[Patient safety in differentiated (in-hospital) activation of the resuscitation room for severely injured patients]

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Providing trauma services demands high personnel resources and structural costs. The goal of this study was to show if the assignment of trauma patients to a defined A or B resuscitation room treatment as a modified management concept is safe and feasible.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between May 2020 and January 2021, all resuscitation room trauma patients were included in this single center prospective observational study. All patients admitted to the resuscitation room underwent a classification according to the German S3 guidelines grade of recommendation GoR A and GoR B in polytrauma and the status of the ABCDE sequence to an A and B resuscitation room. The classification was performed by the senior consultant on call via telephone after consultation and discussion of clinical findings.

RESULTS

All 135 resuscitation room patients were included in the study of whom 42 trauma patients were assigned to the A resuscitation room (A-SR) and 93 were assigned to the B resuscitation room (B-SR). The comparison of the two groups showed that patients in the A‑SR group are more likely to be accompanied by a prehospital emergency physician (80.5%) than patients in the B‑SR group (55.5%). Patients in the B‑SR group showed a significantly higher Glasgow coma scale (GCS). Using the eFAST emergency ultrasound protocol, 2.4% of the A‑SR and 4.3% of the B‑SR patients had trauma-associated pathologies, 26% of the A‑SR and only 3.2% of the B‑SR patients had to be admitted to the ICU, 21.4% of the A‑SR and 1% of the B‑SR patients died within 30 days after trauma. The injury severity scores (ISS) of the A‑SR patients were significantly higher than in the B‑SR group (ISS 28.3 vs. 6.8).

CONCLUSION

The study confirmed that the assignment by the emergency department consultant according to the German S3 guideline in combination with the ABCDE sequence into resuscitation room A or B treatment is feasible, does not compromise the quality of care and is efficient in the use of the personnel resources.

Castleman's disease mimicked melanoma metastasis in the mesentery - A case report

•

Castleman’s disease (CD) is a rare finding and diagnosis is very challenging.

•

Intraabdominal localization is uncommon and can pretend malignancy.

•

Misinterpretation might lead to surgical overtreatment of asymptomatic patients.

•

Close follow-up examination might help to distinguish between malignancy and CD.

Introduction

Castleman’s disease (CD) is a rare and mainly asymptomatic cause of lymph node swelling. Often it is unicentric and located in the mediastinum. Due to rarity of the disease as well as a lack of symptoms, diagnosis proves to be challenging, especially when CD affects another region.

Presentation of case

A 51-year old male underwent resection of a malignant melanoma. Further staging revealed an unclear abdominal mass located in the mesentery with close contact to small intestine. Under the assumption of metastasis, complete tumor removal including intestine resection and anastomosis was performed. Both, operation and postoperative phase proved uncomplicated. Surprisingly, however, histology revealed a benign lymphoproliferative disorder, CD.

Discussion

There are several differential diagnoses for abdominal soft tissue tumor, such as: gastrointestinal stromal tumor, sarcoma, lymphoma, or metastasis. In reference to the resected melanoma described above, metastasis was assumed with subsequent oncological resection. Both, the reliable detection of CD as well as the exclusion of malignant disease (e.g. lymphoma) can only be achieved through pathology, in that specific tests fail yet to exist. The etiology of CD remains barely understood and based upon few cases reported complete surgical resection is recommended. However, the common form is meant to be benign.

Conclusion

The potential diagnosis of CD should be made more common to surgeons, especially in completely asymptomatic patients and non-superficial lesions, whereby close follow-up examination might be offered to patients.