Support Through Remote Observation and Nutrition Guidance (STRONG), a digital health intervention to reduce malnutrition among pancreatic cancer patients: A study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial

Background

Malnutrition is a common and distressing condition among pancreatic cancer patients. Fewer than a quarter of pancreatic cancer patients receive medical nutrition therapy (MNT), important for improving nutritional status, weight maintenance, quality of life and survival. System, provider, and patient level barriers limit access to MNT. We propose to examine the feasibility of a 12-week multi-level, digital health intervention designed to expand MNT access among pancreatic cancer patients.

Methods

Individuals with advanced pancreatic cancer starting chemotherapy (N = 80) will be 1:1 randomized to the intervention or usual care. The Support Through Remote Observation and Nutrition Guidance (STRONG) intervention includes system-level (e.g., routine malnutrition and screening), provider-level (e.g., dietitian training and web-based dashboard), and patient-level strategies (e.g., individualized nutrition plan, self-monitoring of dietary intake via Fitbit, ongoing goal monitoring and feedback). Individuals receiving usual care will be referred to dietitians based on their oncologists' discretion. Study assessments will be completed at baseline, 4-, 8-, 12-, and 16-weeks.

Results

Primary outcomes will be feasibility (e.g., recruitment, retention, assessment completion) and acceptability. We will collect additional implementation outcomes, such as intervention adherence, perceived usability, and feedback on intervention quality via an exit interview. We will collect preliminary data on outcomes that may be associated with the intervention including malnutrition, quality of life, treatment outcomes, and survival.

Conclusion

This study will advance our knowledge on the feasibility of a digital health intervention to reduce malnutrition among individuals with advanced pancreatic cancer. Trial registration: NCT05675059, registered on December 9, 2022.

Burnout and Appreciation: A Cross-Sectional Study Assessing Preferences for Appreciation Among Oncology Clinicians

PURPOSE

Feeling appreciated is related to increased well-being/reduced burnout. We developed a health care-specific appreciation assessment for clinicians, exploring what impactful appreciation looks like and whether it differs across a diverse provider population.

METHODS

The cross-sectional study was conducted with a diverse oncology clinician population in academic medicine as part of a general well-being survey. A total of 28 different methods of appreciation were assessed for their impact on feeling appreciated.

RESULTS

A total of 405 clinicians participated (response rate, 58%). No single method of appreciation showed high/low impact for everyone, although seven methods received high impact ratings from 60% or more, including inclusion in decision making (76%), private words of affirmation (64%), positive feedback about skills (63%), positive comments about clinical care from patients/families (62%), efforts to reduce daily frustrations (62%), signs of trust in medical skills (62%), and time for self-care (62%). The least impactful methods of appreciation describe public expression of accomplishments, leadership rounding, and awards but each still receive a rating of moderate/high impact from 33% of participants.

CONCLUSION

Appreciation comes from many different places and takes on multiple forms, suggesting that making healthcare workers (HCWs) feel valued takes the efforts of colleagues, leaders, the system as well as patients. There exists no one perfect way of showing appreciation, and no one method is meaningless for all. The impact on feeling valued is primarily a function of the specific appreciation method and not the demographic/personal characteristics of the recipient. The findings highlight modifiable factors that-when intervened upon-can reduce burnout and address organization-level determinants of burnout impactfully.

Association of mild acetabular dysplasia with an increased risk of incident hip osteoarthritis in elderly white women: the study of osteoporotic fractures

OBJECTIVE

To determine if acetabular dysplasia increases the risk of incident hip osteoarthritis (OA) among elderly white women.

METHODS

Baseline and followup anteroposterior pelvic radiographs were obtained a mean of 8 years apart, and read for individual radiographic features (IRFs) of hip OA; summary grades (0-4) were then assigned based on the IRFs present. Acetabular dysplasia was defined by the results of measurements of the acetabular depth (<9 mm) or the center-edge angle (<30 degrees). Logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the association between acetabular dysplasia and incident hip OA, and all analyses were adjusted for age, current weight, body mass index, affected side, and investigational site.

RESULTS

The odds ratios for the association of abnormal center-edge angle and acetabular dysplasia with incident hip OA were 3.3 (95% confidence interval 1.1-10.1) and 2.8 (95% confidence interval 1.0-7.9), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Acetabular dysplasia, defined by a decrease in the center-edge angle, is associated with a modestly increased risk of incident hip OA in elderly white women.

Osteoarthritis and risk of falls, rates of bone loss, and osteoporotic fractures. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group

OBJECTIVE

To examine the association between osteoarthritis (OA), as defined by radiographic evidence and self report, and osteoporotic fractures, falls, and bone loss in a cohort of elderly white women.

METHODS

A cohort of 5,552 elderly women from the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures was followed up prospectively for a mean of 7.4 years. Self-reported, physician-diagnosed OA was recorded at interview, and radiologic OA of the hip and hand were defined from pelvis and hand radiographs obtained at baseline by validated techniques. Prevalent and incident vertebral fractures were detected by vertebral morphometry, and data on incident fractures and falls were collected by postcard surveys; fractures were confirmed by radiography. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured on 2 occasions at the hip, lumbar spine, and calcaneus, and rates of bone loss were calculated.

RESULTS

Women with radiographic hip OA had a reduced risk of recurrent falls in the first year (relative risk [RR] 0.7, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.5-0.95). However, those with self-reported OA had an increased risk of falls (RR 1.4, 95% CI 1.2-1.5). Radiographic hip OA was associated with reduced bone loss in the femoral neck compared with controls (mean +/- SD -0.29+/-0.09%/year versus -0.51+/-0.03%/year; P = 0.018). However, radiographic hip OA showed nonsignificant trends toward increased bone loss at the calcaneus and lumbar spine. There was no significant association between self-reported OA or radiographic hand OA with bone loss. No definition of OA was associated with incident nonvertebral fracture, hip fracture, or vertebral fracture.

CONCLUSION

Despite having increased BMD compared with controls, subjects with OA did not have a significantly reduced risk of osteoporotic fracture, although there was a trend toward a reduced risk of femoral neck fractures in subjects with severe radiographic OA. The failure of the observed increase in BMD to translate into a reduced fracture risk may be due, in part, to the number and type of falls sustained by subjects with OA. Patients with OA should not be considered to be at a lower risk of fracture than the general population. Physicians should be aware that a high BMD in patients with OA may be falsely reassuring.

Serum vitamin D levels and incident changes of radiographic hip osteoarthritis: a longitudinal study. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship of serum levels of 25-vitamin D and 1,25-vitamin D to incident changes of radiographic hip osteoarthritis (OA) among elderly white women.

METHODS

Baseline and followup hip radiographs of 237 subjects were obtained an average of 8 years apart. Hips were scored for individual radiographic features (IRF) and assigned a summary grade based on the number and type of IRF present. Serum 25- and 1,25-vitamin D levels from baseline samples were analyzed by radioimmunoassay. Logistic and linear regression were used to examine the association of 25- and 1,25-vitamin D levels with radiographic changes, adjusting for age, health status, physical activity, weight, vitamin D supplement use, and calcaneal bone mineral density.

RESULTS

The risk of incident hip OA defined as the development of definite joint space narrowing was increased for subjects who were in the middle (odds ratio [OR] 3.21, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.06, 9.68) and lowest (OR 3.34, 95% CI 1.13, 9.86) tertiles for 25-vitamin D compared with subjects in the highest tertile. Vitamin D levels were not associated with incident hip OA defined as the development of definite osteophytes or new disease according to the summary grade. No association between serum 1,25-vitamin D and changes in radiographic hip OA was found.

CONCLUSION

Low serum levels of 25-vitamin D may be associated with incident changes of radiographic hip OA characterized by joint space narrowing.