1
|
Graeßner M, Jungwirth B, Frank E, Schaller SJ, Kochs E, Ulm K, Blobner M, Ulm B, Podtschaske AH, Kagerbauer SM. Enabling personalized perioperative risk prediction by using a machine-learning model based on preoperative data. Sci Rep 2023; 13:7128. [PMID: 37130884 PMCID: PMC10153050 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-33981-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2022] [Accepted: 04/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Preoperative risk assessment is essential for shared decision-making and adequate perioperative care. Common scores provide limited predictive quality and lack personalized information. The aim of this study was to create an interpretable machine-learning-based model to assess the patient's individual risk of postoperative mortality based on preoperative data to allow analysis of personal risk factors. After ethical approval, a model for prediction of postoperative in-hospital mortality based on preoperative data of 66,846 patients undergoing elective non-cardiac surgery between June 2014 and March 2020 was created with extreme gradient boosting. Model performance and the most relevant parameters were shown using receiver operating characteristic (ROC-) and precision-recall (PR-) curves and importance plots. Individual risks of index patients were presented in waterfall diagrams. The model included 201 features and showed good predictive abilities with an area under receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve of 0.95 and an area under precision-recall curve (AUPRC) of 0.109. The feature with the highest information gain was the preoperative order for red packed cell concentrates followed by age and c-reactive protein. Individual risk factors could be identified on patient level. We created a highly accurate and interpretable machine learning model to preoperatively predict the risk of postoperative in-hospital mortality. The algorithm can be used to identify factors susceptible to preoperative optimization measures and to identify risk factors influencing individual patient risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Graeßner
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, School of Medicine, University Hospital Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Germany
| | - Bettina Jungwirth
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, School of Medicine, University Hospital Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Germany
| | - Elke Frank
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, School of Medicine, University Hospital Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Germany
- Commercial department, Klinikum rechts der isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stefan Josef Schaller
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine (CVK, CCM), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Eberhard Kochs
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Kurt Ulm
- Department of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Manfred Blobner
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, School of Medicine, University Hospital Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Germany
| | - Bernhard Ulm
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, School of Medicine, University Hospital Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Germany
| | - Armin Horst Podtschaske
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Simone Maria Kagerbauer
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, School of Medicine, University Hospital Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Blobner M, Hunter JM, Ulm K. How robust are the STRONGER and STIL-STRONGER studies? Br J Anaesth 2023; 130:e41-e44. [PMID: 36182557 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.08.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2022] [Revised: 08/24/2022] [Accepted: 08/25/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
In 2020, the Sugammadex vs Neostigmine for Reversal of Neuromuscular Blockade and Postoperative Pulmonary Complications (STRONGER) study provided evidence for the first time that use of sugammadex is associated with fewer postoperative pulmonary complications than use of neostigmine. In a recent publication in the British Journal of Anaesthesia, a secondary analysis of the same data, the Association Between Neuromuscular Blockade Reversal Agent Choice and Postoperative Pulmonary Complications (STIL-STRONGER) study, has produced similar evidence of the advantages of sugammadex over neostigmine in high-risk and older patients undergoing prolonged, elective surgery. Here we consider the implications of the detailed statistical analysis used in these two studies and how its limitations could possibly have enhanced the statistical differences between the two drugs with respect to postoperative pulmonary complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manfred Blobner
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
| | - Jennifer M Hunter
- Department of Musculoskeletal Biology, Institute of Ageing and Chronic Disease, Faculty of Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Kurt Ulm
- Institute of Medical Statistics, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Napieralski R, Schricker G, Auer G, Aubele M, Perkins J, Magdolen V, Ulm K, Hamann M, Walch A, Weichert W, Kiechle M, Wilhelm OG. PITX2 DNA-Methylation: Predictive versus Prognostic Value for Anthracycline-Based Chemotherapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients. Breast Care (Basel) 2021; 16:523-531. [PMID: 34720812 DOI: 10.1159/000510468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2020] [Accepted: 07/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Background PITX2 DNA methylation has been shown to predict outcomes in high-risk breast cancer patients after anthracycline-based chemotherapy. To determine its prognostic versus predictive value, the impact of PITX2 DNA methylation on outcomes was studied in an untreated cohort vs. an anthracycline-treated triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cohort. Material and Methods The percent DNA methylation ratio (PMR) of paired-like homeodomain transcription factor 2 (PITX2) was determined by a validated methylation-specific real-time PCR test. Patient samples of routinely collected archived formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue and clinical data from 144 TNBC patients of 2 independent cohorts (i.e., 66 untreated patients and 78 patients treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy) were analyzed. Results The risk of 5- and 10-year overall survival (OS) increased continuously with rising PITX2 DNA methylation in the anthracycline-treated population, but it increased only slightly during 10-year follow-up time in the untreated patient population. PITX2 DNA methylation with a PMR cutoff of 2 did not show significance for poor vs. good outcomes (OS) in the untreated patient cohort (HR = 1.55; p = 0.259). In contrast, the PITX2 PMR cutoff of 2 identified patients with poor (PMR >2) vs. good (PMR ≤2) outcomes (OS) with statistical significance in the anthracycline-treated cohort (HR = 3.96; p = 0.011). The results in the subgroup of patients who did receive anthracyclines only (no taxanes) confirmed this finding (HR = 5.71; p = 0.014). Conclusion In this hypothesis-generating study PITX2 DNA methylation demonstrated predominantly predictive value in anthracycline treatment in TNBC patients. The risk of poor outcome (OS) correlates with increasing PITX2 DNA methylation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Gert Auer
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | | | - Viktor Magdolen
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics and Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCCTUM), Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Kurt Ulm
- Institute of Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Moritz Hamann
- Department of Gynecology Rotkreuzklinikum München, Munich, Germany
| | - Axel Walch
- Research Unit Analytical Pathology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Munich, Germany
| | - Wilko Weichert
- Institute of Pathology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Marion Kiechle
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics and Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCCTUM), Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Steger A, Dommasch M, Müller A, Sinnecker D, Huster KM, Gotzler T, Gotzler O, Hapfelmeier A, Ulm K, Barthel P, Hnatkova K, Laugwitz KL, Malik M, Schmidt G. Polyscore of autonomic parameters for risk stratification of the elderly general population: the Polyscore study. Europace 2021; 23:789-796. [PMID: 33276379 PMCID: PMC8139819 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euaa359] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2020] [Accepted: 11/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Aims Present society is constantly ageing and elderly frequently suffer from conditions that are difficult and/or costly to treat if detected late. Effective screening of the elderly is therefore needed so that those requiring detailed clinical work-up are identified early. We present a prospective validation of a screening strategy based on a Polyscore of seven predominantly autonomic, non-invasive risk markers. Methods and results Within a population-based survey in Germany (INVADE study), participants aged ≥60 years were enrolled between August 2013 and February 2015. Seven prospectively defined Polyscore components were obtained during 30-min continuous recordings of electrocardiogram, blood pressure, and respiration. Out of 1956 subjects, 168 were excluded due to atrial fibrillation, implanted pacemaker, or unsuitable recordings. All-cause mortality over a median 4-year follow-up was prospectively defined as the primary endpoint. The Polyscore divided the investigated population (n = 1788, median age: 72 years, females: 58%) into three predefined groups with low (n = 1405, 78.6%), intermediate (n = 326, 18.2%), and high risk (n = 57, 3.2%). During the follow-up, 82 (4.6%) participants died. Mortality in the Polyscore-defined risk groups was 3.4%, 7.4%, and 17.5%, respectively (P < 0.0001). The Polyscore-based mortality prediction was independent of Framingham score, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and major stroke and/or myocardial infarction history. It was particularly effective in those aged <75 years (n = 1145). Conclusion The Polyscore-based mortality risk assessment from short-term non-invasive recordings is effective in the elderly general population, especially those aged 60–74 years. Implementation of a comprehensive Polyscore screening of this age group is proposed to advance preventive medical care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Steger
- Klinik für Innere Medizin I, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Michael Dommasch
- Klinik für Innere Medizin I, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Alexander Müller
- Klinik für Innere Medizin I, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Daniel Sinnecker
- Klinik für Innere Medizin I, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Katharina M Huster
- Klinik für Innere Medizin I, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Teresa Gotzler
- Klinik für Innere Medizin I, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Othmar Gotzler
- INVADE Study Group, Karl-Böhm-Str. 32, 85598 Baldham, Germany
| | - Alexander Hapfelmeier
- Institute of Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, Technische Universität München, Grillparzerstr. 18, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Kurt Ulm
- Institute of Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, Technische Universität München, Grillparzerstr. 18, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Petra Barthel
- Klinik für Innere Medizin I, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Katerina Hnatkova
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, ICTEM, Hammersmith Campus, 72 Du Cane Road, Shepherd's Bush, London W120NN, UK
| | - Karl-Ludwig Laugwitz
- Klinik für Innere Medizin I, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Marek Malik
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, ICTEM, Hammersmith Campus, 72 Du Cane Road, Shepherd's Bush, London W120NN, UK.,Department of Internal Cardiology Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Jihlavská 20, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Georg Schmidt
- Klinik für Innere Medizin I, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tufman A, Neumann J, Manapov F, Sellmer L, Jung A, Kauffmann-Guerrero D, Kahnert K, Mertsch P, Borgmeier A, Semrau S, Rittmeyer A, Ulm B, Ulm K, Flentje M, Fietkau R, Huber RM. Prognostic and predictive value of PD-L1 expression and tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TiLs) in locally advanced NSCLC treated with simultaneous radiochemotherapy in the randomized, multicenter, phase III German Intergroup lung Trial (GILT). Lung Cancer 2021; 160:17-27. [PMID: 34371299 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2021.07.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2021] [Revised: 06/30/2021] [Accepted: 07/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Immune checkpoint inhibition after radiochemotherapy (RTCT) has become a new standard of care for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. However, little is known about the prognostic role of immune response markers in this setting. We analysed PD-L1 expression and tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TiLs) in tumour biopsies from the multicenter German Intergroup Lung Trial (GILT), which previously randomised patients with stage III NSCLC to RTCT with or without consolidation chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed tumour biopsies from patients treated in the GILT trial. PD-L1 expression was analysed using the Ventana SP263 assay and TiL score (low, intermediate, high) and pattern (excluded, inflamed, desert) were assessed. The primary endpoint of the biomarker analysis was PFS in patients with PD-L1 ≥ 1% vs. PD-L1 < 1% NSCLC. Secondary endpoints explored the prognostic relevance of additional PD-L1 expression levels and TiL score and pattern. RESULTS Biopsies were available from 92 patients treated with RTCT. Patients with available tumor tissue did not differ significantly from the whole study population. PD-L1 scores from 78 samples were available for analysis. There was no difference in PFS in the PD-L1 < 1% vs. PD-L1 ≥ 1% subgroups. TiL score was available in 66 patients. Patients with high TiL score showed favourable overall survival compared to the low TiL subgroup. This trend was most pronounced in those patients treated with consolidative chemotherapy. CONCLUSION In this analysis, PD-L1 expression did not correlate with PFS following RTCT. However, patients with TiLs > 10% were found to have longer overall survival, especially for those patients treated with consolidation chemotherapy after the end of RTCT. Further analyses to explore the prognostic and predictive relevance of TiLs in the context of consolidative checkpoint inhibition with durvalumab are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Tufman
- Department of Internal Medicine V, Thoracic Oncology Centre Munich, LMU Munich, Ziemssenstr. 1, 80336 Munich, Germany; Comprehensive Pneumology Center Munich (CPC-M), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Max-Lebsche-Platz 31, 81377 Munich, Germany.
| | - Jens Neumann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany.
| | - Farkhad Manapov
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany.
| | - Laura Sellmer
- Department of Internal Medicine V, Thoracic Oncology Centre Munich, LMU Munich, Ziemssenstr. 1, 80336 Munich, Germany; Comprehensive Pneumology Center Munich (CPC-M), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Max-Lebsche-Platz 31, 81377 Munich, Germany.
| | - Andreas Jung
- Institute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, LMU Munich, Thalkirchner Str. 36, 80337 Munich, Germany.
| | - Diego Kauffmann-Guerrero
- Department of Internal Medicine V, Thoracic Oncology Centre Munich, LMU Munich, Ziemssenstr. 1, 80336 Munich, Germany; Comprehensive Pneumology Center Munich (CPC-M), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Max-Lebsche-Platz 31, 81377 Munich, Germany.
| | - Kathrin Kahnert
- Department of Internal Medicine V, Thoracic Oncology Centre Munich, LMU Munich, Ziemssenstr. 1, 80336 Munich, Germany; Comprehensive Pneumology Center Munich (CPC-M), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Max-Lebsche-Platz 31, 81377 Munich, Germany.
| | - Pontus Mertsch
- Department of Internal Medicine V, Thoracic Oncology Centre Munich, LMU Munich, Ziemssenstr. 1, 80336 Munich, Germany; Comprehensive Pneumology Center Munich (CPC-M), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Max-Lebsche-Platz 31, 81377 Munich, Germany.
| | - Astrid Borgmeier
- Department of Internal Medicine V, Thoracic Oncology Centre Munich, LMU Munich, Ziemssenstr. 1, 80336 Munich, Germany; Comprehensive Pneumology Center Munich (CPC-M), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Max-Lebsche-Platz 31, 81377 Munich, Germany.
| | - Sabine Semrau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen, Universitätsstr. 27, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
| | - Achim Rittmeyer
- Department of Pneumology, Lung Clinic Immenhausen, Robert-Koch-Str. 3, 34376 Immenhausen, Germany.
| | - Bernhard Ulm
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
| | - Kurt Ulm
- Institute of Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str 22, 81675 Munich, Germany.
| | - Michael Flentje
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Würzburg, Josef-Schneider Str. 2, 97080 Würzburg, Germany.
| | - Rainer Fietkau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen, Universitätsstr. 27, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
| | - Rudolf Maria Huber
- Department of Internal Medicine V, Thoracic Oncology Centre Munich, LMU Munich, Ziemssenstr. 1, 80336 Munich, Germany; Comprehensive Pneumology Center Munich (CPC-M), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Max-Lebsche-Platz 31, 81377 Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Schneider J, Mijočević H, Ulm K, Ulm B, Weidlich S, Würstle S, Rothe K, Treiber M, Iakoubov R, Mayr U, Lahmer T, Rasch S, Herner A, Burian E, Lohöfer F, Braren R, Makowski MR, Schmid RM, Protzer U, Spinner C, Geisler F. SARS-CoV-2 serology increases diagnostic accuracy in CT-suspected, PCR-negative COVID-19 patients during pandemic. Respir Res 2021; 22:119. [PMID: 33892720 PMCID: PMC8062836 DOI: 10.1186/s12931-021-01717-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2020] [Accepted: 04/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In the absence of PCR detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA, accurate diagnosis of COVID-19 is challenging. Low-dose computed tomography (CT) detects pulmonary infiltrates with high sensitivity, but findings may be non-specific. This study assesses the diagnostic value of SARS-CoV-2 serology for patients with distinct CT features but negative PCR. Methods IgM/IgG chemiluminescent immunoassay was performed for 107 patients with confirmed (group A: PCR + ; CT ±) and 46 patients with suspected (group B: repetitive PCR-; CT +) COVID-19, admitted to a German university hospital during the pandemic’s first wave. A standardized, in-house CT classification of radiological signs of a viral pneumonia was used to assess the probability of COVID-19. Results Seroconversion rates (SR) determined on day 5, 10, 15, 20 and 25 after symptom onset (SO) were 8%, 25%, 65%, 76% and 91% for group A, and 0%, 10%, 19%, 37% and 46% for group B, respectively; (p < 0.01). Compared to hospitalized patients with a non-complicated course (non-ICU patients), seroconversion tended to occur at lower frequency and delayed in patients on intensive care units. SR of patients with CT findings classified as high certainty for COVID-19 were 8%, 22%, 68%, 79% and 93% in group A, compared with 0%, 15%, 28%, 50% and 50% in group B (p < 0.01). SARS-CoV-2 serology established a definite diagnosis in 12/46 group B patients. In 88% (8/9) of patients with negative serology > 14 days after symptom onset (group B), clinico-radiological consensus reassessment revealed probable diagnoses other than COVID-19. Sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 serology was superior to PCR > 17d after symptom onset. Conclusions Approximately one-third of patients with distinct COVID-19 CT findings are tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 RNA by PCR rendering correct diagnosis difficult. Implementation of SARS-CoV-2 serology testing alongside current CT/PCR-based diagnostic algorithms improves discrimination between COVID-19-related and non-related pulmonary infiltrates in PCR negative patients. However, sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 serology strongly depends on the time of testing and becomes superior to PCR after the 2nd week following symptom onset.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jochen Schneider
- Department of Internal Medicine II, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany. .,German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), partner site Munich, Munich, Germany.
| | - Hrvoje Mijočević
- German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), partner site Munich, Munich, Germany.,Institute for Virology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Kurt Ulm
- Institute for Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Bernhard Ulm
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Simon Weidlich
- Department of Internal Medicine II, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), partner site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Silvia Würstle
- Department of Internal Medicine II, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Kathrin Rothe
- German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), partner site Munich, Munich, Germany.,Institute for Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Hygiene, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Matthias Treiber
- Department of Internal Medicine II, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Roman Iakoubov
- Department of Internal Medicine II, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Ulrich Mayr
- Department of Internal Medicine II, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Tobias Lahmer
- Department of Internal Medicine II, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sebastian Rasch
- Department of Internal Medicine II, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Alexander Herner
- Department of Internal Medicine II, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Egon Burian
- Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Fabian Lohöfer
- Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Rickmer Braren
- Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Marcus R Makowski
- Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Roland M Schmid
- Department of Internal Medicine II, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Ulrike Protzer
- German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), partner site Munich, Munich, Germany.,Institute for Virology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christoph Spinner
- Department of Internal Medicine II, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), partner site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Fabian Geisler
- Department of Internal Medicine II, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kadeerhan G, Gerhard M, Gao JJ, Mejías-Luque R, Zhang L, Vieth M, Ma JL, Bajbouj M, Suchanek S, Liu WD, Ulm K, Quante M, Li ZX, Zhou T, Schmid R, Classen M, Li WQ, Zhang Y, You WC, Pan KF. Microbiota alteration at different stages in gastric lesion progression: a population-based study in Linqu, China. Am J Cancer Res 2021; 11:561-575. [PMID: 33575087 PMCID: PMC7868750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2020] [Accepted: 12/16/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
In addition to Helicobacter pylori (H.pylori), gastric microbiota may be involved in carcinogenesis process. However, the longitudinal study to assess changes in the gastric microbiota associated with the development of gastric carcinogenesis is still limited. The aim of this study is to explore dynamic microbial alterations in gastric cancer (GC) development based on a 4-year endoscopic follow-up cohort in Linqu County, China. Microbial alterations were investigated by deep sequencing of the microbial 16S ribosomal RNA gene in 179 subjects with various gastric lesions, and validated in paired gastric biopsies prospectively collected before and after lesion progression and in non-progression controls. Significant differences were found in microbial diversity and community structure across various gastric lesions, with 62 candidate differential taxa between at least two lesion groups. Further validations identified Helicobacter, Bacillus, Capnocytophaga and Prevotella to be associated with lesion progression-to-dysplasia (DYS)/GC (all P < 0.05), especially for subjects progressing from intestinal metaplasia (IM) to DYS/GC. The combination of the four genera in a microbial dysbiosis index showed a significant difference after lesion progression-to-DYS/GC compared to controls (P = 0.027). The panel including the four genera identified subjects after progression-to-DYS/GC with an area under the receiver-operating curve (AUC) of 0.941. Predictive significance was found before lesion progression-to-DYS/GC with an AUC = 0.776 and an even better AUC (0.927) for subjects progressing from IM to DYS/GC. Microbiota may play different roles at different stages in gastric carcinogenesis. A panel of bacterial genera associated with gastric lesions may help to assess gastric microbial dysbiosis and show potential predictive values for lesion progression. Our findings provide new clues for the microbial mechanism of H.pylori-associated carcinogenesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gaohaer Kadeerhan
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & InstituteBeijing, China
| | - Markus Gerhard
- PYLOTUM Key Joint Laboratory for Upper GI Cancer, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany, Peking University Cancer Hospital & InstituteBeijing, China
- Institute of Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Hygiene, Technische Universität MünchenMunich, Germany
- German Center for Infection Research, Partner Site MunichMunich, Germany
| | - Juan-Juan Gao
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & InstituteBeijing, China
| | - Raquel Mejías-Luque
- PYLOTUM Key Joint Laboratory for Upper GI Cancer, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany, Peking University Cancer Hospital & InstituteBeijing, China
- Institute of Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Hygiene, Technische Universität MünchenMunich, Germany
- German Center for Infection Research, Partner Site MunichMunich, Germany
| | - Lian Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & InstituteBeijing, China
| | - Michael Vieth
- PYLOTUM Key Joint Laboratory for Upper GI Cancer, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany, Peking University Cancer Hospital & InstituteBeijing, China
- Institute of Pathology, Klinikum BayreuthBayreuth, Germany
| | - Jun-Ling Ma
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & InstituteBeijing, China
| | - Monther Bajbouj
- PYLOTUM Key Joint Laboratory for Upper GI Cancer, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany, Peking University Cancer Hospital & InstituteBeijing, China
- II. Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität MünchenMunich, Germany
| | - Stepan Suchanek
- PYLOTUM Key Joint Laboratory for Upper GI Cancer, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany, Peking University Cancer Hospital & InstituteBeijing, China
- Department of Medicine, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Military University Hospital, Charles UniversityPrague, Czech Republic
| | - Wei-Dong Liu
- Linqu Public Health BureauLinqu, Shandong, China
| | - Kurt Ulm
- PYLOTUM Key Joint Laboratory for Upper GI Cancer, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany, Peking University Cancer Hospital & InstituteBeijing, China
- Institute of Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, Technische Universität MünchenMunich, Germany
| | - Michael Quante
- PYLOTUM Key Joint Laboratory for Upper GI Cancer, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany, Peking University Cancer Hospital & InstituteBeijing, China
- II. Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität MünchenMunich, Germany
| | - Zhe-Xuan Li
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & InstituteBeijing, China
- PYLOTUM Key Joint Laboratory for Upper GI Cancer, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany, Peking University Cancer Hospital & InstituteBeijing, China
| | - Tong Zhou
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & InstituteBeijing, China
| | - Roland Schmid
- PYLOTUM Key Joint Laboratory for Upper GI Cancer, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany, Peking University Cancer Hospital & InstituteBeijing, China
- II. Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität MünchenMunich, Germany
| | - Meinhard Classen
- PYLOTUM Key Joint Laboratory for Upper GI Cancer, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany, Peking University Cancer Hospital & InstituteBeijing, China
- International Digestive Cancer AllianceGermany
| | - Wen-Qing Li
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & InstituteBeijing, China
- PYLOTUM Key Joint Laboratory for Upper GI Cancer, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany, Peking University Cancer Hospital & InstituteBeijing, China
| | - Yang Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & InstituteBeijing, China
- PYLOTUM Key Joint Laboratory for Upper GI Cancer, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany, Peking University Cancer Hospital & InstituteBeijing, China
| | - Wei-Cheng You
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & InstituteBeijing, China
- PYLOTUM Key Joint Laboratory for Upper GI Cancer, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany, Peking University Cancer Hospital & InstituteBeijing, China
| | - Kai-Feng Pan
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & InstituteBeijing, China
- PYLOTUM Key Joint Laboratory for Upper GI Cancer, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany, Peking University Cancer Hospital & InstituteBeijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Guo Y, Zhang Y, Gerhard M, Gao JJ, Mejias-Luque R, Zhang L, Vieth M, Ma JL, Bajbouj M, Suchanek S, Liu WD, Ulm K, Quante M, Li ZX, Zhou T, Schmid R, Classen M, Li WQ, You WC, Pan KF. Effect of Helicobacter pylori on gastrointestinal microbiota: a population-based study in Linqu, a high-risk area of gastric cancer. Gut 2020; 69:1598-1607. [PMID: 31857433 PMCID: PMC7456744 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 155] [Impact Index Per Article: 38.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2019] [Revised: 11/06/2019] [Accepted: 12/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Gastrointestinal microbiota may be involved in Helicobacter pylori-associated gastric cancer development. The aim of this study was to explore the possible microbial mechanisms in gastric carcinogenesis and potential dysbiosis arising from H. pylori infection. DESIGN Deep sequencing of the microbial 16S ribosomal RNA gene was used to investigate alterations in paired gastric biopsies and stool samples in 58 subjects with successful and 57 subjects with failed anti-H. pylori treatment, relative to 49 H. pylori negative subjects. RESULTS In H. pylori positive subjects, richness and Shannon indexes increased significantly (both p<0.001) after successful eradication and showed no difference to those of negative subjects (p=0.493 for richness and p=0.420 for Shannon index). Differential taxa analysis identified 18 significantly altered gastric genera after eradication. The combination of these genera into a Microbial Dysbiosis Index revealed that the dysbiotic microbiota in H. pylori positive mucosa was associated with advanced gastric lesions (chronic atrophic gastritis and intestinal metaplasia/dysplasia) and could be reversed by eradication. Strong coexcluding interactions between Helicobacter and Fusobacterium, Neisseria, Prevotella, Veillonella, Rothia were found only in advanced gastric lesion patients, and were absent in normal/superficial gastritis group. Changes in faecal microbiota included increased Bifidobacterium after successful H. pylori eradication and more upregulated drug-resistant functional orthologs after failed treatment. CONCLUSION H. pylori infection contributes significantly to gastric microbial dysbiosis that may be involved in carcinogenesis. Successful H. pylori eradication potentially restores gastric microbiota to a similar status as found in uninfected individuals, and shows beneficial effects on gut microbiota.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Guo
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Yang Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
- PYLOTUM Key joint laboratory for upper GI cancer, Technische Universität München/Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Munich/Beijing, Germany/China
| | - Markus Gerhard
- PYLOTUM Key joint laboratory for upper GI cancer, Technische Universität München/Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Munich/Beijing, Germany/China
- Institute of Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Hygiene, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
- German Center for Infection Research, Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Juan-Juan Gao
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Raquel Mejias-Luque
- PYLOTUM Key joint laboratory for upper GI cancer, Technische Universität München/Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Munich/Beijing, Germany/China
- Institute of Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Hygiene, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
- German Center for Infection Research, Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Lian Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Michael Vieth
- PYLOTUM Key joint laboratory for upper GI cancer, Technische Universität München/Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Munich/Beijing, Germany/China
- Institute of Pathology, Klinikum Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - Jun-Ling Ma
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Monther Bajbouj
- PYLOTUM Key joint laboratory for upper GI cancer, Technische Universität München/Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Munich/Beijing, Germany/China
- II. Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Stepan Suchanek
- PYLOTUM Key joint laboratory for upper GI cancer, Technische Universität München/Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Munich/Beijing, Germany/China
- Department of Medicine, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Military University Hospital, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Wei-Dong Liu
- Linqu Public Health Bureau, Linqu, Shandong, China
| | - Kurt Ulm
- PYLOTUM Key joint laboratory for upper GI cancer, Technische Universität München/Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Munich/Beijing, Germany/China
- Institute of Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Michael Quante
- PYLOTUM Key joint laboratory for upper GI cancer, Technische Universität München/Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Munich/Beijing, Germany/China
- II. Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Zhe-Xuan Li
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
- PYLOTUM Key joint laboratory for upper GI cancer, Technische Universität München/Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Munich/Beijing, Germany/China
| | - Tong Zhou
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Roland Schmid
- PYLOTUM Key joint laboratory for upper GI cancer, Technische Universität München/Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Munich/Beijing, Germany/China
- II. Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Meinhard Classen
- PYLOTUM Key joint laboratory for upper GI cancer, Technische Universität München/Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Munich/Beijing, Germany/China
- II. Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Wen-Qing Li
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
- PYLOTUM Key joint laboratory for upper GI cancer, Technische Universität München/Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Munich/Beijing, Germany/China
| | - Wei-Cheng You
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
- PYLOTUM Key joint laboratory for upper GI cancer, Technische Universität München/Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Munich/Beijing, Germany/China
| | - Kai-Feng Pan
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
- PYLOTUM Key joint laboratory for upper GI cancer, Technische Universität München/Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Munich/Beijing, Germany/China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Solbach P, Chhatwal P, Woltemate S, Tacconelli E, Buhl M, Autenrieth IB, Vehreschild MJGT, Jazmati N, Gerhard M, Stein-Thoeringer CK, Rupp J, Ulm K, Ott A, Lasch F, Koch A, Manns MP, Suerbaum S, Bachmann O. Microbiota-associated risk factors for C. difficile acquisition in hospitalized patients: A prospective, multicentric study. Clin Infect Dis 2020; 73:e2625-e2634. [PMID: 32589701 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaa871] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Asymptomatic C. difficile colonization is believed to predispose to subsequent C. difficile infection (CDI). While emerging insights into the role of the commensal microbiota in mediating colonization resistance against C. difficile have associated CDI with specific microbial components, corresponding prospectively collected data on colonization with C. difficile are largely unavailable. METHODS C. difficile status was assessed by GDH EIA and real-time PCR targeting the toxin A (tcdA) and B (tcdB) genes. 16S V3 and V4 gene sequencing results from fecal samples of patients tested positive for C. difficile were analyzed by assessing alpha and beta diversity, LefSe, and the Piphillin functional inference approach to estimate functional capacity. RESULTS 1506 patients were recruited into a prospective observational study (DRKS00005335) upon admission into one of five academic hospitals. 936 of them provided fecal samples on admission and at discharge and were thus available for longitudinal analysis. Upon hospital admission, 5.5% (83/1506) and 3.7% (56/1506) of patients were colonized with toxigenic (TCD) and non-toxigenic C. difficile (NTCD), respectively. During hospitalization, 1.7% (16/936) acquired TCD. Risk factors for acquisition of TCD included pre-existing lung diseases, lower GI endoscopy and antibiotics. Species protecting against hospital-related C. difficile acquisition included Gemmiger spp., Odoribacter splanchnicus, Ruminococcus bromii and other Ruminococcus spp.. Metagenomic pathway analysis identified steroid biosynthesis as the most underrepresented metabolic pathway in patients who later acquire C. difficile colonization. CONCLUSIONS Gemmiger spp., Odoribacter splanchnicus, Ruminococcus bromii and other Ruminococci were associated with a decreased risk of C. difficile acquisition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Solbach
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.,German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), partner site Hannover-Braunschweig, Germany.,Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hospital Epidemiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.,Medical Department I, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Patrick Chhatwal
- German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), partner site Hannover-Braunschweig, Germany.,Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hospital Epidemiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Sabrina Woltemate
- German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), partner site Hannover-Braunschweig, Germany.,Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hospital Epidemiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Evelina Tacconelli
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine 1, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany and Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Italy.,German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), partner site Tübingen, Germany
| | - Michael Buhl
- German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), partner site Tübingen, Germany.,Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Ingo B Autenrieth
- German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), partner site Tübingen, Germany.,Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Maria J G T Vehreschild
- 1st Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), partner site Bonn-Cologne, Germany.,Department of Internal Medicine, Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Nathalie Jazmati
- German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), partner site Bonn-Cologne, Germany.,Institute for Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Hygiene, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany; currently: Laboratory Dr. Wisplinghoff, Cologne, Germany
| | - Markus Gerhard
- Institute for Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Hygiene, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.,German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), partner site Munich, Germany
| | - Christoph K Stein-Thoeringer
- German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), partner site Munich, Germany.,Microbiome and Cancer Research Division, German Center for Cancer Research (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jan Rupp
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany.,German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), partner site Hamburg-Lübeck-Borstel-Riems, Germany
| | - Kurt Ulm
- Institute of Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Armin Ott
- Institute of Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Florian Lasch
- Institute for Biometry, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Armin Koch
- Institute for Biometry, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Michael P Manns
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.,German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), partner site Hannover-Braunschweig, Germany
| | - Sebastian Suerbaum
- German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), partner site Hannover-Braunschweig, Germany.,Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hospital Epidemiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.,German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), partner site Munich, Germany.,Chair of Medical Microbiology and Hospital Epidemiology, Max von Pettenkofer Institute, Faculty of Medicine, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Oliver Bachmann
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.,German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), partner site Hannover-Braunschweig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hüsch T, Kretschmer A, Obaje A, Kirschner-Hermanns R, Anding R, Pottek T, Rose A, Olianas R, Friedl A, Homberg R, Pfitzenmaier J, Abdunnur R, Queissert F, Naumann CM, Schweiger J, Wotzka C, Nyarangi-Dix J, Hofmann T, Ulm K, Hübner W, Bauer RM, Haferkamp A. Fixed or adjustable sling in the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence: results from a large cohort study. Transl Androl Urol 2020; 9:1099-1107. [PMID: 32676393 PMCID: PMC7354336 DOI: 10.21037/tau-19-852] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Fixed and adjustable male slings for the treatment of male urinary stress incontinence became increasingly popular during the last decade. Although fixed slings are recommended for the treatment of mild to moderate stress urinary incontinence, there is still a lack of evidence regarding the precise indication for an adjustable male sling. Furthermore, there is still no evidence that one type of male sling is superior to another. However, both, adjustable and fixed slings, are commonly utilized in daily clinical practice. This current investigation aims to evaluate the differences between fixed and adjustable male slings regarding indications, complication rates and functional outcome in the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence in current clinical practice. Methods A total of 294 patients with a fixed and 176 patients with an adjustable male sling were evaluated in a multicenter single arm cohort trial. Data collection was performed retrospectively according the medical record. Functional outcome was prospectively analyzed by standardized, validated questionnaires. Descriptive statistics was performed to present patient characteristics, complication rates and functional outcome. A chi2-test for categorical and independent t-test for continuous variables was performed to identify heterogeneity between the groups and to correlate preoperative characteristics with the outcome. A P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results Patients with higher degree of urinary incontinence (P<0.001) and risk factors such as history of pelvic irradiation (P<0.001) or prior surgery for urethral stricture (P=0.032) were more likely to receive an adjustable MS. Complication rates were comparable except for infection (P=0.009, 0 vs. 2.3%) and pain (P=0.001, 1.7% vs. 11.3%) which occurred more frequently in adjustable slings. Functional outcome according validated questionnaires demonstrated no differences between fixed and adjustable male slings. Conclusions Adjustable male slings are more frequently utilized in patients with higher degree of incontinence and risk factors compared to fixed slings. No differences could be identified between functional outcome which may imply an advantage for adjustability. However, pain and infection rates were significantly higher in adjustable MS and should be considered in the decision process for sling type.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tanja Hüsch
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.,Promedon GmbH, Clinical Research, Kolbermoor, Germany
| | - Alexander Kretschmer
- Department of Urology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.,Vancouver Prostate Center, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Alice Obaje
- Department of Urology, St. Bernward Hospital Hildesheim, Hildesheim, Germany
| | | | - Ralf Anding
- Neuro-Urology/Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Tobias Pottek
- Reconstructive Urology, Vivantes Hospital, Berlin, Germany
| | - Achim Rose
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Helios Hospital Duisburg, Duisburg, Germany
| | | | - Alexander Friedl
- Department of Urology, Merciful Sisters Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Roland Homberg
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, St. Barbara Hospital Hamm GmbH, Hamm, Germany
| | | | - Rudi Abdunnur
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Helios Hospital Schwelm, Schwelm, Germany
| | - Fabian Queissert
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Deutschland
| | - Carsten M Naumann
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Marienhaus Hospital Neuwied, Neuwied, Germany
| | - Josef Schweiger
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Catholic Hospital St. Johann Nepomuk, Erfurt, Germany
| | - Carola Wotzka
- Department of Urology, Diakonie Hospital Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Joanne Nyarangi-Dix
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Torben Hofmann
- Department of Urology, Diakonie Hospital Schwaebisch Hall, Schwaebisch Hall, Germany
| | - Kurt Ulm
- Institute of medical Statistic and Epidemiology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Wilhelm Hübner
- Department of Urology, Hospital Weinviertel Korneuburg, Korneuburg, Austria
| | - Ricarda M Bauer
- Department of Urology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
| | - Axel Haferkamp
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Blobner M, Hunter JM, Ulm K, Hollmann M. Neuromuscular monitoring and reversal: responses to the POPULAR study - Authors' reply. Lancet Respir Med 2020; 7:e7-e8. [PMID: 30709456 DOI: 10.1016/s2213-2600(18)30462-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2018] [Accepted: 10/30/2018] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Manfred Blobner
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich 81675, Germany.
| | - Jennifer M Hunter
- Department of Musculoskeletal Biology, Institute of Ageing and Chronic Disease, Liverpool University, Liverpool, UK
| | - Kurt Ulm
- Department of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, Technical University of Munich, Munich 81675, Germany
| | - Markus Hollmann
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam University, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kiechle M, Schricker G, Napieralski R, Aubele M, Auer G, Ulm K, Perkins J, Paepke S, Hamann M, Wilhelm OG. Abstract P3-08-65: PITX2 DNA methylation: A prognostic/predictive biomarker for anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Cancer Res 2020. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs19-p3-08-65] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Published data on the basis of a research-use-only PITX2 methylation assay using fresh-frozen tissue showed that the PITX2 DNA methylation may be a predictive marker for response to (neo) adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy in breast cancer patients, including high-risk lymph node positive, estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). A retrospective study showed that high-risk ER-positive patients with a high PITX2 methylation ratio (PMR>12) had a poor outcome after anthracycline-based chemotherapy [HR 2,28; 95%-Cl 1,49 - 3,49; p<0.001, median DFS 71 months] compared to patients with low PITX2 methylation ratios [PMR≤12, median DFS 105 months]. Nevertheless, the question regarding the prognostic versus predictive value of PITX2 methylation for anthracycline therapy remained unanswered so far. Within an exploratory study using archived tissue specimen, this question was addressed by comparing the impact of PITX2 methylation on outcome in an untreated versus treated TNBC population. Methods: Patient samples and clinical data from 144 TNBC patients of 2 cohorts were analyzed: 1) 66 untreated patients from the Karolinska Institute in Sweden (primary diagnosis 1971-1976) and 2) 78 patients treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy from the Comprehensive Cancer Center TUM in Germany (primary diagnosis 1996 to 2014). The main eligibility criteria were as follows: ER-negative, PR-negative, HER2-negative breast cancer (TNBC); no endocrine therapy; untreated collective: no further therapy besides surgery and radiation therapy; treated collective: surgery followed by anthracycline based chemotherapy. Samples were assessed for PITX2 methylation using a CE marked PITX2 RGQ PCR Test. The study was designed to determine the PITX2 PMR cut-off value in the untreated population (n=66, prognostic value) and to subsequently determine if this cut-off provides statistical significance in the treated population (n=78, prognostic & predictive value) as well. If no statistically significant cut-off value can be determined in the untreated population, cut-off determination was performed in the treated population and the cut-off was applied in the untreated population. The primary clinical endpoint for all cut-offs was 10-years DFS, secondary clinical endpoints were DFS censored at 5-years and OS censored at 5- and 10-years. Results: The untreated TNBC study population demonstrated a higher event rate at 10-years DFS/OS compared to the anthracycline-treated population [36 DFS/28 OS events vs 28 DFS/14 OS events]. Anthracycline treatment improved significantly overall survival [HR=0.42; p=0.008]. Risk recurrence increased continuously over 5 year and 10 years DFS/OS with increasing PITX2 DNA methylation in the anthracycline-treated population but not in the untreated patients over 5 years DFS/OS and only marginally over 10 years DFS/OS. PITX2 methylation identifies at the cut-off of PMR 2 a patient population with poor vs good overall survival with statistical significance [HR=3.96, p=0.011] in the treated patient cohort but did not identify patients with poor vs good outcome in the untreated patient cohort [HR=1.55, p=0.259].
Summary: In this hypothesis generating study DNA-methylation of PITX2 identifies with high statistical significance anthracycline-treated patients with poor vs good survival. Recurrence risk increases with increasing PITX2 DNA-methylation. PITX2 DNA-methylation shows no prognostic, but significant predictive value for anthracycline treatment in TNBC patients in this study. To confirm conclusively the predictive value of PITX2 DNA-methylation, the results warrant a confirmatory study with tumor specimens from a prospective trial of anthracycline-treated patients vs. anthracycline-free treated patients.
Citation Format: Marion Kiechle, Gabriele Schricker, Rudolf Napieralski, Michaela Aubele, Gert Auer, Kurt Ulm, Jonathan Perkins, Stefan Paepke, Moritz Hamann, Olaf G. Wilhelm. PITX2 DNA methylation: A prognostic/predictive biomarker for anthracycline-based chemotherapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-08-65.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marion Kiechle
- 1Klinik Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Gert Auer
- 4Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Kurt Ulm
- 5Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Stefan Paepke
- 1Klinik Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Munich, Germany
| | - Moritz Hamann
- 7Klinik Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Rotkreuzklinikum München, Munich, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Haller B, Mansmann U, Dobler D, Ulm K, Hapfelmeier A. Confidence interval estimation for the changepoint of treatment stratification in the presence of a qualitative covariate-treatment interaction. Stat Med 2020; 39:70-96. [PMID: 31701549 DOI: 10.1002/sim.8404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2018] [Revised: 08/11/2019] [Accepted: 09/27/2019] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
The goal in stratified medicine is to administer the "best" treatment to a patient. Not all patients might benefit from the same treatment; the choice of best treatment can depend on certain patient characteristics. In this article, it is assumed that a time-to-event outcome is considered as a patient-relevant outcome and a qualitative interaction between a continuous covariate and treatment exists, ie, that patients with different values of one specific covariate should be treated differently. We suggest and investigate different methods for confidence interval estimation for the covariate value, where the treatment recommendation should be changed based on data collected in a randomized clinical trial. An adaptation of Fieller's theorem, the delta method, and different bootstrap approaches (normal, percentile-based, wild bootstrap) are investigated and compared in a simulation study. Extensions to multivariable problems are presented and evaluated. We observed appropriate confidence interval coverage following Fieller's theorem irrespective of sample size but at the cost of very wide or even infinite confidence intervals. The delta method and the wild bootstrap approach provided the smallest intervals but inadequate coverage for small to moderate event numbers, also depending on the location of the true changepoint. For the percentile-based bootstrap, wide intervals were observed, and it was slightly conservative regarding coverage, whereas the normal bootstrap did not provide acceptable results for many scenarios. The described methods were also applied to data from a randomized clinical trial comparing two treatments for patients with symptomatic, severe carotid artery stenosis, considering patient's age as predictive marker.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernhard Haller
- School of Medicine, Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Ulrich Mansmann
- Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Dennis Dobler
- Department of Mathematics, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kurt Ulm
- School of Medicine, Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Alexander Hapfelmeier
- School of Medicine, Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Haller B, Ulm K, Hapfelmeier A. A Simulation Study Comparing Different Statistical Approaches for the Identification of Predictive Biomarkers. Comput Math Methods Med 2019; 2019:7037230. [PMID: 31312252 PMCID: PMC6595324 DOI: 10.1155/2019/7037230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2019] [Accepted: 05/22/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Identification of relevant biomarkers that are associated with a treatment effect is one requirement for adequate treatment stratification and consequently to improve health care by administering the best available treatment to an individual patient. Various statistical approaches were proposed that allow assessing the interaction between a continuous covariate and treatment. Nevertheless, categorization of a continuous covariate, e.g., by splitting the data at the observed median value, appears to be very prevalent in practice. In this article, we present a simulation study considering data as observed in a randomized clinical trial with a time-to-event outcome performed to compare properties of such approaches, namely, Cox regression with linear interaction, Multivariable Fractional Polynomials for Interaction (MFPI), Local Partial-Likelihood Bootstrap (LPLB), and the Subpopulation Treatment Effect Pattern Plot (STEPP) method, and of strategies based on categorization of continuous covariates (splitting the covariate at the median, splitting at quartiles, and using an "optimal" split by maximizing a corresponding test statistic). In different scenarios with no interactions, linear interactions or nonlinear interactions, type I error probability and the power for detection of a true covariate-treatment interaction were estimated. The Cox regression approach was more efficient than the other methods for scenarios with monotonous interactions, especially when the number of observed events was small to moderate. When patterns of the biomarker-treatment interaction effect were more complex, MFPI and LPLB performed well compared to the other approaches. Categorization of data generally led to a loss of power, but for very complex patterns, splitting the data into multiple categories might help to explore the nature of the interaction effect. Consequently, we recommend application of statistical methods developed for assessment of interactions between continuous biomarkers and treatment instead of arbitrary or data-driven categorization of continuous covariates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernhard Haller
- Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Institute of Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Kurt Ulm
- Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Institute of Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Alexander Hapfelmeier
- Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Institute of Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Fasching PA, Eggemann H, Krocker J, Häberle L, Volz B, Kleine-Tebbe A, Blohmer JU, Kittel K, Hufnagel M, Janni W, Emons G, Simon E, Köhler U, Thomssen C, Kohls A, Beckmann MW, Hielscher C, Krabisch P, Zeiser T, Brodkorb T, Baier F, Nabieva N, Kellner S, Untch M, Stadie S, Budner M, Breitbach GP, Keller M, Stickeler E, Kühn T, Tolkmitt M, Belau AK, Schmidt M, Ulm K, Kümmel S. Abstract P1-13-01: Final results of the ASG1-3 study, a randomized phase III study comparing a standard dose chemotherapy with epirubicin/cyclophosphamide and paclitaxel with a dose dense regimen with epirubicin and paclitaxel. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-p1-13-01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Dose dense chemotherapy (DDT) has shown improvements of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival for primary breast cancer patients with a high risk of relapse. There are much less data about the effect of DDT in patients with intermediate risk of recurrence (1-3 positive axillary lymph nodes). Aim of this prospectively randomized trial was to investigate the superiority of a DDT schedule over a standard chemotherapy (ST) in primary breast cancer patients with 1-3 positive axillary lymph nodes.
Methods
The ASG1-3 study is a prospectively randomized, open label phase III study of the Adjuvant Study Group of the NOGGO association. Patients were eligible for the trial, if they had a primary invasive breast cancer (pT1-3) with 1-3 positive axillary lymph nodes and no evidence of distant metastases. Patients were randomized to an adjuvant therapy with either 4 cycles epirubicin (90mg/m2 body surface area, BSA) and cyclophosphamide (600mg/m2 BSA) q3w, followed by 4 cycles of paclitaxel (175mg/m2 BSA) referred to as ST or to a therapy with 4 cycles of epicubicin (120 mg/m2 BSA) q2w and primary G-CSF support followed by 4 cycles of paclitaxel (175mg/m2 BSA) q2w and primary G-CSF support referred to as DDT. Trastuzumab was not given in this study. The study was designed to show an increase of 70% DFS (ST) to 80% DFS (DDT) 5 years after randomization. Comparisons were conducted using Kaplan Meier estimates, log rank tests and Cox regression analyses. In an exploratory way, subgroup analyses were performed for HER2, hormone receptor status and grading using Cox regression models with interaction terms.
Results
A total of 936 patients were eligible for survival analysis, of which 465 were randomized to ST and 471 to DDT from 2001 to 2004. Patient characteristics were mainly well balanced, with patients being 52.5/52.1 years old, 71.9/78.1% being hormone receptor positive, 24.4/24.6% being HER2 positive and 38.6/38.8% having a tumor grade of 3 in the ST arm and DDT arm respectively. 53 events occurred after ST and 46 after DDT. Adjusted hazard ratio (HR) was 0.87 (95%CI: 0.57-1.35; p=0.54). 5 year DFS rates were 85% (ST) vs. 87% (DDT). Hematological toxicities were the most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 57.2 vs. 28.0%, grade 3/4 anemia in 15.3% vs. 17.1% and grade 3 /4 pain symptoms were seen in 13.2 vs. 12.4% of the patients in the ST arm vs. DDT arm respectively. Other grade 3/4 toxicities were less frequent than 10%. Subgroup analysis showed a significant interaction (p<0.001) between HER2 status and randomization arm with regard to DFS. In HER2 negative patients the HR was 1.53 (95%CI: 0.91-2.59), whereas in HER2 positive patients the HR was 0.22 (95%CI: 0.09-0.55). Patients with HER2 positive disease and DDT had a similar prognosis like HER2 negative patients.
Conclusion
In the overall population a statistically significant improvement of DFS could not be shown for the DDT arm. In patients with HER2 positive breast cancer DDT chemotherapy improved the disease-free survival to a prognosis which was similar to patients with HER2 negative disease.
Citation Format: Fasching PA, Eggemann H, Krocker J, Häberle L, Volz B, Kleine-Tebbe A, Blohmer J-U, Kittel K, Hufnagel M, Janni W, Emons G, Simon E, Köhler U, Thomssen C, Kohls A, Beckmann MW, Hielscher C, Krabisch P, Zeiser T, Brodkorb T, Baier F, Nabieva N, Kellner S, Untch M, Stadie S, Budner M, Breitbach G-P, Keller M, Stickeler E, Kühn T, Tolkmitt M, Belau AK, Schmidt M, Ulm K, Kümmel S. Final results of the ASG1-3 study, a randomized phase III study comparing a standard dose chemotherapy with epirubicin/cyclophosphamide and paclitaxel with a dose dense regimen with epirubicin and paclitaxel [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-13-01.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- PA Fasching
- University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany; University Hospital Magedeburg, Magdeburg, Germany; Breast Cancer Center, Sana Klinkum Lichtenberg, Berlin, Germany; Biostatistics and Data Management Unit; University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; DRK-Kliniken Berlin Köpenick, Berlin, Germany; Charité University Hospital Campus Charité-Mitte, Berlin, Germany; Praxisklinik Krebsheilkunde für Frauen – Brustzentrum, Berlin, Germany; Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany; University Hospital Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany; Torgau Hospital "Johann Kentmann" gGmbH, Torgau, Germany; Hospital St. Georg, Leipzig, Germany; Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany; Evang. Hospital Ludwigsfelde -Teltow gGmbH, Ludwigsfelde-Teltow, Germany; gSUND Gynäkologie Kompetenzzentrum Stralsund, Stralsund, Germany; Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Chemnitz, Germany; Paracelsus Hospital, Henstedt-Ulzburg, Germany; Helios Clinics Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany; Medical Centre, Pa
| | - H Eggemann
- University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany; University Hospital Magedeburg, Magdeburg, Germany; Breast Cancer Center, Sana Klinkum Lichtenberg, Berlin, Germany; Biostatistics and Data Management Unit; University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; DRK-Kliniken Berlin Köpenick, Berlin, Germany; Charité University Hospital Campus Charité-Mitte, Berlin, Germany; Praxisklinik Krebsheilkunde für Frauen – Brustzentrum, Berlin, Germany; Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany; University Hospital Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany; Torgau Hospital "Johann Kentmann" gGmbH, Torgau, Germany; Hospital St. Georg, Leipzig, Germany; Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany; Evang. Hospital Ludwigsfelde -Teltow gGmbH, Ludwigsfelde-Teltow, Germany; gSUND Gynäkologie Kompetenzzentrum Stralsund, Stralsund, Germany; Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Chemnitz, Germany; Paracelsus Hospital, Henstedt-Ulzburg, Germany; Helios Clinics Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany; Medical Centre, Pa
| | - J Krocker
- University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany; University Hospital Magedeburg, Magdeburg, Germany; Breast Cancer Center, Sana Klinkum Lichtenberg, Berlin, Germany; Biostatistics and Data Management Unit; University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; DRK-Kliniken Berlin Köpenick, Berlin, Germany; Charité University Hospital Campus Charité-Mitte, Berlin, Germany; Praxisklinik Krebsheilkunde für Frauen – Brustzentrum, Berlin, Germany; Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany; University Hospital Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany; Torgau Hospital "Johann Kentmann" gGmbH, Torgau, Germany; Hospital St. Georg, Leipzig, Germany; Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany; Evang. Hospital Ludwigsfelde -Teltow gGmbH, Ludwigsfelde-Teltow, Germany; gSUND Gynäkologie Kompetenzzentrum Stralsund, Stralsund, Germany; Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Chemnitz, Germany; Paracelsus Hospital, Henstedt-Ulzburg, Germany; Helios Clinics Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany; Medical Centre, Pa
| | - L Häberle
- University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany; University Hospital Magedeburg, Magdeburg, Germany; Breast Cancer Center, Sana Klinkum Lichtenberg, Berlin, Germany; Biostatistics and Data Management Unit; University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; DRK-Kliniken Berlin Köpenick, Berlin, Germany; Charité University Hospital Campus Charité-Mitte, Berlin, Germany; Praxisklinik Krebsheilkunde für Frauen – Brustzentrum, Berlin, Germany; Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany; University Hospital Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany; Torgau Hospital "Johann Kentmann" gGmbH, Torgau, Germany; Hospital St. Georg, Leipzig, Germany; Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany; Evang. Hospital Ludwigsfelde -Teltow gGmbH, Ludwigsfelde-Teltow, Germany; gSUND Gynäkologie Kompetenzzentrum Stralsund, Stralsund, Germany; Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Chemnitz, Germany; Paracelsus Hospital, Henstedt-Ulzburg, Germany; Helios Clinics Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany; Medical Centre, Pa
| | - B Volz
- University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany; University Hospital Magedeburg, Magdeburg, Germany; Breast Cancer Center, Sana Klinkum Lichtenberg, Berlin, Germany; Biostatistics and Data Management Unit; University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; DRK-Kliniken Berlin Köpenick, Berlin, Germany; Charité University Hospital Campus Charité-Mitte, Berlin, Germany; Praxisklinik Krebsheilkunde für Frauen – Brustzentrum, Berlin, Germany; Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany; University Hospital Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany; Torgau Hospital "Johann Kentmann" gGmbH, Torgau, Germany; Hospital St. Georg, Leipzig, Germany; Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany; Evang. Hospital Ludwigsfelde -Teltow gGmbH, Ludwigsfelde-Teltow, Germany; gSUND Gynäkologie Kompetenzzentrum Stralsund, Stralsund, Germany; Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Chemnitz, Germany; Paracelsus Hospital, Henstedt-Ulzburg, Germany; Helios Clinics Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany; Medical Centre, Pa
| | - A Kleine-Tebbe
- University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany; University Hospital Magedeburg, Magdeburg, Germany; Breast Cancer Center, Sana Klinkum Lichtenberg, Berlin, Germany; Biostatistics and Data Management Unit; University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; DRK-Kliniken Berlin Köpenick, Berlin, Germany; Charité University Hospital Campus Charité-Mitte, Berlin, Germany; Praxisklinik Krebsheilkunde für Frauen – Brustzentrum, Berlin, Germany; Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany; University Hospital Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany; Torgau Hospital "Johann Kentmann" gGmbH, Torgau, Germany; Hospital St. Georg, Leipzig, Germany; Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany; Evang. Hospital Ludwigsfelde -Teltow gGmbH, Ludwigsfelde-Teltow, Germany; gSUND Gynäkologie Kompetenzzentrum Stralsund, Stralsund, Germany; Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Chemnitz, Germany; Paracelsus Hospital, Henstedt-Ulzburg, Germany; Helios Clinics Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany; Medical Centre, Pa
| | - J-U Blohmer
- University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany; University Hospital Magedeburg, Magdeburg, Germany; Breast Cancer Center, Sana Klinkum Lichtenberg, Berlin, Germany; Biostatistics and Data Management Unit; University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; DRK-Kliniken Berlin Köpenick, Berlin, Germany; Charité University Hospital Campus Charité-Mitte, Berlin, Germany; Praxisklinik Krebsheilkunde für Frauen – Brustzentrum, Berlin, Germany; Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany; University Hospital Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany; Torgau Hospital "Johann Kentmann" gGmbH, Torgau, Germany; Hospital St. Georg, Leipzig, Germany; Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany; Evang. Hospital Ludwigsfelde -Teltow gGmbH, Ludwigsfelde-Teltow, Germany; gSUND Gynäkologie Kompetenzzentrum Stralsund, Stralsund, Germany; Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Chemnitz, Germany; Paracelsus Hospital, Henstedt-Ulzburg, Germany; Helios Clinics Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany; Medical Centre, Pa
| | - K Kittel
- University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany; University Hospital Magedeburg, Magdeburg, Germany; Breast Cancer Center, Sana Klinkum Lichtenberg, Berlin, Germany; Biostatistics and Data Management Unit; University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; DRK-Kliniken Berlin Köpenick, Berlin, Germany; Charité University Hospital Campus Charité-Mitte, Berlin, Germany; Praxisklinik Krebsheilkunde für Frauen – Brustzentrum, Berlin, Germany; Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany; University Hospital Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany; Torgau Hospital "Johann Kentmann" gGmbH, Torgau, Germany; Hospital St. Georg, Leipzig, Germany; Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany; Evang. Hospital Ludwigsfelde -Teltow gGmbH, Ludwigsfelde-Teltow, Germany; gSUND Gynäkologie Kompetenzzentrum Stralsund, Stralsund, Germany; Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Chemnitz, Germany; Paracelsus Hospital, Henstedt-Ulzburg, Germany; Helios Clinics Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany; Medical Centre, Pa
| | - M Hufnagel
- University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany; University Hospital Magedeburg, Magdeburg, Germany; Breast Cancer Center, Sana Klinkum Lichtenberg, Berlin, Germany; Biostatistics and Data Management Unit; University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; DRK-Kliniken Berlin Köpenick, Berlin, Germany; Charité University Hospital Campus Charité-Mitte, Berlin, Germany; Praxisklinik Krebsheilkunde für Frauen – Brustzentrum, Berlin, Germany; Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany; University Hospital Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany; Torgau Hospital "Johann Kentmann" gGmbH, Torgau, Germany; Hospital St. Georg, Leipzig, Germany; Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany; Evang. Hospital Ludwigsfelde -Teltow gGmbH, Ludwigsfelde-Teltow, Germany; gSUND Gynäkologie Kompetenzzentrum Stralsund, Stralsund, Germany; Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Chemnitz, Germany; Paracelsus Hospital, Henstedt-Ulzburg, Germany; Helios Clinics Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany; Medical Centre, Pa
| | - W Janni
- University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany; University Hospital Magedeburg, Magdeburg, Germany; Breast Cancer Center, Sana Klinkum Lichtenberg, Berlin, Germany; Biostatistics and Data Management Unit; University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; DRK-Kliniken Berlin Köpenick, Berlin, Germany; Charité University Hospital Campus Charité-Mitte, Berlin, Germany; Praxisklinik Krebsheilkunde für Frauen – Brustzentrum, Berlin, Germany; Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany; University Hospital Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany; Torgau Hospital "Johann Kentmann" gGmbH, Torgau, Germany; Hospital St. Georg, Leipzig, Germany; Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany; Evang. Hospital Ludwigsfelde -Teltow gGmbH, Ludwigsfelde-Teltow, Germany; gSUND Gynäkologie Kompetenzzentrum Stralsund, Stralsund, Germany; Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Chemnitz, Germany; Paracelsus Hospital, Henstedt-Ulzburg, Germany; Helios Clinics Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany; Medical Centre, Pa
| | - G Emons
- University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany; University Hospital Magedeburg, Magdeburg, Germany; Breast Cancer Center, Sana Klinkum Lichtenberg, Berlin, Germany; Biostatistics and Data Management Unit; University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; DRK-Kliniken Berlin Köpenick, Berlin, Germany; Charité University Hospital Campus Charité-Mitte, Berlin, Germany; Praxisklinik Krebsheilkunde für Frauen – Brustzentrum, Berlin, Germany; Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany; University Hospital Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany; Torgau Hospital "Johann Kentmann" gGmbH, Torgau, Germany; Hospital St. Georg, Leipzig, Germany; Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany; Evang. Hospital Ludwigsfelde -Teltow gGmbH, Ludwigsfelde-Teltow, Germany; gSUND Gynäkologie Kompetenzzentrum Stralsund, Stralsund, Germany; Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Chemnitz, Germany; Paracelsus Hospital, Henstedt-Ulzburg, Germany; Helios Clinics Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany; Medical Centre, Pa
| | - E Simon
- University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany; University Hospital Magedeburg, Magdeburg, Germany; Breast Cancer Center, Sana Klinkum Lichtenberg, Berlin, Germany; Biostatistics and Data Management Unit; University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; DRK-Kliniken Berlin Köpenick, Berlin, Germany; Charité University Hospital Campus Charité-Mitte, Berlin, Germany; Praxisklinik Krebsheilkunde für Frauen – Brustzentrum, Berlin, Germany; Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany; University Hospital Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany; Torgau Hospital "Johann Kentmann" gGmbH, Torgau, Germany; Hospital St. Georg, Leipzig, Germany; Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany; Evang. Hospital Ludwigsfelde -Teltow gGmbH, Ludwigsfelde-Teltow, Germany; gSUND Gynäkologie Kompetenzzentrum Stralsund, Stralsund, Germany; Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Chemnitz, Germany; Paracelsus Hospital, Henstedt-Ulzburg, Germany; Helios Clinics Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany; Medical Centre, Pa
| | - U Köhler
- University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany; University Hospital Magedeburg, Magdeburg, Germany; Breast Cancer Center, Sana Klinkum Lichtenberg, Berlin, Germany; Biostatistics and Data Management Unit; University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; DRK-Kliniken Berlin Köpenick, Berlin, Germany; Charité University Hospital Campus Charité-Mitte, Berlin, Germany; Praxisklinik Krebsheilkunde für Frauen – Brustzentrum, Berlin, Germany; Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany; University Hospital Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany; Torgau Hospital "Johann Kentmann" gGmbH, Torgau, Germany; Hospital St. Georg, Leipzig, Germany; Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany; Evang. Hospital Ludwigsfelde -Teltow gGmbH, Ludwigsfelde-Teltow, Germany; gSUND Gynäkologie Kompetenzzentrum Stralsund, Stralsund, Germany; Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Chemnitz, Germany; Paracelsus Hospital, Henstedt-Ulzburg, Germany; Helios Clinics Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany; Medical Centre, Pa
| | - C Thomssen
- University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany; University Hospital Magedeburg, Magdeburg, Germany; Breast Cancer Center, Sana Klinkum Lichtenberg, Berlin, Germany; Biostatistics and Data Management Unit; University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; DRK-Kliniken Berlin Köpenick, Berlin, Germany; Charité University Hospital Campus Charité-Mitte, Berlin, Germany; Praxisklinik Krebsheilkunde für Frauen – Brustzentrum, Berlin, Germany; Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany; University Hospital Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany; Torgau Hospital "Johann Kentmann" gGmbH, Torgau, Germany; Hospital St. Georg, Leipzig, Germany; Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany; Evang. Hospital Ludwigsfelde -Teltow gGmbH, Ludwigsfelde-Teltow, Germany; gSUND Gynäkologie Kompetenzzentrum Stralsund, Stralsund, Germany; Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Chemnitz, Germany; Paracelsus Hospital, Henstedt-Ulzburg, Germany; Helios Clinics Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany; Medical Centre, Pa
| | - A Kohls
- University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany; University Hospital Magedeburg, Magdeburg, Germany; Breast Cancer Center, Sana Klinkum Lichtenberg, Berlin, Germany; Biostatistics and Data Management Unit; University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; DRK-Kliniken Berlin Köpenick, Berlin, Germany; Charité University Hospital Campus Charité-Mitte, Berlin, Germany; Praxisklinik Krebsheilkunde für Frauen – Brustzentrum, Berlin, Germany; Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany; University Hospital Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany; Torgau Hospital "Johann Kentmann" gGmbH, Torgau, Germany; Hospital St. Georg, Leipzig, Germany; Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany; Evang. Hospital Ludwigsfelde -Teltow gGmbH, Ludwigsfelde-Teltow, Germany; gSUND Gynäkologie Kompetenzzentrum Stralsund, Stralsund, Germany; Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Chemnitz, Germany; Paracelsus Hospital, Henstedt-Ulzburg, Germany; Helios Clinics Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany; Medical Centre, Pa
| | - MW Beckmann
- University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany; University Hospital Magedeburg, Magdeburg, Germany; Breast Cancer Center, Sana Klinkum Lichtenberg, Berlin, Germany; Biostatistics and Data Management Unit; University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; DRK-Kliniken Berlin Köpenick, Berlin, Germany; Charité University Hospital Campus Charité-Mitte, Berlin, Germany; Praxisklinik Krebsheilkunde für Frauen – Brustzentrum, Berlin, Germany; Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany; University Hospital Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany; Torgau Hospital "Johann Kentmann" gGmbH, Torgau, Germany; Hospital St. Georg, Leipzig, Germany; Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany; Evang. Hospital Ludwigsfelde -Teltow gGmbH, Ludwigsfelde-Teltow, Germany; gSUND Gynäkologie Kompetenzzentrum Stralsund, Stralsund, Germany; Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Chemnitz, Germany; Paracelsus Hospital, Henstedt-Ulzburg, Germany; Helios Clinics Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany; Medical Centre, Pa
| | - C Hielscher
- University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany; University Hospital Magedeburg, Magdeburg, Germany; Breast Cancer Center, Sana Klinkum Lichtenberg, Berlin, Germany; Biostatistics and Data Management Unit; University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; DRK-Kliniken Berlin Köpenick, Berlin, Germany; Charité University Hospital Campus Charité-Mitte, Berlin, Germany; Praxisklinik Krebsheilkunde für Frauen – Brustzentrum, Berlin, Germany; Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany; University Hospital Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany; Torgau Hospital "Johann Kentmann" gGmbH, Torgau, Germany; Hospital St. Georg, Leipzig, Germany; Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany; Evang. Hospital Ludwigsfelde -Teltow gGmbH, Ludwigsfelde-Teltow, Germany; gSUND Gynäkologie Kompetenzzentrum Stralsund, Stralsund, Germany; Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Chemnitz, Germany; Paracelsus Hospital, Henstedt-Ulzburg, Germany; Helios Clinics Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany; Medical Centre, Pa
| | - P Krabisch
- University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany; University Hospital Magedeburg, Magdeburg, Germany; Breast Cancer Center, Sana Klinkum Lichtenberg, Berlin, Germany; Biostatistics and Data Management Unit; University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; DRK-Kliniken Berlin Köpenick, Berlin, Germany; Charité University Hospital Campus Charité-Mitte, Berlin, Germany; Praxisklinik Krebsheilkunde für Frauen – Brustzentrum, Berlin, Germany; Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany; University Hospital Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany; Torgau Hospital "Johann Kentmann" gGmbH, Torgau, Germany; Hospital St. Georg, Leipzig, Germany; Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany; Evang. Hospital Ludwigsfelde -Teltow gGmbH, Ludwigsfelde-Teltow, Germany; gSUND Gynäkologie Kompetenzzentrum Stralsund, Stralsund, Germany; Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Chemnitz, Germany; Paracelsus Hospital, Henstedt-Ulzburg, Germany; Helios Clinics Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany; Medical Centre, Pa
| | - T Zeiser
- University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany; University Hospital Magedeburg, Magdeburg, Germany; Breast Cancer Center, Sana Klinkum Lichtenberg, Berlin, Germany; Biostatistics and Data Management Unit; University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; DRK-Kliniken Berlin Köpenick, Berlin, Germany; Charité University Hospital Campus Charité-Mitte, Berlin, Germany; Praxisklinik Krebsheilkunde für Frauen – Brustzentrum, Berlin, Germany; Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany; University Hospital Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany; Torgau Hospital "Johann Kentmann" gGmbH, Torgau, Germany; Hospital St. Georg, Leipzig, Germany; Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany; Evang. Hospital Ludwigsfelde -Teltow gGmbH, Ludwigsfelde-Teltow, Germany; gSUND Gynäkologie Kompetenzzentrum Stralsund, Stralsund, Germany; Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Chemnitz, Germany; Paracelsus Hospital, Henstedt-Ulzburg, Germany; Helios Clinics Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany; Medical Centre, Pa
| | - T Brodkorb
- University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany; University Hospital Magedeburg, Magdeburg, Germany; Breast Cancer Center, Sana Klinkum Lichtenberg, Berlin, Germany; Biostatistics and Data Management Unit; University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; DRK-Kliniken Berlin Köpenick, Berlin, Germany; Charité University Hospital Campus Charité-Mitte, Berlin, Germany; Praxisklinik Krebsheilkunde für Frauen – Brustzentrum, Berlin, Germany; Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany; University Hospital Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany; Torgau Hospital "Johann Kentmann" gGmbH, Torgau, Germany; Hospital St. Georg, Leipzig, Germany; Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany; Evang. Hospital Ludwigsfelde -Teltow gGmbH, Ludwigsfelde-Teltow, Germany; gSUND Gynäkologie Kompetenzzentrum Stralsund, Stralsund, Germany; Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Chemnitz, Germany; Paracelsus Hospital, Henstedt-Ulzburg, Germany; Helios Clinics Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany; Medical Centre, Pa
| | - F Baier
- University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany; University Hospital Magedeburg, Magdeburg, Germany; Breast Cancer Center, Sana Klinkum Lichtenberg, Berlin, Germany; Biostatistics and Data Management Unit; University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; DRK-Kliniken Berlin Köpenick, Berlin, Germany; Charité University Hospital Campus Charité-Mitte, Berlin, Germany; Praxisklinik Krebsheilkunde für Frauen – Brustzentrum, Berlin, Germany; Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany; University Hospital Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany; Torgau Hospital "Johann Kentmann" gGmbH, Torgau, Germany; Hospital St. Georg, Leipzig, Germany; Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany; Evang. Hospital Ludwigsfelde -Teltow gGmbH, Ludwigsfelde-Teltow, Germany; gSUND Gynäkologie Kompetenzzentrum Stralsund, Stralsund, Germany; Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Chemnitz, Germany; Paracelsus Hospital, Henstedt-Ulzburg, Germany; Helios Clinics Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany; Medical Centre, Pa
| | - N Nabieva
- University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany; University Hospital Magedeburg, Magdeburg, Germany; Breast Cancer Center, Sana Klinkum Lichtenberg, Berlin, Germany; Biostatistics and Data Management Unit; University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; DRK-Kliniken Berlin Köpenick, Berlin, Germany; Charité University Hospital Campus Charité-Mitte, Berlin, Germany; Praxisklinik Krebsheilkunde für Frauen – Brustzentrum, Berlin, Germany; Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany; University Hospital Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany; Torgau Hospital "Johann Kentmann" gGmbH, Torgau, Germany; Hospital St. Georg, Leipzig, Germany; Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany; Evang. Hospital Ludwigsfelde -Teltow gGmbH, Ludwigsfelde-Teltow, Germany; gSUND Gynäkologie Kompetenzzentrum Stralsund, Stralsund, Germany; Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Chemnitz, Germany; Paracelsus Hospital, Henstedt-Ulzburg, Germany; Helios Clinics Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany; Medical Centre, Pa
| | - S Kellner
- University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany; University Hospital Magedeburg, Magdeburg, Germany; Breast Cancer Center, Sana Klinkum Lichtenberg, Berlin, Germany; Biostatistics and Data Management Unit; University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; DRK-Kliniken Berlin Köpenick, Berlin, Germany; Charité University Hospital Campus Charité-Mitte, Berlin, Germany; Praxisklinik Krebsheilkunde für Frauen – Brustzentrum, Berlin, Germany; Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany; University Hospital Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany; Torgau Hospital "Johann Kentmann" gGmbH, Torgau, Germany; Hospital St. Georg, Leipzig, Germany; Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany; Evang. Hospital Ludwigsfelde -Teltow gGmbH, Ludwigsfelde-Teltow, Germany; gSUND Gynäkologie Kompetenzzentrum Stralsund, Stralsund, Germany; Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Chemnitz, Germany; Paracelsus Hospital, Henstedt-Ulzburg, Germany; Helios Clinics Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany; Medical Centre, Pa
| | - M Untch
- University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany; University Hospital Magedeburg, Magdeburg, Germany; Breast Cancer Center, Sana Klinkum Lichtenberg, Berlin, Germany; Biostatistics and Data Management Unit; University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; DRK-Kliniken Berlin Köpenick, Berlin, Germany; Charité University Hospital Campus Charité-Mitte, Berlin, Germany; Praxisklinik Krebsheilkunde für Frauen – Brustzentrum, Berlin, Germany; Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany; University Hospital Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany; Torgau Hospital "Johann Kentmann" gGmbH, Torgau, Germany; Hospital St. Georg, Leipzig, Germany; Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany; Evang. Hospital Ludwigsfelde -Teltow gGmbH, Ludwigsfelde-Teltow, Germany; gSUND Gynäkologie Kompetenzzentrum Stralsund, Stralsund, Germany; Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Chemnitz, Germany; Paracelsus Hospital, Henstedt-Ulzburg, Germany; Helios Clinics Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany; Medical Centre, Pa
| | - S Stadie
- University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany; University Hospital Magedeburg, Magdeburg, Germany; Breast Cancer Center, Sana Klinkum Lichtenberg, Berlin, Germany; Biostatistics and Data Management Unit; University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; DRK-Kliniken Berlin Köpenick, Berlin, Germany; Charité University Hospital Campus Charité-Mitte, Berlin, Germany; Praxisklinik Krebsheilkunde für Frauen – Brustzentrum, Berlin, Germany; Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany; University Hospital Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany; Torgau Hospital "Johann Kentmann" gGmbH, Torgau, Germany; Hospital St. Georg, Leipzig, Germany; Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany; Evang. Hospital Ludwigsfelde -Teltow gGmbH, Ludwigsfelde-Teltow, Germany; gSUND Gynäkologie Kompetenzzentrum Stralsund, Stralsund, Germany; Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Chemnitz, Germany; Paracelsus Hospital, Henstedt-Ulzburg, Germany; Helios Clinics Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany; Medical Centre, Pa
| | - M Budner
- University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany; University Hospital Magedeburg, Magdeburg, Germany; Breast Cancer Center, Sana Klinkum Lichtenberg, Berlin, Germany; Biostatistics and Data Management Unit; University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; DRK-Kliniken Berlin Köpenick, Berlin, Germany; Charité University Hospital Campus Charité-Mitte, Berlin, Germany; Praxisklinik Krebsheilkunde für Frauen – Brustzentrum, Berlin, Germany; Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany; University Hospital Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany; Torgau Hospital "Johann Kentmann" gGmbH, Torgau, Germany; Hospital St. Georg, Leipzig, Germany; Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany; Evang. Hospital Ludwigsfelde -Teltow gGmbH, Ludwigsfelde-Teltow, Germany; gSUND Gynäkologie Kompetenzzentrum Stralsund, Stralsund, Germany; Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Chemnitz, Germany; Paracelsus Hospital, Henstedt-Ulzburg, Germany; Helios Clinics Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany; Medical Centre, Pa
| | - G-P Breitbach
- University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany; University Hospital Magedeburg, Magdeburg, Germany; Breast Cancer Center, Sana Klinkum Lichtenberg, Berlin, Germany; Biostatistics and Data Management Unit; University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; DRK-Kliniken Berlin Köpenick, Berlin, Germany; Charité University Hospital Campus Charité-Mitte, Berlin, Germany; Praxisklinik Krebsheilkunde für Frauen – Brustzentrum, Berlin, Germany; Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany; University Hospital Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany; Torgau Hospital "Johann Kentmann" gGmbH, Torgau, Germany; Hospital St. Georg, Leipzig, Germany; Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany; Evang. Hospital Ludwigsfelde -Teltow gGmbH, Ludwigsfelde-Teltow, Germany; gSUND Gynäkologie Kompetenzzentrum Stralsund, Stralsund, Germany; Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Chemnitz, Germany; Paracelsus Hospital, Henstedt-Ulzburg, Germany; Helios Clinics Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany; Medical Centre, Pa
| | - M Keller
- University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany; University Hospital Magedeburg, Magdeburg, Germany; Breast Cancer Center, Sana Klinkum Lichtenberg, Berlin, Germany; Biostatistics and Data Management Unit; University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; DRK-Kliniken Berlin Köpenick, Berlin, Germany; Charité University Hospital Campus Charité-Mitte, Berlin, Germany; Praxisklinik Krebsheilkunde für Frauen – Brustzentrum, Berlin, Germany; Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany; University Hospital Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany; Torgau Hospital "Johann Kentmann" gGmbH, Torgau, Germany; Hospital St. Georg, Leipzig, Germany; Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany; Evang. Hospital Ludwigsfelde -Teltow gGmbH, Ludwigsfelde-Teltow, Germany; gSUND Gynäkologie Kompetenzzentrum Stralsund, Stralsund, Germany; Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Chemnitz, Germany; Paracelsus Hospital, Henstedt-Ulzburg, Germany; Helios Clinics Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany; Medical Centre, Pa
| | - E Stickeler
- University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany; University Hospital Magedeburg, Magdeburg, Germany; Breast Cancer Center, Sana Klinkum Lichtenberg, Berlin, Germany; Biostatistics and Data Management Unit; University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; DRK-Kliniken Berlin Köpenick, Berlin, Germany; Charité University Hospital Campus Charité-Mitte, Berlin, Germany; Praxisklinik Krebsheilkunde für Frauen – Brustzentrum, Berlin, Germany; Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany; University Hospital Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany; Torgau Hospital "Johann Kentmann" gGmbH, Torgau, Germany; Hospital St. Georg, Leipzig, Germany; Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany; Evang. Hospital Ludwigsfelde -Teltow gGmbH, Ludwigsfelde-Teltow, Germany; gSUND Gynäkologie Kompetenzzentrum Stralsund, Stralsund, Germany; Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Chemnitz, Germany; Paracelsus Hospital, Henstedt-Ulzburg, Germany; Helios Clinics Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany; Medical Centre, Pa
| | - T Kühn
- University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany; University Hospital Magedeburg, Magdeburg, Germany; Breast Cancer Center, Sana Klinkum Lichtenberg, Berlin, Germany; Biostatistics and Data Management Unit; University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; DRK-Kliniken Berlin Köpenick, Berlin, Germany; Charité University Hospital Campus Charité-Mitte, Berlin, Germany; Praxisklinik Krebsheilkunde für Frauen – Brustzentrum, Berlin, Germany; Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany; University Hospital Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany; Torgau Hospital "Johann Kentmann" gGmbH, Torgau, Germany; Hospital St. Georg, Leipzig, Germany; Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany; Evang. Hospital Ludwigsfelde -Teltow gGmbH, Ludwigsfelde-Teltow, Germany; gSUND Gynäkologie Kompetenzzentrum Stralsund, Stralsund, Germany; Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Chemnitz, Germany; Paracelsus Hospital, Henstedt-Ulzburg, Germany; Helios Clinics Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany; Medical Centre, Pa
| | - M Tolkmitt
- University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany; University Hospital Magedeburg, Magdeburg, Germany; Breast Cancer Center, Sana Klinkum Lichtenberg, Berlin, Germany; Biostatistics and Data Management Unit; University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; DRK-Kliniken Berlin Köpenick, Berlin, Germany; Charité University Hospital Campus Charité-Mitte, Berlin, Germany; Praxisklinik Krebsheilkunde für Frauen – Brustzentrum, Berlin, Germany; Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany; University Hospital Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany; Torgau Hospital "Johann Kentmann" gGmbH, Torgau, Germany; Hospital St. Georg, Leipzig, Germany; Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany; Evang. Hospital Ludwigsfelde -Teltow gGmbH, Ludwigsfelde-Teltow, Germany; gSUND Gynäkologie Kompetenzzentrum Stralsund, Stralsund, Germany; Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Chemnitz, Germany; Paracelsus Hospital, Henstedt-Ulzburg, Germany; Helios Clinics Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany; Medical Centre, Pa
| | - AK Belau
- University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany; University Hospital Magedeburg, Magdeburg, Germany; Breast Cancer Center, Sana Klinkum Lichtenberg, Berlin, Germany; Biostatistics and Data Management Unit; University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; DRK-Kliniken Berlin Köpenick, Berlin, Germany; Charité University Hospital Campus Charité-Mitte, Berlin, Germany; Praxisklinik Krebsheilkunde für Frauen – Brustzentrum, Berlin, Germany; Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany; University Hospital Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany; Torgau Hospital "Johann Kentmann" gGmbH, Torgau, Germany; Hospital St. Georg, Leipzig, Germany; Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany; Evang. Hospital Ludwigsfelde -Teltow gGmbH, Ludwigsfelde-Teltow, Germany; gSUND Gynäkologie Kompetenzzentrum Stralsund, Stralsund, Germany; Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Chemnitz, Germany; Paracelsus Hospital, Henstedt-Ulzburg, Germany; Helios Clinics Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany; Medical Centre, Pa
| | - M Schmidt
- University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany; University Hospital Magedeburg, Magdeburg, Germany; Breast Cancer Center, Sana Klinkum Lichtenberg, Berlin, Germany; Biostatistics and Data Management Unit; University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; DRK-Kliniken Berlin Köpenick, Berlin, Germany; Charité University Hospital Campus Charité-Mitte, Berlin, Germany; Praxisklinik Krebsheilkunde für Frauen – Brustzentrum, Berlin, Germany; Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany; University Hospital Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany; Torgau Hospital "Johann Kentmann" gGmbH, Torgau, Germany; Hospital St. Georg, Leipzig, Germany; Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany; Evang. Hospital Ludwigsfelde -Teltow gGmbH, Ludwigsfelde-Teltow, Germany; gSUND Gynäkologie Kompetenzzentrum Stralsund, Stralsund, Germany; Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Chemnitz, Germany; Paracelsus Hospital, Henstedt-Ulzburg, Germany; Helios Clinics Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany; Medical Centre, Pa
| | - K Ulm
- University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany; University Hospital Magedeburg, Magdeburg, Germany; Breast Cancer Center, Sana Klinkum Lichtenberg, Berlin, Germany; Biostatistics and Data Management Unit; University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; DRK-Kliniken Berlin Köpenick, Berlin, Germany; Charité University Hospital Campus Charité-Mitte, Berlin, Germany; Praxisklinik Krebsheilkunde für Frauen – Brustzentrum, Berlin, Germany; Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany; University Hospital Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany; Torgau Hospital "Johann Kentmann" gGmbH, Torgau, Germany; Hospital St. Georg, Leipzig, Germany; Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany; Evang. Hospital Ludwigsfelde -Teltow gGmbH, Ludwigsfelde-Teltow, Germany; gSUND Gynäkologie Kompetenzzentrum Stralsund, Stralsund, Germany; Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Chemnitz, Germany; Paracelsus Hospital, Henstedt-Ulzburg, Germany; Helios Clinics Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany; Medical Centre, Pa
| | - S Kümmel
- University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany; University Hospital Magedeburg, Magdeburg, Germany; Breast Cancer Center, Sana Klinkum Lichtenberg, Berlin, Germany; Biostatistics and Data Management Unit; University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; DRK-Kliniken Berlin Köpenick, Berlin, Germany; Charité University Hospital Campus Charité-Mitte, Berlin, Germany; Praxisklinik Krebsheilkunde für Frauen – Brustzentrum, Berlin, Germany; Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany; University Hospital Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany; Torgau Hospital "Johann Kentmann" gGmbH, Torgau, Germany; Hospital St. Georg, Leipzig, Germany; Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany; Evang. Hospital Ludwigsfelde -Teltow gGmbH, Ludwigsfelde-Teltow, Germany; gSUND Gynäkologie Kompetenzzentrum Stralsund, Stralsund, Germany; Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Chemnitz, Germany; Paracelsus Hospital, Henstedt-Ulzburg, Germany; Helios Clinics Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany; Medical Centre, Pa
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kunath J, Günther J, Rauh K, Hoffmann J, Stecher L, Rosenfeld E, Kick L, Ulm K, Hauner H. Effects of a lifestyle intervention during pregnancy to prevent excessive gestational weight gain in routine care - the cluster-randomised GeliS trial. BMC Med 2019; 17:5. [PMID: 30636636 PMCID: PMC6330753 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-018-1235-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2018] [Accepted: 12/10/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Excessive gestational weight gain (GWG) leads to obstetric complications, maternal postpartum weight retention and an increased risk of offspring obesity. The GeliS study examines the effect of a lifestyle intervention during pregnancy on the proportion of women with excessive GWG and pregnancy and obstetric complications, as well as the long-term risk of maternal and infant obesity. METHODS The GeliS study is a cluster-randomised multicentre controlled trial including 2286 women with a pre-pregnancy BMI between 18.5 and 40.0 kg/m2 recruited from gynaecological and midwifery practices prior to the end of the 12th week of gestation in five Bavarian regions. In the intervention regions, four lifestyle counselling sessions covering a balanced healthy diet, regular physical activity and self-monitoring of weight gain were performed by trained healthcare providers alongside routine pre- and postnatal practice visits. In the control regions, leaflets with general recommendations for a healthy lifestyle during pregnancy were provided. RESULTS The intervention did not result in a significant reduction of women showing excessive GWG (adjusted OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.66-1.38, p = 0.789), with 45.1% and 45.7% of women in the intervention and control groups, respectively, gaining weight above the Institute of Medicine recommendations. Gestational diabetes mellitus was diagnosed in 10.8% and 11.1% of women in the intervention and control groups, respectively (p = 0.622). Mean birth weight and length were slightly lower in the intervention group (3313 ± 536 g vs. 3363 ± 498 g, p = 0.020; 51.1 ± 2.7 cm vs. 51.6 ± 2.5 cm, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION In the setting of routine prenatal care, lifestyle advice given by trained healthcare providers was not successful in limiting GWG and pregnancy complications. Nevertheless, the potential long-term effects of the intervention remain to be assessed. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT01958307 , ClinicalTrials.gov, retrospectively registered October 9, 2013.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Kunath
- Else Kröner-Fresenius-Centre for Nutritional Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Georg-Brauchle-Ring 62, 80992, Munich, Germany
| | - Julia Günther
- Else Kröner-Fresenius-Centre for Nutritional Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Georg-Brauchle-Ring 62, 80992, Munich, Germany
| | - Kathrin Rauh
- Else Kröner-Fresenius-Centre for Nutritional Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Georg-Brauchle-Ring 62, 80992, Munich, Germany.,Competence Centre for Nutrition (KErn), Am Gereuth 4, 85354, Freising, Germany
| | - Julia Hoffmann
- Else Kröner-Fresenius-Centre for Nutritional Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Georg-Brauchle-Ring 62, 80992, Munich, Germany
| | - Lynne Stecher
- Else Kröner-Fresenius-Centre for Nutritional Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Georg-Brauchle-Ring 62, 80992, Munich, Germany.,Institute of Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Eva Rosenfeld
- Competence Centre for Nutrition (KErn), Am Gereuth 4, 85354, Freising, Germany
| | - Luzia Kick
- Competence Centre for Nutrition (KErn), Am Gereuth 4, 85354, Freising, Germany
| | - Kurt Ulm
- Institute of Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Hans Hauner
- Else Kröner-Fresenius-Centre for Nutritional Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Georg-Brauchle-Ring 62, 80992, Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Haller B, Eckstein HH, Ringleb PA, Ulm K. Investigation of age–treatment interaction in the SPACE trial using different statistical approaches. J Appl Stat 2018. [DOI: 10.1080/02664763.2018.1558186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Bernhard Haller
- Institute of Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Hans-Henning Eckstein
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter A. Ringleb
- Department of Neurology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Kurt Ulm
- Institute of Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Haller B, Ulm K. A simulation study on estimating biomarker–treatment interaction effects in randomized trials with prognostic variables. Trials 2018; 19:128. [PMID: 29463271 PMCID: PMC5819679 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-018-2491-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2017] [Accepted: 01/22/2018] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To individualize treatment decisions based on patient characteristics, identification of an interaction between a biomarker and treatment is necessary. Often such potential interactions are analysed using data from randomized clinical trials intended for comparison of two treatments. Tests of interactions are often lacking statistical power and we investigated if and how a consideration of further prognostic variables can improve power and decrease the bias of estimated biomarker–treatment interactions in randomized clinical trials with time-to-event outcomes. Methods A simulation study was performed to assess how prognostic factors affect the estimate of the biomarker–treatment interaction for a time-to-event outcome, when different approaches, like ignoring other prognostic factors, including all available covariates or using variable selection strategies, are applied. Different scenarios regarding the proportion of censored observations, the correlation structure between the covariate of interest and further potential prognostic variables, and the strength of the interaction were considered. Results The simulation study revealed that in a regression model for estimating a biomarker–treatment interaction, the probability of detecting a biomarker–treatment interaction can be increased by including prognostic variables that are associated with the outcome, and that the interaction estimate is biased when relevant prognostic variables are not considered. However, the probability of a false-positive finding increases if too many potential predictors are included or if variable selection is performed inadequately. Conclusions We recommend undertaking an adequate literature search before data analysis to derive information about potential prognostic variables and to gain power for detecting true interaction effects and pre-specifying analyses to avoid selective reporting and increased false-positive rates. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-018-2491-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|
19
|
Hapfelmeier A, Ulm K, Haller B. Subgroup identification by recursive segmentation. J Appl Stat 2018. [DOI: 10.1080/02664763.2018.1444152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Hapfelmeier
- Institute of Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Kurt Ulm
- Institute of Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Bernhard Haller
- Institute of Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Schricker G, Napieralski R, Noske A, Piednoir E, Manner O, Schüren E, Lauber J, Perkins J, Magdolen V, Schmitt M, Ulm K, Weichert W, Kiechle M, Martens JWM, Wilhelm OG. Clinical performance of an analytically validated assay in comparison to microarray technology to assess PITX2 DNA-methylation in breast cancer. Sci Rep 2018; 8:16861. [PMID: 30442983 PMCID: PMC6237923 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-34919-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2018] [Accepted: 10/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Significant evidence has accumulated that DNA-methylation of the paired-like homeodomain transcription factor 2 (PITX2) gene can serve as a prognostic and predictive biomarker in breast cancer. PITX2 DNA-methylation data have been obtained so far from microarray and polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based research tests. The availability of an analytically validated in vitro methylation-specific real-time PCR assay format (therascreen PITX2 RGQ PCR assay) intended for the determination of the percent methylation ratio (PMR) in the (PITX2) promoter 2 prompted us to investigate whether the clinical performance of these different assay systems generate comparable clinical outcome data. Mathematically converted microarray data of a previous breast cancer study (n = 204) into PMR values leads to a PITX2 cut-off value at PMR 14.73. Recalculation of the data to experimentally equivalent PMRs with the PCR PITX2 assay leads to a cut-off value at PMR 12 with the highest statistical significance. This cut-off predicts outcome of high-risk breast cancer patients to adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy (n = 204; Hazard Ratio 2.48; p < 0.001) comparable to microarray generated results (n = 204; Hazard ratio 2.32; p < 0.0001). The therascreen PITX2 RGQ PCR assay is an analytically validated test with high reliability and robustness and predicts outcome of high-risk breast cancer patients to anthracycline-based chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriele Schricker
- Therawis Diagnostics GmbH, Grillparzerstrasse 14, 81675, Munich, Germany.
| | - Rudolf Napieralski
- Therawis Diagnostics GmbH, Grillparzerstrasse 14, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Aurelia Noske
- Institute of Pathology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Elodie Piednoir
- HalioDx Luminy Biotech Entreprises, 163 Avenue de Luminy, 13009, Marseille, France
| | - Olivia Manner
- HalioDx Luminy Biotech Entreprises, 163 Avenue de Luminy, 13009, Marseille, France
| | - Elisabeth Schüren
- Therawis Diagnostics GmbH, Grillparzerstrasse 14, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Jürgen Lauber
- QIAGEN GmbH, Qiagen Strasse 1, 40724, Hilden, Germany
| | - Jonathan Perkins
- QIAGEN Manchester Ltd., Lloyd Street North, Manchester, M15 6SH, United Kingdom
| | - Viktor Magdolen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinical Research Unit, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaningerstrasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Manfred Schmitt
- Therawis Diagnostics GmbH, Grillparzerstrasse 14, 81675, Munich, Germany
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinical Research Unit, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaningerstrasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Kurt Ulm
- Institute of Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, Grillparzerstrasse 18, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Wilko Weichert
- Institute of Pathology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Marion Kiechle
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinical Research Unit, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaningerstrasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - John W M Martens
- Department of Medical Oncology and Cancer Genomics Netherlands, Erasmus MC, Wytemaweg 80, 3015 CN, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Olaf G Wilhelm
- Therawis Diagnostics GmbH, Grillparzerstrasse 14, 81675, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Schmitt M, Wilhelm OG, Noske A, Schricker G, Napieralski R, Vetter M, Aubele M, Perkins J, Lauber J, Ulm K, Thomssen C, Martens JWM, Weichert W, Kiechle M. Clinical Validation of PITX2 DNA Methylation to Predict Outcome in High-Risk Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Anthracycline-Based Chemotherapy. Breast Care (Basel) 2018; 13:425-433. [PMID: 30800037 DOI: 10.1159/000493016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Breast cancer patients at high risk for recurrence are treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy, but not all patients do equally benefit from such a regimen. To further improve therapy decision-making, biomarkers predicting outcome are of high unmet medical need. Methods: The percent DNA methylation ratio (PMR) of the promoter gene coding for the Paired-like homeodomain transcription factor 2 (PITX2) was determined by a validated methylation-specific real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test. The multicenter study was conducted in routinely collected archived formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue from 205 lymph node-positive breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Results: The cut-off for the PITX2 methylation status (PMR = 12) was confirmed in a randomly selected cohort (n = 60) and validated (n = 145) prospectively with disease-free survival (DFS) at the 10-year follow-up. DFS was significantly different between the PMR ≤ 12 versus the PMR > 12 group with a hazard ratio (HR) of 2.74 (p < 0.001) in the validation cohort and also for the patient subgroup treated additionally with endocrine therapy (HR 2.47; p = 0.001). Conclusions: Early-stage lymph node-positive breast cancer patients with low PITX2 methylation do benefit from adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Patients with a high PITX2 DNA methylation ratio, approximately 30%, show poor outcome and should thus be considered for alternative chemotherapy regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manfred Schmitt
- Therawis Diagnostics GmbH, Munich, Germany.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Aurelia Noske
- Institute of Pathology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | - Martina Vetter
- Department of Gynecology, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | | | | | | | - Kurt Ulm
- Institute of Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Christoph Thomssen
- Department of Gynecology, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - John W M Martens
- Department of Medical Oncology and Cancer Genomics Netherlands, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wilko Weichert
- Institute of Pathology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Marion Kiechle
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Kirmeier E, Eriksson LI, Lewald H, Jonsson Fagerlund M, Hoeft A, Hollmann M, Meistelman C, Hunter JM, Ulm K, Blobner M. Post-anaesthesia pulmonary complications after use of muscle relaxants (POPULAR): a multicentre, prospective observational study. Lancet Respir Med 2018; 7:129-140. [PMID: 30224322 DOI: 10.1016/s2213-2600(18)30294-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 195] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2018] [Revised: 06/28/2018] [Accepted: 07/03/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Results from retrospective studies suggest that use of neuromuscular blocking agents during general anaesthesia might be linked to postoperative pulmonary complications. We therefore aimed to assess whether the use of neuromuscular blocking agents is associated with postoperative pulmonary complications. METHODS We did a multicentre, prospective observational cohort study. Patients were recruited from 211 hospitals in 28 European countries. We included patients (aged ≥18 years) who received general anaesthesia for any in-hospital procedure except cardiac surgery. Patient characteristics, surgical and anaesthetic details, and chart review at discharge were prospectively collected over 2 weeks. Additionally, each patient underwent postoperative physical examination within 3 days of surgery to check for adverse pulmonary events. The study outcome was the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications from the end of surgery up to postoperative day 28. Logistic regression analyses were adjusted for surgical factors and patients' preoperative physical status, providing adjusted odds ratios (ORadj) and adjusted absolute risk reduction (ARRadj). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01865513. FINDINGS Between June 16, 2014, and April 29, 2015, data from 22 803 patients were collected. The use of neuromuscular blocking agents was associated with an increased incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications in patients who had undergone general anaesthesia (1658 [7·6%] of 21 694); ORadj 1·86, 95% CI 1·53-2·26; ARRadj -4·4%, 95% CI -5·5 to -3·2). Only 2·3% of high-risk surgical patients and those with adverse respiratory profiles were anaesthetised without neuromuscular blocking agents. The use of neuromuscular monitoring (ORadj 1·31, 95% CI 1·15-1·49; ARRadj -2·6%, 95% CI -3·9 to -1·4) and the administration of reversal agents (1·23, 1·07-1·41; -1·9%, -3·2 to -0·7) were not associated with a decreased risk of postoperative pulmonary complications. Neither the choice of sugammadex instead of neostigmine for reversal (ORadj 1·03, 95% CI 0·85-1·25; ARRadj -0·3%, 95% CI -2·4 to 1·5) nor extubation at a train-of-four ratio of 0·9 or more (1·03, 0·82-1·31; -0·4%, -3·5 to 2·2) was associated with better pulmonary outcomes. INTERPRETATION We showed that the use of neuromuscular blocking drugs in general anaesthesia is associated with an increased risk of postoperative pulmonary complications. Anaesthetists must balance the potential benefits of neuromuscular blockade against the increased risk of postoperative pulmonary complications. FUNDING European Society of Anaesthesiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Kirmeier
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Lars I Eriksson
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Surgical Services and Intensive Care, Karolinska University Hospital and Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Heidrun Lewald
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Malin Jonsson Fagerlund
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Surgical Services and Intensive Care, Karolinska University Hospital and Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Andreas Hoeft
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Markus Hollmann
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam University, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Jennifer M Hunter
- Department of Musculoskeletal Biology, Institute of Ageing and Chronic Disease, Liverpool University, Liverpool, UK
| | - Kurt Ulm
- Department of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Manfred Blobner
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate the significance of the ice water test in patients with multiple sclerosis and to evaluate a novel ice water test nomogram in a large patient cohort. METHODS A total of 201 ice water tests of patients with multiple sclerosis were retrospectively evaluated. Incontinence episodes in 24 h and sex were correlated with the ice water test. Furthermore, an ice water test nomogram was developed in order to categorize the detrusor overactivity in severity degrees. Descriptive statistics were carried out for population characteristics. Correlations of categorical variables were calculated by the χ2 -test. The independent t-test was carried out for correlations of continuous variables. Furthermore, the data were evaluated in the novel ice water test nomogram. RESULTS The patient population consisted of 141 (70.1%) women and 60 (39.9%) men. A clinically positive ice water test (maximum detrusor pressure >15 cmH2 O) was identified in 75 patients (37.3%). Significantly more men presented a clinically positive ice water test (P = 0.006). In 16.5%, the ice water test unmasked an involuntary detrusor contraction, although routine cystometry did not show any detrusor overactivity. The ice water test nomogram could be successfully applied. The incontinence episodes and maximum detrusor pressure correlated positively with a higher categorization in the nomogram. Therapeutic interventions and follow-up controls could be successfully illustrated by the nomogram. CONCLUSIONS The ice water test is a simple tool for unmasking non-identified detrusor overactivity in neurogenic bladder dysfunction. A severity categorization of the detrusor overactivity can be facilitated by the use of the ice water test nomogram. After further validation, the ice water test could be ultimately used in future as objective assessment for bladder dysfunction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tanja Hüsch
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - André Reitz
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.,KontinenzZentrum Hirslanden, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Kurt Ulm
- Institute of Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Axel Haferkamp
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Schmitt M, Harbeck N, Thomssen C, Wilhelm O, Magdolen V, Reuning U, Ulm K, Höfler H, Jänicke F, Graeff H. Clinical Impact of the Plasminogen Activation System in Tumor Invasion and Metastasis: Prognostic Relevance and Target for Therapy. Thromb Haemost 2018. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1657541] [Citation(s) in RCA: 147] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- M Schmitt
- Frauenklinik und Poliklinik, Universität München, München
| | - N Harbeck
- Frauenklinik und Poliklinik, Universität München, München
| | - C Thomssen
- Frauenklinik der Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - O Wilhelm
- Frauenklinik und Poliklinik, Universität München, München
| | - V Magdolen
- Frauenklinik und Poliklinik, Universität München, München
| | - U Reuning
- Frauenklinik und Poliklinik, Universität München, München
| | - K Ulm
- Institut für Medizinische Statistik und Epidemiologie, Universität München, München
| | - H Höfler
- Institut für Allgemeine Pathologie und Pathologische Anatomie der Technischen Universität München, München
| | - F Jänicke
- Frauenklinik der Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - H Graeff
- Frauenklinik und Poliklinik, Universität München, München
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Gao JJ, Zhang Y, Gerhard M, Mejias-Luque R, Zhang L, Vieth M, Ma JL, Bajbouj M, Suchanek S, Liu WD, Ulm K, Quante M, Li ZX, Zhou T, Schmid R, Classen M, Li WQ, You WC, Pan KF. Association Between Gut Microbiota and Helicobacter pylori-Related Gastric Lesions in a High-Risk Population of Gastric Cancer. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2018; 8:202. [PMID: 29971220 PMCID: PMC6018392 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2018.00202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 88] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2018] [Accepted: 05/30/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Eradication of Helicobacter pylori has been found to be effective for gastric cancer prevention, but uncertainties remain about the possible adverse consequences such as the potential microbial dysbiosis. In our study, we investigated the association between gut microbiota and H. pylori-related gastric lesions in 47 subjects by deep sequencing of microbial 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene in fecal samples. The dominant phyla in fecal samples were Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, and Proteobacteria with average relative abundances of 54.77, 31.37 and 12.91%, respectively. Microbial diversity analysis showed that observed species and Shannon index were increased in subjects with past or current H. pylori infection compared with negative subjects. As for the differential bacteria, the average relative abundance of Bacteroidetes was found to significantly decrease from H. pylori negative (66.16%) to past infection group (33.01%, p = 0.007), as well as from normal (76.49%) to gastritis (56.04%) and metaplasia subjects (46.83%, p = 0.027). For Firmicutes and Proteobacteria, the average relative abundances showed elevated trends in the past H. pylori infection group (47.11, 20.53%) compared to negative group (23.44, 9.05%, p = 0.068 and 0.246, respectively), and similar increased trends were also found from normal (18.23, 5.05%) to gastritis (35.31, 7.23%, p = 0.016 and 0.294, respectively) or metaplasia subjects (32.33, 20.07%, both p < 0.05). These findings suggest that the alterations of fecal microbiota, especially the dominant phyla of Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes and Proteobacteria, may be involved in the process of H. pylori-related gastric lesion progression and provide hints for future evaluation of microbial changes after H. pylori eradication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan-Juan Gao
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Yang Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Markus Gerhard
- Institute of Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Hygiene, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.,German Center for Infection Research, Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Raquel Mejias-Luque
- Institute of Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Hygiene, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.,German Center for Infection Research, Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Lian Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Michael Vieth
- Institute of Pathology, Klinikum Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - Jun-Ling Ma
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Monther Bajbouj
- II. Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Stepan Suchanek
- Department of Internal Medicine, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Military University Hospital, Prague, Czechia
| | - Wei-Dong Liu
- Linqu Public Health Bureau, Linqu, Shandong, China
| | - Kurt Ulm
- Institute of Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Hygiene, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Michael Quante
- II. Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Zhe-Xuan Li
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Tong Zhou
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Roland Schmid
- II. Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Wen-Qing Li
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Wei-Cheng You
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Kai-Feng Pan
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Paepke S, Wilhelm OG, Schmitt M, Noske A, Schricker G, Napieralski R, Vetter M, Thomssen C, Perkins J, Lauber J, Ulm K, Martens JWM, Weichert W, Kiechle M. PITX2 DNA-Methylierung: Erster klinisch validierter prädiktiver Marker zur Vorhersage des Ansprechens auf anthrazyklin-basierte Chemotherapie bei Brustkrebspatientinnen mit hohem Rezidivrisiko. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2018. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1655534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- S Paepke
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde/Institut für Pathologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Comprehensive Cancer Center; Qiagen GmbH, Hilden und Therawis Diagnostics GmbH München, Deutschland
| | - OG Wilhelm
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde/Institut für Pathologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Comprehensive Cancer Center; Qiagen GmbH, Hilden und Therawis Diagnostics GmbH München, Deutschland
| | - M Schmitt
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde/Institut für Pathologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Comprehensive Cancer Center; Qiagen GmbH, Hilden und Therawis Diagnostics GmbH München, Deutschland
| | - A Noske
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde/Institut für Pathologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Comprehensive Cancer Center; Qiagen GmbH, Hilden und Therawis Diagnostics GmbH München, Deutschland
| | - G Schricker
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde/Institut für Pathologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Comprehensive Cancer Center; Qiagen GmbH, Hilden und Therawis Diagnostics GmbH München, Deutschland
| | - R Napieralski
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde/Institut für Pathologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Comprehensive Cancer Center; Qiagen GmbH, Hilden und Therawis Diagnostics GmbH München, Deutschland
| | - M Vetter
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde/Institut für Pathologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Comprehensive Cancer Center; Qiagen GmbH, Hilden und Therawis Diagnostics GmbH München, Deutschland
| | - C Thomssen
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde/Institut für Pathologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Comprehensive Cancer Center; Qiagen GmbH, Hilden und Therawis Diagnostics GmbH München, Deutschland
| | - J Perkins
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde/Institut für Pathologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Comprehensive Cancer Center; Qiagen GmbH, Hilden und Therawis Diagnostics GmbH München, Deutschland
| | - J Lauber
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde/Institut für Pathologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Comprehensive Cancer Center; Qiagen GmbH, Hilden und Therawis Diagnostics GmbH München, Deutschland
| | - K Ulm
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde/Institut für Pathologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Comprehensive Cancer Center; Qiagen GmbH, Hilden und Therawis Diagnostics GmbH München, Deutschland
| | - JWM Martens
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde/Institut für Pathologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Comprehensive Cancer Center; Qiagen GmbH, Hilden und Therawis Diagnostics GmbH München, Deutschland
| | - W Weichert
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde/Institut für Pathologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Comprehensive Cancer Center; Qiagen GmbH, Hilden und Therawis Diagnostics GmbH München, Deutschland
| | - M Kiechle
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde/Institut für Pathologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Comprehensive Cancer Center; Qiagen GmbH, Hilden und Therawis Diagnostics GmbH München, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Abstract
This paper reports on the performance of a recently developed neural network environment incorporating likelihood-based optimization and complexity reduction techniques in the analysis of breast cancer follow-up data with the goal of building up a clinical decision support system. The inputs to the neural network include classical factors such as grading, age, tumor size, estrogen and progesterone receptor measurements, as well as tumor biological markers such as PAI-1 and uPA. The network learns the structural relationship between these factors and the follow-up data. Examples of neural models for relapse-free survival are presented, which are based on data from 784 breast cancer patients who received their primary therapy at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Technische Universität München, Germany. The performance of the neural analysis as quantified by various indicators (likelihood, Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank tests) was very high. For example, dividing the patients into two equally sized groups based on the neural score (i.e., cutoff = median score) leads to an estimated difference in relapse-free survival of 40% or better (80% vs. 40%) after 10 years in Kaplan-Meier analysis. Evidence for factor interactions as well as for time-varying impacts is presented. The neural network weights included in the models are significant at the 5% level. The use of neural network analysis and scoring in combination with strong tumor biological factors such as uPA and PAI-1 appears to result in a very effective risk group discrimination. Considerable additional comparison of data from different patient series will be required to establish the generalization capability more firmly. Nonetheless, the improvement of risk group discrimination represents an important step toward the use of neural networks for decision support in a clinical framework and in making the most of biological markers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Harbeck
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Technical University, Munich, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
A method is presented which allows a stepwise selection of relevant variables for a diagnosis and also a sequential allocation bearing in mind the time-sequence and the expense in recording the variables. The method is based on an information-theoretical approach and is suitable for the application of qualitative variables. The method is presented using data concerning patients with suspected coronary artery disease, taking into consideration the fact that the variables are observed at different times.
Collapse
|
29
|
Meierhofer C, Tavakkoli T, Kühn A, Ulm K, Hager A, Müller J, Martinoff S, Ewert P, Stern H. Importance of Non-invasive Right and Left Ventricular Variables on Exercise Capacity in Patients with Tetralogy of Fallot Hemodynamics. Pediatr Cardiol 2017; 38:1569-1574. [PMID: 28776135 DOI: 10.1007/s00246-017-1697-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2017] [Accepted: 07/21/2017] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Good quality of life correlates with a good exercise capacity in daily life in patients with tetralogy of Fallot (ToF). Patients after correction of ToF usually develop residual defects such as pulmonary regurgitation or stenosis of variable severity. However, the importance of different hemodynamic parameters and their impact on exercise capacity is unclear. We investigated several hemodynamic parameters measured by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) and echocardiography and evaluated which parameter has the most pronounced effect on maximal exercise capacity determined by cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). 132 patients with ToF-like hemodynamics were tested during routine follow-up with CMR, echocardiography and CPET. Right and left ventricular volume data, ventricular ejection fraction and pulmonary regurgitation were evaluated by CMR. Echocardiographic pressure gradients in the right ventricular outflow tract and through the tricuspid valve were measured. All data were classified and correlated with the results of CPET evaluations of these patients. The analysis was performed using the Random Forest model. In this way, we calculated the importance of the different hemodynamic variables related to the maximal oxygen uptake in CPET (VO2%predicted). Right ventricular pressure showed the most important influence on maximal oxygen uptake, whereas pulmonary regurgitation and right ventricular enddiastolic volume were not important hemodynamic variables to predict maximal oxygen uptake in CPET. Maximal exercise capacity was only very weakly influenced by right ventricular enddiastolic volume and not at all by pulmonary regurgitation in patients with ToF. The variable with the most pronounced influence was the right ventricular pressure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Meierhofer
- Pediatric Cardiology and Congenital Heart Disease, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
- Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technical University of Munich, Lazarettstrasse 36, 80636, Munich, Germany.
| | - Timon Tavakkoli
- Pediatric Cardiology and Congenital Heart Disease, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Andreas Kühn
- Pediatric Cardiology and Congenital Heart Disease, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Kurt Ulm
- Department of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Alfred Hager
- Pediatric Cardiology and Congenital Heart Disease, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jan Müller
- Pediatric Cardiology and Congenital Heart Disease, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stefan Martinoff
- Radiology, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Ewert
- Pediatric Cardiology and Congenital Heart Disease, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Heiko Stern
- Pediatric Cardiology and Congenital Heart Disease, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Hüsch T, Kretschmer A, Thomsen F, Kronlachner D, Kurosch M, Obaje A, Anding R, Kirschner-Hermanns R, Pottek T, Rose A, Olianas R, Friedl A, Hübner W, Homberg R, Pfitzenmaier J, Grein U, Queissert F, Naumann CM, Schweiger J, Wotzka C, Nyarangi-Dix J, Brehmer B, Ulm K, Bauer RM, Haferkamp A. The TiLOOP® Male Sling: Did We Forejudge. Urol Int 2017; 100:216-221. [DOI: 10.1159/000477765] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2017] [Accepted: 05/22/2017] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
31
|
|
32
|
Unterbuchner C, Blobner M, Pühringer F, Janda M, Bischoff S, Bein B, Schmidt A, Ulm K, Pithamitsis V, Fink H. Development of an algorithm using clinical tests to avoid post-operative residual neuromuscular block. BMC Anesthesiol 2017; 17:101. [PMID: 28778151 PMCID: PMC5545011 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-017-0393-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2017] [Accepted: 07/28/2017] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Quantitative neuromuscular monitoring is the gold standard to detect postoperative residual curarization (PORC). Many anesthesiologists, however, use insensitive, qualitative neuromuscular monitoring or unreliable, clinical tests. Goal of this multicentre, prospective, double-blinded, assessor controlled study was to develop an algorithm of muscle function tests to identify PORC. METHODS After extubation a blinded anesthetist performed eight clinical tests in 165 patients. Test results were correlated to calibrated electromyography train-of-four (TOF) ratio and to a postoperatively applied uncalibrated acceleromyography. A classification and regression tree (CART) was calculated developing the algorithm to identify PORC. This was validated against uncalibrated acceleromyography and tactile judgement of TOF fading in separate 100 patients. RESULTS After eliminating three tests with poor correlation, a model with four tests (r = 0.844) and uncalibrated acceleromyography (r = 0.873) were correlated to electromyographical TOF-values without losing quality of prediction. CART analysis showed that three consecutively performed tests (arm lift, head lift and swallowing or eye opening) can predict electromyographical TOF. Prediction coefficients reveal an advantage of the uncalibrated acceleromyography in terms of specificity to identify the EMG measured train-of-four ratio < 0.7 (100% vs. 42.9%) and <0.9 (89.7% vs. 34.5%) compared to the algorithm. However, due to the high sensitivity of the algorithm (100% vs. 94.4%), the risk to overlook an awake patient with a train-of-four ratio < 0.7 was minimal. Tactile judgement of TOF fading showed poorest sensitivity and specifity at train of four ratio < 0.9 (33.7%, 0%) and <0.7 (18.8%, 16.7%). CONCLUSIONS Residual neuromuscular blockade can be detected by uncalibrated acceleromyography and if not available by a pathway of four clinical muscle function tests in awake patients. The algorithm has a discriminative power comparable to uncalibrated AMG within TOF-values >0.7 and <0.3. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinical Trials.gov (principal investigator's name: CU, and identifier: NCT03219138) on July 8, 2017.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Unterbuchner
- Klinik für Anaesthesiologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany. .,Klinik für Anaesthesiologie, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Universität Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee, 11 93051, Regensburg, Germany.
| | - Manfred Blobner
- Klinik für Anaesthesiologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Friedrich Pühringer
- Klinik für Anaesthesiologie und operative Intensivmedizin, Klinikum am Steinenberg, Steinenbergstr. 31, 72764, Reutlingen, Germany
| | - Matthias Janda
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivtherapie, Universität Rostock, Schillingallee 35, 18057, Rostock, Germany
| | - Sebastian Bischoff
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Anästhesiologie und operative Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Münster, Germany
| | - Berthold Bein
- Klinik für Anästhesiologie und Operative Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, 24105, Kiel, Germany
| | - Annette Schmidt
- Klinik für Anaesthesiologie, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Kurt Ulm
- Klinik für Anaesthesiologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Viktor Pithamitsis
- Klinik für Anaesthesiologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Heidrun Fink
- Klinik für Anaesthesiologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Li ZX, Huang LL, Liu C, Formichella L, Zhang Y, Wang YM, Zhang L, Ma JL, Liu WD, Ulm K, Wang JX, Zhang L, Bajbouj M, Li M, Vieth M, Quante M, Zhou T, Wang LH, Suchanek S, Soutschek E, Schmid R, Classen M, You WC, Gerhard M, Pan KF. Cut-off optimization for 13C-urea breath test in a community-based trial by mathematic, histology and serology approach. Sci Rep 2017; 7:2072. [PMID: 28522798 PMCID: PMC5437005 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-02180-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2017] [Accepted: 04/07/2017] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
The performance of diagnostic tests in intervention trials of Helicobacter pylori (H.pylori) eradication is crucial, since even minor inaccuracies can have major impact. To determine the cut-off point for 13C-urea breath test (13C-UBT) and to assess if it can be further optimized by serologic testing, mathematic modeling, histopathology and serologic validation were applied. A finite mixture model (FMM) was developed in 21,857 subjects, and an independent validation by modified Giemsa staining was conducted in 300 selected subjects. H.pylori status was determined using recomLine H.pylori assay in 2,113 subjects with a borderline 13C-UBT results. The delta over baseline-value (DOB) of 3.8 was an optimal cut-off point by a FMM in modelling dataset, which was further validated as the most appropriate cut-off point by Giemsa staining (sensitivity = 94.53%, specificity = 92.93%). In the borderline population, 1,468 subjects were determined as H.pylori positive by recomLine (69.5%). A significant correlation between the number of positive H.pylori serum responses and DOB value was found (rs = 0.217, P < 0.001). A mathematical approach such as FMM might be an alternative measure in optimizing the cut-off point for 13C-UBT in community-based studies, and a second method to determine H.pylori status for subjects with borderline value of 13C-UBT was necessary and recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhe-Xuan Li
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, 52 Fu-cheng Road, Hai-dian District, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Lei-Lei Huang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, 52 Fu-cheng Road, Hai-dian District, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Cong Liu
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, 52 Fu-cheng Road, Hai-dian District, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Luca Formichella
- Technische Universität München, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Trogerstr. 30, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Yang Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, 52 Fu-cheng Road, Hai-dian District, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Yu-Mei Wang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, 52 Fu-cheng Road, Hai-dian District, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Lian Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, 52 Fu-cheng Road, Hai-dian District, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Jun-Ling Ma
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, 52 Fu-cheng Road, Hai-dian District, Beijing, 100142, China
| | | | - Kurt Ulm
- Technische Universität München, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Trogerstr. 30, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Lei Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, 52 Fu-cheng Road, Hai-dian District, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Monther Bajbouj
- Technische Universität München, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Trogerstr. 30, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Ming Li
- Healthy Bureau of Linqu County, Shandong, China
| | - Michael Vieth
- Institute of Pathology, Klinikum Bayreuth, Preuschwitzer Str. 101, 95445, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - Michael Quante
- Technische Universität München, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Trogerstr. 30, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Tong Zhou
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, 52 Fu-cheng Road, Hai-dian District, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Le-Hua Wang
- Healthy Bureau of Linqu County, Shandong, China
| | - Stepan Suchanek
- Charles University, Central Military Hospital Prague, Ovocný trh 3-5, Prague, 11636, Czech Republic
| | - Erwin Soutschek
- Mikrogen GmbH, Floriansbogen 2-4, Neuried, Munich, 82061, Germany
| | - Roland Schmid
- Technische Universität München, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Trogerstr. 30, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Meinhard Classen
- Technische Universität München, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Trogerstr. 30, 81675, Munich, Germany.,International Digestive Cancer Alliance, 81541, Munich, Germany
| | - Wei-Cheng You
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, 52 Fu-cheng Road, Hai-dian District, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Markus Gerhard
- Technische Universität München, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Trogerstr. 30, 81675, Munich, Germany. .,German Centre of Infection Research, partner site Munich, Munich, Germany.
| | - Kai-Feng Pan
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, 52 Fu-cheng Road, Hai-dian District, Beijing, 100142, China.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Hüsch T, Mager R, Ober E, Bentler R, Ulm K, Haferkamp A. Long-term safety and efficacy of transvaginal mesh repair for pelvic organ prolapse. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2016. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1593131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
|
35
|
Hüsch T, Kretschmer A, Thomsen F, Kronlachner D, Kurosch M, Obaje A, Anding R, Pottek T, Rose A, Olianas R, Friedl A, Hübner W, Homberg R, Pfitzenmaier J, Grein U, Queissert F, Naumann CM, Schweiger J, Wotzka C, Nyarangi-Dix J, Hofmann T, Ulm K, Bauer RM, Haferkamp A. Risk Factors for Failure of Male Slings and Artificial Urinary Sphincters: Results from a Large Middle European Cohort Study. Urol Int 2016; 99:14-21. [DOI: 10.1159/000449232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2016] [Accepted: 08/17/2016] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
36
|
Hüsch T, Mager R, Ober E, Bentler R, Ulm K, Haferkamp A. Quality of life in women of non-reproductive age with transvaginal mesh repair for pelvic organ prolapse: A cohort study. Int J Surg 2016; 33 Pt A:36-41. [PMID: 27465100 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.07.062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2016] [Revised: 06/27/2016] [Accepted: 07/20/2016] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transvaginal mesh repair has been discredited due to high complications rates in the past years. Therefore, we evaluated the quality of life (QoL) and complication rates after transvaginal mesh (TVM) repair for pelvic organ prolapse (POP). METHODS A total of 148 women who underwent TVM repair for symptomatic POP were retrospectively enrolled. Complication rates and functional outcomes were retrospectively assessed and validated, standardised questionnaires were used prospectively for evaluation of QoL. Univariate analysis by the chi(2)-test as well as a multivariate Cox regression analysis was conducted to predict mesh exposure using various variables as predictors. RESULTS Intraoperative complications with bowel or bladder injury appeared in 3.4%. Mesh exposure occurred in 2.7% whereas surgical revision was necessary only in 1.4%. No predictor for mesh exposure could be identified. Postoperative complications according to Clavien-Dindo classification ≥ III occurred in only 2.8%. An improvement of POP-symptoms was reported by 84.6% according the "patients' global impression of improvement" (PGI-I) and 88.2% women would repeat the surgery. The results of the "prolapse-quality of life"-questionnaire were comparable to asymptomatic women. Only 33% reported vaginal pain with a mean vaginal pain score of 0.6 according the international index of pain. Of sexually active women, 29% reported sexual impairments and mean score of sexual impairment was 1.52. CONCLUSION Low complication rates and a quality of life comparable to asymptomatic women following TVM repair could be achieved in our cohort. However, a high number of sexual impairments was identified although the impact of impairment was marginal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tanja Hüsch
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
| | - René Mager
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Erika Ober
- Gynecological Practice, Michelstadt, Germany
| | | | - Kurt Ulm
- Institute of Medical Statistic and Epidemiology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Axel Haferkamp
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Kaufhold N, Schaller S, Stäuble C, Baumüller E, Ulm K, Blobner M, Fink H. Sugammadex and neostigmine dose-finding study for reversal of residual neuromuscular block at a train-of-four ratio of 0.2 (SUNDRO20) † †This report was previously presented, in part, at the Annual Meeting of the International Society for Anaesthetic Pharmacology, San Diego, CA, USA, on October 15, 2010. , # #This Article is accompanied by Editorial Aev448. Br J Anaesth 2016; 116:233-40. [DOI: 10.1093/bja/aev437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
|
38
|
Pan KF, Zhang L, Gerhard M, Ma JL, Liu WD, Ulm K, Wang JX, Zhang L, Zhang Y, Bajbouj M, Zhang LF, Li M, Vieth M, Liu RY, Quante M, Wang LH, Suchanek S, Zhou T, Guan WX, Schmid R, Classen M, You WC. A large randomised controlled intervention trial to prevent gastric cancer by eradication of Helicobacter pylori in Linqu County, China: baseline results and factors affecting the eradication. Gut 2016; 65:9-18. [PMID: 25986943 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 118] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2015] [Accepted: 04/24/2015] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To clarify the full range of benefits and adverse consequences of Helicobacter pylori eradication as a strategy for gastric cancer prevention, the community-based intervention trial was launched in Linqu County, China. DESIGN A total of 184,786 residents aged 25-54 years were enrolled in this trial and received (13)C-urea breath test. H. pylori positive participants were assigned into two groups, either receiving a 10-day quadruple anti-H. pylori treatment or lookalike placebos together with a single dosage of omeprazole and bismuth. RESULTS The prevalence of H. pylori in trial participants was 57.6%. A total of 94,101 subjects completed the treatment. The overall H. pylori eradication rate was 72.9% in the active group. Gender, body mass index, history of stomach disease, baseline delta over baseline-value of (13)C-urea breath test, missed medication doses, smoking and drinking were independent predictors of eradication failure. The missed doses and high baseline delta over baseline-value were important contributors in men and women (all Ptrend<0.001). However, a dose-response relationship between failure rate and smoking or drinking index was found in men (all Ptrend<0.001), while high body mass index (Ptrend<0.001) and history of stomach disease were significant predictors in women. The treatment failure rate increased up to 48.8% (OR 2.87, 95% CI 2.24 to 3.68) in men and 39.4% (OR 2.67, 95% CI 1.61 to 4.42) in women with multiple factors combined. CONCLUSIONS This large community-based intervention trial to eradicate H. pylori is feasible and acceptable. The findings of this trial lead to a distinct evaluation of factors influencing eradication that should be generally considered for future eradication therapies. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ChiCTR-TRC-10000979 in accordance with WHO ICTRP requirements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kai-feng Pan
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Lian Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | | | - Jun-ling Ma
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | | | - Kurt Ulm
- Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Lei Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Yang Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | | | | | - Ming Li
- Healthy Bureau of Linqu County, Weifang, China
| | - Michael Vieth
- Institute of Pathology, Klinikum Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany
| | | | | | - Le-hua Wang
- Healthy Bureau of Linqu County, Weifang, China
| | - Stepan Suchanek
- Department of Medicine, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Military University Hospital, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Tong Zhou
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Wei-xiang Guan
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | | | - Meinhard Classen
- Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany International Digestive Cancer Alliance, Germany
| | - Wei-cheng You
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Loregger A, Grandl M, Mejías-Luque R, Allgäuer M, Degenhart K, Haselmann V, Oikonomou C, Hatzis P, Janssen KP, Nitsche U, Gradl D, van den Broek O, Destree O, Ulm K, Neumaier M, Kalali B, Jung A, Varela I, Schmid RM, Rad R, Busch DH, Gerhard M. The E3 ligase RNF43 inhibits Wnt signaling downstream of mutated β-catenin by sequestering TCF4 to the nuclear membrane. Sci Signal 2015; 8:ra90. [PMID: 26350900 DOI: 10.1126/scisignal.aac6757] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Given its fundamental role in development and cancer, the Wnt-β-catenin signaling pathway is tightly controlled at multiple levels. RING finger protein 43 (RNF43) is an E3 ubiquitin ligase originally found in stem cells and proposed to inhibit Wnt signaling by interacting with the Wnt receptors of the Frizzled family. We detected endogenous RNF43 in the nucleus of human intestinal crypt and colon cancer cells. We found that RNF43 physically interacted with T cell factor 4 (TCF4) in cells and tethered TCF4 to the nuclear membrane, thus silencing TCF4 transcriptional activity even in the presence of constitutively active mutants of β-catenin. This inhibitory mechanism was disrupted by the expression of RNF43 bearing mutations found in human gastrointestinal tumors, and transactivation of the Wnt pathway was observed in various cells and in Xenopus embryos when the RING domain of RNF43 was mutated. Our findings indicate that RNF43 inhibits the Wnt pathway downstream of oncogenic mutations that activate the pathway. Mimicking or enhancing this inhibitory activity of RNF43 may be useful to treat cancers arising from aberrant activation of the Wnt pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anke Loregger
- Institut für Medizinische Mikrobiologie, Immunologie und Hygiene, Technische Universität München, Munich 81675, Germany
| | - Martina Grandl
- Institut für Medizinische Mikrobiologie, Immunologie und Hygiene, Technische Universität München, Munich 81675, Germany
| | - Raquel Mejías-Luque
- Institut für Medizinische Mikrobiologie, Immunologie und Hygiene, Technische Universität München, Munich 81675, Germany
| | - Michael Allgäuer
- Institut für Medizinische Mikrobiologie, Immunologie und Hygiene, Technische Universität München, Munich 81675, Germany. Medical Department II, Technische Universität München, Munich 81675, Germany
| | - Kathrin Degenhart
- Institut für Medizinische Mikrobiologie, Immunologie und Hygiene, Technische Universität München, Munich 81675, Germany
| | - Verena Haselmann
- Institute for Clinical Chemistry, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Mannheim 68167, Germany
| | - Christina Oikonomou
- Division of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Biomedical Sciences Research Center "Alexander Fleming," Vari 16672, Greece
| | - Pantelis Hatzis
- Division of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Biomedical Sciences Research Center "Alexander Fleming," Vari 16672, Greece
| | - Klaus-Peter Janssen
- Department of Surgery, Technische Universität München, Munich 81675, Germany
| | - Ulrich Nitsche
- Department of Surgery, Technische Universität München, Munich 81675, Germany
| | - Dietmar Gradl
- Zoologisches Institut II, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe 76131, Germany
| | | | | | - Kurt Ulm
- Institute of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, Technische Universität München, Munich 81675, Germany
| | - Michael Neumaier
- Institute for Clinical Chemistry, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Mannheim 68167, Germany
| | - Behnam Kalali
- Institut für Medizinische Mikrobiologie, Immunologie und Hygiene, Technische Universität München, Munich 81675, Germany
| | - Andreas Jung
- Institute of Pathology, University of Munich, Munich 80337, Germany
| | - Ignacio Varela
- Instituto de Biomedicina y Biotecnología de Cantabria, Santander 39011, Spain
| | - Roland M Schmid
- Medical Department II, Technische Universität München, Munich 81675, Germany
| | - Roland Rad
- Medical Department II, Technische Universität München, Munich 81675, Germany
| | - Dirk H Busch
- Institut für Medizinische Mikrobiologie, Immunologie und Hygiene, Technische Universität München, Munich 81675, Germany
| | - Markus Gerhard
- Institut für Medizinische Mikrobiologie, Immunologie und Hygiene, Technische Universität München, Munich 81675, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Tauber R, Schmolling K, Ulm K. [Antegrade scrotal sclerosis therapy. Gold Standard of varicocele treatment]. Urologe A 2015; 54:1121-1122. [PMID: 26465026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
|
41
|
Renkawitz T, Weber M, Springorum HR, Sendtner E, Woerner M, Ulm K, Weber T, Grifka J. Impingement-free range of movement, acetabular component cover and early clinical results comparing ‘femur-first’ navigation and ‘conventional’ minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 2015; 97-B:890-8. [DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.97b7.34729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
We report the kinematic and early clinical results of a patient- and observer-blinded randomised controlled trial in which CT scans were used to compare potential impingement-free range of movement (ROM) and acetabular component cover between patients treated with either the navigated ‘femur-first’ total hip arthroplasty (THA) method (n = 66; male/female 29/37, mean age 62.5 years; 50 to 74) or conventional THA (n = 69; male/female 35/34, mean age 62.9 years; 50 to 75). The Hip Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, the Harris hip score, the Euro-Qol-5D and the Mancuso THA patient expectations score were assessed at six weeks, six months and one year after surgery. A total of 48 of the patients (84%) in the navigated ‘femur-first’ group and 43 (65%) in the conventional group reached all the desirable potential ROM boundaries without prosthetic impingement for activities of daily living (ADL) in flexion, extension, abduction, adduction and rotation (p = 0.016). Acetabular component cover and surface contact with the host bone were > 87% in both groups. There was a significant difference between the navigated and the conventional groups’ Harris hip scores six weeks after surgery (p = 0.010). There were no significant differences with respect to any clinical outcome at six months and one year of follow-up. The navigated ‘femur-first’ technique improves the potential ROM for ADL without prosthetic impingement, although there was no observed clinical difference between the two treatment groups. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015; 97-B:890–8.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T. Renkawitz
- Regensburg University Medical Centre, Asklepios
Klinikum Bad Abbach, Kaiser-Karl V.-Allee 3, 93077
Bad Abbach, Germany
| | - M. Weber
- Regensburg University Medical Centre, Asklepios
Klinikum Bad Abbach, Kaiser-Karl V.-Allee 3, 93077
Bad Abbach, Germany
| | - H-R. Springorum
- Regensburg University Medical Centre, Asklepios
Klinikum Bad Abbach, Kaiser-Karl V.-Allee 3, 93077
Bad Abbach, Germany
| | - E. Sendtner
- Regensburg University Medical Centre, Asklepios
Klinikum Bad Abbach, Kaiser-Karl V.-Allee 3, 93077
Bad Abbach, Germany
| | - M. Woerner
- Regensburg University Medical Centre, Asklepios
Klinikum Bad Abbach, Kaiser-Karl V.-Allee 3, 93077
Bad Abbach, Germany
| | - K. Ulm
- Technische Universität München, Institut
für Medizinische Statistik und Epidemiologie, Germany
| | - T. Weber
- Regensburg University Medical Centre, Asklepios
Klinikum Bad Abbach, Kaiser-Karl V.-Allee 3, 93077
Bad Abbach, Germany
| | - J. Grifka
- Regensburg University Medical Centre, Asklepios
Klinikum Bad Abbach, Kaiser-Karl V.-Allee 3, 93077
Bad Abbach, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Hapfelmeier A, Hothorn T, Riediger C, Ulm K. Estimation of a predictor's importance by Random Forests when there is missing data: risk prediction in liver surgery using laboratory data. Int J Biostat 2014; 10:165-83. [PMID: 24914728 DOI: 10.1515/ijb-2013-0038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
Abstract In the last few decades, new developments in liver surgery have led to an expanded applicability and an improved safety. However, liver surgery is still associated with postoperative morbidity and mortality, especially in extended resections. We analyzed a large liver surgery database to investigate whether laboratory parameters like haemoglobin, leucocytes, bilirubin, haematocrit and lactate might be relevant preoperative predictors. It is not uncommon to observe missing values in such data. This also holds for many other data sources and research fields. For analysis, one can make use of imputation methods or approaches that are able to deal with missing values in the predictor variables. A representative of the latter are Random Forests which also provide variable importance measures to assess a variable's relevance for prediction. Applied to the liver surgery data, we observed divergent results for the laboratory parameters, depending on the method used to cope with missing values. We therefore performed an extensive simulation study to investigate the properties of each approach. Findings and recommendations: Complete case analysis should not be used as it distorts the relevance of completely observed variables in an undesirable way. The estimation of a variable's importance by a self-contained measure that can deal with missing values appropriately reflects the decreased relevance of variables with missing values. It can therefore be used to obtain insight into Random Forests which are commonly fit without preprocessing of missing values in the data. By contrast, multiple imputation allows for the assessment of a variable's relevance one would potentially observe in complete-data situations, if imputation performs well. For the laboratory data, lactate and bilirubin seem to be associated with the risk of liver failure and postoperative complications. These relations should be investigated by future studies in more detail. However, it is important to carefully consider the method used for analysis when there are missing values in the predictor variables.
Collapse
|
43
|
Tufman A, Borgmeier A, Belka C, Ulm K, Tian F, Flentje M, Schnabel P, Goldmann T, Huber RM. Individualisation of radiochemotherapy (RTCT) for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Pneumologie 2014. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1376830] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
44
|
Tufman A, Schuster T, Borgmeier A, Schmidt M, Ulm K, Flentje M, Huber RM. Ort der ersten Progression nach Radiochemotherapie (RTCT) des NSCLC im Stadium III: Unterschied zwischen simultaner Radiochemotherapie im Vergleich mit alleiniger Radiotherapie (RT) nach Induktionschemotherapie. Pneumologie 2014. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1375927] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
45
|
|
46
|
Rauh K, Kunath J, Rosenfeld E, Kick L, Ulm K, Hauner H. Healthy living in pregnancy: a cluster-randomized controlled trial to prevent excessive gestational weight gain - rationale and design of the GeliS study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2014; 14:119. [PMID: 24678761 PMCID: PMC3973835 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2014] [Accepted: 03/20/2014] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Recent studies suggest that excessive gestational weight gain (GWG) leads to adverse maternal and fetal outcomes including weight retention in the mother and an increased risk of childhood obesity in the offspring. The aim of the GeliS study is to examine the effect of a lifestyle intervention programme during pregnancy to avoid excessive GWG and, hence, to reduce pregnancy and obstetric complications as well as the risk of maternal and offspring obesity. Methods and design The GeliS study is a multicentre cluster-randomized controlled trial. A total number of 2500 pregnant women (singleton pregnancy) with a pre-pregnancy BMI ≥ 18.5 kg/m2 and ≤ 40 kg/m2 will be recruited in practices of gynaecologists and midwives in ten Bavarian regions. The intervention comprises three structured and individualised counselling sessions on a healthy diet, regular physical activity as well as weight monitoring during pregnancy and one session after delivery, respectively. The counselling sessions are attached to routine pre- and postnatal visits using standardised materials and procedures. In the control regions, general recommendations for a healthy lifestyle are given. An oral glucose tolerance test is offered to all participants. The primary outcome is the proportion of participants with excessive GWG. Secondary outcomes include pregnancy and obstetric complications such as frequency of gestational diabetes, preeclampsia and caesarean sections as well as weight retention in the mothers and BMI and other health variables in the offspring. A 5-year follow-up of both mothers and their infants is planned. Discussion The GeliS lifestyle intervention programme has been adapted to the existing routine health care system for pregnant women. If shown to be effective, it could be immediately implemented in routine care. Trial registration The study protocol is registered at the ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol Registration System (NCT01958307).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Hans Hauner
- ZIEL - Research Centre for Nutrition and Food Sciences, Technische Universität München, Freising-Weihenstephan, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Pan KF, Formichella L, Zhang L, Zhang Y, Ma JL, Li ZX, Liu C, Wang YM, Goettner G, Ulm K, Classen M, You WC, Gerhard M. Helicobacter pylori antibody responses and evolution of precancerous gastric lesions in a Chinese population. Int J Cancer 2013; 134:2118-25. [PMID: 24155048 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.28560] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2013] [Accepted: 10/04/2013] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Helicobacter pylori-specific proteins are involved in gastric carcinogenesis. To investigate the seroprevalence of six H. pylori-specific antibodies in patients with different gastric histology, and the impact of seropositivities on the evolution of precancerous gastric lesions, a follow-up study was conducted in Linqu County, China. The seropositivities for CagA, VacA, GroEL, UreA, HcpC and gGT were assessed by recomLine analysis in 573 H. pylori-positive subjects and correlated with evolution of precancerous gastric lesions. We found that the score of H. pylori recomLine test was significantly increased in subjects with chronic atrophic gastritis (CAG, p < 0.0001) or intestinal metaplasia (IM, p = 0.0125), and CagA was an independent predictor of advanced gastric lesions, adjusted odds ratios (ORs) were 2.54 (95% CI = 1.42-4.55) for IM and 2.38 (95% CI = 1.05-5.37) for dysplasia (DYS). Moreover, seropositivities for CagA and GroEL were identified as independent predictors for progression of gastric lesions in a longitudinal study, and ORs were 2.89 (95% CI = 1.27-6.59) and 2.20 (95% CI = 1.33-3.64), respectively. Furthermore, the risk of progression was more pronounced in subjects with more than three positive antigens (p(for) trend = 0.0003). This population-based study revealed that seropositivities for CagA and GroEL might be potential markers to identify patients infected with high-risk H. pylori strains, which are related to the development of GC in a Chinese high-risk population, and recomLine test might serve as a tool for risk stratification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kai-Feng Pan
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Scharnbacher J, Claus M, Reichert J, Röhrl T, Hoffmann U, Ulm K, Letzel S, Nowak D. Hypothenar hammer syndrome: a multicenter case-control study. Am J Ind Med 2013; 56:1352-8. [PMID: 24038322 DOI: 10.1002/ajim.22237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/18/2013] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The rarely diagnosed hypothenar hammer syndrome (HHS) is due to vascular damage to the distal part of the ulnar artery probably caused by acute or repetitive blunt trauma to the hypothenar region. To date, mainly case reports have been published, while epidemiological data are almost absent. AIM To identify potential risk factors for HHS. METHOD An interview-based multicenter case-control study of 71 patients with HHS and 105 matched controls was conducted with standardized questions regarding disease specific variables, occupation, exposure of the hands to different types of trauma in occupational and leisure context. Medical data were verified from individual medical records. RESULTS Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that using the hand as a hammer on a daily basis (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 17.04, 95% CI 5.51-52.67) daily pressure to the palm of the hand (aOR 4.96, 95% CI 1.39-17.71), and daily exposure to vibrating tools (aOR 3.41, 95% CI 1.03-11.31) were significant risk factors for HHS. CONCLUSIONS This investigation represents one of the largest groups of patients with HHS described so far. Work-related repeated blunt trauma to the palm of the hand significantly increases the risk of HHS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jutta Scharnbacher
- Institute of Occupational; Social and Environmental Medicine; University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz; Germany
| | - Matthias Claus
- Institute of Teachers' Health at the Institute of Occupational; Social and Environmental Medicine; University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz; Germany
| | - Jörg Reichert
- Institute and Outpatient Clinic for Occupational; Social and Environmental Medicine; Clinical Center; Ludwig-Maximilian University; Munich; Germany
| | - Tobias Röhrl
- Institute and Outpatient Clinic for Occupational; Social and Environmental Medicine; Clinical Center; Ludwig-Maximilian University; Munich; Germany
| | - Ulrich Hoffmann
- Division of Vascular Medicine; Medical Clinic IV; Ludwig-Maximilian University; Munich; Germany
| | - Kurt Ulm
- Institute of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology; Technical University; Munich; Germany
| | - Stephan Letzel
- Institute of Occupational; Social and Environmental Medicine; University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz; Germany
| | - Dennis Nowak
- Institute and Outpatient Clinic for Occupational; Social and Environmental Medicine; Clinical Center; Ludwig-Maximilian University; Munich; Germany
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
|
50
|
|