1
|
Mercadante S, Adile C, Aielli F, Gaetano L, Mistakidou K, Maltoni M, Soares LG, DeSantis S, Ferrera P, Rosati M, Rossi R, Casuccio A. Personalized Pain Goals and Responses in Advanced Cancer Patients. Pain Med 2021; 21:e215-e221. [PMID: 31633792 DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnz254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the personalized pain intensity goal (PPIG), the achievement of a personalized pain goal response (PPGR), and patients' global impression (PGI) in advanced cancer patients after a comprehensive pain and symptom management. DESIGN Prospective, longitudinal. SETTING Acute pain relief and palliative/supportive care. SUBJECTS 689 advanced cancer patients. METHODS Measurement of Edmonton Symptom Assessment Score (ESAS) and personalized pain intensity goal (PPIG) at admission (T0). After a week (T7) personalized pain goal response (PPGR) and patients' global impression (PGI) were evaluated. RESULTS The mean PPIG was 1.33 (SD 1.59). A mean decrease in pain intensity of - 2.09 was required on PPIG to perceive a minimal clinically important difference (MCID). A better improvement corresponded to a mean change of - 3.41 points, while a much better improvement corresponded to a mean of - 4.59 points. Patients perceived a MCID (little worse) with a mean increase in pain intensity of 0.25, and a worse with a mean increase of 2.33 points. Higher pain intensity at T0 and lower pain intensity at T7 were independently related to PGI. 207 (30.0%) patients achieved PPGR. PPGR was associated with higher PPIG at T0 and T7, and inversely associated to pain intensity at T0 and T7, and Karnofsky level. Patients with high pain intensity at T0 achieved a favorable PGI, even when PPIG was not achieved by PPGR. CONCLUSION PPIG, PPGR and PGI seem to be relevant for evaluating the effects of a comprehensive management of pain, assisting decision-making process according to patients' expectations. Some factors may be implicated in determining the individual target and the clinical response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Claudio Adile
- Pain Relief & Supportive Care, La Maddalena Cancer Center, Palermo, Italy
| | - Federica Aielli
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Lanzetta Gaetano
- Medical Oncology Unit, IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, Italy.,Medical Oncology Unit, Italian Neuro-Traumatology Institute, Grottaferrata, Italy
| | - Kyriaki Mistakidou
- Pain Relief and Palliative Care Unit, Department of Radiology, Areteion Hospital, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Athens, Greece
| | - Marco Maltoni
- Palliative Care Unit, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, FC, Italy
| | - Luiz Guilherme Soares
- Post-Acute Care Services and Palliative Care Program, Hospital Placi, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Stefano DeSantis
- Palliative Care and Oncologic Pain Service, S. Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Patrizia Ferrera
- Pain Relief & Supportive Care, La Maddalena Cancer Center, Palermo, Italy
| | - Marta Rosati
- Palliative Care Unit, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, FC, Italy
| | - Romina Rossi
- Palliative Care Unit, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, FC, Italy
| | - Alessandra Casuccio
- Department of Sciences for Health Promotion and Mother Child Care, Università di Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mercadante S, Adile C, Aielli F, Gaetano L, Mistakidou K, Maltoni M, Cortegiani A, Soares LG, De Santis S, Ferrera P, Rosati M, Rossi R, Casuccio A. Personalized goal for insomnia and clinical response in advanced cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 2019; 28:1089-1096. [PMID: 31190161 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-019-04912-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2019] [Accepted: 05/31/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
AIM The aim of this study was to assess the Personalized Insomnia Intensity Goal (PIIG), the achievement of Personalized Goal Response (PGR), and Patient Global Impression (PGI) after a comprehensive symptom management. PATIENTS AND METHODS Advanced cancer patients admitted to palliative care units rated pain and symptoms intensity and their PIIG by using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Score (ESAS) (T0). In patients with significant levels of insomnia, the achievement of target expected (PIIG) was measured (patient goal response, PIGR), as well the patient global impression (PGI), by the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), after a comprehensive symptom management (T7). RESULTS Three hundred ninety-seven patients with a level of insomnia of ≥ 3 on ESAS were analyzed in this study. The mean values of PIIG at T0 and T7 were 1.2 (SD 1.5) and 0.9 (SD 1.4), respectively. Most patients (n = 406, 89.8%) indicated a PIIG of ≤ 3 as a target at T0. Such target was significantly lower at T7 (p = < 0.0005). PGI, expressed as MCID, was perceived with a mean decrease in insomnia intensity of - 2.3. In a minority of patients (n = 26; 5.8%) insomnia worsened, with a MCID of 0.50 (SD 2.8). Higher insomnia intensity at T0 and lower insomnia intensity at T7 were independently related to PGI. PIGR was achieved in 87.9% of patients. PIGR was associated with PIIG at T0, and inversely associated to insomnia intensity at T0 and T7, and PIIG at T7. CONCLUSION PGIR and PGI seem to be relevant for evaluating the effects of a comprehensive management of insomnia, suggesting therapeutic decisions according to PIIG. Some factors influencing the individual target and clinical response have been detected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastiano Mercadante
- Main Regional Center for Pain Relief & Supportive Care, La Maddalena Cancer Center, Via San Lorenzo 312, 90145, Palermo, Italy.
| | - Claudio Adile
- Pain Relief & Supportive Care, La Maddalena Cancer Center, Palermo, Italy
| | | | - Lanzetta Gaetano
- Medical Oncology Unit, IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, Italy
- Medical Oncology Unit, Italian Neuro-Traumatology Institute, Grottaferrata, Italy
| | - Kyriaki Mistakidou
- Pain Relief and Palliative Care Unit, Department of Radiology, Areteion Hospital, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Athens, Greece
| | - Marco Maltoni
- Palliative Care Unit - Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy
| | - Andrea Cortegiani
- Department of Anesthesioloogy, University of Palermo, Palermo, PA, Italy
| | - Luiz Guilherme Soares
- Post-Acute Care Services and Palliative Care Program, Hospital Placi, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Stefano De Santis
- Palliative Care and Oncologic Pain Service - S. Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Patrizia Ferrera
- Pain Relief & Supportive Care, La Maddalena Cancer Center, Palermo, Italy
| | - Marta Rosati
- Palliative Care Unit - Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy
| | - Romina Rossi
- Palliative Care Unit - Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mercadante S, Adile C, Aielli F, Lanzetta G, Mistakidou K, Maltoni M, Soares LG, De Santis S, Ferrera P, Rosati M, Rossi R, Casuccio A. Personalized Goal for Dyspnea and Clinical Response in Advanced Cancer Patients. J Pain Symptom Manage 2019; 57:79-85. [PMID: 30336213 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.10.492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2018] [Revised: 10/05/2018] [Accepted: 10/07/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The clinical response after comprehensive symptom management is difficult to determine in terms of a clinically important difference. Moreover, therapies should try to reach the threshold perceived by the individual patient for the determination of a favorable response to a treatment. MEASURES The Edmonton Symptom Assessment Score (ESAS) was measured at admission (T0), and seven days after starting palliative care (T7). Patient Global Impression and Goal Response after one week of palliative care and its relation with the Personalized Dyspnea Goal were measured at T7. INTERVENTION Patients admitted to palliative care units underwent a comprehensive symptom assessment by a specialist palliative care team. At T0, patients were asked about their Personalized Dyspnea Intensity Goal on ESAS. One week later (T7), after a comprehensive palliative care treatment, Personalized Dyspnea Intensity Goals were measured again. Patients were considered to have achieved a Patient Dyspnea Goal Response if dyspnea intensity (measured at T7) was equal or less than their expected Personalized Dyspnea Intensity Goal. At the same interval (T7), Patient Global Impression (improvement or deterioration) was measured. OUTCOMES 279 patients were analyzed in this study. The mean Personalized Dyspnea Intensity Goal at T0 and T7 were 0.97 (SD 1.3), and 0.71 (SD 2.1), respectively. 263 patients (94.2%) indicated a Personalized Dyspnea Intensity Goal of ≤3 as a target at T0. Patients perceived a bit better, a better improvement, and a much better improvement with a mean decrease in dyspnea intensity of -2.1, -3.5, and -4.3 points on the dyspnea intensity scale, respectively. In 60 patients (21.5%), dyspnea intensity did not change, and in 4.7%, dyspnea intensity worsened. Patients perceived a Minimal Clinically Important Difference (little worse) with a mean increase in dyspnea intensity of 0.10, and they perceived a worse with a mean increase of 1.7 points. Higher dyspnea intensity at T0 and lower dyspnea intensity at T7 were independently related to Patient Global Impression. At T7, 93 (33.3%) patients achieved their Personalized Goal Response, based on Personalized Dyspnea Intensity. Patient Dyspnea Goal Response was associated with Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale score and Personalized Dyspnea Intensity Goal at T0, and inversely associated with dyspnea intensity at T0 and T7, and lower Karnofsky level. For Patient Dyspnea Goal Response, no significant differences among categories of dyspnea intensity were found (P>0.05). CONCLUSION Patient Dyspnea Goal Response and Patient Global Impression seem to be relevant for evaluating the effects of a comprehensive management of symptoms, including dyspnea, assisting decision making process. Some factors may be implicated in determining the individual target and clinical response. A personalized symptom goal may translate in terms of therapeutic intervention, according to the achievement of the patients' expectations. High values of dyspnea intensity, a lower Karnofsky level, as well as high level of Dyspnea Intensity Goal (that is less patients' expectations) favor the achievement of the target.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Claudio Adile
- Pain Relief & Supportive Care, La Maddalena Cancer Center, Palermo, Italy
| | - Federica Aielli
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Gaetano Lanzetta
- Medical Oncology Unit, IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, Italy; Medical Oncology Unit, Italian Neuro-Traumatology Institute, Grottaferrata, Italy
| | - Kyriaki Mistakidou
- Pain Relief and Palliative Care Unit, Department of Radiology, Areteion Hospital, School of Medicine, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Marco Maltoni
- Palliative Care Unit, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Forlì-Cesena, Italy
| | - Luiz Guilherme Soares
- Post-Acute Care Services and Palliative Care Program, Hospital Placi, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Stefano De Santis
- Palliative Care and Oncologic Pain Service, S. Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Patrizia Ferrera
- Pain Relief & Supportive Care, La Maddalena Cancer Center, Palermo, Italy
| | - Marta Rosati
- Pain Relief and Palliative Care Unit, Department of Radiology, Areteion Hospital, School of Medicine, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Romina Rossi
- Palliative Care Unit, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Forlì-Cesena, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zygogianni A, Syrigos K, Mistakidou K, Fotineas A, Kyrgias G, Ferendouros V, Kouvaris J, Papadimitriou C, Kantzou I, Pantelakos P, Kouloulias V. Structure and function of the oncologic boards in Greece. Description of the institutional and scientific frame; objective problems and difficulties. J BUON 2013; 18:281-288. [PMID: 23613417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Oncology boards should constitute a routine in all hospitals that are dealing with the care of cancer patients. Unfortunately the procedure which should be followed to deal with this health problem has some deficiencies. METHODS A literature review has recently been attempted, searching Internet databases by using key words such as oncologic board, medical legislation and medical ethics. RESULTS Current mentality suggests that hiding the truth from the patient is wrong and unethical. However, in the Greek society, this is not the case as it seems not right to adopt foreign practices, i.e. to disclose directly to the patient all information relevant to his health status, the intended therapy and possible outcome. Instead, ambiguous information pass onto relatives who in turn bear the burden of informing the patient. CONCLUSIONS The best solution would be the integration of the positive elements of the patient's awareness and the beneficial effects of the involvement of the Greek family in the general care of the cancer patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Zygogianni
- 1st Department of Radiology, Aretaieion University Hospital, Athens, Greece.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|