Training patterns associated with injury in New York City Marathon runners

OBJECTIVE

Training patterns are commonly implicated in running injuries. The purpose of this study was to measure the incidence of injury and illness among marathon runners and the association of injuries with training patterns and workload.

METHODS

Runners registered for the New York City Marathon were eligible to enrol and prospectively monitored during the 16 weeks before the marathon, divided into 4-week 'training quarters' (TQ) numbered TQ1-TQ4. Training runs were tracked using Strava, a web and mobile platform for tracking exercise. Runners were surveyed at the end of each TQ on injury and illness, and to verify all training runs were recorded. Acute:chronic workload ratio (ACWR) was calculated by dividing the running distance in the past 7 days by the running distance in the past 28 days and analysed using ratio thresholds of 1.3 and 1.5.

RESULTS

A total of 735 runners participated, mean age 41.0 (SD 10.7) and 46.0% female. Runners tracked 49 195 training runs. The incidence of injury during training was 40.0% (294/735), and the incidence of injury during or immediately after the marathon was 16.0% (112/699). The incidence of illness during training was 27.2% (200/735). Those reporting an initial injury during TQ3 averaged less distance/week during TQ2 compared with uninjured runners, 27.7 vs 31.9 miles/week (p=0.018). Runners reporting an initial injury during TQ1 had more days when the ACWR during TQ1 was ≥1.5 compared with uninjured runners (injured IQR (0-3) days vs uninjured (0-1) days, p=0.009). Multivariable logistic regression for training injuries found an association with the number of days when the ACWR was ≥1.5 (OR 1.06, 95% CI (1.02 to 1.10), p=0.002).

CONCLUSION

Increases in training volume ≥1.5 ACWR were associated with more injuries among runners training for a marathon. These findings can inform training recommendations and injury prevention programmes for distance runners.

Lower Extremity Muscle Injuries in the Overhead Athlete

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Lower extremity (LE) injuries are a common source of disability and time-loss for overhead athletes, and muscles have been found to be the predominant soft tissue structure affected. The current review highlights the orthopaedic literature examining lower extremity muscle injuries in overhead athletes in regard to epidemiology, diagnosis, and conventional and emerging treatment measures.

RECENT FINDINGS

The hamstring muscles have been found to be the most commonly injured lower extremity muscle group in professional baseball, followed by the adductors, quadriceps, iliopsoas, and gastrocnemius-soleus complex. Strains and contusions comprise over 90% of these muscle injuries. Various advanced imaging grading systems have been developed to help characterize the nature of a muscle injury, although a clear and consistent prognostic utility of these systems is still unclear. The vast majority of lower extremity muscle injuries in overhead athletes are managed nonoperatively, and there is promising data on the use of emerging treatments such as platelet-rich plasma and blood flow restriction therapy. Lower extremity muscle injuries-often referred to as strains-are a relatively common issue in high-demand overhead athletes and can be a significant source of time-loss. Within baseball, position players are affected far more often than pitchers, and sprinting and fielding are the most common activities leading to strains. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is considered the gold standard imaging modality to evaluate these muscle injuries and will allow for a detailed assessment of tissue damage. Nonetheless, return-to-play is often dictated by a given athlete's progression through a nonoperative rehabilitation protocol, with surgical intervention reserved for less common, select injury patterns.

Factors associated with injuries in first-time marathon runners from the New York City marathon

OBJECTIVES

To determine how baseline characteristics of first-time marathon runners and training patterns are associated with risk of injuries during training and the race.

METHODS

First-time adult marathon runners who were registered for the 2017 New York City Marathon were monitored starting 12 weeks prior to the race. Baseline data collection included demographics and running experience. Running frequency, distance, and injury occurrence were self-reported using online surveys every 2 weeks.

RESULTS

A total of 720 runners participated of which 675 completed the study. There were 64/675 (9.5%) who had major injuries during training or the race that preventing starting or finishing the race. An additional 332 (49.2%) had minor injuries interfering with training and/or affecting race performance. Injury incidence was not significantly different based on age or sex. Runners who completed a half marathon prior to the study were less likely to report getting injured [multivariable odds ratio (OR) 0.40, (0.22, 0.76), p= 0.005]. Runners who averaged <4 training runs per week during the study were less likely to report getting injured compared to those who averaged ≥4 per week [relative risk 1.36, (1.13-1.63), p= 0.001]. Longest training run distance during the study was inversely associated with race-day injury incidence [OR 0.87 (0.81, 0.94), p< 0.001].

CONCLUSION

Injuries are common among first-time marathon runners. We found that risk of injury during training was associated with lack of half marathon experience and averaging ≥4 training runs per week. Longer training runs were associated with a lower incidence of race-day injuries. These results can inform the development of targeted injury-prevention interventions.

Is workload associated with latissimus dorsi and teres major tears in professional baseball pitchers? An analysis of days of rest, innings pitched, and batters faced

BACKGROUND

Latissimus dorsi (LD) and teres major (TM) tears have become increasingly recognized injuries in professional baseball pitchers. The purpose of this study was to determine whether workload, as measured by the number of days of rest between outings, number of innings pitched, number of batters faced, and being a starting pitcher, is associated with an increased risk of sustaining an LD-TM tear in professional baseball pitchers.

METHODS

All professional baseball pitchers who sustained an LD-TM tear between 2011 and 2017 were identified using the Major League Baseball Health and Injury Tracking System. A separate player-usage data set was used to determine workload. We then compared workload variables between pitcher-games 2, 6, 12, and >12 weeks prior to a documented LD-TM tear and pitcher-games from a non-LD-TM tear control group. In a paired analysis, we compared the acute workload (2, 6, and 12 weeks) prior to injury and the injured pitchers' non-acute workload >12 weeks prior to injury.

RESULTS

A total of 224 unique LD-TM tears were documented in the Major League Baseball Health and Injury Tracking System database. In most periods, player-games with more innings pitched and more batters faced were associated with a higher incidence of subsequent LD-TM tears. The number of days of rest was not a significant predictor of an LD-TM tear in the acute workload setting, but pitchers who sustained an LD-TM injury averaged fewer days of rest over the previous ≥12 weeks than controls (P < .001). Pitchers who faced >30 batters per game showed a 1.57-fold increase in the percentage of pitchers with a subsequent LD-TM tear as compared with pitchers who faced ≤5 batters per game. Significantly more starting pitchers were in the case group that sustained LD-TM tears over multiple time points than in the control group.

CONCLUSION

Having a greater pitcher workload and being a starting pitcher were associated with an increased risk of sustaining LD-TM tears in professional baseball players. The average number of days of rest was only a risk factor for LD-TM tears over a 3-month or longer period.

Efficacy of Arm Care Programs for Injury Prevention

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Arm care programs for baseball players are an increasingly popular area of interest for players, parents, coaches, sports performance staff, and team physicians. Once a general afterthought, the design of arm care programs is now heavily scrutinized in order to maximize performance and help reduce injury risk. Given the recent spike in interest for arm care programs for baseball players of all ages, the purpose of this work is to review the relevant literature regarding the efficacy of arm care programs and to discuss the authors' preferred, evidence-based principles for arm care programs.

RECENT FINDINGS

Arm care programs appear to provide favorable results for performance, maintenance of strength and flexibility, and reduced injury risk. These programs should be tailored to the demands of the athlete, which can change based on the time of year and physical demands of the player's position. A good program will incorporate flexibility, strengthening, proprioception, and joint mobility for the entire kinetic chain. Appropriate warm-up and cool-down periods are also important. Arm care programs should start with basic movement patterns before progressing to more advanced, coordinated exercises. Arm care programs are an important piece of a holistic approach to caring for the throwing arm of baseball athletes. In general, they appear to be a safe and efficacious way to help prevent a portion of throwing arm injuries. Further research is needed to determine the optimal arm care program for each athlete.

Considerations for Return to Exercise Following Mild-to-Moderate COVID-19 in the Recreational Athlete

The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in significant morbidity and mortality around the world. The spectrum of COVID-19 is broad, from clinical disease requiring intensive medical care to less severe symptoms that are treated with supportive care. The majority of COVID-19 cases fall into the mild-to-moderate category, with symptoms lasting less than 6 weeks. Nevertheless, the morbidity from COVID-19 is significant and can affect multiple body systems, most frequently the cardiac, pulmonary, hematologic, musculoskeletal, and gastrointestinal systems. For patients who wish to return to exercise after mild-to-moderate COVID-19, the wide range of disease expression presents a challenge for clinicians seeking to offer counsel. This literature review on return to activity following mild to moderate COVID-19 in the recreational athlete includes evidence-based considerations and recommendations for clinicians in guiding the safest return to activity.

A Randomized Study of a Strength Training Program to Prevent Injuries in Runners of the New York City Marathon

BACKGROUND

Lower extremity overuse injuries are common among runners, especially first-time marathoners. Hip abductor and quadriceps strengthening is often recommended to reduce running-related injuries.

HYPOTHESIS

A 12-week strength training program would decrease the rate of overuse injuries resulting in marathon noncompletion and improve race finishing time.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized trial.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 2.

METHODS

Twelve weeks before the New York City Marathon, first-time marathon runners age 18 years and older were randomized into a strength training group or an observation group. The strength training group was instructed to perform a 10-minute program 3 times weekly using written and video instruction. This program targeted the quadriceps, hip abductor, and core muscle groups. Injuries were self-reported through biweekly surveys, with major injuries being those that resulted in marathon noncompletion and minor injuries being those that impaired training or race performance.

RESULTS

A total of 720 runners were enrolled (mean age, 35.9 ± 9.4 years; 69.4% female), of whom 583 runners started the marathon and 579 completed it. The incidence of major injury was 8.9% and minor injury was 48.5%. Fifty two of 64 major injuries were overuse, of which 20 were bone stress injuries. The incidence of overuse injury resulting in marathon noncompletion was 7.1% in the strength training group and 7.3% in the observation group (risk ratio, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.57-1.63; P = 0.90). The mean finishing time was 5 hours 1 ± 60 minutes in the strength training group and 4 hours 58 ± 55 minutes in the observation group (P = 0.35).

CONCLUSION

There is a high prevalence of injury among first-time marathon runners, but this self-directed strength training program did not decrease overuse injury incidence resulting in marathon noncompletion.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Prevention strategies such as strength training need to be developed and evaluated through clinical trials to reduce the high prevalence of overuse injuries in runners, especially for high-risk populations such as first-time marathon runners.

Comparative Effectiveness of Alternative Dosing Regimens of Hyaluronic Acid Injections for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review

CONTEXT

Viscosupplementation is widely used for management of knee osteoarthritis. Many formulations of hyaluronic acid (HA) are available, ranging from a single injection to a series of up to 5 injections per treatment.

OBJECTIVE

To compare efficacy between single and multiple HA injection formulations.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, Web of Science, Scopus databases were all searched.

STUDY SELECTION

Full-text prospective randomized and nonrandomized controlled human trials, cohort studies, and cost-effectiveness evaluations in the English language comparing different injection regimens of viscosupplementation were included.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 1.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data were collected using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Four databases were searched by a librarian and the principal investigator, identifying 6196 articles for screening.

RESULTS

Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria. Of the studies comparing single- with multiple-injection formulations of HA for treatment of knee osteoarthritis, there was no consistent difference in patient-reported outcomes. Furthermore, 5-injection formulations do not appear to be superior to 3-injection formulations.

CONCLUSION

There are limited head-to-head trials comparing viscosupplementation formulations that differ based on number of injections, and in particular, there is a paucity of trials evaluating single-injection formulations. Based on the currently available data, there appears to be similar efficacy with the possibility for greater cost-effectiveness and less patient inconvenience with single-injection formulations.