The role of lung biopsy for diagnosis and prognosis of interstitial lung disease in systemic sclerosis: a systematic literature review

BACKGROUND

The prognostic and theragnostic role of histopathological subsets in systemic sclerosis interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) have been largely neglected due to the paucity of treatment options and the risks associated with surgical lung biopsy. The novel drugs for the treatment of ILDs and the availability of transbronchial cryobiopsy provide a new clinical scenario making lung biopsy more feasible and a pivotal guide for treatment. The aim of our study was to investigate the usefulness of lung biopsy in SSc ILD with a systematic literature review (SLR).

METHODS

PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched up to June 30, 2023. Search terms included both database-specific controlled vocabulary terms and free-text terms relating to lung biopsy and SSc-ILD diagnostic and prognosis. The SLR was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA). Studies were selected according to the PEO (population, exposure, and outcomes) framework and Quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS) were reported.

RESULTS

We selected 14 articles (comprising 364 SSc-ILD patients). The paucity and heterogeneity of the studies prevented a systematic analysis. Diffuse cutaneous SSc was present in 30-100% of cases. Female predominance was observed in all studies (ranging from 64 to 100%). Mean age ranged from 42 to 64 years. Mean FVC was 73.98 (+/-17.3), mean DLCO was 59.49 (+/-16.1). Anti-Scl70 antibodies positivity was detected in 33% of cases (range: 0-69.6). All patients underwent surgical lung biopsies, and multiple lobes were biopsied in a minority of studies (4/14). Poor HRCT-pathologic correlation was reported with HRCT-NSIP showing histopathologic UIP in up to 1/3 of cases. Limited data suggest that SSc-UIP patients may have a worse prognosis and response to immunosuppressive treatment compared to other histopathologic patterns.

CONCLUSIONS

The data from this SLR clearly show the paucity and heterogeneity of the studies reporting lung biopsy in SSc ILD. Moreover, they highlight the need for further research to address whether the lung biopsy can be helpful to refine prognostic prediction and guide therapeutic choices.

POS0388 DEVELOPING A SCREENING TOOL FOR THE DETECTION OF INTERSTITIAL LUNG DISEASE IN SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS: THE ILD-RISC RISK SCORE

Background

High resolution computed tomography (HRCT) is the gold standard for the diagnosis of systemic sclerosis associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD). Although there is agreement in performing HRCT as a screening test at time of SSc diagnosis, some physicians do not regularly perform baseline HRCTs. In addition, it is unclear according to which criteria HRCTs should be repeated during the follow-up of baseline ILD negative patients.

Objectives

To develop a risk score for the presence of SSc-ILD (the ILD-RISC), to guide physicians in ordering both baseline and follow-up HRCTs.

Methods

The steering board included six SSc-ILD experts from referral centers, two fellows and a patient research partner. Items for regression analysis were selected according to face validity, feasibility, scientific background, and personal experience using the nominal group technique (NGT). The prediction model for the presence of ILD was developed from baseline visits of SSc patients from the six centers using multivariable logistic regression with backward selection. Patients were randomly divided into a derivation and validation cohort consisting of 66% and 34% of patients respectively. Patients with missing data in the selected covariates and in the ILD status (outcome) were excluded. After identifying a cut-off favoring sensitivity >85% from the ROC curve analysis, the derived ILD-RISC score was applied first in the validation cohort and then longitudinally in a cohort of SSc patients with negative baseline HRCT.

Results

The steering board selected 13 variables deemed important in the identification of SSc-ILD: sex, age, disease duration from first non-Raynaud’s phenomenon symptom, skin subset (diffuse/limited), presence of esophageal symptoms, digital ulcers (DU) ever, arthritis ever, smoking ever, increased inflammatory markers, NYHA functional class, SSc autoantibody status (SSc_Atb), FVC% and DLCO%. Among 780/3240 patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria, 533 (43% ILD) and 247 (48% ILD) respectively constituted the derivation and the validation cohort. In the derivation cohort, a model including FVC%, DLCO%, DU ever, age and SSc_Atb (Table 1A) showed an OR of 133.9 (95% CI 53.4-335.9) and an AUC of 79.1% (95% CI 75.3-83.0%) for the presence of ILD on HRCT (Figure 1). An ILD-RISC score ≥0.3 showed sensitivity of 85.6% and specificity of 53.6%, NPV of 83.2% and PPV of 58.2%, which were replicated in the validation cohort (Table 1B). Among 819 patients with negative baseline HRCT, 170 (20.8%) developed ILD during a 3.8±3.0 years follow up (1988 visits). Longitudinally, the ILD-RISC score showed comparable sensitivity and specificity (Table 1B).

Table 1.A)ILD-RISC MODEL VARIABLESOR95% CIp valueDigital ulcers, ever2.0581.347-3.145<0.001Age1.0261.010-1.0420.001SSc_ATBAnti-centromere0.3340.198-0.563<0.001Anti-topoisomerase I2.3791.326-4.2670.004Anti-RNA-polymerase III1.4070.636-3.1130.399Anti-Pm/Scl2.5560.916-7.1350.073None of the aboveComparatorFVC%0.9900.979-1.0020.091DLCO%0.9710.960-0.982<0.001B)ILD-RISC SCORE PERFORMANCEDerivation cohortValidation cohortLongitudinal cohortAll Patients/ILD patients533/229247/119819/170AUC %, 95% CI79.1 (75.3 – 83.0)76.4 (71.0 – 82.7)72.6 (68.9 – 76.2)Sensitivity %, 95% CI85.6 (80.4 – 89.9)85.7 (78.1 – 91.5)80.4 (73.9 – 86.0)Specificity %, 95% CI53.6 (47.8 – 59.3)49.2 (40.3 – 58.2)50.5 (48.2 – 52.9)Negative Predictive Value %, 95% CI83.2 (77.2 – 88.1)78.8 (68.2 – 87.1)96.3 (94.9 – 97.4)Positive Predictive Value %, 95% CI58.2 (52.7 – 63.5)61.1 (53.2 – 68.5)13.9 (11.8 – 16.1)

Conclusion

We developed and validated the ILD-RISC score to predict the presence of ILD at time of diagnosis and evaluated its performance during follow-up. The ILD-RISC may be useful in routine practice when resources for HRCTs might be limited. In particular, it may also help to decide when to order HRCTs at follow up, thus limiting unnecessary HRCTs and reducing the burden for patients and institutions.

Disclosure of Interests

Cosimo Bruni Speakers bureau: Actelion, Consultant of: Boehringer-Ingelheim, Eli-Lilly, Grant/research support from: New Horizon fellowship, FOREUM, EUSTAR, GILS, Lorenzo Tofani: None declared, Håvard Fretheim: None declared, Sophie Liem: None declared, Arthiha Velauthapillai: None declared, Hilde Jenssen Bjørkekjær: None declared, Imon Barua: None declared, Ilaria Galetti: None declared, Alexandru Garaiman: None declared, Mike O. Becker Speakers bureau: Mepha, MSD, Novartis, GSK, Bayer and Vifor, Consultant of: Mepha, MSD, Novartis, GSK, Bayer and Vifor, Grant/research support from: Mepha, MSD, Novartis, GSK, Bayer and Vifor, Anna-Maria Hoffmann-Vold Consultant of: Actelion, ARXX therapeutics, Bayer, Janssen, MSD, Lilly, Roche, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Medscape., Jeska de Vries-Bouwstra Speakers bureau: Payment for presentations and educational events by Boehringer Ingelheim and Janssen, Consultant of: Janssen and Boehringer Ingelheim, Abbvie, Grant/research support from: Roche, Galapagos and Janssen, ZonMW and ReumaNederland, Madelon Vonk: None declared, Jörg H.W. Distler Shareholder of: J.H.W.D. is stock owner of 4D Science and Scientific head of FibroCure., Grant/research support from: J.H.W.D. has received research funding from Anamar, Active Biotech, Array Biopharma, aTyr, BMS, Bayer Pharma, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Galapagos, GSK, Inventiva, Novartis, Sanofi-Aventis, RedX, UCB., Marco Matucci-Cerinic Speakers bureau: Biogen, Bayer, Boehringer-Ingelheim, CSL Behring, Eli-Lilly., Consultant of: Actelion, Biogen, Bayer, Boehringer-Ingelheim, CSL Behring, Eli-Lilly., Grant/research support from: Actelion, Oliver Distler Speakers bureau: Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, Medscape, Consultant of: Abbvie, Acceleron, Alcimed, Amgen, AnaMar, Arxx, AstraZeneca, Baecon, Blade, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Corbus, CSL Behring, 4P Science, Galapagos, Glenmark, Horizon, Inventiva, Kymera, Lupin, Miltenyi Biotec, Mitsubishi Tanabe, MSD, Novartis, Prometheus, Roivant, Sanofi and Topadur, Grant/research support from: Kymera, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Boehringer Ingelheim

AB0747 Oral microbiome in rheumatic diseases.What involvement?

Background

The concept of core-microbiome in health is useful for investigating the possible role of the oral microbiome in autoimmune disease, such as Rheumatoid Arthritis, Spondyloarthritis, Sjogren Syndrome or Systemic Sclerosis (SSc), whose pathogenesis has not been fully understood. Environmental factors and certain genetic backgrounds have been proposed. Among the various environmental factors, the microbiota stands out, the entire composition of microorganisms, mainly bacteria but also fungi and viruses, which populate the human body.

Objectives

The aim of the study was to verify whether there were quantitative differences between the microorganisms present in the oral cavity, in particular between the lactobacillus spp., of patients with SSc compared to those present in the oral cavity of healthy subjects taken as controls.

Methods

Twenty-nine SSc female patients (mean age 62.) classified according to the ACR/EULAR2013 criteria and twenty-three female healthy subjects (HS, mean age 57.6) were enrolled and underwent tongue and gum swab sampling. Quantitative PCR was conducted in triplicates using Lactobacillus specific primers rpoB1, rpoB1o and rpoB2 for RNA-polymerase β subunit gene.

Results

Our data showed Lactobacillusspp.rpoB sequences significantly lower in the tongue of SSc patients than in HS (p=0.0211).The statistical analysis in HS highlighted a significant lower amount of rpoB on the gums than on the tongue.

Conclusion

Our preliminary data show that the number of Lactobacillus on the tongue in SSc patients is about half that of HS. These data make it more likely that Lactobacillus in SSc patients may play a protective role. Further investigations will also be needed in other autoimmune diseases.

References

[1]Zaura E, Keijser BJ, Huse SM, Crielaard W Defining the healthy “core microbiome” of oral microbial communities. BMC Microbiol. 2009 Dec 15;9:259. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-9-259.

[2]Nikitakis NG, Papaioannou W, Sakkas LI, Kousvelari E.The autoimmunity-oral microbiome connection. Oral Diseases (2017) 23, 828-839.

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

AB0256 BARICITINIB (BARI) VERSUS BIOLOGICS IMPACT ON STEROID TAPERING IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS (RA)

Background:

Biologic and target synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs and tcDMARDs) are recommended to control RA disease activity, pain and steroid use. Following randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and their post-hoc analyses, the Janus Kinase Inhibitor tsDMARDs BARI was superior to reference bDMARD Adalimumab in reducing disease activity, pain and functional disability. In addition, BARI monotherapy also determined more significant pain reduction and functional improvement when compared to Tocilizumab monotherapy (3).

Objectives:

to confirm RCT results in a real-life clinical setting, with focus on disease activity, pain, functional disability and steroid tapering, when comparing BARI to bDMARDs for the treatment of active RA.

Methods:

RA patients starting BARI or a bDMARD for active RA were retrospectively evaluated from June 2019 to June 2020. Disease activity (DAS28CRP, SDAI, CDAI), pain visual analogic scale (pain_VAS), functional disability (HAQ) assessments and mean prednisone dosage (pred_dose) were collected at baseline (BL), 3 months (3M) and 6 months (6M) after BARI/bDMARD initiation. The changes of the outcome measures were evaluated between BL-3M, 3M-6M and BL-6M, as well as between BARI and bDMARDs groups. Finally, we assessed the variables associated with prednisone tapering in the whole population.

Results:

90 out of 100 RA patients evaluated (baseline: age 57±12 years, disease duration 131±100 months, DAS28PCR 4.8±1.0, pain_VAS 61±23 mm, prednisone dose 5.5±5.3 mg) were eligible for the study; 49 received BARI and 41 bDMARDs (17 abatacept, 12 TNF inhibitors, 11 tocilizumab, 1 rituximab). At BL, the two groups did not differ statistically in terms of age, sex, disease duration, disease activity, pain_VAS, previous bDMARD failure or ts/bDMARD naive, concomitant conventional synthetic DMARDs treatment, pred_dose. Both BARI and bDMARDs determined a significant reduction in activity scales and HAQ when comparing BL-3M and BL-6M, with only pain_VAS and pred_dose showing a significant decrease in the 3M-6M interval. When comparing the two groups, BARI showed a significantly higher reduction of pred_dose (-3.2±5.1 vs -1.7±3.7 mg at BL-3M, and -4.1±5.3 vs -1.9±4.6 mg at BL-6M), which was not significant after adjusting for BL pred_dose. No other difference was seen when the two groups, including the numerically higher reduction of pain_VAS in the BARI group (-29±28 vs -20±27 mm at BL-3M and -35±25 vs -30±28 mm at BL-6M comparison). The analysis of the predictors for steroid tapering (Δmean_pred) in the two intervals, showed that BL DAS28PCR, DAS28PCR BL-3M change and BL pred_dose were associated with BL-3M Δmean_pred, while 3M pain_VAS and 3M pred_dose were associated with 3M-6M Δmean_pred.

Conclusion:

Although limited by the small samples and the retrospective nature, our real-life comparison shows similar efficacy of BARI and bDMARDs in terms of disease activity control, functional disability and pain. In addition, the treatment with BARI or bDMARD did not influence the steroid tapering, which was driven mostly by its initial dose, disease activity and pain. Larger real-life multi-center studies are warranted to confirm our results.

References:

[1]Taylor PC et al. Baricitinib versus Placebo or Adalimumab in Rheumatoid Arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2017 Feb 16;376(7):652-662.

[2]Fautrel B et al. Effect of Baricitinib and Adalimumab in Reducing Pain and Improving Function in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis in Low Disease Activity: Exploratory Analyses from RA-BEAM. J Clin Med. 2019 Sep 5;8(9):1394.

[3]Fautrel B et al. Comparative effectiveness of improvement in pain and physical function for baricitinib versus adalimumab, tocilizumab and tofacitinib monotherapies in rheumatoid arthritis patients who are naïve to treatment with

Disclosure of Interests:

Laura Cometi: None declared, Cosimo Bruni Speakers bureau: Actelion, Consultant of: Eli Lilly, Grant/research support from: Fondazione Italiana Ricerca sull’Artrite (FIRA), Gruppo Italiano lotta alla Sclerodermia (GILS), New Horizon Fellowship, European Scleroderma Trials and Research (EUSTAR) group, Foundation for Research in Rheumatology (FOREUM)., Lorenzo Tofani: None declared, Giulia Tesei: None declared, Francesca Nacci: None declared, Ginevra Fiori: None declared, Francesca Bartoli: None declared, Marco Matucci-Cerinic Speakers bureau: Biogen Italia, Actelion, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, CSL Behring, Eli-Lilly, Consultant of: Biogen Italia, Actelion, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, CSL Behring, Eli-Lilly, Grant/research support from: Biogen Italia, Actelion, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, CSL Behring, Eli-Lilly,

POS0317 THE PERFORMANCE OF DIFFUSING CAPACITY FOR MONOXIDE CARBON (DLCO) AND FORCED VITAL CAPACITY (FVC) IN PREDICTING THE ONSET OF SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS (SSc)-INTERSTITIAL LUNG DISEASE (ILD) IN THE EUROPEAN SCLERODERMA TRIALS AND RESEARCH (EUSTAR) DATABASE

Background:

In SSc, ILD is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. High resolution computed tomography (HRCT) is the gold standard for the diagnosis. Predictors of ILD onset are eagerly awaited to improve SSc-ILD management. Pulmonary function test (PFTs) are routinely performed to measure lung function changes.

Objectives:

Our aim was to investigate the performance of DLCO (diffusing capacity of lung carbon monoxide) and FVC (forced vital capacity) in predicting the development of SSc-ILD.

Methods:

The longitudinal data of DLCO, FVC and ILD on HRCT of SSc patients from the EUSTAR database were evaluated at baseline (t0), after 12 (±4) (t1) and 24 (±4) (t2) months. Patients with negative HRCT for any sign of ILD both at t0 and t1 were included. Patients who presented or developed pulmonary hypertension during the study period were excluded. At baseline, demographic data, disease duration from Raynaud’s onset, disease subsets, autoantibodies and other laboratory and instrumental data were recorded.

Results:

474/17805 patients were eligible for the study (403 females, 71 males): 26.0% dcSSc, 58.3% lcSSc, 220 (48.0%) patients with positive anticentromere antibodies (ACA) and 117 (25.4%) with positive antitopoisomerase I antibodies (Topo-I abs). Among all enrolled patients, 46 (9.7%) developed HRCT signs of ILD at t2. Patients with Topo-I abs showed an association with ILD development at t2 (16.7% vs 7.8%, p=0.0031), contrarily ACA positive patients were negatively associated with ILD appearance after 2 years of follow-up (4.4% vs 14.4%, p=0.0001). Positive t2 HRCT patients had a significant lower value of DLCO and FVC at all three assessments when compared to patients with a negative HRCT at t2 (Table 1) and both t0 DLCO and FVC values negatively correlated with ILD development (Table 1). The mean t0 to t1 change (Δ) of DLCO in patients with negative t2 HRTC and positive t2 HRCT were -0.5 (±12.6) and -1.0 (±15.1), respectively. The mean t0 to t1 ΔFVC in patients with negative t2 HRTC and positive t2 HRCT were -0.2 (±10.6) and 0.1 (±11.5), respectively. None of them predicted the appearance of ILD at t2 (ΔDLCO: OR (IC) 0.997 (0.97-1.02), p=0.8024; ΔFVC OR (IC) 1.002 (0.97-1.03), p=0.8664). The data showed an association between t0 DLCO value<80% and ILD appearance after 2 years of follow-up [OR(IC): 3.09(1.49-6.40), p=0.0023]. Such association was not observed for t0 FVC value<80% [OR(IC): 1.95(0.81-4.68), p=0.1329]. The predictive capability of t0 DLCO<80% was moderate but stronger than FVC<80% [AU ROC: 0.62 (0.56-0.69), 0.53 (0.48-0.59) respectively, p=0.0205].

Conclusion:

Our data suggest that an impaired baseline DLCO (<80%) may have a predictive value for the development of ILD on HRCT after 2 years of follow-up. Further rigorous prospective studies are warranted to understand the role of DLCO evaluation in the course of SSc.

Table 1.

DLCO and FVC values at t0, t1 and t2 values in patients with positive or negative HRCT for ILD at t2 and their statistical differences.

Patients without ILD at t2 (mean±SD)Patients with ILD at t2 (mean±SD)OR (95%CL)p-valueDLCO at t079.0 ± 16.669.9 ± 17.40.97 (0.95 - 0.99)0.0006DLCO at t178.4 ± 16.868.9 ± 18.60.97 (0.95 - 0.98)0.0005DLCO at t278.0 ± 17.065.1 ± 19.10.95 (0.93 - 0.97)<0.0001FVC at t0102.2 ± 17.394.6 ± 16.20.97 (0.96 - 0.99)0.0052FVC at t1101.9 ± 17.994.7 ± 16.50.98 (0.96 - 0.99)0.0092FVC at t2101.6 ± 17.694.5 ± 20.00.98 (0.96 - 1)0.0126

Disclosure of Interests:

Gemma Lepri: None declared, Cosimo Bruni Speakers bureau: CB reports personal fees from Actelion, personal fees from Eli Lilly, Grant/research support from: CB reports personal fees from Actelion, personal fees from Eli Lilly, grants from European Scleroderma Trial and Research (EUSTAR) group, grants from New Horizon Fellowship, grants from Foundation for Research in Rheumatology (FOREUM), grants from Fondazione Italiana per la Ricerca sull’Artrite (FIRA), outside the submitted work, Lorenzo Tofani: None declared, Alberto Moggi Pignone: None declared, Martina Orlandi: None declared, Tomasetti Sara Speakers bureau: Speaker’s fees for Roche and Boehringer Ingelheim, Mike Hughes: None declared, Francesco Del Galdo: None declared, Rosaria Irace: None declared, Oliver Distler Grant/research support from: OD (last three years) has/had consultancy relationship and/or has received research funding in the area of potential treatments for systemic sclerosis and its complications from (last three years): Abbvie, Acceleron Pharma, Amgen, AnaMar, Arxx Therapeutics, Baecon Discovery, Blade Therapeutics, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, ChemomAb, Corbus Pharmaceuticals, CSL Behring, Galapagos NV, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, GSK, Horizon (Curzion) Pharmaceuticals, Inventiva, iQvia, Italfarmaco, iQone, Kymera Therapeutics, Lilly, Medac, Medscape, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Serodapharm, Topadur, Target Bioscience and UCB. Patent issued “mir-29 for the treatment of systemic sclerosis” (US8247389, EP2331143)., Valeria Riccieri: None declared, Yannick Allanore Speakers bureau: YA received personal fees from Boehringer, Sanofi, Menarini and Medsenic and grants from Alpine with regards to the management of systemic sclerosis, Grant/research support from: YA received personal fees from Boehringer, Sanofi, Menarini and Medsenic and grants from Alpine with regards to the management of systemic sclerosis, Ana Maria Gheorghiu: None declared, Elise Siegert: None declared, Jeska de Vries-Bouwstra: None declared, Eric Hachulla: None declared, Mohammed Tikly: None declared, Nemanja Damjanov: None declared, Francois Spertini: None declared, Luc Mouthon: None declared, Anna-Maria Hoffmann-Vold Speakers bureau: AMHV: received consulting fees from Actelion, ARXX, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Lilly, Medscape, Merck Sharp & Dohme and Roche; and grants from Boehringer Ingelheim., Consultant of: AMHV: received consulting fees from Actelion, ARXX, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Lilly, Medscape, Merck Sharp & Dohme and Roche; and grants from Boehringer Ingelheim., Grant/research support from: AMHV: received consulting fees from Actelion, ARXX, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Lilly, Medscape, Merck Sharp & Dohme and Roche; and grants from Boehringer Ingelheim., Armando Gabrielli: None declared, Serena Guiducci: None declared, Marco Matucci-Cerinic Speakers bureau: has received consulting fees or honorarium from Actelion, Janssen, Inventiva, Bayer, Biogen, Boehringer, CSL Behring, Corbus, Galapagos, Mitsubishi, Samsung, Regeneron, Acceleron, MSD, Chemomab, Lilly, Pfizer, Roche, Grant/research support from: has received consulting fees or honorarium from Actelion, Janssen, Inventiva, Bayer, Biogen, Boehringer, CSL Behring, Corbus, Galapagos, Mitsubishi, Samsung, Regeneron, Acceleron, MSD, Chemomab, Lilly, Pfizer, Roche, Daniel Furst: None declared, Silvia Bellando Randone: None declared

POS0264 THE EMERGING ROLE OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING IN INTERSTITIAL LUNG DISEASE IN SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS: EVIDENCE FOR ULTRA SHORT TE AND COMPRESSED SENSING VIBE ACQUISITIONS AS PROMISING TOOLS FOR THE EVALUATION OF PARENCHYMAL ALTERATIONS

Background:

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a frequent complication and the major cause of death in Systemic sclerosis (SSc). Computed tomography (CT) is the gold standard imaging technique to assess ILD but is burdened by exposure to ionizing radiations that limits its use for the follow-up. MRI sequences with Ultra Short Echo Time (UTE) are promising for ILD.

Objectives:

We tested two MRI sequences, UTE Spiral VIBE and Compressing Sensing (CS) VIBE, in SSc-ILD, in comparison to chest CT.

Methods:

SSc patients with suspected-ascertained ILD were evaluated for undergoing CT-MRI examinations in the same day. Two radiologists visually scored the extent of ground glass opacities (GGO), reticulations, honeycombing and consolidations on CT-MRI. The sum of alteration was assumed as ILD extent. A quantitative texture analysis (qCT) was also performed on CT. Cohen’s k was adopted for interreader concordance in ILD detection. MRI sensitivity and specificity in ILD detection were evaluated. Lin’s concordance was adopted to compare extent analysis between readers and between CT (visual and qCT analysis) and MRI sequences.

Results:

54 patients performed both CT and MRI. MRI interreader concordance was moderate in ILD detection, while ILD and GGO extent analysis showed good or very good concordance. UTE Spiral VIBE had a sensitivity and specificity in ILD detection of 95.8% and 77.8%, while alterations extent analysis obtained a very good concordance with CT for ILD and GGO. CS VIBE showed a sensitivity and specificity in ILD detection of 46.7% and 95.0%, but a slight or fair concordance with CT in all alterations’ extent analysis.

Conclusion:

MRI UTE Spiral VIBE sequences are helpful in the evaluation of SSc-ILD. Larger cohorts of patients will be needed to confirm that MRI may be useful in clinical practice, reducing the radiological load of chest CT

References:

[1]Romei C, Turturici L, Tavanti L, et al. The use of chest magnetic resonance imaging in interstitial lung disease: a systematic review. Eur Respir Rev. 2018;27(150):180062. Doi:10.1183/16000617.0062-2018

[2]Miller GW, Mugler JP, Sá RC, Altes TA, Prisk GK, Hopkins SR. Advances in functional and structural imaging of the human lung using proton MRI. NMR Biomed. 2014;27(12):1542-1556. doi:10.1002/nbm.3156

[3]Pinal-Fernandez I, Pineda-Sanchez V, Pallisa-Nuñez E, et al. Fast 1.5 T chest MRI for the assessment of interstitial lung disease extent secondary to systemic sclerosis. Clin Rheumatol. 2016;35(9):2339-2345. doi:10.1007/s10067-016-3267-0

[4]Ohno Y, Koyama H, Yoshikawa T, et al. Pulmonary high-resolution ultrashort TE MR imaging: Comparison with thin-section standard- and low-dose computed tomography for the assessment of pulmonary parenchyma diseases: Pulmonary MRI with UTE in Pulmonary Disease. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2016;43(2):512-532. doi:10.1002/jmri.25008

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

OP0176 ULTRASOUND (US) EVALUATION OF BOWEL VASCULOPATHY IN SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS (SSC)

Background:

Gastrointestinal involvement is one of the most frequent features of SSc, affecting nearly 90% of patients, with a great impact on quality of life and morbidity. One of the key pathological factors of SSc bowel involvement is vasculopathy (1), although little is known about its pathophysiology and no treatments are currently available.

Objectives:

to assess with abdominal US the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) vessel characteristics and blood flow in SSc, compared to healthy controls (HC).

Methods:

we performed fasting abdominal US in SSc patients fulfilling the ACR/EULAR 2013 classification criteria and HC. Patients with a history of peripheral /coronary arterial disease were excluded. For both SMA and IMA, caliber (mm), Peak Systolic Velocity – PSV (cm/sec), Reverse Velocity – RV (cm/sec), End-Diastolic Velocity – EDV (cm/sec), Mean Velocity – mV (cm/sec), Blood-flow (cm/sec), Resistive Index – RI and Pulsatility Index – PI were measured.

Results:

28 SSc patients [25 females (89.3%), mean age 48.75 ± 12.39 years; 6 (22.22%) anti-centromere and 19 (70.37%) positive for anti-topoisomerase I antibodies] and 28 HC [18 females (64.3%), mean age 36.25 ± 12.08 years] were evaluated. In SSc, the SMA caliber was significantly smaller than in HC (5.75 ± 0.62 vs. 6.45 ± 0.60 mm, p<0.0001), while IMA dimensions did not differ.

The SMA study revealed SSc patients had a significant reduction of RV (7.25 ± 6.37 vs. 18.52 ± 6.16 cm/sec, p<0.0001) and PI (3.33 ± 0.75 vs. 4.53 ± 1.03, p<0.0001) when compared to HC. In addition, in SSc the mV of SMA was significantly lower than in HC (38.03 ± 13.90 vs. 28.32 ±9.25 cm/sec, p=0.0035), as well as the RI (0.88 ± 0.04 vs. 0.91 ± 0.03, p=0.0034); EDV was significantly increased (16.34 ± 7.03 vs. 12.64 ± 5.46 cm/sec, p=0.0321). Similarly to SMA, also in IMA RV and PI were significantly lower that controls (RV: 2.69 ± 6.10 vs. 17.06 ± 5.75 cm/sec, p<0.0001; PI: 3.54 ± 0.95 vs. 6.08 ± 1.53, p<0.0001). Moreover SSc patients presented a significant reduction of PSV and RI of IMA (PSV: 72.27 ± 27.23 vs. 93.81 ± 25.73 cm/sec, p=0.0084; RI: 0.88 ± 0.04 vs. 0.91 ± 0.03, p=0.0132) when compared to HC. Although the HC group was significantly younger than the SSc group (p=0.0003), all the results were confirmed after adjustment for age (Table 1).

Table 1.

comparison of the characteristics of SMA and IMA between SSc patients and HC.

SScHCp-valueAge adjusted p-valueSMANMean ± SDNMean ± SDCaliber (mm)285.75 ± 0.62286.45 ± 0.60<0.00010.0002PSV (cm/sec)28137.50 ± 34.5028135.26 ± 33.810.80750.7297RV (cm/sec)287.25 ± 6.372818.52 ± 6.16<0.0001<0.0001EDV (cm/sec)2816.34 ± 7.032812.64 ± 5.460.03210.0650mV (cm/sec)2838.03 ± 13.902828.32 ±9.250.00350.0150Blood-flow (cm/sec)281073.1 ± 831.1628913.36 ± 272.870.34090.4781PI283.33 ± 0.75284.53 ± 1.03<0.00010.0002RI280.88 ± 0.04280.91 ± 0.030.00340.0141IMACaliber (mm)262.71 ± 0.47242.79 ± 0.370.48720.5385PSV (cm/sec)2372.27 ± 27.232393.81 ± 25.730.00840.0044RV (cm/sec)232.69 ± 6.102317.06 ± 5.75<0.0001<0.0001EDV (cm/sec)237.87 ± 2.01237.95 ± 2.100.89210.9250mV (cm/sec)2317.83 ± 5.332314.75 ± 5.080.05140.3938Blood-flow (cm/sec)23106.70 ± 47.992084.00 ± 30.130.06760.3056PI233.54 ± 0.95236.08 ± 1.53<0.0001<0.0001RI230.88 ± 0.04230.91 ± 0.030.01320.0205

SMA=superior mesentheric artery, IMA=inferior mesentheric artery, PSV=Peak Systolic Velocity, RV=Reverse Velocity, EDV=End-Diastolic Velocity, mV=Mean Velocity, PI=Pulsatility Index, RI=Resistive Index.

Conclusion:

this preliminary study shows, for the first time, the presence of a significant reduction of RV, PI and RI in the intestinal arteries of SSc patients when compared to HC. These data show an increased stiffness of the gastrointestinal arterial wall, in agreement with the typical SSc vasculopathy. A larger cohort is needed to confirm the results and explore the possible relationship with other clinical features of the disease.

References:

[1]Sjogren, RW.Gastrointestinal features of scleroderma. Curr Opin Rheumatol 1996;8:569-75.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

POS0842 LUNG ULTRASOUND TO ASSESS THE SEVERITY OF INTERSTITIAL LUNG DISEASE IN SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS

Background:

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is one of the most common complications and one of the main causes of morbidity and mortality in Systemic Sclerosis (SSc). High-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) is the gold standard for the diagnosis of ILD and it allows its quantification. Among semi-quantitative methods, Goh et al proposed a semi-quantitative scoring system to visually quantify ILD extent, with categorical cut-off of 20% to distinguish limited and extensive parenchymal involvement with prognostic implications. More recently, the use of radiomics has allowed the objective quantification of ILD through the use of dedicated software, which calculate different parameters of lung density.

Given the exposure to ionizing radiation that the procedure entails, other methods of ILD evaluation are being studied, among which lung ultrasound (LUS) identifies the B-lines as a main feature of ILD. So far, different evidences have proposed the use of LUS for the screening of ILD, even in the early phases of the disease and in subclinical lung involvement.

Objectives:

the aim of this study is to test the role of LUS in quantifying the severity of SSc-ILD, evaluated with both semi-quantitative visual radiological and quantitative radiomic scores.

Methods:

Adult SSc patients classified according to the ACR/EULAR 2013 criteria patients were assessed with pulmonary function test (PFTs), lung ultrasound and HRCT over 60 days. CT images were analysed qualitatively (by presence/absence of ILD), semi-quantitatively (categorical Goh score <20% vs> 20% of extent and the continuous extent Goh score made from 5 levels’ assessment– 0 to 100%) and quantitatively [with the densitometric radiomic data obtained through the Horos software - Mean lung attenuation (MLA), Standard Deviation (SD), Kurtosis, Skewness and Lung volume (LV)]. LUS was used to quantify the B-lines detected in each patient by scanning a total of 13 intercostal spaces, on both anterior and posterior chest wall.

Results:

Among 59 SSc patients (81% women, mean age 48±14 years, 45% anti-Scl70 positive), 23 (39%) presented ILD on HRCT, of which 14 limited and 9 extensive. The mean visual semi-quantitative score was 6%, ranging from 0 to 66%. Our data showed a significantly different number of B-Lines in ILD vs non-ILD patients (median 38 vs 9, p <.005), a result which was further confirmed among non-ILD vs ILD> 20% (median 47 vs 9, p=.001) and ILD <20% (median 36 vs 9, p=.001) patients. Conversely, the number of B-lines was not statistically different between patients with ILD <20% and >20% (median 47 vs 36, p=.78). We observed a significant negative correlation between the number of B-lines and FVC (r=-.472, p<.05) TLC (r=-.436, p=.003), DLco (r=-.515, p<.001), DLCO/VA (r=.-306, p=.03). Finally, the number of B-lines showed a statistically significant correlation with the Goh score on 5 levels (r=.437, p=.001), MLA (r=.571, p<.001), kurtosis (r=-.285, p=.028), skewness (r=-.370, p = .004) and LV (r=-.277, p=.033). All data were confirmed analysing anterior and posterior B-Lines separately.

Conclusion:

Our study confirms that LUS represents a useful tool for the identification of SSc-ILD. In addition, we showed that LUS may be useful also for the quantification of the severity of SSc-ILD, by correlating with PFT parameters, radiomics parameters and visual radiological evaluation. Together with the PFTs, LUS could be used to increase the accuracy of the screening and, potentially, of the follow-up of SSc-ILD patients.

Disclosure of Interests:

Cosimo Bruni: None declared, Lavinia Mattolini: None declared, Lorenzo Tofani: None declared, Luna Gargani Consultant of: GE Healthcare, Philips Healthcare and Caption Health, Nicholas Landini: None declared, Gemma Lepri: None declared, Martina Orlandi: None declared, Serena Guiducci: None declared, Silvia Bellando Randone: None declared, Marco Matucci-Cerinic: None declared

AB0281 SAFETY AND RETENTION RATE AFTER SWITCHING FROM ETANERCEPT ORIGINATOR (ETN) TO ETANERCEPT BIOSIMILAR (SB4) IN INFLAMMATORY JOINT DISEASES: DATA FROM REAL LIFE

Background:

SB4 in now commonly used in the treatment of inflammatory joint diseases, with evidence of efficacy and persistence up to 12 months from switching in both randomized controlled trials in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) and Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS).

Objectives:

we investigated the safety and retention rate of SB4 at 6, 12 and 18 months after switching from ETN in two rheumatology departments in our region.

Methods:

adult patients with RA, PsA, AS, Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) and other rheumatic diseases treated with ETN for at least 6 months, switched to SB4 in stable clinical conditions, were eligible for this retrospective evaluation. Data on adverse events (in particular infectious events), loss of efficacy (articular, cutaneous, ocular or intestinal disease re-activation) and persistence on treatment were collected since latest available follow-up. Retention rate, reason for discontinuation and subsequent management data were collected at 6, 12, 18 months.

Results:

220 patients (142 females, mean age 58+-7 years, disease duration 12+-4 years, ETN duration 7+-4 years) were enrolled, with median follow up of 12.1 (9.7-15.8) months duration; ETN was used in different biologic DMARDs treatment lines (first 76.8%, second 17.7%, third 3.2 %, fourth 2.3%). Study population was composed of 85 RA, 81 PsA, 33 AS, 14 JIA and 7 other conditions (mostly scleroderma). In the follow-up, 50 patients (22.7%) presented with at least one non-serious adverse event, with 36 (16,4%) disease re-activation (mostly articular) and 30 (13,6% - 11 for safety and 19 loss of efficacy) SB4 interruptions. Retention rates were 99.1 (210/212) at 6, 90.9% (150/165) at 12 and 81.5% (53/65) at 18 months respectively. Back-switch to ETN was performed in 17/30 cases, the remaining cases were managed with change of bDMARD or csDMARD). Age was the only significant predictor of SB4 interruption at 6 months (OR 1.058, 95%CI 1.007-1.112, p=0.026), while disease, bDMARD line, csDMARD combination, gender, disease duration or ETN duration did not influence retention rates at 6, 12 or 18 months.

Conclusion:

our real-life data confirm the safety profile of switching from ETN to SB4. In our patients, the data show a higher retention rate, when compared to other-real life registries data (1,2)

References:

[1]Ebbers HC et al. Real-World evidence on Etanercept Biosimilar SB4 in Etanercept-Naïve or Switching Patients: A Systematic Review. Rheumatol Ther. 2019 Sep;6(3):317-338.

Disclosure of Interests:

Cosimo Bruni Speakers bureau: Actelion, Eli Lilly, Stefano Gentileschi: None declared, Marco Capassoni: None declared, Giovanni Pacini: None declared, Marco Bardelli: None declared, Caterina Baldi: None declared, Lorenzo Tofani: None declared, Laura Cometi: None declared, Francesca Nacci: None declared, Francesca Bartoli: None declared, Ginevra Fiori: None declared, Luca Cantarini: None declared, Serena Guiducci: None declared, Bruno Frediani: None declared, Marco Matucci-Cerinic Grant/research support from: Actelion, MSD, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Speakers bureau: Acetelion, Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim

THU0360 EFFICACY OF A SELF-TREATMENT PROTOCOL FOR FACE AND TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINTS REHABILITATION IN SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS (SSC)

Background:

In SSc, skin involvement of the face is frequent and extremely disabling, resulting in limited mouth opening, an altered dentition, difficulty in teeth care, as well as having a strong impact on the emotional and psychological well-being, thus impairing quality of life.

Objectives:

to evaluate the efficacy of a self-treatment protocol (created by AMURR A Multidisciplinary Association of Rheumatological Rehabilitation) for face and tempomandibular joints (TMJs) rehabilitation with two devices used in the dental field.

Methods:

40 SSc patients (37 female and 3 male) with a mouth opening ≤ 40 mm, were recruited and randomized in two groups of treatment: Group 1 (20 patients: mean age 50,650 yrs ± 13,937 SD, mean disease duraton 10,45 yrs ± 7,877 SD, opening mouth 32,250 mm ± 5,590 SD) treated with a home self-treatment protocol consisting of 23 exercises carried out at home in front of a mirror, 22/23 exercises were performed once a day, one of these using a device to obtain uniform stretching of the buccal rhyme, another one usingused three times a day to reduce tension of muscles of the TMJs, facilitating the mouth opening; group 2 (20 patients: mean age 58,05 yrs ± 18,103 SD, mean disease duration 17,4 yrs ± 15,017 SD, opening mouth 34,950 mm ± 5,753) without physical rehabilitation, only drugs as treatments of SSc and its complications. All patients underwent a baseline (T0) and 45 days (T1) clinimetric assessment by self-assessment of quality of life with SF-36 (Short-Form 36 Health Survey), of the degree of disability of the mouth with MHISS (of the Mouth Handicap in Systemic Sclerosis scale), Muscle pain evaluated by numerical rating scale (NRS) of the temporomandibular joint with TMD (Temporo mandibular Disorders), evaluation of mouth opening and ROM of the cervical spine. Statistical analysis was performed using the t-test or the Mann-Whitney test for assessing changes in all measurement scales between treatment groups.

Results:

The protocol of home physiotherapy exercises resulted in a statistically significant improvement in the treated group compared to group 2 both for mouth opening (T0: 32,250 ± 5,590, T1: 35,650 ± 6,046) vs (T0: 34,950 ± 5,753 T1: 34,300 ± 6,001) (p<0.001), cervical flexion (T0: 2,950 ± 1,939 T1: 1.700 ± 1,525) vs (T0: 4,450 ± 2,282 T1:4,075 ± 2,238) (p<0.01), cervical extension (T0: 17,025 ± 1,895 T1: 17,625 ± 1,605) vs (T0: 17,050 ± 2,089 T1: 16,525 ± 3,110) (p<0.05), cervical right lateral flexion (T0: 14,075 ± 2,386 T1:13,400 ± 2,431) vs (T0: 14,200 ± 1,765 T1: 14,425 ± 1,742) (p<0.01), cervical right rotation (T0: 14,200 ± 3,416 T1:13,750 ± 3,206) vs (T0: 14,900 ± 1,683 T1: 15,550 ± 2,188) (p<0.01), cervical left rotation (T0: 14,725 ±3,640 T1:14,450 ± 3,710) vs (T0: 15,900 ± 2,614 T1: 16,450 ± 2,964) (p<0.05), mouth disability at MHISS (T0: 19,100 ± 10,356 T1: 16,000 ± 9,989) vs (T0: 20,950 ± 9,950, T1: 21,100 ± 10,775) (p<0.01).

Conclusion:

The use of the home exercises protocol associated with the two devices has shown a significant improvement of the disability linked to skin involvement of the face. This highlights the fundamental role that home rehabilitation self therapy has in practice. These data will need to be confirmed in a larger cohort of patients

Disclosure of Interests:

Mauro Passalacqua: None declared, Cristian Foggi: None declared, Nicola Mauro: None declared, Lorenzo Tofani: None declared, Serena Guiducci: None declared, Cosimo Bruni Speakers bureau: Actelion, Eli Lilly, Gemma Lepri: None declared, Jelena Blagojevic: None declared, Khadija El Aoufy: None declared, Ginevra Fiori: None declared, Francesca Bartoli: None declared, Susanna Maddali Bongi: None declared, Marco Mitola: None declared, Marco Gizduloch: None declared, Marco Matucci-Cerinic Grant/research support from: Actelion, MSD, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Speakers bureau: Acetelion, Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, Silvia Bellando Randone: None declared

AB0239 EFFECTS OF DYSMETABOLISMS AND COMORBIDITIES ON THE EFFICACY, SAFETY AND RETENTION RATE OF BIOLOGICAL DMARDS (bDMARD) IN INFLAMMATORY JOINT DISEASES

Background:

bDMARDs have an effect on glucose homeostasis (1), lipoproteins profile (2; 3) and blood pressure (4). However, with the exception of obesity (5; 6), there are no clear data on how bDMARDs work in patients who already have or develop metabolic comorbidities and whether these conditions can impact on their efficacy and safety profile.

Objectives:

to evaluate, in chronic inflammatory joint diseases, the effect of arterial hypertension (AH), dyslipidemia (DYS) and diabetes mellitus (DM) on efficacy, safety and retention rate of first-line bDMARDs therapy.

Methods:

a retrospective observational study on the clinical charts of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) or Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS), treated with first on-label bDMARD was performed. Data on adverse events, efficacy and comorbidities at the baseline visit in which the bDMARD was prescribed (BL), the visit performed after 6 months of therapy (6M), and the last visit on treatment (LoT) were collected.

Results:

383 patients (41,8% RA, 33,4% PsA and 24,8% AS) were included in the study, with the predominance of females (F: 67,36%, M: 32,64%; mean age 51,67 ± 15,11 years). Our data show that the presence of comorbidities had no influence on efficacy of bDMARD, while patients who had DYS at BL manifested a higher rate of systemic adverse events either in the first 6 months of therapy (58,9% vs 43,7%, p=0,040) and also later on (80,36% vs. 66,67%, p=0,046). In addition, patients who developed DYS and AH after the 6M visit reported a higher rate of systemic adverse events at LoT visit, compared to others (DYS: 97,8% vs 66,7%, p<0,001; AH: 86,9% vs 65,2%, p=0,031). For what concerns the retention rate, patients who developed DYS or AH during bDMARD treatment continued the drug for a longer period of time (DYS 95,5 vs 19,6 months, p<0,001; AH 72,1 vs 23,4 months, p<0,001). In particular, patients with AH who concomitantly carried out therapy with ACE-inhibitors (ACEi) and/or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB) continued bDMARDs for nearly 20 more months than patients who were not exposed to these drugs (40,5 vs 23,4 months, p=0,001) and more frequently maintained the bDMARDS at LoT (59,42% vs. 47,53%). In case of withdrawal in the ACEi/ARB exposed cohort, this was due to well-being and disease remission rather than inefficacy or adverse reaction (p=0,025). In dyslipidemic patients treated with statins, data showed that bDMARDs were continued for a longer time than in DYS patients treated with other anti dyslipidemic therapies (41,09 vs. 26,50 months, p=0,042).

Conclusion:

our data suggest that AH and DYS may be associated with higher frequency of adverse events but a better drug retention. The combination of bDMARD and ACEi/ARB may determine a better control of the inflammatory process by inhibition of angiotensin II, favouring the achievement of remission. In AH patients on bDMARDs, ACEi and ARB could therefore represent an useful anti-hypertensive drug choice. Similarly, statins could be the treatment of choice in DYS patients.

References:

[1]Gonzalez-Gay MA, et al. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2006.

[2]Pollono EN, et al. Clin Rheumatol. 2010

[3]van Sijl AM, et al. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2011.

[4]Yoshida S, et al. J Hum Hypertens. 2014.

[5]Gremese E, et al. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2013.

[6]Heimans L, et al. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2013.

Disclosure of Interests:

Laura Cometi: None declared, Cosimo Bruni Speakers bureau: Actelion, Eli Lilly, Nicolò Chiti: None declared, Lorenzo Tofani: None declared, Francesca Nacci: None declared, Francesca Bartoli: None declared, Silvia Bellando Randone: None declared, Ginevra Fiori: None declared, Serena Guiducci: None declared, Marco Matucci-Cerinic Grant/research support from: Actelion, MSD, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Speakers bureau: Acetelion, Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim

AB0361 EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF BARICITINIB (BARI) IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS(RA): CLINICAL AND ULTRASOUND EVALUATION IN REAL LIFE

Background:

Remission or low disease activity (LDA) are the ultimate goals of both conventional synthetic (csDMARD), target synthetic and biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARD) in treating RA. Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitors are nowadays part of tsDMARDs, with BARI as an oral selective JAK1-2 inhibitor. Ultrasound (US) is a valuable imaging tool for detecting inflammatory joint changes and monitoring RA patients. The US7 score (US7) is a semiquantitative score including grayscale (GS) and power Doppler (PD) measurements of synovitis and tenosynovitis in 7 joints of the clinically dominant hand and foot.

Objectives:

to evaluate real life efficacy and safety of BARI 4 mg in RA patients using clinical, clinimetric and US evaluation.

Methods:

adult RA patients starting BARI were eligible. DAS28ESR, CDAI, SDAI, painVAS, HAQ, COCHIN, laboratory parameters and US7 were performed/collected at baseline (BL) and after 3 and 6 months. Adverse events (AE) and concomitant medications were recorded. Responder/non responder status was determined using DAS28ESR improvement according to the EULAR Response Criteria at 3 months. Moreover, SDAI clinical remission or LDA (remission: SDAI≤3,3; LDA:3,3<SDAI≤11) were calculated at 3 and 6 months.

Results:

43 patients (12 csDMARD and 31 bDMARD failure) were enrolled, with 30 patients starting BARI in combination with a csDMARDs. BL painVAS was 68±23mm and disease activity was moderate to severe according to DAS28VES, CDAI and SDAI. BARI determined a significant improvement of every disease activity composite score and US7 components, except tendon PD; steroid daily dosage was significantly reduced.

28 patients were considered Responders at 3 months: responders used to have higher disease activity levels and synovitis scores at baseline.

Table 1.

Comparisons demographics and renal pathologies of responder and non-responder groups

BL3Mp value6Mp valueRNRRNRRNRpainVAS67,88±23,3758,18±22,7230,19±23,5245,64±25,48p=0.004030,19±20,4229,73±22,15p=0.2105Daily prednisone equivalent5,97±5,575,45±4,302,96±3,023,95±3,63p=0.22481,63±2,103,03±3,59p=0.1247GSS8,50±5,257,00±3,813,69±3,632,33±2,45p=0.93343,56±3,014,22±2,64p=0.2452GST2,88±2,333,11±2,090,88±0,891,56±1,59p=0.65011,00±1,372,78±1,72p=0.0831PDS8,00±7,113,33±3,463,00±3,482,44±3,36p=0.00663,25±3,135,00±4,56p=0,0006PDT2,81±2,462,44±3,360,88±1,541,33±1,50p=0.449901,06±1,533,78±3,19p=0.0156Erosions1,25±2,050,44±0,731,50±2,030,44±0,73p=0.07361,31±2,091,11±1,27p=0.0902

Interestingly, painVAS and steroid dosage significantly decreased both in responders and non-responders, achieving similar value at 6 months. Non-responders showed both synovial and tendon involvement relapse at 6 months, with significantly higher PD score compared to responders. Remission was reached by 12,8% patients at 3 months and 21,6% at 6 months, while LDA patients were respectively 53,8% and 51,3%; combination with csDMARD was the only factor positively associated with remission/LDA at 3 months.

The percentage of dropped-out patients due to AE was aligned with literature data (5% in 6 months) whereas the percentage of Herpes Zoster Virus (HZV) infections was higher (4,6% in 6 months in our population vs 4,3% in 1 year in RCTs). Corticosteroid dosage was directly associated with AE development at 6 months.

Conclusion:

Real life data confirmed BARI RCTs efficacy and safety data. Non responders showed both synovial and tendon PD disease relapse, despite painVAS and steroid reduction were comparable to responders. In our population, HZV infection prevalence was higher than in RCTs and corticosteroid dosage was positively associated with AE development at 6 months.

Disclosure of Interests:

Giulia Tesei: None declared, Cosimo Bruni Speakers bureau: Actelion, Eli Lilly, Laura Cometi: None declared, Francesca Nacci: None declared, Marco Capassoni: None declared, Riccardo Terenzi: None declared, Lorenzo Tofani: None declared, Francesca Bartoli: None declared, Ginevra Fiori: None declared, Marco Matucci-Cerinic Grant/research support from: Actelion, MSD, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Speakers bureau: Acetelion, Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim

Caspofungin PK in critically ill patients after the first and fourth doses: suggestions for therapeutic drug monitoring?

We describe caspofungin pharmacokinetics (PK) after the first and fourth doses in 20 critically ill septic patients. Monte Carlo simulation was used to analyze the probability of target attainment (PTA) (AUC/MIC > 865) for Candida spp. Caspofungin concentrations were analyzed by HPLC in plasma and urine. A great variability in PK parameters was observed after both doses. Patients were divided in two groups according to their AUC values (AUC ≤ 75 mg h/L cut-off). In the low-AUC group Cmax, Cmin and AUC were lower, while Vd and Cl were higher than in the high-AUC group (p < 0.05, both at day 1 and 4). The mean 24-h urinary recovery of the drug was 8 ± 6.3% (day1) and 9.8 ± 6.3 (day4). Monte Carlo simulation analysis (0.03-1 mg/L MIC-range) showed that PTA was guaranteed only for MICs ≤ 0.03 mg/L in the low-AUC group, and for MICs ≤ 0.06 mg/L in the high-AUC group. No group had a PTA ≥ 90% for 0.125 mg/L MIC (the epidemiological cut-off). Mortality was higher in low-AUC group (p < 0.01). In our 'real-world' population, no clinical data can predict which patient will have lower, suboptimal caspofungin exposure, therefore we suggest TDM to optimize caspofungin therapy and reduce the risk of selecting resistances (CEAVC, 32366/2015; OSS.15.114, NCT03798600).