An institutional review of treatment outcomes in extraosseous Ewing's sarcoma- the largest Asian experience

PURPOSE

To analyze the treatment strategies, outcomes and factors impacting these outcomes in extraosseous ewings sarcoma (EOES).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A search of the hospital database yielded a total of 109 EOES patients registered in last 10 years out of which 25 patients were excluded from analysis due to incomplete medical records. Demographic and clinical characteristics were reported using descriptive statistics. Overall survival (OS) was taken from the time of diagnosis to death. Patients who were alive or lost to follow up were censored from the survival analysis. A total of 12 clinical and treatment related variables were taken into univariate analysis and those showing significance or a trend towards significance were taken up for multivariate analysis. Further a cluster analysis was done in a quest to find a subgroup which would have a better survival outcome as compared to other clusters. SPSS version 23 was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Chest wall (n=26), lower extremity (n=22) and paraspinal area (n=14) were the common sites involved. Localised swelling (n=43) was the most common presenting symptom and the median time to presentation was 2 months. Overall survival of the entire cohort at 5 years was 52 percent. Stage at presentation had a significant impact (P value<0.001) on estimated median OS (localised 70 months versus 36 months in metastatic stage). Cluster analysis showed that, patients with localised stage at presentation, good response to chemotherapy, negative resection margin and no adjuvant RT had a median survival of 69 months.

CONCLUSION

Judicious use of trimodality treatment in EOES yields optimal results and it also adds significantly onto the scarce literature on this subtype of sarcoma.

Compensator-based intensity-modulated radiotherapy in head and neck cancer: our experience in achieving dosimetric parameters and their clinical correlation

AIMS

To review the Batra Hospital and Medical Research Centre experience of using compensator-based intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) to treat head and neck cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between October 2003 and August 2004, 18 patients underwent IMRT for head and neck cancer at our institution. IMRT was delivered using partial transmission high-resolution compensator blocks.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 13.3 months, two patients had residual disease and two failed in the gross tumour volume (GTV). The complete response rate after surgical salvage was 94.5%. Both the locoregional relapse-free and disease-free survival rates were 81.8%. The target coverage in terms of average maximum, mean and minimum dose (in Gy) delivered was 78.6, 73.5 and 58.4 to the GTV-planning target volume, 82.3, 70.9 and 47.3 to clinical target volume 1 (CTV1) and 82.9, 66.2 and 29.6 to CTV2. The dose constraint of 30 Gy to less than 50% of the contralateral parotid volume was achieved in 12 (66.7%) patients. If the dose constraint was revised to 35 Gy, at least 50% of the parotid volume was spared in 17 (94.5%) patients. On average, 75% of the contralateral parotid volume received a dose less than 35 Gy in 13 (72.3%) patients with grade I xerostomia, whereas this was 49.3% in five (27.7%) patients with grade II xerostomia, and the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In our initial experience, compensator-based IMRT is feasible with regard to target coverage and parotid volume sparing. The parotid volume dose has significant clinical implications on the grade of xerostomia. Our results invoke rethinking into the issues of the parotid volume dose constraint in our subpopulation.