Left Hepatic Lobectomy in the Living Donor-Comparison Between Open vs Laparoscopic Surgery

Laparoscopic hepatic surgery dramatically changed surgical practice in the last decades, improving outcomes in correctly selected patients. The reduction of postoperative pain, lower rate of complication, early return to work activities, and better esthetic result have been well described in several studies. The success of these procedures would inevitably clash in the more complex and delicate field of hepatectomy in the living donor. The 2nd International Consensus of the Conference on Laparoscopic Liver Surgery considers laparoscopic hepatectomy in the donor as an ideal procedure. The aim of this study is to compare the results between conventional and laparoscopic surgery; prospective data and retrospective analysis of 55 cases of live liver donor lobectomy were collected between January 2013 and June 2018. The mean age was 30.4 years in the video laparoscopic technique and 32.1 years in conventional surgery; the majority of donors were male in both groups. The mean time of ischemia was 70.2 minutes (range, 50-120 minutes) in laparoscopic surgery and 80.2 minutes (range, 50-165 minutes) in conventional surgery. The surgical time ranged from 270 to 800 minutes (mean, 452 minutes) in laparoscopic surgery and ranged from 300 to 600 minutes (mean, 424 minutes) in conventional surgery. The mean length of hospital stay was 2.2 days in laparoscopy and 3.97 days in conventional surgery. Laparoscopic left liver lobectomy in the living donor is safe and feasible. There was no significant difference in surgical time; however, the time of hospitalization was lower in patients submitted to laparoscopic technique.

Impact of Model for End-stage Liver Disease Score in Post-Liver Transplantation Prognosis

Although the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score has been used to evaluate mortality of patients on the waiting list for liver transplantation, it has not established if it correlates with post-liver transplantation prognosis. The aim of this study is to assess if there is a relationship between pretransplantation MELD and post-transplantation results, especially regarding 30-day post-LT survival rates. We analyzed data from 172 patients who underwent deceased-donor liver transplantation between February 2013 and May 2015 in a single center. The sample was divided in two groups according to their MELD scores: group 1, with MELD <25 (n = 134), and group 2, with MELD ≥25 (n = 38). The groups were compared with regard to 1-, 3-, and 12-month postoperative survival; total length of stay and in intensive care unit; and perioperative blood transfusion. The global 30-day post-liver transplantation survival rate was 87.2% (89.55% for group 1 and 78.99% for group 2 (P = .090). The evaluation of 3- and 12-month survival showed that in group 2 the mortality was higher (P = .01). Our data suggests a positive relationship between the higher MELD group and longer length of stay in intensive care unit (P = .0345), but not for total time of hospital admission (P = .524). Perioperative blood product transfusion was needed in 35.82% of patients in group 1 and 71.05% in group 2; this correlated with a higher 30- day postoperative mortality (P < .001).