Interferon-γ/IL-2 ELISpot and mRNA Responses to the SARS-CoV2, Feline Coronavirus Serotypes 1 (FCoV1), and FCoV2 Receptor Binding Domains by the T Cells from COVID-19-Vaccinated Humans and FCoV1-Infected Cats

The receptor binding domain (RBD) of SARS-CoV-2 (SCoV2) has been used recently to identify the RBD sequences of feline coronavirus serotypes 1 (FCoV1) and 2 (FCoV2). Cats naturally infected with FCoV1 have been shown to possess serum reactivities with FCoV1 and SCoV2 RBDs but not with FCoV2 RBD. In the current study, COVID-19-vaccinated humans and FCoV1-infected laboratory cats were evaluated for interferon-gamma (IFNγ) and interleukin-2 (IL-2 ELISpot responses by their peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) to SCoV2, FCoV1, and FCoV2 RBDs. Remarkably, the PBMC from COVID-19-vaccinated subjects developed IFNγ responses to SCoV2, FCoV1, and FCoV2 RBDs. The most vaccinated subject (five vaccinations over 2 years) appeared to produce hyperreactive IFNγ responses to all three RBDs, including the PBS media control. This subject lost IFNγ responses to all RBDs at 9 months (9 mo) post-last vaccination. However, her IL-2 responses to FCoV1 and FCoV2 RBDs were low but detectable at 10 mo post-last vaccination. This observation suggests that initially robust IFNγ responses to SCoV2 RBD may be an outcome of robust inflammatory IFNγ responses to SCoV2 RBD. Hence, the T-cell responses of vaccine immunity should be monitored by vaccine immunogen-specific IL-2 production. The PBMC from chronically FCoV1-infected cats developed robust IFNγ responses to SCoV2 and FCoV2 RBDs but had the lowest IFNγ responses to FCoV1 RBD. The constant exposure to FCoV1 reinfection may cause the IFNγ responses to be downregulated to the infecting virus FCoV1 but not to the cross-reacting epitopes on the SCoV2 and FCoV2 RBDs.

Comparative Transcriptome Analysis of Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli O157:H7 on Bovine Rectoanal Junction Cells and Human Colonic Epithelial Cells during Initial Adherence

Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) are notorious foodborne pathogens, capable of causing severe diarrhea and life-threatening complications in humans. Cattle, acting as both primary reservoirs and asymptomatic carriers of STEC, predominantly harbor the pathogen in their rectoanal junction (RAJ), facilitating its transmission to humans through contaminated food sources. Despite the central role of cattle in STEC transmission, the molecular mechanisms governing STEC's adaptation in the RAJ of the asymptomatic reservoir host and its subsequent infection of human colonic epithelial cells, resulting in diarrhea, remain largely unexplored. This study aims to uncover these complicated dynamics by focusing on the STEC O157:H7 serotype within two distinct host environments, bovine RAJ cells and human colonic epithelial cells, during initial colonization. We employed comparative transcriptomics analysis to investigate differential gene expression profiles of STEC O157:H7 during interactions with these cell types. STEC O157:H7 was cultured either with bovine RAJ cells or the human colonic epithelial cell line CCD CoN 841 to simulate STEC-epithelial cell interactions within these two host species. High-throughput RNA sequencing revealed 829 and 1939 bacterial genes expressed in RAJ and CCD CoN 841, respectively. After gene filtering, 221 E. coli O157:H7 genes were upregulated during initial adherence to CCD CoN cells and 436 with RAJ cells. Furthermore, 22 genes were uniquely expressed with human cells and 155 genes with bovine cells. Our findings revealed distinct expression patterns of STEC O157:H7 genes involved in virulence, including adherence, metal iron homeostasis, and stress response during its initial adherence (i.e., six hours post-infection) to bovine RAJ cells, as opposed to human colonic epithelial cells. Additionally, the comparative analysis highlighted the potential role of some genes in host adaptation and tissue-specific pathogenicity. These findings shed new light on the potential mechanisms of STEC O157:H7 contributing to colonize the intestinal epithelium during the first six hours of infection, leading to survival and persistence in the bovine reservoir and causing disease in humans.

Mycobacterium tuberculosis transcriptional regulator Rv1019 is upregulated in hypoxia, and negatively regulates Rv3230c-Rv3229c operon encoding enzymes in the oleic acid biosynthetic pathway

The main obstacle in eradicating tuberculosis is the ability of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to remain dormant in the host, and then to get reactivated even years later under immunocompromised conditions. Transcriptional regulation in intracellular pathogens plays an important role in their adapting to the challenging environment inside the host cells. Previously, we demonstrated that Rv1019, a putative transcriptional regulator of M. tuberculosis H37Rv, is an autorepressor. We showed that Rv1019 is cotranscribed with Rv1020 (mfd) and Rv1021 (mazG) which encode DNA repair proteins and negatively regulates the expression of these genes. In the present study, we show that Rv1019 regulates the expression of the genes Rv3230c and Rv3229c (desA3) also which form a two-gene operon in M. tuberculosis. Overexpression of Rv1019 in M. tuberculosis significantly downregulated the expression of these genes. Employing Wayne's hypoxia-induced dormancy model of M. tuberculosis, we show that Rv1019 is upregulated three-fold under hypoxia. Finally, by reporter assay, using Mycobacterium smegmatis as a model, we validate that Rv1019 is recruited to the promoter of Rv3230c-Rv3229c during hypoxia, and negatively regulates this operon which is involved in the biosynthesis of oleic acid.

Chrysomycin A inhibits the topoisomerase I of Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Novel anti-tuberculosis drugs are essential to manage drug-resistant tuberculosis, caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis. We recently reported the antimycobacterial activity of chrysomycin A in vitro and in infected macrophages. In this study, we report that it inhibits the growth of drug-resistant clinical strains of M. tuberculosis and acts in synergy with anti-TB drugs such as ethambutol, ciprofloxacin, and novobiocin. In pursuit of its mechanism of action, it was found that chrysomycin A is bactericidal and exerts this activity by interacting with DNA at specific sequences and by inhibiting the topoisomerase I activity of M. tuberculosis. It also exhibits weak inhibition of the DNA gyrase enzyme of the pathogen.