Phase I Study of Bortezomib, Fludarabine, and Melphalan, with or without Total Marrow Irradiation as Conditioning for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with High-Risk or Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Though outcomes of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) have improved, cure remains elusive. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-sCT) is associated with a lower relapse rate, but its role is hindered due to toxicities. We hypothesized that targeted total body irradiation in the form of total marrow irradiation (TMI) could safely facilitate allo-SCT via an improved toxicity profile. Therefore, we conducted a phase I study to investigate the safety and feasibility of a bortezomib (BTZ), fludarabine (FLU), and melphalan (MEL), with or without TMI, prior to allo-SCT for patients with high-risk (HR) or relapsed/refractory (R/R) MM.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Between 2012 and 2018 this study enrolled patients with HR or R/R MM on one of two strata, each comprising BTZ dose-escalation cohorts. Patients aged 18-60 with no prior radiation (RT) received TMI at 900 cGy (in 6 fractions delivered twice-daily), FLU, and MEL conditioning, with BTZ added in the second cohort (stratum I). Patients aged 18-70 with prior RT received FLU, MEL, and BTZ, without TMI (stratum II). The primary endpoint was feasibility of escalating doses of BTZ, with or without TMI, defined using a 3+3 design. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as any Grade 3+ Bearman toxicity or prolonged CTCAE v4.0 Grade 4+ neutropenia. Secondary endpoints included treatment response, time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment, incidence of acute (a) and chronic (c) graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), progression-free-survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Eight patients were enrolled on stratum I. One of three patients in the first cohort of stratum I experienced DLT, which led to expansion to three more patients with no DLT. Cohort 2 enrolled only 2 patients due to low accrual, with BTZ added at 0.5 mg/m2; neither experienced DLT. Nine patients were enrolled on stratum II. Three patients were enrolled on cohort 1 (BTZ 0.5 mg/m2) and none experienced DLT. Three were enrolled on cohort 2 (bortezomib 0.7 mg/m2), and one experienced DLT. Therefore, the cohort expanded to three more patients. One more patient experienced DLT and 0.5 mg/m2 was considered the maximum tolerated dose. There were no primary or secondary graft failures. Complete response was achieved in 7 and 4 patients in strata I and II, respectively. Median follow-up for all patients was 30.7 months (mos) and was 99.8 mos for surviving patients. Median overall survival (OS) on strata I and II were 44.5 mos and 21.6 mos, respectively. Median PFS on strata I and II were 18.1 mos and 8.9 mos, respectively. In strata I, 5 patients developed Grade 2+ aGVHD and 8 developed extensive cGVHD. In strata II, 4 patients developed Grade 2+ aGVHD and 6 developed extensive cGVHD.

CONCLUSION

The TMI 900 cGy, FLU, and MEL conditioning regimen is considered safe as conditioning for allo-SCT and may warrant further investigation due to favorable response rates and survival; the conditioning regimen of FLU, MEL, and BTZ (0.7 mg/m2) is associated with unacceptable toxicities.