3
|
Bourdel N, Huchon C, Abdel Wahab C, Azaïs H, Bendifallah S, Bolze PA, Brun JL, Canlorbe G, Chauvet P, Chereau E, Courbiere B, De La Motte Rouge T, Devouassoux-Shisheboran M, Eymerit-Morin C, Fauvet R, Gauroy E, Gauthier T, Grynberg M, Koskas M, Larouzee E, Lecointre L, Levêque J, Margueritte F, Mathieu D'argent E, Nyangoh-Timoh K, Ouldamer L, Raad J, Raimond E, Ramanah R, Rolland L, Rousset P, Rousset-Jablonski C, Thomassin-Naggara I, Uzan C, Zilliox M, Daraï E. Borderline ovarian tumors: Guidelines from the French national college of obstetricians and gynecologists (CNGOF). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2020; 256:492-501. [PMID: 33262005 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.11.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2020] [Revised: 11/12/2020] [Accepted: 11/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
It is recommended to classify Borderline Ovarian Tumors (BOTs) according to the WHO classification. Transvaginal and suprapubic ultrasonography are recommended for the analysis of an ovarian mass (Grade A). In case of an undetermined ovarian lesion on ultrasonography, it is recommended to perform a pelvic MRI (Grade A) with a score for malignancy (ADNEX MR/O-RADS) (Grade C) included in the report and to formulate a histological hypothesis (Grade C). Pelvic MRI is recommended to characterize a tumor suspected of being BOT (Grade C). It is recommended to evaluate serum levels of HE4 and CA125 and to use the ROMA score for the diagnosis of indeterminate ovarian mass on imaging (grade A). If there is a suspicion of a mucinous BOT on imaging, serum levels of CA 19-9 may be proposed (Grade C). For Early Stages (ES) of BOT, if surgery without risk of tumor rupture is possible, laparoscopy with protected extraction is recommended over laparotomy (Grade C). For treatment of a bilateral serous ES BOT with a strategy to preserve fertility and/or endocrine function, bilateral cystectomy is recommended where possible (Grade B). For mucinous BOTs with a treatment strategy of fertility and/or endocrine function preservation, unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy is recommended (grade C). For mucinous BOTs treated by initial cystectomy, unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy is recommended (grade C). For serous or mucinous ES BOTs, routine hysterectomy is not recommended (Grade C). For ES BOTs, lymphadenectomy is not recommended (Grade C). For ES BOTs, appendectomy is recommended only in case of a macroscopically pathological appendix (Grade C). Restaging surgery is recommended in cases of serous BOTs with micropapillary architecture and an incomplete abdominal cavity inspection during initial surgery (Grade C). Restaging surgery is recommended for mucinous BOTs after initial cystectomy or in cases where the appendix was not examined (Grade C). If restaging surgery is decided for ES BOTs, the following procedures should be performed: peritoneal washing (grade C), omentectomy (grade B), complete exploration of the abdominal cavity with peritoneal biopsies (grade C), visualization of the appendix and appendectomy in case of a pathological macroscopic appearance (grade C) as well as unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in case of a mucinous BOT initially treated by cystectomy (grade C). In advanced stages (AS) of BOT, it is not recommended to perform a lymphadenectomy as a routine procedure (Grade C). For AS BOT in a patient with a desire to fall pregnant, conservative treatment involving preservation of the uterus and all or part of the ovary may be proposed (Grade C). Restaging surgery aimed at removing all lesions, not performed initially, is recommended for AS BOTs (Grade C). After treatment, follow-up for a duration greater than 5 years is recommended due to the median recurrence time of BOTs (Grade B). It is recommended that a systematic clinical examination be carried out during follow-up of a treated BOT (Grade B). If the determination of tumor markers is normal preoperatively, the routine dosage of tumor markers in BOT follow-up is not recommended (Grade C). In case of an initial elevation in serum CA 125 levels, it is recommended to monitor CA 125 during follow up (Grade B). In case of conservative treatment, it is recommended to use transvaginal and transabdominal ultrasound during follow up of a treated BOT (Grade B). In the event of a BOT recurrence in a woman of childbearing age, a second conservative treatment may be proposed (Grade C). A consultation with a physician specialized in Assisted Reproductive Technique (ART) should be offered in the case of BOTs in women of childbearing age (Grade C). When possible, a conservative surgical strategy is recommended to preserve fertility in women of childbearing age (Grade C). In the case of optimally treated BOT, there is no evidence to contraindicate the use of ART. The use of hormonal contraception after serous or mucinous BOT is not contraindicated (Grade C). After management of mucinous BOT, for women under 45 years, given the benefit of Hormonal Replacement Therapy (HRT) on cardiovascular and bone risks, and the lack of hormone sensitivity of mucinous BOTs, it is recommended to offer HRT (Grade C). Over 45 years of age, HRT can be prescribed in case of a climacteric syndrome after individual benefit to risk assessment (Grade C).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Bourdel
- Service de Chirurgie Gynécologique, CHU de Clermont Ferrand, 1 Place Lucie Aubrac, 63 003 Clermont Ferrand, France
| | - C Huchon
- Service de Gynécologie & Obstétrique, Hopital Lariboisière, 2 rue Ambroise Paré, 75010 Paris, France; Université de Paris, Paris, France.
| | - C Abdel Wahab
- APHP.6 Service de Radiologie, Hôpital Tenon, 4 rue de la Chine, 75020, Paris, France; Faculté De Médecine UPMC, Sorbonne Université, France
| | - H Azaïs
- AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service De Chirurgie Et Oncologie Gynécologique Et Mammaire, 75013 Paris, France; Faculté de Médecine UPMC, Sorbonne Université, France
| | - S Bendifallah
- Service De Gynécologie-Obstétrique Et Médecine De La Reproduction, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique Des Hôpitaux De Paris (AP-HP), Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie (IUC), Centre CALG (Cancer Associé à La Grossesse), UMRS-938, Faculté de Médecine UPMC, Sorbonne Université, France
| | - P A Bolze
- Service De Chirurgie Gynécologique Et Oncologique, Obstétrique, 165 Chemin du Grand Revoyet, 69310, Lyon Sud, Pierre Bénite, France; Université Lyon 1, 43 Boulevard du 11 Novembre 1918, 69100, Villeurbanne, France
| | - J L Brun
- Service De Chirurgie Gynécologique, Centre Aliénor d'Aquitaine, Hôpital Pellegrin, 33076 Bordeaux, Société Française De Gynéco Pathologie, 81 Rue Verte, 76000 Rouen, France
| | - G Canlorbe
- AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service De Chirurgie Et Oncologie Gynécologique Et Mammaire, 75013 Paris, France; Faculté de Médecine UPMC, Sorbonne Université, France
| | - P Chauvet
- Service de Chirurgie Gynécologique, CHU de Clermont Ferrand, 1 Place Lucie Aubrac, 63 003 Clermont Ferrand, France
| | - E Chereau
- Service De Gynécologie Obstétrique, Hopital Saint Joseph, Marseille, France
| | - B Courbiere
- Centre Clinico-Biologique d'AMP, Pôle Femmes - Parents- Enfants, AP-HM, Hôpital de La Conception, 147 Bd Baille, 13005 Marseille, France
| | | | - M Devouassoux-Shisheboran
- Institut De Pathologie Multi-Sites Des HOSPICES CIVILS De LYON, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Centre De Biologie Et Pathologie Sud, 165 Chemin Du Grand Revoyet, 69495 Pierre Bénite. Société Française de Gynéco Pathologie, 81 Rue Verte, 76000 Rouen, France
| | - C Eymerit-Morin
- Service d'Anatomie Et Cytologie Pathologiques, Hôpital Tenon, HUEP, UPMC Paris VI, Sorbonne Universities, 4 rue de la Chine, 75020 Paris, France; Institut de Pathologie de Paris, 35 boulevard Stalingrad, 92240 Malakoff, France
| | - R Fauvet
- Service de Gynécologie Obstétrique, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen, Caen, France
| | - E Gauroy
- Service de Gynécologie-Obstétrique, Hôpital Bichat, 46 Rue Henri Huchard, 75018 Paris, France; Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - T Gauthier
- Service De Gynécologie-Obstétrique, Hôpital Mère-Enfant, CHU Limoges, 8 Av Dominique Larrey 87042 Limoges, France
| | - M Grynberg
- Service De Médecine De La Reproduction, Hôpital Antoine Béclère, 157 Rue De La Porte De Trivaux, 92140 Clamart, France
| | - M Koskas
- Service De Gynécologie-Obstétrique, Hôpital Bichat, 46 Rue Henri Huchard, 75018 Paris, France; Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - E Larouzee
- Service de Gynécologie-Obstétrique, Hôpital Bichat, 46 Rue Henri Huchard, 75018 Paris, France; Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - L Lecointre
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Hautepierre, Hôpital de Hautepierre, CHRU Strasbourg, 1 Avenue Molière, 67000 Strasbourg, France
| | - J Levêque
- Département De Gynécologie Obstétrique Et Reproduction Humaine, 16, Boulevard De Bulgarie, 35000 CHU Anne De Bretagne, UFR Médecine Université de Rennes 1, Rennes, Bretagne, France
| | - F Margueritte
- Service De Gynécologie-Obstétrique, Hôpital Mère-Enfant, CHU Limoges, 8 Av Dominique Larrey, 87042 Limoges, France
| | - E Mathieu D'argent
- Service de Gynécologie-Obstétrique Et Médecine De La Reproduction, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique Des Hôpitaux De Paris (AP-HP), Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie (IUC), Centre CALG (Cancer Associé à La Grossesse), UMRS-938, Faculté de Médecine UPMC, Sorbonne Université, France
| | - K Nyangoh-Timoh
- Département De Gynécologie Obstétrique Et Reproduction Humaine, 16, Boulevard De Bulgarie, 35000 CHU Anne De Bretagne, UFR Médecine Université de Rennes 1, Rennes, Bretagne, France
| | - L Ouldamer
- Département De Gynécologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire De Tours, Hôpital Bretonneau, 2 Boulevard Tonnellé, 37000, Tours, France
| | - J Raad
- Service De Médecine De La Reproduction, Hôpital Antoine Béclère, 157 Rue De La Porte De Trivaux, 92140 Clamart, France
| | - E Raimond
- Département de Gynécologie Obstétrique, Institut Alix De Champagne, CHU Reims, Reims, France
| | - R Ramanah
- Pôle Mère-Femme, CHU Besançon, 3 Boulevard Fleming, 25000 Besançon, France
| | - L Rolland
- Centre Clinico-Biologique d'AMP, Pôle Femmes - Parents- Enfants, AP-HM, Hôpital de La Conception, 147 Bd Baille, 13005 Marseille, France
| | - P Rousset
- Service de Radiologie, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, HCL, EMR 3738, 165 Chemin du Grand Revoyet, 69310, Lyon Sud, Pierre-Bénite, France; Université Lyon 1, 43 Boulevard Du 11 Novembre 1918, 69100, Villeurbanne, France
| | - C Rousset-Jablonski
- Centre Léon Bérard, 28 Rue Laënnec, 69008, Lyon, France; Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Pierre-Bénite, France; Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, EA 7425 Hesper, Health Service and Performance Research, Domaine Rockefeller, 8 Avenue Rockefeller, 69373, Lyon Cedex 8, France
| | - I Thomassin-Naggara
- APHP.6 Service de Radiologie, Hôpital Tenon, 4 rue de la Chine, 75020, Paris, France; Faculté de Médecine UPMC, Sorbonne Université, France
| | - C Uzan
- AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service De Chirurgie Et Oncologie Gynécologique Et Mammaire, 75013 Paris, France; Faculté de Médecine UPMC, Sorbonne Université, France
| | - M Zilliox
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Hautepierre, Hôpital De Hautepierre, CHRU Strasbourg, 1 Avenue Molière, 67000 Strasbourg, France
| | - E Daraï
- Service de Gynécologie-Obstétrique Et Médecine De La Reproduction, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique Des Hôpitaux De Paris (AP-HP), Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie (IUC), Centre CALG (Cancer Associé à La Grossesse), UMRS-938, Faculté de Médecine UPMC, Sorbonne Université, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lebreton M, Carton I, Brousse S, Lavoué V, Body G, Levêque J, Nyangoh-Timoh K. Vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia: Classification, epidemiology, diagnosis, and management. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 2020; 49:101801. [PMID: 32417455 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2019] [Revised: 05/02/2020] [Accepted: 05/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN) is classified into two entities: differentiated (dVIN) and vulvar high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (vH-SIL). dVIN is a premalignant lesion that develops on an existing vulvar lesion such as lichen sclerosus, while vH-SIL is associated with HPV infection. The two entities differ in terms of pathophysiology, background, prognosis, and management. The incidence of VIN in young women is rising and recurrence is common, even after radical surgery, which can cause significant disfigurement. Alternative strategies include topical treatments, ablation, and a watch-and-wait approach. There is currently no consensus on how these lesions should be managed. We review the literature in this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Lebreton
- Département de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Reproduction Humaine, CHU Anne de Bretagne, 16 Bd de Bulgarie BP 90347, F-35 203, Rennes Cedex 2, France
| | - I Carton
- Département de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Reproduction Humaine, CHU Anne de Bretagne, 16 Bd de Bulgarie BP 90347, F-35 203, Rennes Cedex 2, France
| | - S Brousse
- Département de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Reproduction Humaine, CHU Anne de Bretagne, 16 Bd de Bulgarie BP 90347, F-35 203, Rennes Cedex 2, France
| | - V Lavoué
- Département de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Reproduction Humaine, CHU Anne de Bretagne, 16 Bd de Bulgarie BP 90347, F-35 203, Rennes Cedex 2, France
| | - G Body
- Service de gynécologie obstétrique et médecine fœtale, université François Rabelais, CHRU de Tours, 2, boulevard Tonnelle, 37044, Tours Cedex 9, France
| | - J Levêque
- Département de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Reproduction Humaine, CHU Anne de Bretagne, 16 Bd de Bulgarie BP 90347, F-35 203, Rennes Cedex 2, France.
| | - K Nyangoh-Timoh
- Département de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Reproduction Humaine, CHU Anne de Bretagne, 16 Bd de Bulgarie BP 90347, F-35 203, Rennes Cedex 2, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Nyangoh-Timoh K, Bendifallah S, Dion L, Ouldamer L, Levêque J. [Borderline Ovarian Tumours: CNGOF Guidelines for Clinical Practice - Value of Tumor Markers]. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020; 48:277-286. [PMID: 32004789 DOI: 10.1016/j.gofs.2020.01.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the diagnostic value of serum biomarkers in the management strategy of borderline ovarian tumours (BOT) to make management recommendations. METHODS English and French review of literature from 1990 to 2019 based on publications from Pubmed, Medline, Cochrane, with keywords: borderline ovarian tumors, tumour markers, CA125, CA19 9, ACE, CA72 4, TAG72, HE4, ROMA, mucinous, serous, mucinous, endometrioid ovarian tumours, peritoneal implants, recurrence, overall survival, follow-up. Among 1000 references, 400 were selected and only 30 were screened for this work. RESULTS Literature review: there is low evidence in literature concerning the discriminating value of serum tumour biomarkers (CA125, CA19-9, CEA, CA72-4, HE4) and specific score between presumed benign ovarian tumour/BOT/ovarian cancer (LE4). Serum CA125 antigen is higher in case of serous borderline ovarian tumour (LE4), increase with the tumor height, the FIGO stage, notably in case of serous borderline ovarian tumor. However, a normal value rate of serum CA125 antigen does not rule out a BOT (LE4). The preoperative positivity rate of CA19 9 in case of TFO is relatively lower than that of CA125 and is higher in mucinous TFO. The preoperative rate of serum CA19 9 antigen increases with the tumour height and the FIGO stage (LE4) and are higher in case of mucinous BOT (LE4). Preoperative rates of serum HE4 are not different between histologic type of BOT. A high level of serum biomarkers (CA125) is a predictive factor of peritoneal implants (LE4) and an independent predictive factor of recurrence (CA125) (LE4). RECOMMENDATIONS no recommendation can be made about the use of serum tumour biomarkers (CA125, CA19-9, CEA, CA72-4, HE4) or specific score in order to distinguish benign ovarian tumor/borderline ovarian tumor/ovarian cancer in case of indeterminate mass. In case of suspicion of mucinous ovarian tumour on imaging, the systematic dosage of serum CA19-9 antigen can be proposed (grade C). In case of an ovarian indeterminate mass on imaging; dosage of serum HE4 and C125 is recommended. If preoperative dosage of serum tumor biomarkers is normal, their systematic dosage is not recommended in the follow-up of BOT (grade C). If preoperative dosage of CA125 is high, the systematic dosage of CA125 is recommended in the follow-up of BOT with no precisions about the rhythm and the duration of the follow-up (grade B).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Nyangoh-Timoh
- Département de gynécologie-obstétrique et reproduction humaine, 16, boulevard de Bulgarie, 35000 Rennes, France; UFR médecine université de Rennes 1, CHU Anne-de-Bretagne, Bretagne, France
| | - S Bendifallah
- Service de chirurgie gynécologique et mammaire, maternité, et médecine de la reproduction, hôpital Tenon, AP-HP, 4, rue de la Chine, 75020 Paris, France; Sorbonne Université, 75006 Paris, France
| | - L Dion
- Département de gynécologie-obstétrique et reproduction humaine, 16, boulevard de Bulgarie, 35000 Rennes, France; UFR médecine université de Rennes 1, CHU Anne-de-Bretagne, Bretagne, France
| | - L Ouldamer
- Département de gynécologie, hôpital Bretonneau, centre hospitalier universitaire de Tours, 2, boulevard Tonnellé, 37000 Tours, France
| | - J Levêque
- Département de gynécologie-obstétrique et reproduction humaine, 16, boulevard de Bulgarie, 35000 Rennes, France; UFR médecine université de Rennes 1, CHU Anne-de-Bretagne, Bretagne, France.
| |
Collapse
|