1
|
White VM, Skaczkowski G, Pinkerton R, Coory M, Osborn M, Bibby H, Nicholls W, Orme LM, Conyers R, Phillips MB, Harrup R, Walker R, Thompson K, Anazodo A. Clinical management of Australian adolescents and young adults with acute lymphoblastic and myeloid leukemias: A national population-based study. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2018; 65:e27349. [PMID: 30039912 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.27349] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2018] [Revised: 05/23/2018] [Accepted: 06/10/2018] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND While several studies have examined the treatment of adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), studies of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are rare. Using national data for Australia, we describe (i) the number and type of treatment centers caring for AYAs, (ii) induction/first-line treatments, and (iii) survival outcomes. PROCEDURE National population-based study assessing treatment of 15- to 24-year-olds diagnosed with ALL or AML between 2007 and 2012. Treatment details were abstracted from hospital medical records. Treatment centers were classified as pediatric or adult (adult AYA-focused or other adult; and by AYA volume [high/low]). Cox proportional hazard regression analyses examined associations between treatment and overall, event-free, and relapse-free survival outcomes. RESULTS Forty-seven hospitals delivered induction therapy to 351 patients (181 ALL and 170 AML), with 74 (21%) treated at pediatric centers; 70% of hospitals treated less than two AYA leukemia patients per year. Regardless of treatment center, 82% of ALL patients were on pediatric protocols. For AML, pediatric protocols were not used in adult centers, with adult centers using a non-COG 7+3-type induction protocol (51%, where COG is Cooperative Oncology Group) or an ICE-type protocol (39%, where ICE is idarubicin, cytarabine, etoposide). Exploratory analyses suggested that for both ALL and AML, AYAs selected for adult protocols have worse overall, event-free, and relapse-free survival outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Pediatric protocols were commonly used for ALL patients regardless of where they are treated, indicating rapid assimilation of recent evidence by Australian hematologists. For AML, pediatric protocols were only used at pediatric centers. Further investigation is warranted to determine the optimal treatment approach for AYA AML patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V M White
- Centre for Behavioural Research in Cancer, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,School of Psychology, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia
| | - G Skaczkowski
- Centre for Behavioural Research in Cancer, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.,Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness & Research Centre, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - R Pinkerton
- Children's Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - M Coory
- Children's Cancer Centre, The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - M Osborn
- Royal Adelaide Hospital, South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | - H Bibby
- Centre for Behavioural Research in Cancer, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - W Nicholls
- Children's Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - L M Orme
- Children's Cancer Centre, The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - R Conyers
- Children's Cancer Centre, The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - M B Phillips
- Princess Margaret Hospital for Children, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - R Harrup
- Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| | - R Walker
- Children's Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - K Thompson
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - A Anazodo
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.,Nelune Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.,School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sawyer SM, McNeil R, Thompson K, Orme LM, McCarthy M. Developmentally appropriate care for adolescents and young adults with cancer: how well is Australia doing? Support Care Cancer 2018; 27:1783-1792. [PMID: 30155569 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-018-4420-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2017] [Accepted: 08/12/2018] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Developmentally appropriate care underpins quality cancer treatment. This study aimed to describe how well Australian cancer services deliver patient-focussed, developmentally appropriate care to adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer. METHODS In a national, cross sectional study, 196 AYAs with cancer aged between 15 and 25 years at diagnosis reported their general experiences of the cancer care team (Cancer Needs Questionnaire), access to age-appropriate treatment environments (Cancer Needs Questionnaire) and frequency of psychosocial assessment (Adolescent Friendly Hospital Survey). RESULTS Very positive responses were reported around engagement and communication with staff who were reported as approachable, friendly and trustworthy; 11 of the 14 items were positively rated by over 90% of respondents. In contrast, over 70% of AYAs expressed unmet need around their physical and social environments, whether in relation to the opportunity to be nursed in wards designed for AYAs, spend time with other young people with cancer, or talk to young people their own age; less than a third reported their needs had been met on the majority of these items. The frequency that specific psychosocial assessment domains were discussed was highly variable; responses suggested that AYAs were less commonly questioned about overtly sensitive topics. AYAs who experienced private consultations with health care providers (41%) were significantly more likely to experience thorough psychosocial assessment. CONCLUSION Australian cancer services are generally communicating well with AYAs. There is room for improvement around more developmentally specific aspects of healthcare quality, such as psychosocial assessment, and around treatment environments that promote greater social interaction between AYAs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S M Sawyer
- Centre for Adolescent Health, Royal Children's Hospital, 50 Flemington Rd, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
| | - R McNeil
- Centre for Adolescent Health, Royal Children's Hospital, 50 Flemington Rd, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - K Thompson
- Victorian Youth Cancer Service, Peter MacCallum Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - L M Orme
- Victorian Youth Cancer Service, Peter MacCallum Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Children's Cancer Centre, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - M McCarthy
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- Children's Cancer Centre, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
White VM, Bibby H, Green M, Anazodo A, Nicholls W, Pinkerton R, Phillips M, Harrup R, Osborn M, Orme LM, Conyers R, Thompson K, Coory M. Inconsistencies and time delays in site-specific research approvals hinder collaborative clinical research in Australia. Intern Med J 2016; 46:1023-9. [DOI: 10.1111/imj.13191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2016] [Revised: 07/05/2016] [Accepted: 07/05/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- V. M. White
- Cancer Council Victoria; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - H. Bibby
- Cancer Council Victoria; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - M. Green
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - A. Anazodo
- Sydney Children's Hospital; Sydney New South Wales Australia
- Prince of Wales Hospital; Sydney New South Wales Australia
| | - W. Nicholls
- Children's Health Queensland; Brisbane Queensland Australia
| | - R. Pinkerton
- Children's Health Queensland; Brisbane Queensland Australia
| | - M. Phillips
- Princess Margaret Hospital for Children; Perth Western Australia Australia
| | - R. Harrup
- Royal Hobart Hospital; Hobart Tasmania Australia
| | - M. Osborn
- Royal Adelaide Hospital; Adelaide South Australia Australia
| | - L. M. Orme
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - R. Conyers
- Royal Children's Hospital; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - K. Thompson
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - M. Coory
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| |
Collapse
|