Improved method robustness and ruggedness in liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry by increasing the acid content of the mobile phase

A routine multiresidue method developed for the detection and quantification of veterinary drug residues in animal-based food was used to analyze sheep (ovine) liver. Unlike when working with previously validated matrices (e.g., bovine liver), some of the analytes of interest chromatographed in the form of split- or even fully baseline separated peaks. In other cases a significantly longer retention times (tR) was observed. A detailed investigation led to the elucidation of taurocholic acid as the causative agent. This compound is present in sheep liver at significantly higher concentrations than in most other animal tissues. Taurocholic acid is a zwitterionic compound and likely acts as an ion pairing agent, which modifies the selectivity of the stationary phase in a highly spatial and dynamic way. Injecting smaller volumes of matrix extract or the use of a significantly higher formic acid concentration in the mobile phase reduced or even completely eliminated the peak splitting. A more detailed examination led to the observation that the problem is not restricted to this particular matrix and extraction procedure or the used stationary phase. In fact, a higher formic acid concentration (e.g., 1.0 % versus 0.1 %) significantly improves the peak shape of many analytes present in fortified matrix samples as well as in pure standard solutions. In addition, analytical column aging was observed as being slower with a higher formic acid concentration. Finally the peak shape of analytes interacting with the metallic parts along the flow path of the liquid chromatograph was also significantly improved. Use of 0.1 % acid in mobile phases is often taken for granted in LC-MS. Regardless of the stationary phase, a higher ionic strength better stabilizes the pH and reduces unwanted interactions, which ultimately improves the method robustness. Flow injection experiments often show that 0.1 % acid concentrations produce the highest analyte signals. Yet, the use of 1 % acid in the mobile phase often leads to narrower and therefore taller chromatographic peaks, which may lead to lower detection limits for many analytes and to an improved separation efficiency.

Optimized multimatrix calibration concept for liquid chromatography mass spectrometry-based bioanalysis methods

In this paper, a calibration procedure for LC/MS-based bioanalysis methods, termed "A/B fortification", is proposed. The concept relies on the post-extraction fortification (B-spike) of an aliquot of the injection-ready sample extract for the determination and compensation of specific signal suppression or enhancement effects compared to matrix-free extract prepared in buffer or mobile phase. Conventional analyte recovery, observed due to the incomplete extraction of analytes from the sample or losses during a cleanup, is determined by the conventional pre-extraction fortification (A-spike) of a blank sample that belongs to the same type of matrix as the sample with the unknown analyte concentration. This approach permits a higher throughput than conventional sample fortification strategies. The results obtained by utilizing the A/B fortification concept were extensively compared against conventional methods (representative bank matrix fortification, sample fortification and internal standard). The proposed concept (based on the pre-fortification of a reference matrix and post-fortification of the sample) was found to be significantly less biased than internal standard-based techniques. The A/B fortification indicated a better accuracy than the sample fortification or representative blank matrix fortification approach and, most importantly, produced significantly fewer outliers. This was linked to the fact that in the case of the A/B fortification, the uncertainty of the subtraction of two peak areas (fortified minus unfortified sample) is reduced, because fortifications are not made prior to the extraction step but are made into the final injection-ready sample extract. Fortification into an injection-ready aliquot eliminates all sample processing-related differences (procedural errors), which can affect conventional sample fortification-based quantifications.

Reliability of veterinary drug residue confirmation: high resolution mass spectrometry versus tandem mass spectrometry

Confirmation of suspected residues has been a long time domain of tandem triple quadrupole mass spectrometry (QqQ). The currently most widely used confirmation strategy relies on the use of two selected reaction monitoring signals (SRM). The details of this confirmation procedure are described in detail in the Commission Decision 93/256/EC (CD). On the other hand, high resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) is nowadays increasingly used for trace analysis. Yet its utility for confirmatory purposes has not been well explored and utilized, since established confirmation strategies like the CD do not yet include rules for modern HRMS technologies. It is the focus of this paper to evaluate the likelihood of false positive and false negative confirmation results, when using a variety of HRMS based measurement modes as compared to conventional QqQ mass spectrometry. The experimental strategy relies on the chromatographic separation of a complex blank sample (bovine liver extract) and the subsequent monitoring of a number of dummy transitions respectively dummy accurate masses. The term "dummy" refers to precursor and derived product ions (based on a realistic neutral loss) whose elemental compositions (CxHyNzOdCle) were produced by a random number generator. Monitoring a large number of such hypothetical SRM's, or accurate masses inevitably produces a number of mass traces containing chromatographic peaks (false detects) which are caused by eluting matrix compounds. The number and intensity of these peaks were recorded and standardized to permit a comparison among the two employed MS technologies. QqQ performance (compounds which happen to produce a response in two SRM traces at identical retention time) was compared with a number of different HRMS(1) and HRMS(2) detection based modes. A HRMS confirmation criterion based on two full scans (an unfragmented and an all ion fragmented) was proposed. Compared to the CD criteria, a significantly lower probability of false positive and false negative findings is obtained by utilizing this criterion.

Development of an improved high resolution mass spectrometry based multi-residue method for veterinary drugs in various food matrices

Multi-residue methods for veterinary drugs or pesticides in food are increasingly often based on ultra performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) coupled to high resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS). Previous available time of flight (TOF) technologies, showing resolutions up to 15,000 full width at half maximum (FWHM), were not sufficiently selective for monitoring low residue concentrations in difficult matrices (e.g. hormones in tissue or antibiotics in honey). The approach proposed in this paper is based on a single stage Orbitrap mass spectrometer operated at 50,000 FWHM. Extracts (liver and kidney) which were produced according to a validated multi-residue method (time of flight detection based) could not be analyzed by Orbitrap because of extensive signal suppression. This required the improvement of established extraction and clean-up procedures. The introduced, more extensive deproteinzation steps and dedicated instrumental settings successfully eliminated these detrimental suppression effects. The reported method, covering more than 100 different veterinary dugs, was validated according to the EU Commission Decision 2002/657/EEC. Validated matrices include muscle, kidney, liver, fish and honey. Significantly better performance parameters (e.g. linearity, reproducibility and detection limits) were obtained when comparing the new method with the older, TOF based method. These improvements are attributed to the higher resolution (50,000 versus 12,000 FWHM) and the superior mass stability of the of the Orbitrap over the previously utilized TOF instrument.

Post-interface signal suppression, a phenomenon observed in a single-stage Orbitrap mass spectrometer coupled to an electrospray interfaced liquid chromatograph

Signal suppression is a common issue when analyzing compounds by liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS). Suppression of signals is caused by co-eluting matrix compounds and is thought to take place in the interface. This paper reports strong signal suppression effects which were observed when using a single-stage Orbitrap instrument which was coupled by an electrospray interface to a liquid chromatograph. This type of signal suppression (often the complete loss of certain analyte signal) is observed in addition to signal suppression originating in the electrospray interface. The location of where this phenomenon occurs was shown to be clearly beyond the interface region. It was suspected that not the Orbitrap cell itself, but the C-trap, which is an integral part within the Orbitrap instrument, was the probable location. Such post-interface signal suppression was observed--and could be experimentally induced--when multiply charged ions (e.g. electrospray protonated proteins) were co-eluting with the analytes. High concentrations of proteins, yet not exceeding the maximum ion capacity of the trap, can cause a complete loss of all low m/z masses. This paper describes the practical implication when analyzing heavy matrix samples and discusses strategies to reduce such detrimental effects.

Analysis of polyphosphates in fish and shrimps tissues by two different ion chromatography methods: implications on false-negative and -positive findings

Inorganic polyphosphates (di-, tri- and higher polyphosphates) can be used to treat fish, fish fillets and shrimps in order to improve their water-binding capacity. The practical relevance of this treatment is a significant gain of weight caused by the retention/uptake of water and natural juice into the fish tissues. This practice is legal; however, the use of phosphates has to be declared. The routine control testing of fish for the presence of polyphosphates, produced some results that were difficult to explain. One of the two analytical methods used determined low diphosphate concentrations in a number of untreated samples, while the other ion chromatography (IC) method did not detect them. This initiated a number of investigations: results showed that polyphosphates in fish and shrimps tissue undergo a rapid enzymatic degradation, producing the ubiquitous orthophosphate. This led to the conclusion that sensitive analytical methods are required in order to detect previous polyphosphate treatment of a sample. The polyphosphate concentrations detected by one of the analytical methods could not be explained by the degradation of endogenous high-energy nucleotides like ATP into diphosphate, but by a coeluting compound. Further investigations by LC-MS-MS proved that the substance responsible for the observed peak was inosine monophsosphate (IMP) and not as thought the inorganic diphosphate. The method producing the false-positive result was modified and both methods were ultimately able to detect polyphosphates well separated from natural nucleotides. Polyphosphates could no longer be detected (<0.5 mg kg-1) after modification of the analytical methodology. The relevance of these findings lies in the fact that similar analytical methods are employed in various control laboratories, which might lead to false interpretation of measurements.