Can we reduce excision margins for head and neck melanoma? A 12-year retrospective study

Although wide local excision is the standard treatment for primary melanoma, the surgical margin remains controversial. Melanomas of the head and neck exhibit higher recurrence rates and worse prognosis than lesions in other body locations, and their close proximity to critical anatomical and functional structures means that wide excision margins are often not feasible. Surgeons must therefore achieve a balance of oncological safety and functional and aesthetic needs. The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyse melanoma data over a 12-year period at a large skin surgery unit to identify potential differences in outcomes in patients who had reduced wide local excision margins for primary head and neck melanoma. The study would provide further evidence for the need for large randomised prospective trials to reduce excision margins for head and neck melanoma. Local cancer network data were retrospectively analysed over a period of 12 years (2008-2019). Data included site, initial stage, multidisciplinary team (MDT) meeting recommendations for excision margins and the actual wide local excision margin taken, recurrence rate, and disease-specific and absolute survival. A total of 222/305 patients (73%) had the recommended excision margin, while in 27% margins were reduced due to anatomical or functional considerations. Recurrence rates were similar (recommended 11.7% vs narrow 13.3% excision margins) (p = 0.64). The mean follow-up time for all patients was 48.5 months. In aesthetically and functionally sensitive areas of the head and neck, wide local excision margins need to be carefully considered after MDT discussion and discussion with the patient. This study suggests the need for further multicentre trials to address the uniqueness of head and neck melanoma.

Cataract extraction and patient vision-related quality of life: a cohort study

AIMS

Cataract surgery is one of the most common surgeries performed, but its overuse has been reported. The threshold for cataract surgery has become increasingly lenient; therefore, the selection process and surgical need has been questioned. The aim of this study was to evaluate the changes associated with cataract surgery in patient-reported vision-related quality of life (VR-QoL).

METHODS

A prospective cohort study was conducted. Consecutive patients referred to cataract clinics in an NHS unit in Scotland were identified. Those listed for surgery were invited to complete a validated questionnaire (TyPE) to measure VR-QoL pre- and post-operatively. TyPE has five different domains (near vision, distance vision, daytime driving, night-time driving, and glare) and a global score of vision. The influence of pre-operative visual acuity (VA) levels, vision, and lens status of the fellow eye on changes in VR-QoL were explored.

RESULTS

A total of 320 listed patients were approached, of whom 36 were excluded. Among the 284 enrolled patients, 229 (81%) returned the questionnaire after surgery. Results revealed that the mean overall vision improved, as reported by patients. Improvements were also seen in all sub-domains of the questionnaire.

CONCLUSION

The majority of patients appear to have improvement in patient-reported VR-QoL, including those with good pre-operative VA and previous surgery to the fellow eye. VA thresholds may not capture the effects of the quality of life on patients. This information can assist clinicians to make more informed decisions when debating over the benefits of listing a patient for cataract extraction.

The contemporary management of midface and craniofacial trauma

The successful management of midface and craniofacial trauma requires a thorough understanding of the anatomy and functional demands of this complex region. To achieve optimal outcomes, it is necessary that these injuries are accurately diagnosed and managed in a multi-disciplinary environment at the appropriate time. This review article discusses an overview of these injuries and highlights some of the key principles of management.

Bronchoscopic instillation of surfactant in acute respiratory distress syndrome

Abnormalities of surfactant action in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) result in decreased lung compliance and significant hypoxemia. Several case reports and small studies suggest that there is an improvement in patients with ARDS following the administration of surfactant. However, there is no clear-cut ideal method for surfactant administration. The bronchoscopic administration of surfactant may represent an effective method of surfactant delivery in ARDS. Bronchoscopic instillation offers the theoretical advantages that the surfactant may be distributed directly to the desired regions of the lung, a more economical use of surfactant, and the opportunity to lavage leaked serum proteins prior to instillation. Surfactant has been administered in adults with success. We present a case of initial improvement in oxygenation index, ventilation index, and mechanical ventilatory support in a pediatric patient with ARDS following the bronchoscopic administration of surfactant.

Clinical results with nonthoracotomy ICD systems

The results of two separate US Food and Drug Administration clinical trials that involved endocardial and epicardial leads were compared with regard to patient demographics, detection and conversion characteristics, and subsequent clinical course including long-term survival experience. The patient groups, although not strictly contemporaneous, were sufficiently similar to allow meaningful comparisons. There were no significant differences in detection of induced arrhythmias and ability to convert them. The surgical mortality, infection rate, and incidence of other morbid complications were lower in patients who had received endocardial leads; however, the differences did not reach statistical significance. Survivals through 1 year of follow-up were uniformly high. These results suggest that the performance of the endocardial lead system is comparable to existing epicardial leads in similar patient populations.

Clinical efficacy of low energy cardioversion in automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients

The inclusion of low energy cardioversion capability into modern implantable antiarrhythmic devices, although an appealing idea, is nevertheless unproven with regard to its potential benefits. Moreover, since occasional reports have surfaced suggesting that ineffective application of low energy shocks may prejudice subsequent arrhythmia reversion, we examined the effectiveness and risks of this feature in a large series of patients performed as part of a US Food and Drug Administration clinical trial performed under an investigational device exemption. A total of 813 induced monomorphic ventricular tachycardias were studied in 244 patients. We found that many of the arrhythmias could be reverted to sinus rhythm with small amounts of energy. Cardioversion energy was less than or equal to 6 joules (J) for 84 (53.2%) and less than or equal to 14 joules in 105 (66.4%) of the 158 patients tested at implant and subsequently remained unchanged through greater than 4 months follow up. The incidence of noncardioversion, acceleration or both occurred in 12.7%, 5.7%, and 13.1%, respectively on a per patient basis. On a per episode basis, nonconversion occurred in 51 (6.3%) and acceleration in 61 (7.5%) of the 813 inductions. There was no correlation between the occurrence of nonconversions and accelerations. The devices were allowed to recycle in the event the arrhythmia was not reverted. The subsequent shock was almost always effective, and in any event, no patient failed to be reverted by the second 30-J rescue shock. Over the entire follow-up period as long as 17 months, there were 17 deaths. Neither the incidence nor the mode of death was correlated with nonconversion or acceleration.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)