Cytopathology of Chondromyxoid Fibroma: Report of 2 Cases with Immunocytochemical Expression of GRM1

INTRODUCTION

Chondromyxoid fibroma (CMF) is a rare, benign bone tumor that occurs predominantly in the second and third decades of life, more frequently in males. Overexpression of GRM1 as a consequence of tumor-specific gene rearrangement of GRM1 has recently been reported as a useful immunohistochemical marker for histopathological diagnosis of CMF. However, the usefulness of GRM1 staining of cytology specimens has not yet been evaluated. In this report, the cytological findings and GRM1 immunocytochemistry of two cases of CMF are described.

CASE PRESENTATIONS

Case 1 was a 15-year-old girl with a rib tumor. Imaging findings suggested a benign neurogenic tumor such as schwannoma. The tumor had increased in size over a 2-year period and was resected. Case 2 was a 14-year-old boy with a metatarsal tumor involving his left first toe. Imaging findings were suspicious of a benign neoplastic lesion. Biopsy findings suggested a benign tumor, and the patient underwent tumor resection. Cytologically, in both cases the tumor cells were predominantly spindle-shaped or stellate, with a myxoid to chondromyxoid background matrix and multinucleated giant cells, and these matrices were metachromatic with Giemsa staining. Cellular atypia was more accentuated in case 2 than in case 1. Immunocytochemical staining for GRM1 was positive in both cases.

CONCLUSION

Due to the overlap in cytological findings, it is often difficult to differentiate CMF from chondroblastoma and chondrosarcoma grade 2. Immunocytochemical staining for GRM1 may support the diagnosis of CMF, and the reuse of Papanicolaou-stained specimens is applicable. The present cases further demonstrated the difficulty of differentiating CMF from other mimicking tumors such as chondroblastoma and chondrosarcoma grade 2. In such instances, immunocytochemistry for GRM1 is applicable to the diagnostic process, the value of which is strengthened by reusing Papanicolaou-stained specimens.

High-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma with YWHAE-NUTM2B fusion gene abnormality identified after 10 years of recurrent pulmonary metastases: A case report

•Endometrial stromal sarcoma is the second most common type of uterine sarcoma.•Endometrial stromal sarcoma has undergone modifications since its proposal.•This case highlights the importance of accurately diagnosing endometrial stromal sarcoma.•Asymptomatic uterine fibroids may not be treated with therapeutic intervention or prompt regular check-ups.

Cytological features of BCOR-CCNB3 sarcoma: Comparison with Ewing sarcoma and synovial sarcoma

INTRODUCTION

BCOR-CCNB3 sarcoma (BCS) is one of the histological types classified as an undifferentiated small round cell sarcoma of bone and soft tissue. This sarcoma frequently develops in males under 20 years of age. Histologically, a delicate capillary network has been reported as a conspicuous finding. In this study, the cytological findings of BCS were observed in two cases of primary lesions and one case of a lung metastatic lesion. The cytological findings of BCS were compared with its histological mimics, and the characteristic findings of BCS were examined.

METHODS

Three cases of BCS were studied, and a cytological comparison was performed with 8 cases of Ewing sarcoma (ES) and 10 cases of synovial sarcoma (SS; monophasic type: 7 cases, biphasic type: 2 cases, poorly differentiated: 1 case).

RESULTS

In all BCS cases, small clusters with thin and delicate vascular cores and tiny vascular fragments were conspicuous. In ES and SS cases, although small clusters with vascular cores were observed, the vascular cores were thicker than in BCS, and no tiny vascular fragments appeared in most cases. Cytomorphological differences of tumour cells were also observed among BCS, ES, and SS. Predominantly rounded nuclei with fine chromatin and inconspicuous nucleoli can be cytological clues for BCS.

CONCLUSIONS

BCS shows characteristic cytological findings that make the diagnosis of BCS more likely than that of ES and SS. Cytological evaluation is a useful tool for appropriate differential diagnosis that leads to a more accurate final diagnosis and rapid treatment.