1
|
Serradilla-Martín M, Villodre C, Falgueras-Verdaguer L, Zambudio-Carroll N, Castell-Gómez JT, Blas-Laina JL, Borrego-Estella V, Domingo-del-Pozo C, García-Plaza G, González-Rodríguez FJ, Montalvá-Orón EM, Moya-Herraiz Á, Paterna-López S, Suárez-Muñoz MA, Alkorta-Zuloaga M, Blanco-Fernández G, Dabán-Collado E, Gómez-Bravo MA, Miota-de-Llamas JI, Rotellar F, Sánchez-Pérez B, Sánchez-Cabús S, Pacheco-Sánchez D, Rodríguez-Sanjuan JC, Varona-Bosque MA, Carrión-Álvarez L, de la Serna-Esteban S, Dopazo C, Martín-Pérez E, Martínez-Cecilia D, Castro-Santiago MJ, Dorcaratto D, Gutiérrez-Díaz ML, Asencio-Pascual JM, Burdío-Pinilla F, Carracedo-Iglesias R, Escartín-Arias A, Ielpo B, Rodríguez-Laiz G, Valdivieso-López A, De-Vicente-López E, Alonso-Orduña V, Ramia JM. Feasibility and Short-Term Outcomes in Liver-First Approach: A Spanish Snapshot Study (the RENACI Project). Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1676. [PMID: 38730631 PMCID: PMC11082946 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16091676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2024] [Revised: 04/21/2024] [Accepted: 04/25/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: The liver-first approach may be indicated for colorectal cancer patients with synchronous liver metastases to whom preoperative chemotherapy opens a potential window in which liver resection may be undertaken. This study aims to present the data of feasibility and short-term outcomes in the liver-first approach. (2) Methods: A prospective observational study was performed in Spanish hospitals that had a medium/high-volume of HPB surgeries from 1 June 2019 to 31 August 2020. (3) Results: In total, 40 hospitals participated, including a total of 2288 hepatectomies, 1350 for colorectal liver metastases, 150 of them (11.1%) using the liver-first approach, 63 (42.0%) in hospitals performing <50 hepatectomies/year. The proportion of patients as ASA III was significantly higher in centers performing ≥50 hepatectomies/year (difference: 18.9%; p = 0.0213). In 81.1% of the cases, the primary tumor was in the rectum or sigmoid colon. In total, 40% of the patients underwent major hepatectomies. The surgical approach was open surgery in 87 (58.0%) patients. Resection margins were R0 in 78.5% of the patients. In total, 40 (26.7%) patients had complications after the liver resection and 36 (27.3%) had complications after the primary resection. One-hundred and thirty-two (89.3%) patients completed the therapeutic regime. (4) Conclusions: There were no differences in the surgical outcomes between the centers performing <50 and ≥50 hepatectomies/year. Further analysis evaluating factors associated with clinical outcomes and determining the best candidates for this approach will be subsequently conducted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Serradilla-Martín
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, 18014 Granada, Spain;
- Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.GRANADA, 18012 Granada, Spain
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Granada, 18016 Granada, Spain
| | - Celia Villodre
- Department of Surgery, Hospital General Universitario Dr. Balmis, 03010 Alicante, Spain; (C.V.); (J.M.R.)
- ISABIAL, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de Alicante, 03010 Alicante, Spain
- Department of Surgery, Universidad Miguel Hernández, 03202 Alicante, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Gabriel García-Plaza
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Universitario Insular, 35016 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain;
| | | | - Eva M. Montalvá-Orón
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, IIS La Fe, Ciberehd ISCIII, 46026 Valencia, Spain;
| | - Ángel Moya-Herraiz
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Universitario de Castellón, 12004 Castelló de la Plana, Spain;
| | - Sandra Paterna-López
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain;
| | - Miguel A. Suárez-Muñoz
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, 29010 Málaga, Spain;
| | | | | | | | - Miguel A. Gómez-Bravo
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, 41013 Sevilla, Spain;
| | | | - Fernando Rotellar
- Department of Surgery, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain;
| | - Belinda Sánchez-Pérez
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, 29010 Málaga, Spain;
| | - Santiago Sánchez-Cabús
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Universitario de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, 08041 Barcelona, Spain;
| | | | | | - María A. Varona-Bosque
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de la Candelaria, 38010 Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain;
| | | | | | - Cristina Dopazo
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Universitario Vall d’Hebron, 08035 Barcelona, Spain;
| | - Elena Martín-Pérez
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Universitario La Princesa, 28006 Madrid, Spain; (E.M.-P.); (D.M.-C.)
| | - David Martínez-Cecilia
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Universitario La Princesa, 28006 Madrid, Spain; (E.M.-P.); (D.M.-C.)
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Salud, 45004 Toledo, Spain
| | | | - Dimitri Dorcaratto
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Clínico Universitario, 46010 Valencia, Spain;
| | | | | | - Fernando Burdío-Pinilla
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Universitario del Mar, 08003 Barcelona, Spain; (F.B.-P.); (B.I.)
| | | | | | - Benedetto Ielpo
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Universitario del Mar, 08003 Barcelona, Spain; (F.B.-P.); (B.I.)
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Universitario de León, 24008 León, Spain
| | - Gonzalo Rodríguez-Laiz
- Department of Surgery, Hospital General Universitario Dr. Balmis, 03010 Alicante, Spain; (C.V.); (J.M.R.)
| | | | | | - Vicente Alonso-Orduña
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain;
| | - José M. Ramia
- Department of Surgery, Hospital General Universitario Dr. Balmis, 03010 Alicante, Spain; (C.V.); (J.M.R.)
- ISABIAL, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de Alicante, 03010 Alicante, Spain
- Department of Surgery, Universidad Miguel Hernández, 03202 Alicante, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ramia JM, Villodre-Tudela C, Falgueras-Verdaguer L, Zambudio-Carroll N, Castell-Gómez JT, Carbonell-Morote S, Blas-Laina JL, Borrego-Estella V, Sánchez-Pérez B, Serradilla-Martín M. Textbook outcomes in the liver-first approach for colorectal liver metastases: prospective multicentre analysis. BJS Open 2024; 8:zrad123. [PMID: 38266122 PMCID: PMC10807998 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2023] [Revised: 08/30/2023] [Accepted: 09/24/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Textbook outcome is a valuable tool for assessing surgical outcomes. The aim of this study was to analyse textbook-outcome rates in the prospective Spanish National Registry of the Liver-First Approach (RENACI Project) and the factors influencing textbook-outcome achievement. Additionally, a model for assessing a procedure-specific textbook outcome for the liver-first approach was proposed. METHODS A retrospective analysis of a prospective and multicentre database that included consecutive patients with colorectal cancers and synchronous liver metastases who underwent a liver-first approach between June 2019 and August 2020 was performed. Two types of textbook outcome were measured: classic textbook outcome and liver-first-approach-specific textbook outcome (which included negative margins, no perioperative transfusion, no postoperative major surgical complications, no prolonged length of hospital stay, no readmissions, no mortality, and full treatment completion). The primary endpoint was textbook-outcome rate for a liver-first approach at 90 days. RESULTS A total of 149 patients were included in the analysis. Classic and liver-first-approach-specific textbook-outcome rates were 71.8 per cent (107 patients) and 46 per cent (69 patients) respectively. Factors significantly associated with liver-first-approach-specific textbook-outcome achievement in the multivariable analysis were the number of metastases (OR 0.82 (95 per cent c.i. 0.73 to 0.92); P = 0.001) and intraoperative blood loss (OR 0.99 (95 per cent c.i. 0.99 to 1.00); P = 0.007). Prolonged length of hospital stay (33 patients, 41 per cent), positive margins (31 patients, 39 per cent), perioperative transfusion (27 patients, 34 per cent), and no full treatment completion (18 patients, 23 per cent) were the items that most frequently prevented liver-first-approach-specific textbook-outcome achievement. CONCLUSION Liver-first-approach-specific textbook outcome is a promising tool for measuring the quality of care when using the liver-first approach for synchronous colorectal liver metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José M Ramia
- Department of Surgery, Hospital General Universitario Dr. Balmis, ISABIAL, Universidad Miguel Hernandez, Alicante, Spain
| | - Celia Villodre-Tudela
- Department of Surgery, Hospital General Universitario Dr. Balmis, ISABIAL, Alicante, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Mario Serradilla-Martín
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Aragón, Department of Surgery, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain
| |
Collapse
|