Generalized and localized osteoarthritis and risk of fall among older adults: the role of chronic diseases and medications using real world data from a single center

OBJECTIVE

This study examined the prevalence of falls among older adults with generalized and localized osteoarthritis (OA) and identified the association between falls and both chronic diseases and medications.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective design using the Healthcare Enterprise Repository for Ontological Narration (HERON) database was used. A cohort of 760 patients aged ≥65 years with at least two diagnosis codes for either localized or generalized OA were included. The extracted data included demographics (age, sex, and race), body mass index (BMI), fall history, comorbid health conditions (i.e., type 2 diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, neuropathy, cardiovascular diseases, depression, anxiety, and sleep disorders), and medications [i.e., pain medication (opioids, non-opioids), antidiabetics (insulin or hypoglycemic), antihypertensives, antilipemic, and antidepressants].

RESULTS

The prevalence rates of falls and recurrent falls were 27.77% and 9.88%, respectively. Individuals with generalized OA had a higher prevalence of falls (33.8%) than those with localized OA (24.2%). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that individuals with OA who had hypertension [odds ratio (OR):1.86, 95% CI, (1.20, 2.89), p=0.006] and used antidepressants [OR: 1.72, 95% CI, (1.04, 2.84), p=0.035] were more likely to have a fall. Individuals with OA who had hypertension [OR: 2.69, 95% CI, (1.30, 5.60), p=0.008], neuropathy [OR: 4.95, 95% CI, (2.95, 11.68), p<0.001], and insulin [OR: 2.85, 95% CI, (1.12, 7.22), p=0.035] were more likely to have a recurrent fall (two or more falls).

CONCLUSIONS

Falls are common in individuals with generalized OA. Comorbid health conditions, including hypertension and neuropathy, need to be considered in the screening of the risk of fall. Fall risk needs to be considered when discussing medication prescriptions, especially antidepressants and insulin.

Weight status and associated comorbidities in children and adults with Down syndrome, autism spectrum disorder and intellectual and developmental disabilities

BACKGROUND

Little is known about body weight status and the association between body weight and common comorbidities in children and adults with Down syndrome (DS), autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and other intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDDs).

METHODS

Data were extracted from the University of Kansas Medical Center's Healthcare Enterprise Repository for Ontological Narration clinical integrated data repository. Measures included demographics (sex, age and race), disability diagnosis, comorbid health conditions, height, weight and body mass index percentiles (BMI%ile; <18 years of age) or BMI (≥18 years of age).

RESULTS

Four hundred and sixty-eight individuals with DS (122 children and 346 adults), 1659 individuals with ASD (1073 children and 585 adults) and 604 individuals with other IDDs (152 children and 452 adults) were identified. A total of 47.0% (DS), 41.9% (ASD) and 33.5% (IDD) of children had overweight/obese (OW/OB), respectively. Children with DS were more likely to have OW/OB compared with children with IDD or ASD [odds ratio (OR) = 1.91, 95% confidence interval (CI): (1.49, 2.46); OR = 1.43, 95% CI: (1.19, 1.72)], respectively. A total of 81.1% (DS), 62.1% (ASD), and 62.4% (IDD) of adults were OW/OB, respectively. Adults with DS were more likely to have OW/OB compared with those with IDD [OR = 2.56, 95% CI: (2.16, 3.02)]. No significant differences were observed by race. In children with ASD, higher OW/OB was associated with significantly higher (compared with non-OW/OB) occurrence of sleep apnoea [OR = 2.94, 95% CI: (2.22, 3.89)], hypothyroidism [OR = 3.14, 95% CI: (2.17, 4.25)] and hypertension [OR = 4.11, 95% CI: (3.05, 5.54)]. In adults with DS, OW/OB was significantly associated with higher risk of sleep apnoea and type 2 diabetes [OR = 2.93, 95% CI: (2.10, 4.09); OR = 1.76, 95% CI: (1.11, 2.79) respectively]. Similarly, in adults with ASD and IDD, OW/OB was significantly associated with higher risk of sleep apnoea [OR = 3.39, 95% CI: (2.37, 4.85) and OR = 6.69, 95% CI: (4.43, 10.10)], type 2 diabetes [OR = 2.25, 95 % CI: (1.68, 3.01) and OR = 5.49, 95% CI: (3.96, 7.61)] and hypertension [OR = 3.55, 95% CI: (2.76, 4.57) and 3.97, 95% CI: (3.17, 4.97)].

CONCLUSION

Findings suggest higher rates of OW/OB in individuals with DS compared with ASD and IDD. Given the increased risk of comorbidities associated with the increased risk of OW/OB, identification of effective interventions for this special population of individuals is critical.

Abstract P5-08-23: The share thoughts on breast cancer study: A Greater Plains collaborative cohort characterization project

Background. The Greater Plains Collaborative (GPC) is a new clinical data research network in PCORNet, the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network sponsored by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute to conduct patient-centered outcomes research and comparative effectiveness research. The Phase I GPC network brought together a diverse population of 10 million people across 1300 miles covering seven states with a combined area of 679 159 square miles. Using input from community members, breast cancer was selected as a focus for cohort building activities. Objective. To test the GPC's integrated data sources, technical components, and governance by demonstrating the ability to select, characterize, and achieve at least a 50% response rate for a cohort of breast cancer patients from across the GPC. Methods. Each participating medical center extracted, transformed and loaded North American Association of Central Cancer Registries (NAACCR)-formatted data from their institution's tumor registry into its Informatics for Integrating Biology and the Bedside (i2b2) research warehouse. The GPC i2b2 research warehouse is fully de-identified with re-identification possible when accompanied by an approved IRB protocol. From these data, each medical center selected a cohort of all patients age 18 or older diagnosed with breast cancer between January 2013 and May 2014. De-identified data files were submitted to the GPC Honest Broker who applied eligibility criteria and selected a random sample of 250 eligible patients from each center's file. Eligible patients were women with microscopically-confirmed ductal carcinoma in situ or invasive (but not metastatic) breast cancer diagnosed during the study period. Women who had previously been diagnosed with cancer per tumor registry records were excluded as were women known to be deceased at the time the sample was selected. The sample of patients plus a list of up to 10 replacement patients was provided to each center for re-identification and mailing. Patients participated in designing the study materials. Results. IRBs at 7 of 8 collaborating medical centers ceded IRB review to the University of Iowa IRB pursuant to the GPC reliance agreement. Upon patient advice to ensure a representative cohort, a mailed questionnaire with patient incentive was employed. All study materials were mailed in a single packet containing a cover letter from the participating medical center, a 21-page questionnaire, medical record consent and $10 incentive. Questionnaires were mailed over a six-week period beginning June 19, 2015 and one remailing to nonrespondents was conducted 4 weeks after the initial mailing. A total of 1,986 patients were invited and 1,235 (62.2%) responded. Signed consent to obtain information from medical records was obtained for 852 (69%). The survey dataset for consented subjects was linked to the research warehouse to obtain tumor and treatment data and diagnosis and procedure codes from billing sources. Conclusion. The GPC's integrated data sources, honest broker-mediated approach to extract data and apply standardized clinical criteria, IRB reliance model, and patient study design partners were implemented successfully.

Citation Format: Chrischilles EA, Gryzlak B, McDowell BD, Connolly DW, Waitman LR. The share thoughts on breast cancer study: A Greater Plains collaborative cohort characterization project [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-08-23.

A review of medication reconciliation issues and experiences with clinical staff and information systems

Medication reconciliation was developed to reduce medical mistakes and injuries through a process of creating and comparing a current medication list from independent patient information sources, and resolving discrepancies. The structure and clinician assignments of medication reconciliation varies between institutions, but usually includes physicians, nurses and pharmacists. The Joint Commission has recognized the value of medication reconciliation and mandated implementation in 2006; however, a variety of issues have prevented simple, easy, and universal implementation. This review references issues related to the development and the implementation of medication reconciliation including: - the need of a system or standard for accurate drug identification to create a definitive 'gold standard' patient medication list, - identifying stakeholders of medication reconciliation within the institution and contrasting staff interest and participation with institutional resources, - observations and opportunities of integrating medication reconciliation with the electronic patient health record, and - summarizing a series of institutions experiences developing and implementing medication reconciliation. Last, as medication reconciliation becomes a regular process within medical centers, key concepts for effective implementation are discussed.

Representation and classification of breath sounds recorded in an intensive care setting using neural networks

OBJECTIVE

Develop and test methods for representing and classifying breath sounds in an intensive care setting.

METHODS

Breath sounds were recorded over the bronchial regions of the chest. The breath sounds were represented by their averaged power spectral density, summed into feature vectors across the frequency spectrum from 0 to 800 Hertz. The sounds were segmented by individual breath and each breath was divided into inspiratory and expiratory segments. Sounds were classified as normal or abnormal. Different back-propagation neural network configurations were evaluated. The number of input features, hidden units, and hidden layers were varied.

RESULTS

2127 individual breath sounds from the ICU patients and 321 breaths from training tapes were obtained. Best overall classification rate for the ICU breath sounds was 73% with 62% sensitivity and 85% specificity. Best overall classification rate for the training tapes was 91% with 87% sensitivity and 95% specificity.

CONCLUSIONS

Long term monitoring of lung sounds is not feasible unless several barriers can be overcome. Several choices in signal representation and neural network design greatly improved the classification rates of breath sounds. The analysis of transmitted sounds from the trachea to the lung is suggested as an area for future study.

A proposed method for the measurement of anesthetist care variability

OBJECTIVE

Some critical events in anesthesiology occur as seemingly preventable misadventures, their exact origins indeterminable. Inexperienced anesthetists, anesthesia machine malfunctions, lack of vigilance and human error inevitably initiate some incidents. Anesthesia training improves recognition and decision-making. Avoiding crisis initiation and amelioration of those that do occur is one role of the consultant anesthesiologist. Safe patient care requires medical and procedural knowledge, technical expertise, and control of resources in a complex milieu. Anesthesia simulators are clinical laboratories where anesthetists can sharpen both cognitive and manual skills. Dynamic scenarios allow opportunities for anesthetists to explore and experience crises as they develop and apply their knowledge while attempting to manage these events. Simulator-based scenarios are reproducible and large amounts of useful data can be collected and saved. The authors hypothesize these data can be utilized to compare performance of anesthetists and to measure improvement of individual anesthetists over time.

METHODS

We have designed "Stable Anesthesia," a prototypic scenario to test anesthetists' capabilities under the stress of performance guidelines. Three subjects performed anesthesia using the simulator and this protocol. Data from the simulator were archived by the system and analyzed by the authors.

RESULTS

A simple mathematical analysis gave good separation of data from three subjects of different training level.

CONCLUSIONS

It is suggested that the use of the techniques mentioned here may be of value in the development of a standardized testing protocol for anesthetists.