High Prevalence of Malnutrition and Micronutrient Deficiencies in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease Early in Disease Course

BACKGROUND

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at an increased risk of malnutrition. The goal of this study was to define the prevalence of malnutrition and micronutrient deficiencies in recently diagnosed IBD patients and to compare the performance of existing malnutrition screening tools in identifying IBD patients at increased risk for malnutrition.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of adult patients with recently diagnosed IBD (≤18 months disease duration). A diagnosis of malnutrition was made utilizing the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism malnutrition criteria. Serum micronutrient levels were included. The sensitivity of 5 malnutrition screening tools in identifying patients at moderate-high risk of malnutrition was determined based on the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism malnutrition definition. Descriptive statistics summarized the data and univariate analyses tested associations.

RESULTS

A total of 182 patients were included for analysis; 65 (36%) met criteria for malnutrition. A total of 135 (74%) patients had ≥1 micronutrient level checked and 105 (78%) had ≥1 deficiency. Patients with prior surgery (odds ratio [OR], 4.5; P = .004), active Crohn's disease (OR, 2.8; P = .03), and diarrhea (OR, 2.1; P = .02) were more likely to be malnourished. The Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool and Saskatchewan IBD Nutrition Risk Tool had the highest sensitivity (100%) in predicting those at moderate-high risk of malnutrition at the time of screening.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with recently diagnosed IBD have a high prevalence of malnutrition and micronutrient deficiencies. Both the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool and Saskatchewan IBD Nutrition Risk Tool can be used to identify those at increased risk of malnutrition. Future studies and screening tool development are necessary to identify those at risk of developing malnutrition to facilitate timely referral for nutritional evaluation and prevent disease related complications.

Cystoid macular oedema in uveitis: an unsolved problem

Most papers on the subject of CMO associated with uveitis are retrospective, combine patients with different disease aetiologies, at different stages of evolution, and often describe patients who were previous treatment failures with other therapies besides the one under consideration. There are almost no prospective randomised double-masked controlled studies. This is perhaps in part due to the relative sparsity of uveitis patients seen by many uveitis centres. At the moment, treatment is largely empirical, based in large part on the studies, and others, quoted above. The need to regularly repeat courses of therapy, loss of efficacy of certain form of therapy after repeated use, and cumulative side-effects, all need to be taken into consideration when interpreting results and deciding upon the best approach to be adopted. The risks to the patient's well-being increase with the addition of systemic medication, and long-term steroid use can cause hypertension, induce or exacerbate diabetes, cause premature osteoporosis, cushingoid features, peptic ulceration and aseptic necrosis of the femoral head. Immunosuppressive drugs can be nephrotoxic, hepatotoxic, cause hypertension, gastric disturbances and excessive hair growth. The assessment of macular changes, both structurally and functionally, is the key aspect in understanding visual loss in CMO and also in predicting potential visualrecovery. The combined use of the various tools mentioned here, such as SLO, OCT and electrodiagnostic tests, may give us some of the necessary answers in this process. However, all these tests will need to be validated. A prospective analysis of CMO in cases of uveitis, especially if coupled with therapeutic intervention, will give us the opportunity to achieve this objective.