Treatment of high risk prostate cancer with combined radiotherapy and hormonal treatment- results and identification of factors influencing outcome

PURPOSE

The aim of this work was to prospectively analyze the outcome of combined hormonal treatment and radical radiotherapy in high risk non metastatic prostate cancer patients (T1=4, N0-1, M0).

METHODS

Between April 2003 and December 2007 196 patients with high risk prostate cancer were treated with curative intent. The treatment consisted of 2-month neoadjuvant hormonal treatment (LHRH analog), radical radiotherapy (68-78 Gy, conformal technique) and an optional 2-year adjuvant hormonal treatment.

RESULTS

The median follow up time was 59 months. Fiveyear overall survival was 86% and 5-year biochemical disease free survival (DFS) 70%. Factors found to be statistically significant relative to outcomes were Gleason score (p=0.017), initial PSA value (p=0.039) and adjuvant hormonal treatment (p=0.035). There was no significant association between radiotherapy dose or volume and biochemical DFS (bDFS). Late genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity was acceptable.

CONCLUSION

Treatment combining hormonal therapy and radical radiotherapy can be recommended for this subgroup of prostate cancer patients. Adjuvant hormonal treatment should also be used.

FDG-PET for assessment of early treatment response after four cycles of chemotherapy in patients with advanced-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma has a high negative predictive value

BACKGROUND

As positron emission tomography (PET) seems to be a powerful prognostic marker in the treatment of Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL), we analysed the prognostic value of PET after four cycles of combination therapy with bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine and prednisone (BEACOPP) in patients with advanced-stage HL.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From January 2004 to March 2007, 50 patients with newly diagnosed HL in clinical stages IIB with large mediastinal mass or extranodal disease, III and IV were treated according to the HD15 protocol of the German Hodgkin Study Group. All patients received a PET scan after four cycles of BEACOPP (PET-4).

RESULTS

Of the overall group, 14 of 50 patients had a positive PET-4 while 36 had a negative PET-4. At a median observation time of 25 months, 2 of the 14 patients with a positive PET-4 had progressed or relapsed, while there was no progression or relapse in PET-4-negative patients.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate a very good negative predictive value of PET-4 in advanced-stage HL patients treated with BEACOPP.

Prognostic impact of bone involvement in Hodgkin lymphoma

The purpose of the study is to determine incidence and prognostic impact of osseous Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). Between 1997 and 2004, 198 patients with HL were treated at our institution. Advanced stages and nodular sclerosis histology prevailed. All patients were treated according to protocols of the German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG). After minimum follow-up of 24 months, we retrospectively analyzed the incidence of osseous HL, treatment response and parameters of survival. We recorded 14 cases of osseous HL (7 %), always with concurrent nodal disease. Axial skeleton was most frequently involved. Eleven patients (78,5 %) achieved complete remission and three (21,5 %) progressed primarily. The patients with osseous HL had significantly lower 2-year freedom from treatment failure than the patients without bone involvement (71,4 and 92,7 %, respectively, p=0,004), with no significant difference in 2-year overall survival (85,7 and 95 %, respectively, p=0,14). On multivariate analysis, advanced stage was the only independent adverse prognostic factor. In conclusion, bone involvement is a relatively common finding in HL and is not an independent adverse prognostic factor.