1
|
Laughlin BS, Corbin KS, Thorpe CS, Toesca DAS, Golafshar MA, McGee LA, Halyard M, Mutter RW, Keole SR, Park SS, Shumway D, Vallow LA, Vern-Gross TZ, Wong WW, DeWees TA, Vargas CE. Physician and Patient-Reported Outcomes of a Phase III Trial of Ultra-Hypofractionated vs. Moderate Hypofractionated Radiotherapy to the Whole Breast after Breast-Conserving Surgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:S6. [PMID: 37784534 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) To report a final analysis evaluating physician and patient-reported outcomes of early breast cancer patients receiving moderate hypofractionation or ultra-hypofractionated whole breast radiotherapy (RT). MATERIALS/METHODS Between April 4, 2018, and February 11, 2020, patients with localized breast cancer (T1-T3, N0-N1, and M0) managed with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) were enrolled. Patients were randomized to receive whole breast RT with moderate hypofractionation to 40 Gy in 15 fractions (Arm A) or ultra-hypofractionation to 25 Gy in 5 fractions (Arm B). An optional concurrent integrated boost to 48 Gy on Arm A or 30 Gy on Arm B was allowed. Early toxicity (<3 months), late toxicity (> 3 months), quality of life (QOL), cosmesis, Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE), and deterioration of cosmesis were analyzed. RESULTS One hundred and seven patients were randomized to moderate hypofractionation (n = 54) or ultra-hypofractionation (n = 53). With a median follow-up of 36 months, no significant differences in patient characteristics were noted between the two arms. There were no patients with a grade ≥3 or higher toxicity. Grade 2 toxicities were 7.4% in Arm A and 7.5% in Arm B, and primarily consisted of radiation dermatitis (6 patients), fibrosis (1 patient) and lymphedema (1 patient). The average Harvard Cosmesis score and overall QoL were similar between arms at all time points, with no patients developing cosmetic deterioration. Patient-reported moderate to severe radiation skin burns were more commonly reported in Arm A (21.05%) vs. Arm B (6.25%) at the end of treatment (EOT) (p = 0.078). At EOT, patients receiving moderate hypofractionation had higher mean toxicity scores in breast tenderness (2.66 vs. 1.5, p = 0.018), skin flaking or peeling (0.63 vs. 0.06, p = 0.035), blistering (0.74 vs. 0.06, p = 0.028), pruritis (2.53 vs. 0.87, p < 0.001), erythema (4.24 vs. 2.0, p <0.001), telangiectasias (1.0 vs. 0.28, p = 0.021). Additionally, patients receiving moderate hypofractionation reported significantly worse changes from baseline at EOT in breast tenderness (-2.25 vs. -.86, p = 0.02), telangiectasia (-0.81 vs. 0.18, p = 0.012), skin discoloration (-4.31 vs. -1.04, p < 0.001), skin flaking or peeling (-.55 vs. 0.04, p = 0.053), blistering (-0.82 vs. -0.07, p = 0.033), and pruritus (-2.27 vs. -.67, p = 0.002). There was a return to baseline in all patient-reported breast domains by 3 months (p >0.05) in both arms. CONCLUSION Ultra-hypofractionated whole breast irradiation, consisting of 25 Gy in 5 fractions, provided comparable provider assessed toxicity and cosmetic outcomes to 40 Gy in 15 fractions. At the EOT assessment, ultra-hypofractionation had a better patient reported toxicity profile. Our findings provide further evidence to support daily ultra-hypofractionated whole breast radiotherapy as an appropriate treatment option for early-stage breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B S Laughlin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - K S Corbin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - C S Thorpe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sanford Health, Fargo, ND
| | - D A S Toesca
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - M A Golafshar
- Department of Qualitative Health Sciences, Section of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - L A McGee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - M Halyard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - R W Mutter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - S R Keole
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - S S Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - D Shumway
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - L A Vallow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
| | - T Z Vern-Gross
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - W W Wong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - T A DeWees
- Department of Qualitative Health Sciences, Section of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - C E Vargas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Toesca DAS, Hartsell WF, DeWees TA, Chang J, Laughlin B, Voss MM, Mohammed N, Keole SR, McGee LA, Gondi V, Sweeney PJ, Dorn PL, Sinesi CC, Jr LSD, Rich TA, Vargas CE. Final Analysis of a Phase III Controlled Randomized Study of Stereotactic Body Proton Therapy or Conventionally Fractionated Proton Therapy for Early Prostate Cancer: PCG GU002. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:S24-S25. [PMID: 37784460 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) To determine if stereotactic body proton therapy (SBPT) is non-inferior to conventionally fractionated proton therapy (CFPT) in patients with early prostate cancer. MATERIALS/METHODS Multicenter, randomized, controlled, open-label, non-inferiority phase 3 trial that included patients with histologically confirmed low-risk prostate adenocarcinoma defined by Gleason score ≤6, PSA <10 ng/mL, and clinical stage T1-2a N0 M0 by AJCC 7th Ed. Eligible participants were randomly assigned (initially 1:1 and later 2:1 ratio) to CFPT (79.2 Gy in 44 fractions for 9 weeks) or SBPT (38 Gy in 5 fractions for 1 week). Concurrent or adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy was not allowed. The primary endpoint was freedom from failure (FFF) at 2 years, defined as the first occurrence of local, regional, or distant recurrence, biochemical failure by the Phoenix definition (increase of PSA ≥2 ng/mL over the nadir PSA), or the start of salvage therapy including ADT. Secondary endpoints included GI and GU grade ≥2 toxicity according to CTCAE v4 criteria, as well as health-related quality of life (HRQoL) metrics assessed by AUASI and EPIC scores. Non-inferiority would be declared if the 1-sided 95% confidence interval limit for the difference in 2-year FFF rate was below 4.2% between both groups by Clopper-Pearson exact method. RESULTS Between November 2010 and September 2020, 133 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to CFPT (n = 45) or SBPT (n = 88). Median follow-up was 5 years (IQ 3.9-5.2), with the last patient enrolled followed for at least 2 years. The 2-year FFF was 100% for both groups, fulfilling the pre-specified criteria for non-inferiority of SBPT compared to CFPT. By KM estimates, 5-year FFF was 97.4% and 100% (P = 0.1), and the 5-year OS was 97.1% and 95.5% (P = 0.46) for patients treated with CFPT and SBPT, respectively. The cumulative incidence of any grade ≥3 toxicities at 5 years was 0% and 5.7% (P = 0.14) for patients treated with CFPT and SBPT, respectively. The frequency of GI grade ≥2 toxicity at 6 months was of 0% and 2.3% (P = 0.55), and at 2 years was of 6.7% and 3.4% (P = 0.69) for patients treated with CFPT and SBPT, respectively. The frequency of GU grade ≥2 toxicity at 6 months was of 2.2% and 5.7% (P = 0.42), and at 2 years was of 8.9% and 5.7% (P = 0.54) for patients treated with CFPT and SBPT, respectively. Changes in HRQoL scores at 2 years were similar between groups (Table). CONCLUSION SBPT is non-inferior to CFPT regarding FFF and associated with similar long-term toxicity rates and HRQoL metric scores.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D A S Toesca
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | | | - T A DeWees
- Department of Qualitative Health Sciences, Section of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - J Chang
- The Oklahoma Proton Center and University of Oklahoma Health Science Center, Oklahoma City, OK
| | - B Laughlin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - M M Voss
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Arizona, Phoenix, AZ
| | - N Mohammed
- Northwestern Medicine Chicago Proton Center, Warrenville, IL
| | - S R Keole
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - L A McGee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - V Gondi
- Northwestern Medicine Cancer Center Warrenville and Northwestern Medicine Chicago Proton Center, Warrenville, IL
| | - P J Sweeney
- Northwestern Medicine Chicago Proton Center, Warrenville, IL
| | - P L Dorn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children, Denver, CO
| | - C C Sinesi
- Hampton University Proton Therapy Institute, Hampton, VA
| | - L S Doh Jr
- Radiation Medicine Associates, Oklahoma City, OK
| | - T A Rich
- University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, VA
| | - C E Vargas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ebner DK, Evans JM, Christensen B, Breinholt J, Gamez ME, Lester SC, Routman DM, Ma DJ, Price K, Dong H, Park SS, Chintakuntlawar AV, Neben-Wittich MA, McGee LA, Garces Y, Patel SH, Foote RL, Evans JD. Unique T-cell Sub-Population Shifts after SBPT and Nivolumab in Platinum Refractory HNC: Biomarker Correlates from ROR1771. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:e580. [PMID: 37785763 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.1920] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) ROR1771 was a clinical trial investigating the use of stereotactic body proton radiotherapy (SBPT) and nivolumab in recurrent platinum refractory head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The planned analysis of T-cell subpopulation and biomarker response is herein presented. MATERIALS/METHODS Patients with metastatic histologically confirmed HNSCC from any primary site received 2 cycles of nivolumab followed by SBPT to 1-2 selected target lesion(s) (hilar/lung: 8 of 12 patients), followed by maintenance nivolumab. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated pre-/post-treatment. Flow cytometry identified T-cell subpopulations. Single Cell 5' Gene Expression (GEX) and V(D)J T Cell Receptor libraries were prepared using Single Cell Immune Profiling. Seurat (v4.1.1) was used to identify cell type clusters, and differential expression post-filtration was evaluated using the Wilcoxon Rank Sum test. RESULTS A total of 12 patients were eligible for analysis, with one alive at time of analysis, 52 months from start of treatment. Median overall survival here was 12.5 months vs. 7.5-months on CheckMate 141. SBPT ranged from 35-50 Gy. Sequential changes in T-cell populations from baseline were noted with initiation of nivolumab, driving decrease in tumor-reactive (TTR; CD11ahighPD1+CD8+), central memory (TCM; CCR7+CD45RA-), and effector T-cells (TEF; CCR7-CD45RA-). TTR and TCM increased following SBPT, with greatest increase (3.5x TTR and 5.2x TCM) in the surviving patient. An average of 68 genes with significant differential expression between timepoints (p<0.0001) demonstrated RNA gene expression changes across all cell subtypes, including ribosomal (RPL and RPS) genes, ACTB, FTL, MALAT1, and others. This averaged 113 genes across all timepoints in the surviving patient, with peak following nivolumab induction. On T-cell receptor (TCR) analysis of this patient, the predominant clonotype diversity changed substantially following nivolumab. Following SBPT, clonotype diversity again changed to include a milieu seen neither at baseline nor with nivolumab alone. These TCRs persisted for approximately 2 weeks following SBPT before returning to resemble the nivolumab-induced TCR diversity alone, coinciding with disease recurrence. CONCLUSION ROR1771 demonstrated overall survival favorably comparable to CheckMate 141. Biomarker analysis of peripheral blood samples demonstrated significant shifts in T-cell subpopulations and underlying gene expression to nivolumab and then to SBPT administration. SBPT to a target lesion changed TCR clonotypes within the peripheral blood beyond those seen with nivolumab administration, with fading of these TCR clonotypes coinciding with recurrence. SBPT in combination with nivolumab may drive systemic immunologic change above that induced by nivolumab alone and warrants further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D K Ebner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - J M Evans
- Intermountain Precision Genomics, St George, UT
| | | | - J Breinholt
- Intermountain Precision Genomics, St George, UT
| | - M E Gamez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - S C Lester
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - D M Routman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - D J Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - K Price
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - H Dong
- Department of Urology and Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - S S Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | | | - L A McGee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Y Garces
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - S H Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ
| | - R L Foote
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - J D Evans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Intermountain Healthcare, Murray, UT
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Thorpe CS, DeWees TA, Golafshar MA, Bhangoo RS, Vern-Gross TZ, McGee LA, Wong WW, Halyard MY, Keole SR, Vargas CE. Patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events and quality-of-life linear analogue self-assessment in breast cancer patients receiving radiation therapy: single-institution prospective registry. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2022; 6:3. [PMID: 35006393 PMCID: PMC8748600 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-021-00408-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2021] [Accepted: 12/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose/objectives We sought to investigate the impact of patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE) on overall quality-of-life (QOL) employing linear analogue self-assessment (LASA) in breast cancer (BC) patients undergoing radiation therapy (RT). Materials/methods All patients treated with RT for BC with curative intent from 2015 to 2019 at our institution were included. Breast specific PRO-CTCAE and overall QOL LASA questionnaires were administered at baseline, end-of-treatment, 3, 6, 12 months, and then annually. Minimal clinically important difference in overall QOL was a 10-point change in LASA. Hypofractionation was any treatment > 2 Gy per fraction. Mixed models for repeated measures were used to determine the association of PRO-CTCAE and overall QOL LASA. Results Three hundred thirty-one (331) patients with a median follow-up of 3.1 years (range 0.4–4.9) were included. Average overall QOL LASA scores were 78.5 at baseline, 79.8 at end-of-treatment, 79.8 at 3 months, 77.1 at 6 months, 79.4 at 12 months, and 79.7 at 24 months. On univariate analysis, patients reporting a grade ≥ 3 PRO-CTCAE had, on average, a 10.4-point reduction in overall LASA QOL (p < 0.0001). On multivariate analysis, not being treated with hypofractionation and higher BMI were predictive for worse overall LASA QOL with a 10-point reduction in LASA for patients reporting a grade ≥ 3 PRO-CTCAE (p < 0.0001). Conclusions Patients reporting a grade ≥ 3 PRO-CTCAE experienced statistically significant and clinically meaningful deterioration in overall QOL LASA. Hypofractionation improved QOL while higher BMI predicted for worse QOL. PRO-CTCAE should be integrated into future clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C S Thorpe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 5881 E Mayo Blvd., Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - T A DeWees
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 5881 E Mayo Blvd., Phoenix, AZ, USA.,Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - M A Golafshar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 5881 E Mayo Blvd., Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - R S Bhangoo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 5881 E Mayo Blvd., Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - T Z Vern-Gross
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 5881 E Mayo Blvd., Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - L A McGee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 5881 E Mayo Blvd., Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - W W Wong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 5881 E Mayo Blvd., Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - M Y Halyard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 5881 E Mayo Blvd., Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - S R Keole
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 5881 E Mayo Blvd., Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - C E Vargas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 5881 E Mayo Blvd., Phoenix, AZ, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hoppe BS, Hill-Kayser CE, Tseng YD, Flampouri S, Elmongy HM, Cahlon O, Mendenhall NP, Maity A, McGee LA, Plastaras JP. Consolidative proton therapy after chemotherapy for patients with Hodgkin lymphoma. Ann Oncol 2018; 28:2179-2184. [PMID: 28911093 PMCID: PMC5834068 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background We investigated early outcomes for patients receiving chemotherapy followed by consolidative proton therapy (PT) for the treatment of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). Patients and methods From June 2008 through August 2015, 138 patients with HL enrolled on either IRB-approved outcomes tracking protocols or registry studies received consolidative PT. Patients were excluded due to relapsed or refractory disease. Involved-site radiotherapy field designs were used for all patients. Pediatric patients received a median dose of 21 Gy(RBE) [range 15–36 Gy(RBE)]; adult patients received a median dose of 30.6 Gy(RBE) [range, 20–45 Gy(RBE)]. Patients receiving PT were young (median age, 20 years; range 6–57). Overall, 42% were pediatric (≤18 years) and 93% were under the age of 40 years. Thirty-eight percent of patients were male and 62% female. Stage distribution included 73% with I/II and 27% with III/IV disease. Patients predominantly had mediastinal involvement (96%) and bulky disease (57%), whereas 37% had B symptoms. The median follow-up was 32 months (range, 5–92 months). Results The 3-year relapse-free survival rate was 92% for all patients; it was 96% for adults and 87% for pediatric patients (P = 0.18). When evaluated by positron emission tomography/computed tomography scan response at the end of chemotherapy, patients with a partial response had worse 3-year progression-free survival compared with other patients (78% versus 94%; P = 0.0034). No grade 3 radiation-related toxicities have occurred to date. Conclusion Consolidative PT following standard chemotherapy in HL is primarily used in young patients with mediastinal and bulky disease. Early relapse-free survival rates are similar to those reported with photon radiation treatment, and no early grade 3 toxicities have been observed. Continued follow-up to assess late effects is critical.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B S Hoppe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville.,University of Florida Health Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville
| | - C E Hill-Kayser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Y D Tseng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle.,Proton Collaborative Group Registry Membership Site, Warrenville.,Seattle Cancer Care Alliance Proton Therapy Center, Seattle
| | - S Flampouri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville
| | - H M Elmongy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - O Cahlon
- Proton Collaborative Group Registry Membership Site, Warrenville.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York.,Procure Proton Therapy Center, Somerset
| | - N P Mendenhall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville.,University of Florida Health Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville
| | - A Maity
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - L A McGee
- Proton Collaborative Group Registry Membership Site, Warrenville.,Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, USA
| | - J P Plastaras
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| |
Collapse
|