Early tumor shrinkage and depth of response in patients with metastatic esophageal cancer treated with 2-weekly docetaxel combined with cisplatin plus fluorouracil: an exploratory analysis of the JCOG0807

BACKGROUND

We herein investigated the association between early tumor shrinkage (ETS) and depth of response (DpR) and clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic esophageal cancer treated with 2-weekly docetaxel combined with cisplatin plus fluorouracil (bDCF) using data from the JCOG0807, a phase I/II trial of bDCF as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic esophageal cancer.

METHODS

ETS was defined as a percent decrease in the sum of the target lesions' longest diameter after 8 weeks, whereas DpR was defined as a percentage of the maximal tumor shrinkage during the treatment course. Multivariable analyses were conducted to identify significant prognostic variables in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS): one for ETS and covariates, and another for DpR and covariates.

RESULTS

Among 53 patients, 35 patients with ETS ≥ 20% (66.0%) had longer PFS (7.5 vs. 3.4 months, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.26, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.14-0.49), OS (13.8 vs. 6.1 months, HR 0.20, 95% CI 0.11-0.39), and PPS (6.4 vs. 2.8 months, HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.20-0.72) than those with ETS < 20%. In addition, 37 patients with DpR ≥ 30% (69.8%) had longer PFS (7.5 vs. 2.9 months, HR 0.17, 95% CI 0.08-0.34), OS (13.8 vs. 6.0 months, HR 0.14, 95% CI 0.07-0.27), and PPS (6.8 vs. 2.8 months, HR 0.30, 95% CI 0.15-0.58) than those with DpR < 30%. Multivariable analyses revealed that each ETS and DpR was an independent factor of longer PFS and OS.

CONCLUSIONS

ETS and DpR might be associated with clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic esophageal cancer treated with bDCF.

The impacts of initiating regorafenib with reduced dose on treatment outcomes in metastatic colorectal cancer

133

Background: Since the results of the ReDOS study were published, starting regorafenib (REG) at a reduced dose is now considered a treatment option for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, the impact of starting REG at a reduced dose on treatment outcomes in the real-world setting has not been fully investigated. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients who received REG for mCRC at 4 institutions between May 2013 and December 2020. These patients were divided into two groups: those who started REG before (Period A) and after (Period B) the ReDOS study publication (May 2018). The treatment outcomes between Period A and B were compared in this analysis. Results: A total of 573 patients were evaluated (385 in Period A and 188 in Period B, respectively). In Period B, significantly more patients started REG with reduced dose (34.3% vs. 75.5%, p< 0.001). The median time to first dose reduction was 32.0 days [95% CI: 29.1-34.9] in Period A and 61.0 days [95% CI: 33.7-88.9] in Period B, which was significantly longer in Period B (HR = 0.685, p= 0.003). Both any grades and ≥grade3 hand foot skin reaction (HFSR) were significantly less frequent in Period B than in Period A (any grades: 65.5% vs 54.8%, p= 0.017, ≥grade3: 21.3% vs 14.4%, p= 0.054). The median time to onset of any grades HFSR was 16.0 days [95% CI: 13.6-18.4] in Period A and 28.0 days [95% CI: 15.6-40.4] in Period B, which was significantly longer in Period B (HR = 0.738, p= 0.007). The median overall survival was 6.7 months [95% CI: 5.9-7.4] in Period A, and 5.4 month [95% CI: 4.3-6.5] in Period, respectively (HR = 1.105, p= 0.281). The median progression free survival was 2.0 months [95% CI: 1.9-2.1] in Period A and 2.1 months [95% CI: 1.8-2.4] in Period B, respectively (HR = 1.064, p= 0.498). Conclusions: Our results suggest that starting REG at a reduced dose may contribute to reducing the frequency and delaying the onset of HFSR, whereas it may not affect efficacy.

Biomarker analysis for patients with pancreatic cancer treated with nanoliposomal irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin

BACKGROUND

Nanoliposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV) is a standard second-line therapy for patients with pancreatic cancer. Identification of biomarkers is important to determine appropriate treatment strategies. We investigated the clinical practice outcomes and biomarkers associated with the nanoliposomal irinotecan plus 5-FU/LV regimen.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the data of patients treated with nanoliposomal irinotecan plus 5-FU/LV as a second or subsequent treatment after gemcitabine-based therapy between June 2020 and March 2021 at Shizuoka Cancer Center.

RESULTS

We analyzed 55 consecutive patients who met the selection criteria. At a median of 9.4 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) and median overall survival (OS) were 2.3 and 6.6 months, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) was significantly associated with PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 2.16; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09-4.30; P = 0.028) and OS (0 vs. 1 or 2: HR 2.46; 95% CI 1.15-5.25; P = 0.029). The OS was significantly longer in patients with CA19-9 response than in those without CA19-9 response (12.6 vs. 5.6 months; HR 0.24; 95% CI 0.08-0.75; P = 0.014).

CONCLUSIONS

Nanoliposomal irinotecan was efficacious and tolerable in clinical practice. GPS and CA19-9 response were good candidates as predictive biomarkers, whereas GPS was a good candidate prognostic biomarker for the nanoliposomal irinotecan plus 5-FU/LV regimen.

[Treatment Strategy with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Genetic Testing for Colorectal Cancer with Microsatellite Instability-High]

Recently, pembrolizumab have been approved for advanced solid tumor with microsatellite instability-high, and nivolumab including combination therapy with ipilimumab for colorectal cancer with microsatellite instability-high, and usefulness of those 3 checkpoint inhibitors have been paid attention. Genetic testing is essential for selecting molecular-targeted drugs in colorectal cancer; however, the type of tests and their optimal timing are becoming more complicated. Hence, this article reviews the gene mutation tests used for advanced colorectal cancer, the molecular mechanism of colorectal cancer with microsatellite instability-high, the clinical development status of immune checkpoint inhibitors, and the future perspective on treatment strategy.

Present status of germline findings in precision medicine for Japanese cancer patients: issues in the current system

OBJECTIVE

Since 2019, precision cancer medicine has been covered by national insurance in Japan; however, to date, germline findings have not been fully reported. The aim of this study was to evaluate the current status and raise a problem of germline finding analysis and disclosure in Japanese precision cancer medicine.

METHODS

Germline findings of 52 genes were examined in 296 cases with advanced cancer by a case series study.

RESULTS

Six (2.0%) cases were examined by the Oncoguide™ NCC Oncopanel with germline testing, but no germline findings were reported. The remaining 290 (98.0%) cases were analyzed by FoundationOne® CDx (tumor-only testing), which recognized 404 pathogenic variants; those of BRCA1/2 were recognized in 16 (5.5%) tumors. Our institutional algorithm suggested 39 candidate germline findings in 34 cases, while the public algorithm listed at least 91 candidate germline findings. Four germline findings had been previously identified (BRCA1: 3 and ATM: 1). Nine of 30 cases with candidate germline findings excluding these known germline findings refused or deferred germline testing. Only 4 of 16 cases that received counseling underwent germline testing, and those 4 revealed 3 germline findings (BRCA2, CDK4 and RAD51C); in total, 8 (2.7%) germline findings were revealed. Reasons for refusing genetic counseling and/or germline testing included extra hospital visits, added expense for germline testing due to limited national insurance coverage, poor patient physical condition and no known family members associated with the possible germline finding.

CONCLUSIONS

In current Japanese precision cancer medicine, only a small fraction of the patients undergoes germline testing and demonstrated germline finding. The current results suggested a need for earlier indications for precision cancer medicine, broader insurance coverage and more efficient germline finding prediction algorithms, to increase the number of germline testings and to improve the following managements.

The survival benefit of increasing the number of active drugs for metastatic colorectal cancer: A multicenter retrospective study

Background

The development of chemotherapy and treatment strategies for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) have provided patients with significant survival benefits. Currently, molecular targeting agents and late‐line treatment with regorafenib and trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) are available. However, the impact of this increase in drug availability on overall survival (OS) in mCRC remains a clinical question.

Methods

We retrospectively collected data on consecutive mCRC patients who were treated at three institutions in Japan. We divided the patients into three cohorts: patients who initiated first‐line treatment from Jan 2005 to Dec 2006 (cohort A: only cytotoxic drugs available), Jan 2007 to Dec 2011 (cohort B: molecular targeting drugs available), and Jan 2012 to Sep 2016 (cohort C: late‐line treatment available).

Results

A total of 1409 consecutive patients were analyzed. The median survival time (MST) in cohorts A, B, and C was 18.6, 25.4, and 26.4 months, respectively. The hazard ratio (HR) for cohort B versus A was 0.81 (95% CI 0.68–0.97), for cohort C versus A was 0.74 (95% CI 0.61–0.89), and for cohort C versus B was 0.92 (0.81–1.03). The median number of administered drugs (range) was 3 (1–5) in cohort A, 4 (1–7) in cohort B, and 4 (1–7) in cohort C. The increase in drug availability extended the MST from 15.5 months in patients treated with ≤3 drugs to 36.0–37.3 months in patients treated with six to seven drugs.

Conclusion

The development of chemotherapy including late‐line treatments could improve the prognosis of mCRC patients.

Efficacy and safety of S-1 following gemcitabine with cisplatin for advanced biliary tract cancer

Background Combination therapy of gemcitabine with cisplatin (GC) is a standard first-line therapy for unresectable or recurrent biliary tract cancer (BTC). S-1 is often used as a second-line therapy in clinical practice, based on the results of some clinical studies investigating its efficacy and safety following gemcitabine monotherapy. However, few studies have reported on the clinical outcomes of S-1 following GC. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the efficacy and safety of S-1 following GC for unresectable and recurrent BTC. Methods We retrospectively collected the data of 116 patients (pts) who were treated with S-1 as a second-line therapy following GC for unresectable or recurrent BTC at Shizuoka Cancer Center (November 2009 to July 2019). Results Of these 116 pts., 84 were assessable. Patient characteristics were as follows: intrahepatic bile duct/extrahepatic bile duct/gallbladder cancer, 30/23/31 pts.; metastatic/recurrent/locally advanced, 57/17/10 pts. The median time to treatment failure and overall survival were 2.5 and 6.0 months, respectively. Among 65 pts. with measurable lesions, the overall response rate was 3.1% (2/65 pts) and the disease control rate was 24.6% (19/65 pts). The common grade 3/4 toxicities included anemia (12%), neutropenia (4%), infections (16%), fatigue (6%), and diarrhea (4%). Dose reduction or treatment schedule modification of S-1 was required in 29 pts. (34.5%), and 17 pts. (20%) terminated S-1 due to adverse events. Conclusions The efficacy and safety of S-1 following GC were almost the same as those of S-1 following GEM monotherapy for unresectable or recurrent BTC.

The Prognostic Impact of KRAS G12C Mutation in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Observational Study

BACKGROUND

KRAS is one of the most frequently mutated oncogenes in colorectal cancer (CRC). Recently, a novel therapy targeting KRAS G12C mutation has demonstrated promising activities for corresponding advanced solid tumors, including metastatic CRC (mCRC). However, the prognostic impact of the KRAS G12C mutation remains unclear in patients with mCRC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients with mCRC who received first-line chemotherapy between January 2005 and December 2017 at four large oncology facilities in Japan. Survival outcomes were compared between patients with KRAS G12C and those with non-G12C mutations.

RESULTS

Among 2,457 patients with mCRC, 1,632 met selection criteria, and of these, 696 had KRAS exon 2 mutations, including 45 with KRAS G12C mutation tumors. Patient characteristics were not significantly different between the KRAS G12C and non-G12C groups. At a median follow-up of 64.8 months, patients with the KRAS G12C mutation showed significantly shorter first-line progression-free survival (PFS; median, 9.4 vs. 10.8 months; p = .015) and overall survival (OS; median, 21.1 vs. 27.3 months; p = .015) than those with non-G12C mutations. Multivariate analysis also showed that KRAS G12C mutation was significantly associated with shorter PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-1.96, p = .030) and OS (HR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.01-2.00; p = .044).

CONCLUSION

We demonstrate that, compared with non-G12C mutations, KRAS G12C mutation is significantly correlated with shorter first-line PFS and OS. These findings indicate the relevance of a stratified treatment targeting KRAS G12C mutation in mCRC.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Among patients with KRAS exon 2 mutated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 9.4 and 21.1 months, respectively, for G12C mutation and 10.8 and 27.3 months, respectively, for patients with non-G12C mutations, indicating significantly shorter PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08-2.01; p = .015) and OS (HR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.08-2.08; p = .015) in patients with G12C mutation than in those with non-G12C mutations. Furthermore, multivariate analysis showed that KRAS G12C mutation was independently associated with shorter first-line PFS and OS. Thus, these findings underscore the relevance of a stratified treatment targeting KRAS G12C mutation in mCRC.

Impact of tumor growth rate during preceding treatment on tumor response to nivolumab or irinotecan in advanced gastric cancer

Background

Nivolumab (NIVO) and irinotecan (IRI) are standard treatments for refractory advanced gastric cancer (AGC); however, it is unclear which drug should be administered first or in which cases. The tumor growth rate (TGR) during preceding treatment is reported to be associated with tumor response in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with regorafenib or trifluridine/tipiracil, suggesting that TGR may be useful for drug selection. Therefore, we evaluated the association between TGR during preceding treatment and the tumor response to NIVO or IRI.

Patients and methods

We retrospectively evaluated consecutive AGC patients treated with NIVO or IRI and divided them into slow-growing (Slow) and rapid-growing (Rapid) groups according to TGR and the presence or absence of new lesions (NL+/NL−, respectively) during preceding treatment (Slow group: NL− with low TGR <0.30%/day; Rapid group: NL+ or high TGR ≥0.30%/day).

Results

A total of 117 patients (Rapid/Slow groups, 72/45; NIVO/IRI groups, 32/85) were eligible. All baseline characteristics except peritoneal metastases were similar between patients treated with NIVO and IRI in the Rapid and Slow groups. The response rate was significantly higher in patients treated with NIVO compared with IRI [31%/3%; odds ratio (OR), 13.8; P = 0.01; adjusted OR, 52; P = 0.002] in the Slow group, but there was no difference between patients treated with NIVO and IRI (5%/8%; OR, 0.68; P = 0.73; adjusted OR, 0.94; P = 0.96) in the Rapid group. Disease control rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival were consistent with these results.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that NIVO treatment is a more favorable option for patients with slow-growing tumors, and NIVO and IRI are similarly recommended for patients with rapid-growing tumors in refractory AGC. TGR and NL emergence during preceding treatment may be helpful for drug selection and warrant further investigation.

•

NIVO and IRI are standard treatments for refractory AGC, although it is unclear which should be administered first.

•

TGR may be useful for drug selection, therefore we evaluated the association between TGR and the tumor response to NIVO or IRI.

•

In the Slow group, the response rate (RR) was significantly higher in patients treated with NIVO compared with IRI.

•

In the Rapid group, there was no significant difference in RR between the NIVO and IRI groups.

•

TGR and NL emergence during preceding treatment may be useful for drug selection.

Feasibility and efficacy of chemoradiotherapy with concurrent split-dose cisplatin after induction chemotherapy with docetaxel/cisplatin/5-fluorouracil for locally advanced head and neck cancer

Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with concurrent high-dose cisplatin (CDDP) is a standard treatment for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (LA-SCCHN). Docetaxel plus CDDP and 5-fluorouracil (TPF) induction chemotherapy (ICT) prior to CRT is considered for patients at high risk of distant metastases. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of CRT with split-dose CDDP after TPF-ICT for LA-SCCHN. A total of 21 LA-SCCHN patients treated with TPF-ICT followed by concurrent CRT with split-dose CDDP between January 2011 and December 2017 were retrospectively analysed. The patients' characteristics were i) median age 66 years (48-75 years); ii) male/female, 21/0; iii) performance status 0-1/2, 20/1; iv) larynx/hypopharynx/oropharynx/oral cavity, 4/8/8/1 and v) clinical stage III/IV, 3/18. The numbers of TPF-ICT cycles 1/2/3 were 2/3/16. Median cumulative doses of CDDP in TPF-ICT and CRT were 180.0 and 206.7 mg/m², respectively. All patients completed 70 Gy RT. The complete response rate was 76.2%. At a median follow-up of 51.5 months, median PFS and OS were not reached and 65.5 months, respectively. The most common grade 3 or worse toxicities during CRT-ICT were stomatitis (48%), dysphagia (21%), anorexia (17%) and leukopenia (14%). However, no grade 2 or worse nephrotoxicity, neurotoxicity or ototoxicity was observed. The results demonstrated that concurrent CRT with split-dose CDDP after TPF-ICT is feasible and effective for LA-SCCHN.

Impact of tumor growth rate during preceding treatment on tumor response to nivolumab or irinotecan in advanced gastric cancer

84

Background: Although nivolumab (NIVO) and irinotecan (IRI) are recognized as standard third-line and further treatments for patients (pts) with advanced gastric cancer (AGC), the drug that should be administered first remains unclear. Conversely, tumor growth rate (TGR) during preceding treatment was associated with tumor response to regorafenib or trifluridine/tipiracil in colorectal cancer. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 212 pts with AGC treated with NIVO or IRI for the first time between January 2015 and June 2018 at three institutions. The main inclusion criteria were ECOG PS of 0–2, prior use of fluoropyrimidines and taxanes, and no prior use of NIVO or IRI. Pts were classified into slow- (SG) and rapid- (RG) growing groups according to TGR and presence or absence of new lesions (NL) during preceding treatment. TGR = (D1 − D0)/100D0 (CT1 − CT0), where CT1 is the date of CT at PD during preceding treatment, CT0 is the date of CT before CT1, and Dn is the sum of target lesion diameters at CTn. SG and RG were defined as NL− with low TGR and NL− with high TGR or NL+, respectively. TGR cut-off value was defined as a median TGR of 0.30%/day. Results: A total of 117 pts (RG/SG, 72/45; NIVO/IRI, 32/85) were eligible. Almost all baseline characteristics were similar between the NIVO and IRI groups among the RG or SG, whereas the proportion of pts with peritoneum metastases was higher in the NIVO group than in the IRI group among the RG. The response rate (RR) was significantly higher with NIVO than with IRI [31% vs. 3%, odds ratio (OR): 13.8, p = 0.01; adjusted OR (aOR): 52, p = 0.002] among the SG, whereas it was comparable between both drugs (5% vs. 8%, OR: 0.68, p = 0.73; aOR: 0.94, p = 0.96) among the RG. PFS was longer with NIVO than with IRI [median PFS (mPFS) 4.2 vs. 1.9 months (m), hazard ratio (HR): 0.50, p = 0.10] among the SG, whereas it was shorter with NIVO than with IRI (mPFS 1.6 vs. 2.1 m, HR: 1.37, p = 0.28) in the RG. Conclusions: RR was higher with NIVO than with IRI among slow growing tumors, whereas it was comparable between both drugs among rapid growing tumors. TGR during preceding treatment might be helpful for drug selection in pts with AGC who are considered for treatment with NIVO or IRI.

Immunoglobulin G4-related sclerosing cholangitis diagnosed by liver biopsy: a case report

Patients with immunoglobulin (Ig) G4-related sclerosing cholangitis typically have a high serum IgG4 level. However, here we describe our experience of a patient with a normal serum IgG4 level for whom the cholangitis was diagnosed by liver biopsy. A 61-year-old male presented with elevated liver enzymes and a normal serum IgG4 level. The hilar, intrahepatic, and upper extrahepatic bile ducts were stenotic, with no evidence of a pancreatic lesion. We therefore performed a liver biopsy to differentiate between cholangiocarcinoma and primary sclerosing cholangitis. Pathological examination revealed lymphoplasmacytic infiltrates around the bile ducts with a storiform fibrosis. IgG4-positive plasma cells were also observed. These results fulfilled the Japanese diagnostic criteria for IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis. When this condition is suspected, liver biopsy should be performed even when serum IgG4 levels are normal.