Fracture toughness and fractal analysis of ceramic benchmark materials

Previous studies have reported various methods of measuring the fracture toughness of brittle ceramics. The purpose of the present research was to use a new method of fractal dimension measurement on benchmark materials (silica glass, Viosil SX, Shin-Etsu, n = 13, and silicon nitride standard reference material, SRM2100, NIST, n = 10), to compare the fracture toughness calculated using different methods, and to study the effect of noise filtering on the fractal dimension and fracture surface roughness. Fracture toughness was determined using surface crack in flexure method according to ASTM C1421 and fractal analysis method. Fractal dimension was determined using the Minkowski Cover algorithm on atomic force microscope scans of epoxy replicas of fracture surfaces. The mean ± standard deviation of fracture toughness using surface crack in flexure method and fractals method were 0.97 ± 0.18 MPa·m1/2 and 1.03 ± 0.07 MPa·m1/2 for silica glass and 4.62 ± 0.14 MPa·m1/2 and 2.54 ± 0.07 MPa·m1/2 for silicon nitride, respectively. The mean ± standard deviation of fractal dimension was 2.17 ± 0.03 for silica glass and 2.13 ± 0.01 for silicon nitride. The mean ten-point roughness (Rz) before and after noise filtering was 89 ± 102 nm and 87 ± 101 nm for silica glass and 355 ± 132 nm and 357 ± 134 nm for silicon nitride, respectively. Noise filtering had no significance on the fracture surface roughness of the two materials. The newly developed fractal analysis method can be used to predict the baseline fracture toughness of specimens with unknown failure stress.

Characterization of Reinforced and Unreinforced Glass-Ceramic Veneers

This study aimed to characterize the surface topography, effect of polishing on surface roughness, residual stresses, and hardness in two glass-ceramic veneers. Fifty-two (52) upper incisors were collected, prepared, and scanned for ceramic veneers. Half of the teeth were restored with veneers made up of feldspathic ceramic (FE), and the other half with zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic (SZ). All the veneers were designed and milled using a CAD/CAM system and later cemented following the manufacturer's guideline. An optical microscope analyzed the topography of the specimens before and after polishing. The surface roughness was measured using the roughness meter (n=12) and the topographical analysis was carried out using an atomic force microscope (n=6). The residual stresses and Vickers' hardness were evaluated by the indentation method in a micro-hardness indenter (n=6). The surface roughness was analyzed using a three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by a post hoc Tukey test. The Student t-test was used to compare the residual stresses and hardness between the two ceramics. The topographical analysis revealed that both glass-ceramic veneers had similar percentages of specimens with cracks, before (34.6%) and after (42.3%) polishing. The surface roughness decreased after polishing (p<0.001), and the polishing smoothed out the surface of the veneers. The zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate veneer had a lower roughness as compared to the feldspathic one after polishing, while the residual stresses (p=0.722) and hardness (p=0.782) were statistically similar for both ceramic veneers.