Tonetti J, Carrat L, Blendea S, Merloz P, Troccaz J, Lavallée S, Chirossel JP. Clinical results of percutaneous pelvic surgery. Computer assisted surgery using ultrasound compared to standard fluoroscopy.
Comput Aided Surg 2002;
6:204-11. [PMID:
11835615 DOI:
10.1002/igs.10010]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
This study presents early results of clinical experience with the application of Computer Assisted Surgery (CAS) to percutaneous iliosacral screwing, with comparison to a historical series of patients treated using percutaneous fluoroscopy. Four patients were instrumented using a CAS system, with 10 screws being inserted. Thirty patients were treated by percutaneous fluoroscopic screwing, with 51 screws being inserted. The follow-up assessment included the following criteria; operative time, parameters of radiation exposure, neurological examination, screw placement evaluation on CT-scan, antalgic drug consumption, pain, Majeed grading, and loosening of implants. In the CAS group, the average radiation time was 0.35 min per patient and 0.14 min per screw. No trajectories outside the bone and no postoperative neurological deficits were found. In the fluoroscopic group, the average radiation time was 1.03 min per patient and 0.6 min per screw. Twelve screws had outside-bone trajectories, and iatrogenic neurological deficits were found in seven patients. The average operative time was 50 min in the CAS group and 35 min in the fluoroscopic group. The present CAS technique shows better placement of iliosacral screws, with no outside-bone trajectories and lower radiation exposure.
Collapse