1
|
Philipps L, Foster S, Gardiner D, Gath J, Gillman A, Haviland J, Hill E, King D, Manning G, Stiles M, Hall E, Lewis R. Study within a trial of electronic versus paper-based Patient-Reported oUtcomes CollEction (SPRUCE): study protocol for a partially randomised patient preference study. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e073817. [PMID: 37734892 PMCID: PMC10514621 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2023] [Accepted: 08/30/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) are currently collected from trial participants using paper questionnaires by the Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit at The Institute of Cancer Research (ICR-CTSU). Streamlining PRO collection using electronic questionnaires (ePRO) may improve data collection and patient experience. Here, we outline our protocol for a Study within a trial of electronic versus paper-based Patient-Reported oUtcomes CollEction (SPRUCE), which investigates the acceptability of ePRO in oncology clinical trials. METHODS AND ANALYSIS SPRUCE was developed alongside patient and public contributors. SPRUCE runs in multiple host trials with a partially randomised patient preference design, allowing participants to be randomised or choose their preference of electronic or paper questionnaires. Questionnaires are scheduled in accordance with host trial follow-up. The primary objective will assess differences in return rates (compliance) between ePRO and paper PROs at the first timepoint post-host trial intervention in the randomised group. Paper PRO compliance is expected to be 90%. 244 randomised participants are required to exclude ≤80% compliance rates with ePRO (10% non-inferiority margin, with 80% power and one-sided alpha=0.05). SPRUCE aims to assess acceptability of ePRO in oncology clinical trials, establish whether ePRO is acceptable to ICR-CTSU trial participants and can capture complete PRO data, consistent with paper PROs. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The SPRUCE protocol (ICR-CTSU/2021/10074) was approved by the Coventry and Warwick Central Research Ethics Committee (21/WM/0223) on 21 October 2021. Results will be disseminated via presentations, publications and lay summaries. No participant identifiable data will be included. TRIAL REGISTRATION SWAT169.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lara Philipps
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit (ICR-CTSU), The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Stephanie Foster
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit (ICR-CTSU), The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Deborah Gardiner
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit (ICR-CTSU), The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Jacqui Gath
- Independent Patient Representative, London, UK
| | - Alexa Gillman
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit (ICR-CTSU), The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Joanne Haviland
- Pragmatic Clinical Trials Unit, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Elizabeth Hill
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit (ICR-CTSU), The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Diana King
- Independent Patient Representative, London, UK
| | - Georgina Manning
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit (ICR-CTSU), The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Morgaine Stiles
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit (ICR-CTSU), The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Emma Hall
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit (ICR-CTSU), The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Rebecca Lewis
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit (ICR-CTSU), The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Huddart R, Hafeez S, Omar A, Alonzi R, Birtle A, Cheung KC, Choudhury A, Foroudi F, Gribble H, Henry A, Hilman S, Hindson B, Lewis R, Muthukumar D, McLaren DB, McNair H, Nikapota A, Olorunfemi A, Parikh O, Philipps L, Rimmer Y, Syndikus I, Tolentino A, Varughese M, Vassallo-Bonner C, Webster A, Griffin C, Hall E. Acute Toxicity of Hypofractionated and Conventionally Fractionated (Chemo)Radiotherapy Regimens for Bladder Cancer: An Exploratory Analysis from the RAIDER Trial. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2023; 35:586-597. [PMID: 37225552 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2023.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2022] [Revised: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 05/04/2023] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
AIMS Adding concurrent (chemo)therapy to radiotherapy improves outcomes for muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients. A recent meta-analysis showed superior invasive locoregional disease control for a hypofractionated 55 Gy in 20 fractions schedule compared with 64 Gy in 32 fractions. In the RAIDER clinical trial, patients undergoing 20 or 32 fractions of radical radiotherapy were randomised (1:1:2) to standard radiotherapy or to standard-dose or escalated-dose adaptive radiotherapy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and concomitant therapy were permitted. We report exploratory analyses of acute toxicity by concomitant therapy-fractionation schedule combination. MATERIALS AND METHODS Participants had unifocal bladder urothelial carcinoma staged T2-T4a N0 M0. Acute toxicity was assessed (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events) weekly during radiotherapy and at 10 weeks after the start of treatment. Within each fractionation cohort, non-randomised comparisons of the proportion of patients reporting treatment emergent grade 2 or worse genitourinary, gastrointestinal or other adverse events at any point in the acute period were carried out using Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS Between September 2015 and April 2020, 345 (163 receiving 20 fractions; 182 receiving 32 fractions) patients were recruited from 46 centres. The median age was 73 years; 49% received neoadjuvant chemotherapy; 71% received concomitant therapy, with 5-fluorouracil/mitomycin C most commonly used: 44/114 (39%) receiving 20 fractions; 94/130 (72%) receiving 32 fractions. The acute grade 2+ gastrointestinal toxicity rate was higher in those receiving concomitant therapy compared with radiotherapy alone in the 20-fraction cohort [54/111 (49%) versus 7/49 (14%), P < 0.001] but not in the 32-fraction cohort (P = 0.355). Grade 2+ gastrointestinal toxicity was highest for gemcitabine, with evidence of significant differences across therapies in the 32-fraction cohort (P = 0.006), with a similar pattern but no significant differences in the 20-fraction cohort (P = 0.099). There was no evidence of differences in grade 2+ genitourinary toxicity between concomitant therapies in either the 20- or 32-fraction cohorts. CONCLUSION Grade 2+ acute adverse events are common. The toxicity profile varied by type of concomitant therapy; the gastrointestinal toxicity rate seemed to be higher in patients receiving gemcitabine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Huddart
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Radiotherapy Department, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| | - S Hafeez
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Radiotherapy Department, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - A Omar
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit at The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - R Alonzi
- Clinical Oncology, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust, Middlesex, UK
| | - A Birtle
- Cancer Oncology, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Lancashire, UK
| | - K C Cheung
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit at The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - A Choudhury
- Translational Radiobiology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - F Foroudi
- Radiation Oncology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Australia
| | - H Gribble
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit at The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - A Henry
- University of Leeds and the Leeds Teaching Hospital NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - S Hilman
- Clinical Oncology, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - B Hindson
- Canterbury Regional Cancer and Haematology Service, Te Whatu Ora, Waitaha Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - R Lewis
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit at The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - D Muthukumar
- Oncology, East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust, Colchester, UK
| | - D B McLaren
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Edinburgh Cancer Centre, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
| | - H McNair
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Radiotherapy Department, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - A Nikapota
- Clinical Oncology, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Brighton, UK
| | - A Olorunfemi
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit at The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - O Parikh
- Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Burnley, UK
| | - L Philipps
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit at The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Y Rimmer
- Department of Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - I Syndikus
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Liverpool, UK
| | - A Tolentino
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit at The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - M Varughese
- Department of Oncology, Royal Devon & Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | - C Vassallo-Bonner
- Patient Representative, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - A Webster
- National Radiotherapy Trials Quality Assurance Group (RTTQA), University College Hospital, London, UK
| | - C Griffin
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit at The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - E Hall
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit at The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Philipps L, Porta N, James N, Huddart R, Hafeez S, Hall E. Correlation of Clinician- and Patient-Reported Outcomes in the BC2001 Trial. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2023; 35:331-338. [PMID: 36918330 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2023.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2022] [Revised: 01/04/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2023] [Indexed: 02/11/2023]
Abstract
AIMS To evaluate whether there is sufficient correlation between patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and clinician-reported outcomes (CROs) in bladder cancer follow-up post-radiotherapy to streamline data collection and to reduce trial follow-up burden on patients, clinicians and trial programmes. MATERIALS AND METHODS PROs data were collected within the BC2001 trial using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy specific to bladder cancer (FACT-BL) questionnaire. CROs data were collected by clinicians using Late Effects in Normal Tissues Subjective, Objective and Management (LENT/SOM). Data were collected at baseline, post-treatment, at 6 and 12 months post-randomisation and then annually to 5 years. The percentage agreement between CROs and PROs measures was evaluated at 2 and 5 years post-randomisation. Concordance was tested using the weighted Kappa statistic with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS Correlation was evaluated between six categories of the FACT-BL and LENT/SOM scores. At 2 years the percentage agreement across these domains ranged from 45 to 78%, with the weighted Kappa statistic between 0.07 and 0.35. Results were similar in year 5 with 48-83% agreement and kappa statistics between -0.02 and 0.21. CONCLUSION The correlation between CROs and PROs in patients treated with radiotherapy for bladder cancer were generally poor. PROs appear to be more sensitive, with higher grade events reported. Further work is needed to evaluate whether PROs alone can be used to evaluate toxicity-related outcomes in randomised controlled trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Philipps
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
| | - N Porta
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - N James
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK
| | - R Huddart
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK
| | - S Hafeez
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK
| | - E Hall
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Philipps L, Porta N, James N, Huddart R, Hafeez S, Ballas L, Hall E. Differences in Quality of Life and Toxicity for Male and Female Patients following Chemo(radiotherapy) for Bladder Cancer. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2023; 35:e336-e343. [PMID: 36906497 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2023.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2022] [Revised: 01/12/2023] [Accepted: 02/07/2023] [Indexed: 02/13/2023]
Abstract
AIMS BC2001, a randomised trial of treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer, demonstrated no difference in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) or late toxicity between patients receiving radical radiotherapy with and without chemotherapy. This secondary analysis explored sex-based differences in HRQoL and toxicity. MATERIALS AND METHODS Participants completed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Bladder (FACT-BL) HRQoL questionnaires at baseline, end of treatment, 6 months and annually until 5 years. Clinicians assessed toxicity with the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and Late Effects in Normal Tissues Subjective, Objective and Management (LENT/SOM) scoring systems at the same timepoints. The impact of sex on patient-reported HRQoL was evaluated using multivariate analyses of change in FACT-BL subscores from baseline to the timepoints of interest. For clinician-reported toxicity, differences were compared by calculating the proportion of patients with grade 3-4 toxicities occurring over the follow-up period. RESULTS For both males and females, all FACT-BL subscores had a reduction in HRQoL at the end of treatment. For males, the mean bladder cancer subscale (BLCS) score remained stable through to year 5. For females, there was a decline in BLCS from baseline at years 2 and 3 with a return to baseline at year 5. At year 3, females had a statistically significant and clinically meaningful worsening of mean BLCS score (-5.18; 95% confidence interval -8.37 to -1.99), which was not seen in males (0.24; -0.76 to 1.23). RTOG toxicity was more frequent in females than males (27% versus 16%, P = 0.027). CONCLUSION Results suggest that female patients treated with radiotherapy ± chemotherapy for localised bladder cancer report worse treatment-related toxicity in post-treatment years 2 and 3 than males.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Philipps
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
| | - N Porta
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - N James
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK
| | - R Huddart
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK
| | - S Hafeez
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK
| | - L Ballas
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - E Hall
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Syndikus I, Griffin C, Philipps L, Tree A, Khoo V, Birtle AJ, Choudhury A, Ferguson C, O'Sullivan JM, Panades M, Rimmer YL, Scrase CD, Staffurth J, Cruickshank C, Hassan S, Pugh J, Dearnaley DP, Hall E. 10-Year efficacy and co-morbidity outcomes of a phase III randomised trial of conventional vs. hypofractionated high dose intensity modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer (CHHiP; CRUK/06/016). J Clin Oncol 2023. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2023.41.6_suppl.304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/18/2023] Open
Abstract
304 Background: Five-year results from the CHHiP trial indicated that moderate hypofractionation of 60 Gray (Gy)/20 fractions (f) was non-inferior to 74Gy/37f (Lancet Oncology, 2016). Reporting of long-term efficacy and side effects is essential in a patient population that remain at risk of recurrence years after treatment. Here we report specific co-morbidity data collected at 10 years and an update of efficacy. Methods: Between October 2002 and June 2011, 3216 men with node negative T1b-T3a localised prostate cancer with risk of seminal vesical involvement ≤30% were randomised (1:1:1 ratio) to 74Gy/37f (control), 60Gy/20f or 57Gy/19f. Patients received 3-6 months of androgen deprivation prior to radiotherapy. The primary endpoint was time to biochemical failure (Phoenix consensus guidelines) or clinical failure (BCF). The non-inferiority design specified a critical hazard ratio (HR) of 1.208 for each hypofractionated schedule compared to control. Data on specific radiotherapy related co-morbidities were collected at 10-year follow-up and are presented as frequency and percentages. Analysis was by intention-to-treat; HRs quoted are unadjusted. Results: With a median follow up of 12.1 years, 10-year BCF-free rates (95% CI) were 74Gy: 76.0% (73.1%, 78.6%); 60Gy: 79.8% (77.1%, 82.3%) and 57Gy: 73.4% (70.5%, 76.1%). For 60Gy/20f, non-inferiority was confirmed: HR60=0.84 (90% CI 0.72, 0.97) with borderline significance for superiority (HR=0.84 (95% CI 0.70, 1.00). As in the primary analysis, for 57Gy/19f, non-inferiority could not be declared: HR57=1.13 (90% CI 0.98, 1.30). 10-year overall survival (95% CI) was 78.5% (75.9%, 81.0%), 82.9% (80.4%, 85.0%) and 79.9% (77.3%, 82.2%) in the 74Gy, 60Gy and 57Gy groups. Bone fractures were reported in 2% (15/700), 2% (19/771) and 3% (22/719) of patients in the 74Gy, 60Gy and 57Gy groups respectively at 10 years. The most common intervention reported was a sigmoidoscopy with 12% (79/681), 8% (60/739) and 9% (65/702) in the 74Gy, 60Gy and 57Gy groups respectively. Of those patients who underwent a sigmoidoscopy it was due to symptoms for 81% (63/78) 81% (48/59) and 85% (55/65) of patients in the 74Gy, 60Gy and 57Gy group respectively. Frequencies of all other pre-specified co-morbidities or related interventions (ureteric obstruction, bowel strictures, trans-urethral resection of prostate, urethrotomy, urethral dilatation or long term catheterisation or treatment of proctopathy with steroid, sucralfate, formalin, laser coagulation or rectal diversion) were <1% in all groups. Conclusions: With a median follow-up of 12 years, oncological outcomes following 60Gy/20f continue to be non-inferior to those with 74Gy/37f. Late co-morbidities were very low across all treatment groups. These data support the long-term safety of moderate hypofractionation. Clinical trial information: 97182923 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabel Syndikus
- Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Department of Radiotherapy, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Clare Griffin
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Lara Philipps
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alison Tree
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and the Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Vincent Khoo
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alison Jane Birtle
- Rosemere Cancer Centre, Lancs Teaching Hospitals, & University of Manchester, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - John Staffurth
- Velindre Hospital, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | | | - Shama Hassan
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Julia Pugh
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - David P. Dearnaley
- Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Emma Hall
- The Institute of Cancer Research, Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Philipps L, Foster S, Gardiner D, Gillman A, Haviland J, Hill E, Manning G, Stiles M, Hall E, Lewis R. Considerations when introducing electronic patient-reported outcome data capture in multicentre oncology randomised controlled trials. Trials 2022; 23:1004. [PMID: 36510242 PMCID: PMC9744038 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06955-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2022] [Accepted: 11/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Lara Philipps
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK.
| | - Stephanie Foster
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Deborah Gardiner
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Alexa Gillman
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Joanne Haviland
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Elizabeth Hill
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Georgina Manning
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Morgaine Stiles
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Emma Hall
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Rebecca Lewis
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Murray J, Cruickshank C, Bird T, Bell P, Braun J, Chuter D, Ferreira MR, Griffin C, Hassan S, Hujairi N, Melcher A, Miles E, Naismith O, Panades M, Philipps L, Reid A, Rekowski J, Sankey P, Staffurth J, Syndikus I, Tree A, Wilkins A, Hall E. PEARLS - A multicentre phase II/III trial of extended field radiotherapy for androgen sensitive prostate cancer patients with PSMA-avid pelvic and/or para-aortic lymph nodes at presentation. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2022; 37:130-136. [PMID: 36238579 PMCID: PMC9550847 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2022.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2022] [Accepted: 09/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
PEARLS is a multi-stage randomised controlled trial for prostate cancer patients with pelvic and/or para-aortic PSMA-avid lymph node disease at presentation. The aim of the trial is to determine whether extending the radiotherapy field to cover the para-aortic lymph nodes (up to L1/L2 vertebral interspace) can improve outcomes for this patient group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Murray
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | | | - Thomas Bird
- University Hospitals Bristol & Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | | | - John Braun
- RMH Radiotherapy Focus Group & RMH Biomedical Research Centre Consumer Group, Sutton, UK
| | - Dave Chuter
- NCRI Consumer Forum, London, UK
- NCRI Living With & Beyond Cancer (Acute and Toxicities Workstream), London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Alan Melcher
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Elizabeth Miles
- Radiotherapy Trials QA Group (RTTQA), Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, UK
| | - Olivia Naismith
- Radiotherapy Trials QA Group (RTTQA), Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Lara Philipps
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Alison Reid
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Pete Sankey
- University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK
| | - John Staffurth
- Velindre University NHS Trust and Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | | | - Alison Tree
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Anna Wilkins
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Emma Hall
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Huddart R, Hafeez S, Omar A, Choudhury A, Birtle A, Syndikus I, Hindson B, Varughese M, Henry A, McLaren D, Foroud F, Webster A, McNair H, Tolentino A, Webster L, Gribble H, Philipps L, Nikapota A, Parikh O, Alonzi R, Mahmood R, Hilman S, Rimmer Y, Griffin C, Hall E. OC-0513 Acute toxicity of hypo- and conventionally-fractionated radiosensitised bladder radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(21)06939-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
9
|
Punjabi A, Barrett E, Cheng A, Mulla A, Walls G, Johnston D, McAleese J, Moore K, Hicks J, Blyth K, Denholm M, Magee L, Gilligan D, Silverman S, Qureshi M, Clinch H, Hatton M, Philipps L, Brown S, O'Brien M, McDonald F, Faivre-Finn C, Hiley C, Evison M. Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio and Absolute Lymphocyte Count as Prognostic Markers in Patients Treated with Curative-intent Radiotherapy for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2021; 33:e331-e338. [PMID: 33863615 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2021.03.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2021] [Revised: 02/27/2021] [Accepted: 03/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
AIMS The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and the absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) have been proposed as prognostic markers in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The objective of this study was to examine the association of NLR/ALC before and after curative-intent radiotherapy for NSCLC on disease recurrence and overall survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective study of consecutive patients who underwent curative-intent radiotherapy for NSCLC across nine sites in the UK from 1 October 2014 to 1 October 2016. A multivariate analysis was carried out to assess the ability of pre-treatment NLR/ALC, post-treatment NLR/ALC and change in NLR/ALC, adjusted for confounding factors using the Cox proportional hazards model, to predict disease recurrence and overall survival within 2 years of treatment. RESULTS In total, 425 patients were identified with complete blood parameter values. None of the NLR/ALC parameters were independent predictors of disease recurrence. Higher pre-NLR, post-NLR and change in NLR plus lower post-ALC were all independent predictors of worse survival. Receiver operator curve analysis found a pre-NLR > 2.5 (odds ratio 1.71, 95% confidence interval 1.06-2.79, P < 0.05), a post-NLR > 5.5 (odds ratio 2.36, 95% confidence interval 1.49-3.76, P < 0.001), a change in NLR >3.6 (odds ratio 2.41, 95% confidence interval 1.5-3.91, P < 0.001) and a post-ALC < 0.8 (odds ratio 2.86, 95% confidence interval 1.76-4.69, P < 0.001) optimally predicted poor overall survival on both univariate and multivariate analysis when adjusted for confounding factors. Median overall survival for the high-versus low-risk groups were: pre-NLR 770 versus 1009 days (P = 0.34), post-NLR 596 versus 1287 days (P ≤ 0.001), change in NLR 553 versus 1214 days (P ≤ 0.001) and post-ALC 594 versus 1287 days (P ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSION NLR and ALC, surrogate markers for systemic inflammation, have prognostic value in NSCLC patients treated with curative-intent radiotherapy. These simple and readily available parameters may have a future role in risk stratification post-treatment to inform the intensity of surveillance protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Punjabi
- Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - E Barrett
- Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - A Cheng
- Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - A Mulla
- Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - G Walls
- Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - D Johnston
- Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast, UK
| | - J McAleese
- Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast, UK
| | - K Moore
- NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - J Hicks
- NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - K Blyth
- NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - M Denholm
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - L Magee
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - D Gilligan
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - S Silverman
- University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - M Qureshi
- Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - H Clinch
- The University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK
| | - M Hatton
- Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield, UK
| | | | - S Brown
- The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | | | | - C Faivre-Finn
- The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - C Hiley
- CRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, UCL Cancer Institute, London, UK
| | - M Evison
- Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Evison M, Barrett E, Cheng A, Mulla A, Walls G, Johnston D, McAleese J, Moore K, Hicks J, Blyth K, Denholm M, Magee L, Gilligan D, Silverman S, Hiley C, Qureshi M, Clinch H, Hatton M, Philipps L, Brown S, O'Brien M, McDonald F, Faivre-Finn C. Predicting the Risk of Disease Recurrence and Death Following Curative-intent Radiotherapy for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: The Development and Validation of Two Scoring Systems From a Large Multicentre UK Cohort. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2021; 33:145-154. [PMID: 32978027 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2020.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2020] [Revised: 07/30/2020] [Accepted: 09/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
AIMS There is a paucity of evidence on which to produce recommendations on neither the clinical nor the imaging follow-up of lung cancer patients after curative-intent radiotherapy. In the 2019 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence lung cancer guidelines, further research into risk-stratification models to inform follow-up protocols was recommended. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective study of consecutive patients undergoing curative-intent radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer from 1 October 2014 to 1 October 2016 across nine UK trusts was carried out. Twenty-two demographic, clinical and treatment-related variables were collected and multivariable logistic regression was used to develop and validate two risk-stratification models to determine the risk of disease recurrence and death. RESULTS In total, 898 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 72 years, 63% (562/898) had a good performance status (0-1) and 43% (388/898), 15% (134/898) and 42% (376/898) were clinical stage I, II and III, respectively. Thirty-six per cent (322/898) suffered disease recurrence and 41% (369/898) died in the first 2 years after radiotherapy. The ASSENT score (age, performance status, smoking status, staging endobronchial ultrasound, N-stage, T-stage) was developed, which stratifies the risk for disease recurrence within 2 years, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for the total score of 0.712 (0.671-0.753) and 0.72 (0.65-0.789) in the derivation and validation sets, respectively. The STEPS score (sex, performance status, staging endobronchial ultrasound, T-stage, N-stage) was developed, which stratifies the risk of death within 2 years, with an AUROC for the total score of 0.625 (0.581-0.669) and 0.607 (0.53-0.684) in the derivation and validation sets, respectively. CONCLUSIONS These validated risk-stratification models could be used to inform follow-up protocols after curative-intent radiotherapy for lung cancer. The modest performance highlights the need for more advanced risk prediction tools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Evison
- Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
| | - E Barrett
- Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - A Cheng
- Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - A Mulla
- Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - G Walls
- Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast, UK
| | - D Johnston
- Cancer Centre Belfast City Hospital, Belfast, UK
| | - J McAleese
- Cancer Centre Belfast City Hospital, Belfast, UK
| | - K Moore
- NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - J Hicks
- NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - K Blyth
- NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - M Denholm
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - L Magee
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - D Gilligan
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - S Silverman
- University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - C Hiley
- CRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, UCL Cancer Institute, London, UK
| | | | - H Clinch
- The University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK
| | - M Hatton
- Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield, UK
| | | | - S Brown
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | | | | | - C Faivre-Finn
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bhimani J, Philipps L, Simpson L, Lythgoe M, Soultati A, Webb A, Savage P. The impact of new cancer drug therapies on site specialised cancer treatment activity in a UK cancer network 2014-2018. J Oncol Pharm Pract 2020; 26:93-98. [PMID: 30955466 DOI: 10.1177/1078155219839445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Drug treatment for cancer has changed dramatically over the past decade with many new drugs often with multiple applications. More recently, the detailed pathway for approval from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) in the UK has been simplified. To explore how these changes have impacted on systemic anti-cancer therapy tumour site-specific prescribing and workload activities, we have reviewed the prescribing records for 2014-2018 in a UK cancer network. METHODS Information about the numbers of new systemic anti-cancer therapy drugs and NICE approvals were obtained from print editions of the British National Formulary (BNF) and the NICE website. Data on the numbers of new chemotherapy courses and individual treatment-related attendances were obtained from the cancer network Chemocare electronic prescribing system. RESULTS During the five-year study period, there were 49 new systemic anti-cancer therapy drugs for all tumour types, and a total of 65 NICE technology approvals for solid tumour indications. Overall numbers of treatment courses increased by 40.7% and total treatment-related visits by 80.6%. There was a wide variation across tumour types with the highest number of increased visits seen for melanoma (349.3%) and prostate cancer (242.3%), but in contrast, no appreciable increases were seen for lower gastrointestinal cancers or small cell lung cancer. CONCLUSION The study confirms the major impact of the arrival of new drug technology and positive NICE appraisals on increasing systemic anti-cancer therapy prescribing and chemotherapy unit activity. The data in this study may be of help in planning for future service delivery planning and workforce configurations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenna Bhimani
- Department of Oncology, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals, Brighton, UK
| | - Lara Philipps
- Department of Oncology, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals, Brighton, UK
| | - Lawrence Simpson
- Department of Oncology, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals, Brighton, UK
| | - Mark Lythgoe
- Department of Oncology, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals, Brighton, UK
| | - Aspasia Soultati
- Department of Oncology, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals, Brighton, UK
| | - Andrew Webb
- Department of Oncology, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals, Brighton, UK
| | - Philip Savage
- Department of Oncology, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals, Brighton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Westley R, Philipps L, Lock I, Ahmed M, Mcdonald F. A retrospective analysis of lymphopenia rates during and after sequential and concurrent radical chemoradiotherapy for patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Lung Cancer 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/s0169-5002(19)30236-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
13
|
Philipps L, Brock J, Appleyard S, Doyle R. An Audit of Metastatic Cord Compression Pathways. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2018.03.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|