1
|
Behar Harpaz S, Weber M, Wade S, Ngo P, Vaneckova P, Sarich P, Cressman S, Tammemagi M, Fong K, Marshall H, McWilliams A, Zalcberg J, Caruana M, Canfell K. MA11.03 Updated Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Lung Cancer Screening for Australia, Capturing Differences in the Impact of NELSON and NLST Outcomes. J Thorac Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2022.07.137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
|
2
|
Ngo P, Karikios D, Goldsbury D, Wade S, Canfell K, Weber M. P1.08-01 Updated Costs and Survival Expectations for Stage IV Lung Cancer in Australia. J Thorac Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2022.07.175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
3
|
Vujovich-Dunn C, Wand H, Brotherton JML, Gidding H, Sisnowski J, Lorch R, Veitch M, Sheppeard V, Effler P, Skinner SR, Venn A, Davies C, Hocking J, Whop L, Leask J, Canfell K, Sanci L, Smith M, Kang M, Temple-Smith M, Kidd M, Burns S, Selvey L, Meijer D, Ennis S, Thomson C, Lane N, Kaldor J, Guy R. Measuring school level attributable risk to support school-based HPV vaccination programs. BMC Public Health 2022; 22:822. [PMID: 35468743 PMCID: PMC9036743 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-13088-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2021] [Accepted: 03/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In Australia in 2017, 89% of 15-year-old females and 86% of 15-year-old males had received at least one dose of the HPV vaccine. However, considerable variation in HPV vaccination initiation (dose one) across schools remains. It is important to understand the school-level characteristics most strongly associated with low initiation and their contribution to the overall between-school variation. Methods A population-based ecological analysis was conducted using school-level data for 2016 on all adolescent students eligible for HPV vaccination in three Australian jurisdictions. We conducted logistic regression to determine school-level factors associated with lower HPV vaccination initiation (< 75% dose 1 uptake) and estimated the population attributable risk (PAR) and the proportion of schools with the factor (school-level prevalence). Results The factors most strongly associated with lower initiation, and their prevalence were; small schools (OR = 9.3, 95%CI = 6.1–14.1; 33% of schools), special education schools (OR = 5.6,95%CI = 3.7–8.5; 8% of schools), higher Indigenous enrolments (OR = 2.7,95% CI:1.9–3.7; 31% of schools), lower attendance rates (OR = 2.6,95%CI = 1.7–3.7; 35% of schools), remote location (OR = 2.6,95%CI = 1.6–4.3; 6% of schools,) and lower socioeconomic area (OR = 1.8,95% CI = 1.3–2.5; 33% of schools). The highest PARs were small schools (PAR = 79%, 95%CI:76–82), higher Indigenous enrolments (PAR = 38%, 95%CI: 31–44) and lower attendance rate (PAR = 37%, 95%CI: 29–46). Conclusion This analysis suggests that initiatives to support schools that are smaller, with a higher proportion of Indigenous adolescents and lower attendance rates may contribute most to reducing the variation of HPV vaccination uptake observed at a school-level in these jurisdictions. Estimating population-level coverage at the school-level is useful to guide policy and prioritise resourcing to support school-based vaccination programs. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-13088-x.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Vujovich-Dunn
- University of New South Wales, Kirby Institute, Kensington, Australia.
| | - H Wand
- University of New South Wales, Kirby Institute, Kensington, Australia
| | - J M L Brotherton
- Australian Centre for the Prevention of Cervical Cancer, Population Health, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,University of Melbourne, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Carlton, VIC, Australia
| | - H Gidding
- University of Sydney, Northern Clinical School, Sydney, Australia.,Women and Babies Research, Kolling Institute, Northern Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia.,School of Population Health, University of New South Wales, Kensington, Australia.,National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance, Sydney, Australia
| | - J Sisnowski
- University of New South Wales, Kirby Institute, Kensington, Australia.,Australian National University, National Centre for Epidemiology & Population Health, Canberra, Australia
| | - R Lorch
- University of New South Wales, Kirby Institute, Kensington, Australia
| | - M Veitch
- Department of Health and Human Services, Tasmanian Government, Hobart, Australia
| | - V Sheppeard
- Communicable Diseases Branch, NSW Health, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia.,University of Sydney, Sydney School of Public Health, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - P Effler
- Communicable Disease Control Directorate, Department of Health, Western Australia, East Perth, Australia
| | - S R Skinner
- University of Sydney, Specialty of Child and Adolescent Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, Australia.,Children's Hospital Westmead, Sydney Children's Hospitals Network, Westmead, Australia
| | - A Venn
- Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Tasmanian, Australia
| | - C Davies
- University of Sydney, Specialty of Child and Adolescent Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, Australia.,Children's Hospital Westmead, Sydney Children's Hospitals Network, Westmead, Australia
| | - J Hocking
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Carlton, VIC, Australia
| | - L Whop
- Australian National University, National Centre for Epidemiology & Population Health, Canberra, Australia.,Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Cairns, QLD, Australia
| | - J Leask
- National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance, Sydney, Australia.,University of Sydney, Sydney Nursing School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - K Canfell
- The Daffodil Centre, University of Sydney, A Joint Venture With Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia
| | - L Sanci
- University of Melbourne, Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, Carlton, VIC, Australia
| | - M Smith
- The Daffodil Centre, University of Sydney, A Joint Venture With Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia.,School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - M Kang
- University of Sydney, Westmead Clinical School, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - M Temple-Smith
- University of Melbourne, Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, Carlton, VIC, Australia
| | - M Kidd
- Flinders University, Southgate Institute for Health, Society and Equity, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia
| | - S Burns
- Curtin University, School of Population Health, Bentley, WA, Australia
| | - L Selvey
- University of Queensland, School of Public Health, St Lucia, QLD, Australia
| | - D Meijer
- Immunisation Unit, Health Protection NSW, St Leonard's, New South Wales, Australia
| | - S Ennis
- Immunisation Unit, Health Protection NSW, St Leonard's, New South Wales, Australia
| | - C Thomson
- Communicable Disease Control Directorate, Department of Health, Western Australia, East Perth, Australia
| | - N Lane
- Department of Health and Human Services, Tasmanian Government, Hobart, Australia
| | - J Kaldor
- University of New South Wales, Kirby Institute, Kensington, Australia
| | - R Guy
- University of New South Wales, Kirby Institute, Kensington, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tammemagi M, Myers R, Ruparel M, Tremblay A, Atkar-Khattra S, Marshall H, Brims F, Mcwilliams A, Fogarty P, Stone E, Manser R, Canfell K, Lim K, Rosell A, Weber M, Yee J, Mayo J, Berg C, Lam D, Janes S, Fong K, Lam S. OA19.01 Prospective Study of Lung Cancer Screening Criteria: USPSTF2013 vs PLCOm2012 – International Lung Screening Trial (ILST) Results. J Thorac Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2021.08.097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
5
|
Sisnowski J, Vujovich-Dunn C, Gidding H, Brotherton J, Wand H, Lorch R, Veitch M, Sheppeard V, Effler P, Skinner SR, Venn A, Davies C, Hocking J, Whop L, Leask J, Canfell K, Sanci L, Smith M, Kang M, Temple-Smith M, Kidd M, Burns S, Selvey L, Meijer D, Ennis S, Thomson C, Lane N, Kaldor J, Guy R. Differences in school factors associated with adolescent HPV vaccination initiation and completion coverage in three Australian states. Vaccine 2021; 39:6117-6126. [PMID: 34493408 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.08.076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2021] [Revised: 08/19/2021] [Accepted: 08/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Schools are the primary setting for the delivery of adolescent HPV vaccination in Australia. Although this strategy has achieved generally high vaccination coverage, gaps persist for reasons that are mostly unknown. This study sought to identify school-level correlates of low vaccination course initiation and completion in New South Wales, Tasmania, and Western Australia to inform initiatives to increase uptake. METHODS Initiation was defined as the number of first doses given in a school in 2016 divided by vaccine-eligible student enrolments. Completion was the number of third doses given in a school in 2015-2016 divided by the number of first doses. Low initiation and completion were defined as coverage ≤ 25thpercentile of all reporting schools. We investigated correlations between covariates using Spearman's rank correlation coefficients. Due to multicollinearity, we used univariable logistic regression to investigate associations between school characteristics and low coverage. RESULTS Median initiation was 84.7% (IQR: 75.0%-90.4%) across 1,286 schools and median completion was 93.8% (IQR: 86.0%-97.3%) across 1,295 schools. There were strong correlations between a number of school characteristics, particularly higher Indigenous student enrolments and lower attendance, increasing remoteness, higher postcode socioeconomic disadvantage, and smaller school size. Characteristics most strongly associated with low initiation in univariate analyses were small school size, location in Tasmania, and schools catering for special educational needs. Low completion was most strongly associated with schools in Tasmania and Western Australia, remote location, small size, high proportion of Indigenous student enrolments, and low attendance rates. CONCLUSION This study provides indicative evidence that characteristics of schools and school populations are associated with the likelihood of low initiation and completion of the HPV vaccination course. The findings will guide further research and help target initiatives to improve vaccination uptake in schools with profiles associated with lower coverage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Sisnowski
- The Kirby Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Wallace Wurth Building, High St., Kensington, New South Wales, Australia; Australian National University, National Centre for Epidemiology & Population Health, Canberra, Australia.
| | - C Vujovich-Dunn
- The Kirby Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Wallace Wurth Building, High St., Kensington, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - H Gidding
- University of New South Wales, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Kensington, Australia; National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance, Westmead, Australia; The University of Sydney Northern Clinical School, St Leonards, Australia.
| | - J Brotherton
- Population Health, VCS Foundation, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; University of Melbourne, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.
| | - H Wand
- The Kirby Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Wallace Wurth Building, High St., Kensington, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - R Lorch
- The Kirby Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Wallace Wurth Building, High St., Kensington, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - M Veitch
- Tasmanian Government, Department of Health and Human Services, Hobart, Australia.
| | - V Sheppeard
- Communicable Diseases Branch, Health Protection NSW, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia; University of Sydney, Sydney School of Public Health, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - P Effler
- Communicable Disease Control Directorate, Department of Health, Western Australia, East Perth, Australia.
| | - S R Skinner
- Children's Hospital Westmead, Sydney Children's Hospitals Network, Westmead, Australia; University of Sydney, Specialty of Child and Adolescent Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - A Venn
- Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Tasmanian, Australia.
| | - C Davies
- Children's Hospital Westmead, Sydney Children's Hospitals Network, Westmead, Australia; University of Sydney, Specialty of Child and Adolescent Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - J Hocking
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.
| | - L Whop
- Australian National University, National Centre for Epidemiology & Population Health, Canberra, Australia; Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Cairns, Queensland, Australia.
| | - J Leask
- National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance, Westmead, Australia; University of Sydney, Sydney Nursing School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - K Canfell
- Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - L Sanci
- University of Melbourne, Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.
| | - M Smith
- Communicable Disease Control Directorate, Department of Health, Western Australia, East Perth, Australia; Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - M Kang
- University of Sydney, Westmead Clinical School, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - M Temple-Smith
- University of Melbourne, Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.
| | - M Kidd
- Flinders University, Southgate Institute for Health, Society and Equity, South Australia, Australia.
| | - S Burns
- Curtin University, School of Population Health, Western Australia, Australia.
| | - L Selvey
- University of Queensland, School of Public Health, Queensland, Australia.
| | - D Meijer
- Immunisation Unit, Health Protection NSW, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - S Ennis
- Immunisation Unit, Health Protection NSW, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - C Thomson
- Communicable Disease Control Directorate, Department of Health, Western Australia, East Perth, Australia.
| | - N Lane
- Tasmanian Government, Department of Health and Human Services, Hobart, Australia.
| | - J Kaldor
- The Kirby Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Wallace Wurth Building, High St., Kensington, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - R Guy
- The Kirby Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Wallace Wurth Building, High St., Kensington, New South Wales, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
So C, Cust AE, Gordon LG, Morton RL, Canfell K, Ngo P, Dieng M, McLoughlin K, Watts C. Health utilities for non-melanoma skin cancers and pre-cancerous lesions: A systematic review. Skin Health Dis 2021; 1:e51. [PMID: 35663144 PMCID: PMC9060093 DOI: 10.1002/ski2.51] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2021] [Revised: 05/20/2021] [Accepted: 05/22/2021] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSCs) are common and consume many healthcare resources. A health utility is a single preference-based value for assessing health-related quality of life, which can be used in economic evaluations. There are scarce data on health utilities for NMSCs. OBJECTIVES Using a systematic review approach, we synthesized the current data on NMSC-related health utilities. METHODS A systematic review of studies of NMSC-related health utilities was conducted in Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Data were extracted based on the protocol and a quality assessment was performed for each study. RESULTS The protocol resulted in 16 studies, involving 121 621 participants. Mean utility values across the studies ranged from 0.56 to 1 for undifferentiated NMSC, 0.84 to 1 for actinic keratosis, 0.45 to 1 for squamous cell carcinoma, and 0.67 to 1 for basal cell carcinoma. There was considerable variability in utilities by type of cancer, stage of diagnosis, time to treatment, treatment modality, and quality of life instrument or method. Utility values were predominantly based on the EuroQol 5-dimension instrument and ranged from 0.45 to 0.96, while other measurement methods produced values ranging from 0.67 to 1. Lower utility values were observed for advanced cancers and for the time period during and immediately after treatment, after which values gradually returned to pre-treatment levels. CONCLUSIONS Most utility values clustered around relatively high values of 0.8 to 1, suggesting small decrements in quality of life associated with most NMSCs and their precursors. Variability in utilities indicates that careful characterization is required for measures to be used in economic evaluations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C. So
- Sydney School of Public HealthFaculty of Medicine and Health, The University of SydneySydneyAustralia
| | - A. E. Cust
- The Daffodil CentreThe University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSWSydneyAustralia
- Melanoma Institute AustraliaThe University of SydneySydneyAustralia
| | - L. G. Gordon
- Population Health DepartmentQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Royal Brisbane HospitalBrisbaneAustralia
- School of NursingQueensland University of Technology (QUT)BrisbaneAustralia
- School of MedicineThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia
| | - R. L. Morton
- Faculty of Medicine and HealthNHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, The University of SydneySydneyAustralia
| | - K. Canfell
- The Daffodil CentreThe University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSWSydneyAustralia
| | - P. Ngo
- The Daffodil CentreThe University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSWSydneyAustralia
| | - M. Dieng
- Faculty of Medicine and HealthNHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, The University of SydneySydneyAustralia
| | - K. McLoughlin
- The Daffodil CentreThe University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSWSydneyAustralia
| | - C. Watts
- The Daffodil CentreThe University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSWSydneyAustralia
- Kirby InstituteThe University of New South WalesSydneyAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Davies-Oliveira JC, Smith MA, Grover S, Canfell K, Crosbie EJ. Eliminating Cervical Cancer: Progress and Challenges for High-income Countries. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2021; 33:550-559. [PMID: 34315640 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2021.06.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2021] [Revised: 06/21/2021] [Accepted: 06/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
In 2020, the World Health Organization launched a major initiative to eliminate cervical cancer globally. The initiative is built around the three key pillars of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination, cervical screening and treatment, with associated intervention targets for the year 2030. The '90-70-90' targets specify that 90% of adolescent girls receive prophylactic HPV vaccination, 70% of adult women receive a minimum twice-in-a-lifetime cervical HPV test and 90% receive appropriate treatment for preinvasive or invasive disease. Modelling has shown that if these targets are met, the elimination of cervical cancer, defined as fewer than four cases per 100 000 women per annum, will be achieved within a century. Many high-income countries are well positioned to eliminate cervical cancer within the coming decades, but few have achieved '90-70-90' and many challenges must still be addressed to deliver these critical interventions effectively. This review considers the current status of cervical cancer control in relation to each of the three elimination pillars in high-income countries and discusses some of the developments that will assist countries in reaching these ambitious targets by 2030.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J C Davies-Oliveira
- Gynaecological Oncology Research Group, Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester, UK; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - M A Smith
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - S Grover
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - K Canfell
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - E J Crosbie
- Gynaecological Oncology Research Group, Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester, UK; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Acuti Martellucci C, Nomura S, Yoneoka D, Ueda P, Brotherton J, Canfell K, Palmer M, Manzoli L, Giorgi Rossi P, De Togni A, Palmonari C, Califano A, Saito E, Hashizume M, Shibuya K. Human papillomavirus vaccine effectiveness within a cervical cancer screening programme: cohort study. BJOG 2020; 128:532-539. [PMID: 32779381 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the effectiveness of an HPV vaccination programme in reducing the risk of cervical abnormalities identified at subsequent screening. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study using administrative health data. SETTING General population of Ferrara Province, Italy. POPULATION Female residents born in 1986-1993 and participating in the organized cervical screening programme in 2011-2018, who were eligible for HPV vaccination in catch-up cohorts. METHODS Logistic regression to evaluate the potential association between abnormal cervical cytology and one, two, three or at least one dose of HPV vaccine. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Cervical abnormalities, as predicted by low-grade or high-grade cytology, by number of vaccine doses, stratified by age. RESULTS The sample consisted of 7785 women (mean age 27.5 years, SD 2.3). Overall, 391 (5.0%) were vaccinated with ≥1 dose and 893 (11.5%) had abnormal cytology. Women receiving at least one vaccine dose were significantly less likely to have an abnormal cytology (adjusted odds ratio 0.52; 95% confidence interval 0.34-0.79). Similar results were observed for women receiving a single dose, for both bivalent and quadrivalent vaccines, and applying buffer periods (excluding cytological outcomes within 1 month, 6 months and 1 year of the first dose). CONCLUSIONS In the context of an organised cervical screening programme in Italy, catch-up HPV vaccination almost halved the risk of cytological abnormalities. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT Among Ferrara women, vaccination against human papillomavirus halved the risk of screening cervical abnormalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Acuti Martellucci
- Department of Global Health Policy, School of International Health, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo City, Tokyo, Japan
| | - S Nomura
- Department of Global Health Policy, School of International Health, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo City, Tokyo, Japan
| | - D Yoneoka
- Department of Global Health Policy, School of International Health, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo City, Tokyo, Japan.,Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Graduate School of Public Health, St. Luke's International University, Chuo City, Tokyo, Japan
| | - P Ueda
- Department of Global Health Policy, School of International Health, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo City, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jml Brotherton
- VCS Foundation, Carlton, VIC, Australia.,Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC, Australia
| | - K Canfell
- Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Woolloomooloo, NSW, Australia.,Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - M Palmer
- Department of Global Health Policy, School of International Health, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo City, Tokyo, Japan.,Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC, Australia
| | - L Manzoli
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - P Giorgi Rossi
- Epidemiology Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - A De Togni
- Epidemiology and Public Health Department, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - C Palmonari
- Epidemiology and Public Health Department, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - A Califano
- Epidemiology and Public Health Department, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - E Saito
- Division of Cancer Statistics Integration, Centre for Cancer Control and Information Services, National Cancer Center, Chuo City, Tokyo, Japan
| | - M Hashizume
- Department of Global Health Policy, School of International Health, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo City, Tokyo, Japan
| | - K Shibuya
- Department of Global Health Policy, School of International Health, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo City, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Worthington J, Feletto E, Lew J, Broun K, Durkin S, Wakefield M, Grogan P, Harper T, Canfell K. Evaluating health benefits and cost-effectiveness of a mass-media campaign for improving participation in the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program in Australia. Public Health 2020; 179:90-99. [DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2019.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2019] [Revised: 09/27/2019] [Accepted: 10/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
|
10
|
Feletto E, Grogan P, Vassallo A, Canfell K. Cancer costs and gender: a snapshot of issues, trends, and opportunities to reduce inequities using Australia as an example. Climacteric 2019; 22:538-543. [PMID: 31378097 DOI: 10.1080/13697137.2019.1642319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
As the cancer burden increases, so too does the cost, to health systems, economies, and individuals. There is increasing interest in productivity and out-of-pocket costs for individuals and their carers, but these remain poorly understood. The costs of cancer in women, often carers themselves, are less understood. This summary analysis explored data on the cancer burden in Australia (and health costs in comparable countries), including expenditure reports and literature on macroeconomic outcomes and out-of-pocket costs, to highlight the cost impacts of a cancer diagnosis in women, at a societal and an individual level. Data on productivity costs were skewed toward men, as men are over-represented in paid work compared with women. Data on societal and individual costs of cancer in women were scant, yet the predominance of women in unpaid work suggests the cost is significant. Evidence for the benefits of cancer prevention and early detection suggests that improved targeting of interventions to women would reduce costs at a societal and an individual level. More research is needed on the specific impacts of cancer on women and those they care for, to better target public health and support services to need.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Feletto
- Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council New South Wales , Kings Cross , Sydney NSW , Australia
| | - P Grogan
- Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council New South Wales , Kings Cross , Sydney NSW , Australia.,Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney , Sydney , NSW , Australia
| | - A Vassallo
- Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council New South Wales , Kings Cross , Sydney NSW , Australia
| | - K Canfell
- Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council New South Wales , Kings Cross , Sydney NSW , Australia.,Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney , Sydney , NSW , Australia.,Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales , Sydney , NSW , Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Velentzis LS, Brotherton JML, Canfell K. Recurrent disease after treatment for cervical pre-cancer: determining whether prophylactic HPV vaccination could play a role in prevention of secondary lesions. Climacteric 2019; 22:596-602. [PMID: 31030590 DOI: 10.1080/13697137.2019.1600500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Existing modalities can effectively treat high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) but around 7% of treated women will develop recurrence of CIN grade 2 or above within 2 years of treatment. Post-treatment surveillance is therefore required to detect residual or recurrent disease. Since the implementation of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination programs in high-income countries, significant reductions in high-grade CIN have been recorded in vaccinated cohorts who were predominantly HPV-naïve at vaccination. There is still debate as to the extent of potential benefit from vaccination for women previously infected with HPV, given that HPV incidence in women falls with age and previously cleared infection provides at least some protection against reinfection. Whilst vaccination-induced antibodies could prevent type-specific new infections, it is unclear whether vaccination could also prevent reactivation of latent, previously acquired infection and subsequent disease. A review of the available evidence suggests a potential reduction in risk of recurrent disease if women diagnosed and treated for CIN are offered prophylactic vaccines. New modeled analyses and, ideally, a prospectively designed randomized controlled trial in women treated and then randomized to vaccination or placebo would provide much-needed additional evidence to support the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of offering vaccination to women after treatment for CIN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L S Velentzis
- Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW , Sydney , NSW , Australia.,Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne , Melbourne , VIC , Australia
| | - J M L Brotherton
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne , Melbourne , VIC , Australia.,VCS Population Health, VCS Foundation , Carlton , VIC , Australia
| | - K Canfell
- Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW , Sydney , NSW , Australia.,School of Public Health, University of Sydney , Sydney , NSW , Australia.,Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales , Sydney , NSW , Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Laaksonen M, Arriaga M, Canfell K, MacInnis R, Hull P, Banks E, Giles G, Mitchell P, Cumming R, Byles J, Magliano D, Shaw J, Taylor A, Gill T, Hirani V, Marker J, McCullough S, Velentzis L, Adelstein BA, Vajdic C. Future Burden of Cancer Attributable to Current Modifiable Behaviours: A Pooled Study of Seven Australian Cohorts. J Glob Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1200/jgo.18.18500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The Population Attributable Fraction (PAF) quantifies the fraction of cancer cases attributable to specific exposures. PAF estimates for the future burden of cancer preventable through modifications to current exposure distributions are lacking. Previous PAF studies have also not compared population subgroup differences. Aim: To apply a novel PAF method and i) assess the future burden of cancer in Australia preventable through modifications to current behaviors, and ii) compare the distribution of the preventable cancer burden between population subgroups. Methods: We harmonized and pooled data from seven Australian cohort studies (N=367058) and linked them to national registries to identify cancers and deaths. We estimated the strength of the associations between behaviors and cancer incidence and death using a proportional hazards model, adjusting for age, sex, study and other risk factors. Exposure prevalence was estimated from contemporary national health surveys. We then combined these estimates to calculate PAFs and their 95% confidence intervals for both individual and joint behavior modifications using a novel method accounting for competing risk of death and risk factor interdependence. We also compared PAFs between population subgroups by calculating the 95% confidence interval of the difference in PAF estimates. Results: During the first 10 years of follow-up, there were 22078 deaths and 27483 incident cancers, including 2025 lung, 3471 colorectal, 640 premenopausal and 2632 postmenopausal breast cancers. The leading preventable cause for lung cancer is current smoking (PAF = 53.7%), for colorectal and postmenopausal breast cancer body fatness or BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 (PAF = 11.1% and 10.9% respectively), and for premenopausal breast cancer regular alcohol intake (PAF = 12.3%). Three in five lung cancers, but only one in five colorectal and breast cancers, are jointly attributable to potentially modifiable exposures, which also included physical inactivity and inadequate fruit intake for lung, excessive alcohol intake and current smoking for colorectal, regular alcohol intake and current menopausal hormone therapy for 1 year or more for postmenopausal breast and current oral contraceptive use for 5 years or more for premenopausal breast cancer. The cancer burden attributable to modifiable factors is markedly higher in certain population subgroups, including men (lung, colorectal), people with risk factor clustering (lung, colorectal, breast), and individuals with low educational attainment (lung, breast). Conclusion: We provided up-to-date estimates of the future Australian cancer burden attributable to modifiable risk factors, and identified population subgroups that experience the highest preventable burden. Application of the novel PAF method can inform timely public health action to improve health and health equity, by identifying those with the most to gain from programs that support behavior change and early detection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - M.E. Arriaga
- University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | | | | | - P. Hull
- University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - E. Banks
- Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | - G.G. Giles
- Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | | | - J.E. Byles
- University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia
| | - D.J. Magliano
- Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Australia
| | - J.E. Shaw
- Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - T.K. Gill
- University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - V. Hirani
- University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - J. Marker
- Cancer Voices South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | | | | | | | - C.M. Vajdic
- University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Affiliation(s)
- K. Canfell
- Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Sydney Medical School, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, UNSW Australia, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Greuter MJ, Lew JB, Berkhof J, Canfell K, Dekker E, Meijer GA, Coupe VM. Long-Term Impact of the Dutch Colorectal Cancer Screening Programme on Cancer Incidence: Exploration of the Serrated Pathway. Value Health 2014; 17:A323. [PMID: 27200528 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.08.565] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- M J Greuter
- VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J B Lew
- University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - J Berkhof
- VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - K Canfell
- University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - E Dekker
- Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - G A Meijer
- VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - V M Coupe
- VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Canfell K, Gray W, Snijders P, Murray C, Tipper S, Drinkwater K, Beral V. Factors predicting successful DNA recovery from archival cervical smear samples. Cytopathology 2004; 15:276-82. [PMID: 15456416 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.2004.00164.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based DNA testing of archival cervical smear slides is a useful method of retrospectively establishing the presence of the human papillomavirus (HPV) in cervical cells. A cellular DNA recovery test is performed in parallel to HPV DNA testing to ensure that sufficient cells are present and purification of sample DNA has been successfully performed. Previous studies have not comprehensively assessed DNA recovery rates in slides older than 13 years. We undertook a study to determine the factors impacting DNA recovery in 436 UK slides dating from 11 to 33 years prior to testing. Overall, a low cellular DNA recovery success rate of 29% was obtained but a strong trend was observed with increasing recovery rates the older the slides (P < 0.001). Recovery rates increased from 22% in the most recent slides collected from 1988 to 1992, to 61% in the oldest slides, collected in 1970-72. It is likely that fixation compounds incorporating acetic acid, introduced in the UK through the 1980s, have compromised subsequent attempts at PCR amplification. These findings emphasize the importance of the original fixation method in the success of DNA recovery from archival smear samples.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Canfell
- Polartechnics, Sydney, NSW 2011, Australia.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Abstract
In 2003, the National Health Service Cervical Screening Programme (NHSCSP) announced that its screening interval would be reduced to 3 years in women aged 25–49 and fixed at 5 years in those aged 50–64, and that women under 25 years will no longer be invited for screening. In order to assess these and possible further changes to cervical screening practice in the UK, we constructed a mathematical model of cervical HPV infection, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and invasive cervical cancer, and of UK age-specific screening coverage rates, screening intervals and treatment efficacy. The predicted cumulative lifetime incidence of invasive cervical cancer in the UK is 1.70% in the absence of screening and 0.77% with pre-2003 screening practice. A reduction in lifetime incidence to 0.63% is predicted following the implementation of the 2003 NHSCSP recommendations, which represents a 63% reduction compared to incidence rates in the UK population if it were unscreened. The model suggests that, after the implementation of the 2003 recommendations, increasing the sensitivity of the screening test regime from its current average value of 56 to 90% would further reduce the cumulative lifetime incidence of invasive cervical cancer to 0.46%. Alternatively, extending screening to women aged 65–79 years would further reduce the lifetime incidence to 0.56%. Screening women aged 20–25 years would have minimal impact, with the cumulative lifetime incidence decreasing from 0.63 to 0.61%. In conclusion, the study supports the 2003 recommendations for changes to cervical screening intervals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Canfell
- Cancer Research UK Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Gibson Building, Radcliffe Infirmary, OX2 6HE, UK
| | - R Barnabas
- Cancer Research UK Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Gibson Building, Radcliffe Infirmary, OX2 6HE, UK
- Cancer Research UK Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Gibson Building, Radcliffe Infirmary, OX2 6HE, UK. E-mail:
| | - J Patnick
- Director, NHS Cancer Screening Programmes, The Manor House, 260 Ecclesall Road South, Sheffield, S11 9PS, UK
| | - V Beral
- Cancer Research UK Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Gibson Building, Radcliffe Infirmary, OX2 6HE, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Singer A, Coppleson M, Canfell K, Skladnev V, Mackellar G, Pisal N, Deery A. A real time optoelectronic device as an adjunct to the Pap smear for cervical screening: A multicenter evaluation. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2003; 13:804-11. [PMID: 14675317 DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2003.13393.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022] Open
Abstract
We report on the results from a multicenter trial for a real time optoelectronic device as an adjunct to the Pap smear for cervical screening. TruScreen (Polartechnics Limited, Sydney, Australia) is an automated device which measures the response to optical and electrical stimulation of the cervix and returns a screening result in real time. Analysis was performed on a group of 651 subjects recruited at 10 centers. Cytology and histology analyses were performed by centralized laboratories, with the cytology classification performed according to the Bethesda 2001 system. The sensitivities for histologically confirmed CIN 2/3 lesions by TruScreen, Pap, and TruScreen/Pap combined were 70% (95% CI: 67-74), 69% (CI: 65-72), and 93% (CI: 91-95), respectively. For histologically reported CIN 1, the sensitivities of the TruScreen, Pap, and combined test were 67% (CI: 63-70), 45% (CI: 41-49), and 87% (CI: 84-89). The improvement in sensitivity for the combined test compared to the Pap smear alone was significant (P = 0.002). Because TruScreen and cytology detect partly different but overlapping groups of CIN cases, the adjunctive combination provides very high CIN detection rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Singer
- Department of Gynaecology, The Whittington Hospital, London, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Singer A, Coppleson M, Canfell K, Skladnev V, Mackellar G, Pisal N, Deery A. A real time optoelectronic device as an adjunct to the Pap smear for cervical screening: A multicenter evaluation. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2003. [DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-00009577-200311000-00011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
We report on the results from a multicenter trial for a real time optoelectronic device as an adjunct to the Pap smear for cervical screening. TruScreen (Polartechnics Limited, Sydney, Australia) is an automated device which measures the response to optical and electrical stimulation of the cervix and returns a screening result in real time. Analysis was performed on a group of 651 subjects recruited at 10 centers. Cytology and histology analyses were performed by centralized laboratories, with the cytology classification performed according to the Bethesda 2001 system. The sensitivities for histologically confirmed CIN 2/3 lesions by TruScreen, Pap, and TruScreen/Pap combined were 70% (95% CI: 67–74), 69% (CI: 65–72), and 93% (CI: 91–95), respectively. For histologically reported CIN 1, the sensitivities of the TruScreen, Pap, and combined test were 67% (CI: 63–70), 45% (CI: 41–49), and 87% (CI: 84–89). The improvement in sensitivity for the combined test compared to the Pap smear alone was significant (P = 0.002). Because TruScreen and cytology detect partly different but overlapping groups of CIN cases, the adjunctive combination provides very high CIN detection rates.
Collapse
|
19
|
Quek SC, Mould T, Canfell K, Singer A, Skladnev V, Coppleson M. The Polarprobe--emerging technology for cervical cancer screening. Ann Acad Med Singap 1998; 27:717-21. [PMID: 9919348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/10/2023]
Abstract
The Polarprobe is a portable non invasive electronic device designed for the detection of cervical precancer and cancer. It measures both electrical and optical properties of cervical tissue to allow a real time comparison with a databank of previously determined cervical tissue types. The need for additional tests to augment or even replace the Papanicolaou smear has partly prompted its development. Indeed it has been shown to be associated with less pain and anxiety than the smear and has the capability of encouraging women to attend for screening. Some of the preliminary clinical trials on the Polarprobe are reported as well as the ongoing developments and modifications to the device.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S C Quek
- Department of Gynaecology, Whittington Hospital, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|