Colombia; Secretaria Municipal de Salud, Valledupar, Colombia
| | | | | | - Mónica Padilla
- World Health Organization, PanAmerican Health Organization, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Ludovic Reveiz
- Knowledge Translation Program, Evidence and Intelligence for Action in Health Department, Pan American Health Organization, Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|