Peer-mentor support for older vulnerable myocardial infarction patients referred to cardiac rehabilitation: single-arm feasibility study

Background

The positive effects of cardiac rehabilitation are well established. However, it has an inherent challenge, namely the low attendance rate among older vulnerable patients, which illustrates the need for effective interventions. Peer mentoring is a low-cost intervention that has the potential to improve cardiac rehabilitation attendance and improve physical and psychological outcomes among older patients. The aim of this study was to test the feasibility and acceptability of a peer-mentor intervention among older vulnerable myocardial infarction patients referred to cardiac rehabilitation.

Methods

The study was conducted as a single-arm feasibility study and designed as a mixed methods intervention study. Patients admitted to a university hospital in Denmark between September 2020 and December 2020 received a 24-week peer-mentor intervention. The feasibility of the intervention was evaluated based on five criteria by Orsmond and Cohn: (a) recruitment capability, (b) data-collection procedures, (c) intervention acceptability, (d) available resources, and (e) participant responses to the intervention. Data were collected through self-administrated questionnaires, closed-ended telephone interviews, semi-structured interviews, and document sheets.

Results

Twenty patients were offered the peer-mentor intervention. The intervention proved feasible, with a low dropout rate and high acceptability. However, the original inclusion criteria only involved vulnerable women, and this proved not to be feasible, and were therefore revised to also include vulnerable male patients. Peer mentors (n = 17) were monitored during the intervention period, and the findings indicate that their mentoring role did not cause any harm. The peer-mentor intervention showed signs of effectiveness, as a high rate of cardiac rehabilitation attendance was achieved among patients. Quality of life also increased among patients. This was the case for emotional, physical, and global quality of life measures at 24-week follow-up.

Conclusion

The peer-mentor intervention is a feasible and acceptable intervention that holds the potential to increase both cardiac rehabilitation attendance and quality of life in older vulnerable patients. This finding paves the way for peer-mentor interventions to be tested in randomized controlled trials, with a view toward reducing inequality in cardiac rehabilitation attendance. However, some of the original study procedures were not feasible, and as such was revised.

Trial registration

The feasibility study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (ClinicalTrials.gov identification number: NCT04507529), August 11, 2020.

Recommendations on echocardiography following surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR): time for revision?

Background

ESC guidelines recommend annual echocardiographic evaluation following biological surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR), and 5 years following mechanical SAVR. Conversely, increased life expectancy result in increasing demand on health care resources.

Purpose

To assess aortic reintervention rates at 1-year, 3-year and 5-year following biological and mechanical SAVR in relation to estimated echocardiographic controls.

Methods

From the nationwide Danish Register of Surgical Procedures, we identified all patients ≥40 years with isolated biological or mechanical SAVR +/− concomitant coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) during 2000–2016. In 90-day reintervention-free survivors we assessed aortic valve reintervention rates at 1-year, 3-years and 5-years until December 31st, 2017. We further assessed cumulative risk of reintervention by age (<60, 60–69, 70–79, ≥80 years at SAVR) accounting for the competing risk of death during the study period.

Results

The population of 90-day reintervention-free survivors included 10,526 patients with biological SAVR (CABG 39.7%) and 3,677 patients with mechanical SAVR (CABG 23.8%). Reintervention rates at 1-year, 3-years and 5-years were comparable across type of SAVR, and generally low (Figure). Accounting for the competing risk of death, reintervention rates at 5-years were 1.4% (95% CI 1.1–1.6) for biological SAVR and 1.5% (95% CI 1.1–1.9) for mechanical SAVR, respectively. In age-stratified competing risk analyses, we observed the highest rates in patients aged 40–59 years (4% [95% CI 1.8–6] at 5 years for biological SAVR, and 2% [95% CI 1.3–3] for mechanical SAVR). Following biological SAVR, annual echocardiographic controls would yield a total of 34,516 scans in our population in the first 5 years following surgery. This contrasts to a total of 66 reinterventions following biological SAVR in our population between years 1–5 of which the majority was preceded by a hospital admission with a primary diagnosis of endocarditis within the last 90 days prior to the reintervention; which are unlikely to have been diagnosed at the annual assessment scan.

Conclusion(s)

In this nationwide study, reintervention rates following biological or mechanical SAVR were very low within the first five years after surgery suggesting a discrepancy between ESC recommendations on echocardiographic controls following SAVR, the benefit for patients, and the associated resource burden on the health care system.

Figure 1

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: None

P6218Greater burden of risk factors and need of cardiac rehabilitation in elderly patients with lower educational attainment

Background

A socioeconomic gap in cardiac rehabilitation (CR) has been described in younger populations but whether this is also true in the ageing population is unknown.

Purpose

To describe if poorer education is a predictor for exercise capacity, comorbidity, lifestyle- and risk factors and medical treatment at baseline in CR in an elderly population.

Methods

The observational EU-CaRE study is a European prospective study with eight participating CR centers in seven countries (Denmark, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Italy, Spain and Switzerland). Patients aged 65 or older with CHD or valve surgery participating in CR were consecutively included. Educational attainment was divided into basic, intermediate and high

Results

A total of 1626 patients were included. Educational attainment differed across centers (p<0.001). The groups differed little regarding index event, comorbidity and medical treatment. However, patients with only basic education had more diabetes, higher BMI, less physical activity, lower exercise capacity and higher scores for depression (PHQ 9) and anxiety (GAD). Differences were not affected by adjustment for age, gender and country.

Demographics and risk factor control N=1626 High (N=388) Intermediate (N=788) Basic (N=460) p-value* DEMOGRAPHICS Age (yrs), median (IQR) 72 (68, 76) 71 (68, 75) 74 (70, 78) <0.001 Men 330 (86.8%) 603 (79.3%) 291 (67.4%) <0.001 RISK FACTORS p-value** LDL >1.8 mmol/l*** 255 (66.1%) 518 (66.8%) 293 (63.7%) 0.060 Systolic BP >140 mmHg 85 (22.0%) 179 (23.1%) 100 (21.7%) 0.601 Smoker 26 (6.8%) 80 (10.3%) 46 (10.0%) 0.214 Moderate exercise <4days/week 179 (46.4%) 340 (43.9%) 271 (58.9%) 0.024 BMI >27 kg/m2 133 (35.5%) 389 (50.2%) 255 (55.4%) <0.001 VO2 peak <80% of predicted 220 (57.0%) 443 (57.2%) 252 (54.8%) 0.037 HbA1c >48mmol/mol*** 115 (29.8%) 264 (34.1%) 230 (50.0%) <0.001 Diet score, mean (SD) 6.50 (2.28) 5.93 (2.47) 7.32 (2.35) <0.001 GAD score, median (IQR) 2.0 (0.0,4.0) 2.0 (0.0,5.0) 3.5 (0.0,7.0) 0.051 PHQ-9 score, median (IQR) 4.0 (1.0,7.0) 4.0 (1.0,7.0) 6.0 (2.0,10.0) 0.020 Abbreviations: IQR, interquartile range; SD, standard deviation; ACS, acute coronary syndrome; CAD, coronary artery disease. *Adjusted for center. **Adjusted for center, age, gender. ***Only for ischemic heart disease patients.

Conclusions

The results emphasize the need of CR in this patient-group and that a targeted CR approach should be considered to achieve equal health opportunities also in the elderly.

Acknowledgement/Funding

Horizon2020

P2509Less effect of cardiac rehabilitation for elderly cardiac patients with lower educational attainment

Background

Previous analyses from EU-CaRE study have shown that elderly cardiac patients with basic education have a greater burden of cardiovascular risk factors and a lower exercise capacity at baseline of cardiac rehabilitation (CR). We hypothesize that participation in CR will diminish this socioeconomic gap.

Purpose

To describe if educational level predicts the benefits of CR in an elderly population in Europe.

Methods

The observational EU-CaRE study is a prospective study with eight participating CR centers in seven countries (Denmark, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Italy, Spain and Switzerland). Consecutive patients age 65 or older with coronary heart disease or valve surgery participating in CR were included. Data were obtained at baseline (T0) and at the end of CR (T1) and include risk factors for cardiovascular disease, clinical and psychological assessment, medical treatment and exercise capacity. Patients were divided into basic, intermediate and higher educational levels. We compared changes from T0-T1 by multiple regression models.

Results

A total of 1621 (99% of included) patients were eligible for follow-up analyses. At baseline patients with basic education had more diabetes, higher BMI, lower exercise capacity (VO2 peak) and higher scores for depression (GAD) and anxiety (PHQ-9). At T1 they had improved significantly less on these parameters. The results were not affected by adjustment for gender, age, country and baseline value of the variable. Use of evidence-based medication did not differ by level of education.

Difference between T0 and T1 Factor High Intermediate Basic p-value* N total 1621 N=386 N=775 N=460 BMI, mean (SD) −0.16 (0.71) −0.08 (0.82) −0.26 (0.95) 0.794 LDL (mmol/L), mean (SD) −0.07 (0.63) −0.11 (0.62) −0.04 (0.58) 0.978 HbA1c (mmol/mol), mean (SD) 0.23 (3.70) 0.52 (4.39) 0.04 (5.79) 0.021 GAD score, mean (SD) −0.92 (2.72) −0.76 (3.07) −0.13 (3.47) 0.003 PHQ-9 score, mean (SD) −1.45 (3.21) −1.16 (3.36) −0.93 (4.49) <0.001 Diet score, mean (SD) 0.57 (1.72) 0.63 (1.90) 0.23 (1.81) 0.003 VO2 peak (ml/kg/min), mean (SD) 2.47 (2.90) 1.95 (2.78) 1.75 (2.56) 0.016 *Adjusted for gender, age, country and baseline value.

Difference in VO2peak, GAD and PHQ score

Conclusions

In this large European study with high-quality data from 7 CR centers we found an increased gap disfavoring the lower educated elderly patients participating in CR. These results indicate that “one-size cardiac rehabilitation” does not fit all and indicate that a more personalized CR with attention to the different needs of some patient groups is appropriate.

Acknowledgement/Funding

Horizon2020