Evaluating the efficacy of an advanced practice provider symptom management telephone triage program in reducing ED visits and “avoidable” admissions of oncology patients

177

Background: One of the biggest challenges for oncology patients is timely access to care. The inability to provide the right care for the right patient at the right time many times result in overuse of Emergency Departments (ED) to receive oncology care. Approximately 77% of oncology patients have an ER visit, and 63.2% of visits result in hospital admission (Mayer et al., 2011). Furthermore, the average cancer patient receiving chemotherapy has at least one hospital admission and two ED visits per year (Klodziej, et al., 2011). Establishing a “triage” program that attempts to avoid “avoidable” admissions can reduce unnecessary ED visits and associated inpatient care, therefore improving health outcomes while reducing costs. Methods: A quality improvement value-based care (VBC) initiative to prevent ED visits and avoid “avoidable” admissions, via an “Express Symptom Management Hotline” (ESMH) was created. ESMH provides oncology patients with direct and rapid phone access to an oncology Advanced Practice Provider (APP) who can appropriately triage a patient that is in need of acute symptom management. A patient can be managed over the telephone, with a clinic visit, and/or with other outpatient oncology same day services. A next day follow up call for triaged ensures that there was appropriate management. Telephone triage, associated early intervention by an APP for cancer related symptoms and a next day follow-up call will reduce ED visits and avoid “avoidable” admissions. Results: Among the 294 calls that were received from oncology patients for acute symptoms during a 12 week trial period, only 14 led to patients requiring ED services. All 14 ED visits required an admission. Conclusions: Telephone triage by APP’s via an ESMH can effectively manage oncology patients’ symptoms by providing early outpatient interventions. Such an ESMH helps avoid “avoidable” admissions, leading to improved health outcomes while reducing costs. [Table: see text]

Community-Based Trial of R-CHOP and Maintenance Rituximab for Intermediate- or High-Grade Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma with First-Cycle Filgrastim for Older Patients

BACKGROUND

Administration of full-dose R-CHOP (rituximab/cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine/prednisone) chemotherapy is important to maximize response in patients with intermediate-or high-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma but might be difficult in older patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This community-based study was conducted to determine response, toxicity, and disease-free survival in patients with intermediate-or high-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma receiving R-CHOP with filgrastim. Patients received 6-8 cycles of R-CHOP followed by 4 cycles of maintenance rituximab for responders. Patients aged > 60 years or with increased infection risk received filgrastim 5 microg/kg per day in all R-CHOP cycles; other patients received filgrastim after a neutropenic event (no planned administration for cycle 1).

RESULTS

Of 101 patients enrolled, 60 (59%) were aged > 60 years and received filgrastim in all cycles. Thirty-three patients aged <or= 60 years (80%) received filgrastim, 7 (17%) as primary use in cycle 1. Chemotherapy average relative dose intensity was comparable between age groups (91% > 60 years vs. 93% <or= 60 years). Overall response was similar in both groups (87% > 60 years vs. 95% <or= 60 years; P=0.19); however, the complete response rate was significantly lower for older patients (42% > 60 years vs. 71% <or= 60 years; P=0.005). Seventy-six percent of patients (75% > 60 years vs. 78% <or= 60 years) had no evidence of progression after 2 years of follow-up. Febrile neutropenia (fever >or= 38.3 degrees C with absolute neutrophil count < 500/mm) occurred in 17% of patients overall (22% > 60 years vs. 10% <or= 60 years), and 8% had cycle-1 events (12% > 60 years vs. 2% <or= 60 years).

CONCLUSION

Patients aged > 60 years receiving R-CHOP with filgrastim support in all cycles received comparable doses of chemotherapy and had similar overall response rates compared wtih those of younger patients receiving no preemptive cycle-1 filgrastim.

Fourteen-Day CHOP Supported with Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor in Patients with Aggressive Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma: Results of a Phase II Study

The safety and efficacy of compressed-cycle (14-day) standard-dose CHOP (cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine/prednisone) supported with prophylactic recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF; filgrastim) were evaluated in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Patients with intermediate- or high-grade NHL (Working Formulation groups D-H and J; N = 120), accrued from 25 clinical practices, were given 6 cycles of standard-dose CHOP every 14 days. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor 5 microg/kg was given daily subcutaneously in each cycle, starting on day 2 and continuing until the absolute neutrophil count was = 10000/microL. The overall response rate was 89%, with complete responses (CRs) in 52 of 120 patients (43%) and partial responses in 55 (46%). These results are consistent with previously reported outcomes from trials in this population. Of the 720 chemotherapy cycles planned for all patients, 615 (85%) were given on time at full dose. The median relative dose intensity (RDI) of cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin was 99%; the RDI of vincristine was 73%. In the 53 patients = 60 years of age, 80% of the chemotherapy cycles were given on time at full dose, with median RDIs similar to those in the entire population. Response rates in the older patients were also similar, with CRs in 24 patients (45%) and partial responses in 21 (40%). Hematologic toxicity was significant but tolerable, with no treatment-related deaths. At a median follow-up of 20.6 months, 77% of patients were still alive. Standard-dose CHOP administered every 14 days with prophylactic G-CSF support was delivered as planned in most patients and produced response rates comparable with those with CHOP given every 3 weeks, without exceptional toxicity.

Preoperative therapy with concurrent paclitaxel/carboplatin/infusional 5-FU and radiation therapy in locoregional esophageal cancer: final results of a Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network phase II trial

PURPOSE

This phase II study was designed to determine the feasibility, toxicity, and therapeutic efficacy of a novel outpatient combined-modality preoperative regimen in patients with localized esophageal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred twenty-nine eligible patients with previously untreated, potentially resectable, clinical stage I-III carcinoma of the esophagus were treated between July 1995 and July 1999. Combined-modality treatment included: paclitaxel, 200 mg/m2, 1-hour i.v. infusion, days 1 and 22; carboplatin, an area under the concentration time curve 6.0 i.v., days 1 and 22; 5-fluorouracil, 225 mg/m2/day, continuous i.v. infusion, days 1-42; and radiation therapy, 45 Gy, 1.8-Gy single daily fractions 5 days weekly, beginning day 1. All patients underwent surgical resection 4-8 weeks after completion of the preoperative therapy.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-three patients (95%) completed preoperative therapy, 105 patients (81%) underwent attempted resection, and 96 patients (74%) had definitive resection. A pathological complete response was achieved in 47 of 123 evaluable patients (38%); an additional 30 patients (24%) had only microscopic residual tumor. With a median follow-up of 45 months, the median survival is 22 months (95% CI = 15-32 months), with actuarial 1-, 2-, and 3-year survivals of 71%, 47%, and 41%, respectively. The most frequent grade 3/4 toxicities of the neoadjuvant program were leukopenia (73%) and esophagitis (43%). Although 73 patients (57%) required brief hospitalizations during preoperative therapy, there were no treatment-related deaths, and 94% of patients remained candidates for resection after the completion of treatment. Six patients (6%) died after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

This novel combined-modality regimen is highly active in the treatment of locoregional esophageal cancer, producing an actuarial 3-year survival of 41%. Although this preoperative regimen produced moderate acute toxicity, there were no treatment-related deaths and the large majority of patients were able to undergo subsequent esophageal resection. These results, obtained in a community-based setting and involving multiple surgeons, radiation oncologists, and medical oncologists, compare favorably with those of previous single-center and multicenter results. Further evaluation of novel combined-modality programs is warranted, as is the incorporation of epidermal growth factor receptor antagonists or other targeted agents.

Long-term follow-up of patients treated with paclitaxel/carboplatin-based chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: sequential phase II trials of the Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network

PURPOSE

To provide long-term follow-up on the survival of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer treated with paclitaxel/carboplatin-based regimens in a multicenter, community-based setting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between March 1995 and April 1998, 321 patients with newly diagnosed stage IIIB or IV non-small-cell lung cancer were treated on sequential phase II trials with the following combination regimens: paclitaxel/carboplatin, paclitaxel/carboplatin/gemcitabine, and paclitaxel/carboplatin/vinorelbine. Details of these three regimens and patient populations have been previously reported. Responding and stable patients continued treatment until tumor progression or for a recommended six treatment courses.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 58 months (minimum follow-up, 40 months), the median survival for the entire group of patients was 8.6 months, with actual 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates of 40%, 19%, and 7%, respectively. The actuarial 4-year survival rate for the entire group was 4%. No statistically significant differences in survival were seen among the three regimens. Administration of all three regimens was feasible in a community-based setting; however, myelosuppression and hospitalizations for treatment of neutropenia/fever were more frequent with the three-drug regimens.

CONCLUSION

Paclitaxel/carboplatin-based regimens, in addition to prolonging median survival and improving 1-year survival, result in substantial improvements in the 2-year survival of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer when compared retrospectively with supportive care or traditional cisplatin-based regimens. In these sequential phase II trials, we did not demonstrate any advantages of three-drug regimens when compared with paclitaxel/carboplatin. Because few patients remain alive after 4 years with any of these chemotherapy regimens, future treatment improvements will require the introduction of novel agents.

Weekly docetaxel in the treatment of elderly patients with advanced breast cancer: a Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network phase II trial

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of docetaxel administered weekly to elderly or poor-performance status patients with advanced breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-one patients with advanced breast cancer who were either over the age of 65 or considered to be poor candidates for combination chemotherapy received docetaxel 36 mg/m2 weekly for 6 consecutive weeks, followed by 2 weeks without treatment. The median age of patients in this trial was 74 years, and 73% of patients had one or more visceral sites of metastases. Seventy-five percent of patients received weekly docetaxel as first-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer, and the other 25% received it as second-line treatment. Thirty-six patients were assessable for efficacy, and all patients were assessed for toxicity.

RESULTS

A total of 448 doses of weekly docetaxel were administered to 41 patients. Thirteen patients (36%) had objective responses to treatment, and an additional 13 patients (36%) had stable disease or minor response. Median time to progression for responding and stable patients was 7 months (range, 3 to 27 months). Median survival for the entire group was 13 months, with 1- and 2-year actuarial survival rates of 61% and 29%, respectively. Severe neutropenia occurred in only 0.4% of courses, and no other hematologic toxicity was observed. Grade 3/4 fatigue was the most common toxicity, occurring in 20% of patients.

CONCLUSION

Weekly docetaxel therapy is active and well tolerated by elderly and/or poor-performance status patients with advanced breast cancer. This treatment can be administered with minimal myelosuppression. Weekly docetaxel provides an additional option for treatment in this difficult subgroup of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Well-tolerated combination regimens containing weekly docetaxel merit evaluation for this patient population.

Carcinoma of unknown primary site

BACKGROUND

The long term survival and toxicity associated with the chemotherapy combination of paclitaxel, carboplatin, and extended-schedule etoposide used for the treatment of patients with metastatic carcinoma of unknown primary site were evaluated.

METHODS

Seventy-one patients were treated between March 1995 and November 1996 with paclitaxel, carboplatin, and oral etoposide every 21 days. Stable or responding patients received four to eight courses of therapy. The following histologies were represented: well differentiated adenocarcinoma (34 patients); poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma or poorly differentiated carcinoma (30 patients); poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma (6 patients); and squamous cell carcinoma (1 patient).

RESULTS

Forty-eight percent of assessable patients had major responses to therapy (95% confidence interval, 39%-55%), and 10 patients (15%) had complete responses. There were no response differences among the major histologic types. The median survival for all 71 patients was 11 months, and the 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year survival rates were 48%, 20%, and 14%, respectively. The minimum follow-up period was 34 months (range, 34-50 mos). The regimen was tolerated well with no treatment-related deaths and only 12 hospitalizations for neutropenia and fever. There was no serious long term toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large Phase II trial, the combination of paclitaxel, carboplatin, and oral etoposide produced major responses or stable disease status in nearly 80% of patients who had carcinoma of unknown primary site. The median survival and 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year survival rates were noteworthy. The current study obtained similar or superior results to those seen with chemotherapy for many other groups of patients, such as those who had well defined advanced malignancies, those who were considered to have responsive tumors, and those who had obtained substantial benefits from cytotoxic therapy. Although the regimen reported in the current study can become an attractive option for many patients with carcinoma of unknown primary site, there remains a need for further clinical trials.

Phase II trial evaluating triplet chemotherapy using gemcitabine, paclitaxel, and carboplatin in the treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the combination of gemcitabine, paclitaxel, and carboplatin in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Previously untreated patients with stage IIIB or IV non-small cell lung cancer were enrolled into this trial. Sixty-nine patients from the phase II portion and eight patients from the phase I portion were treated with gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 intravenously on days I and 8, paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 as a 1-hour infusion on day 1, and carboplatin at an area under the curve of 5.0 intravenously on day 1. Treatment courses were repeated every 21 days. The phase II component of the study was completed at 13 community-based practices in the Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network. Thirty-four of 71 fully evaluable patients had an objective response (48%, two complete and 32 partial responses). Twenty-five patients (35%) were stable and 12 (17%) progressed. The median response duration was 6 months (range, 3 to 14 months) and the median survival was 9.9 months, with 1- and 2-year survival rates of 47% and 21%, respectively. The combination of gemcitabine, paclitaxel, and carboplatin has been shown to be safe and effective; thus, this three-drug regimen will be compared with a standard two-drug regimen, paclitaxel/carboplatin, in a phase III study.

Phase I/II trial of paclitaxel by 1-hour infusion, carboplatin, and gemcitabine in the treatment of patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin is widely used in the treatment of patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma. In this Phase I/II study the authors evaluated the feasibility, toxicity, and efficacy of adding a third active antineoplastic agent, gemcitabine, to the paclitaxel/carboplatin combination for the treatment of patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma.

METHODS

Patients with advanced (AJCC Stage IIIB or IV) nonsmall cell lung carcinoma previously untreated with chemotherapy were eligible for this trial. The maximum tolerated doses, determined in the Phase I trial and subsequently used in the Phase II trial, were: paclitaxel, 200 mg/m2, as a 1-hour infusion on Day 1; carboplatin, at area under the curve dose of 5.0 intravenously (i.v.), on Day 1; and gemcitabine, 1000 mg/m2 i.v., on Days 1 and 8. Treatment courses were repeated every 21 days. The Phase II study was conducted in 13 community-based practices in the Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network; 77 patients were treated between December 1996 and September 1997.

RESULTS

Thirty-four of 77 patients (44%) in the Phase II trial had major responses (partial responses, 32 patients and complete responses, 2 patients). An additional 25 patients (33%) had stable disease or minor response; only 23% of patients progressed or were removed from study at or prior to first reevaluation. The median survival was 9.4 months, with a 45% actuarial 1-year survival rate. Myelosuppression was the most common toxicity, with Grade 3/4 NCI Common Toxicity Criteria leukopenia and thrombocytopenia in 49% and 45% of patients, respectively. However, only 11 patients (14%) required hospitalization for neutropenia/ fever, and none had bleeding complications. Grade 3/4 nonhematologic toxicities included fatigue (41%), arthralgias/myalgias (26%), peripheral neuropathy (8%), nausea/emesis (6%), and hypersensitivity reactions (4%). There was one treatment-related death due to sepsis.

CONCLUSIONS

This three-drug regimen is active and has acceptable toxicity in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma. Myelosuppression, particularly thrombocytopenia, is increased in comparison to the paclitaxel/carboplatin regimen. Fatigue also may be increased, but other nonhematologic toxicities are not altered substantially by adding gemcitabine. Although the response rate and median survival are improved modestly compared with our previous experience with paclitaxel/carboplatin, definitive conclusions regarding the efficacy of this regimen await the completion of randomized trials.

Paclitaxel, carboplatin, and extended-schedule etoposide in the treatment of small-cell lung cancer: comparison of sequential phase II trials using different dose-intensities

PURPOSE

In two sequential phase II studies, we evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of adding paclitaxel to a standard platinum/etoposide regimen in the first-line treatment of small-cell lung cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred seventeen patients with small-cell lung cancer were treated between June 1993 and July 1996. The first 38 patients received a lower-dose regimen: paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 by 1-hour infusion, carboplatin at an area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of 5.0, and etoposide 50 mg alternating with 100 mg orally on days 1 to 10. When only mild myelosuppression was observed, doses of paclitaxel and carboplatin were increased in the subsequent 79 patients (paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 by 1-hour infusion and carboplatin at an AUC of 6.0). All patients received four courses of treatment, administered at 21-day intervals. Patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer also received thoracic radiation therapy (1.8 Gy/d; total dose, 45 Gy) administered concurrently with courses 3 and 4 of chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Seventy-two of 79 patients (91%) who receive the higher-dose regimen had major responses. Thirty-two of 38 (84%) with extensive-stage disease responded (21% complete response rate); median survival was 10 months for this group. With limited-stage disease, the overall response rate was 98%, with 71% complete responses; the median survival time has not been reached at 16 months. Median survival in extensive-stage patients was longer in patients who received the higher-dose regimen (10 months) than in the previous group treated with lower doses (7 months; P = .008). The higher-dose regimen was well tolerated, with myelosuppression being the major toxicity. Compared with the lower-dose regimen, grade 3/4 neutropenia increased from 8% to 38% of courses, but the incidence of hospitalization for neutropenia and fever did not increase. Other nonhematologic toxicities were uncommon, and did not increase substantially with the higher-dose regimen.

CONCLUSION

Paclitaxel can be added at full dose (200 mg/m2) to a carboplatin/etoposide combination while maintaining a tolerable toxicity profile. Median survival times in both extensive- and limited-stage patients compare favorably with other reported regimens. This regimen merits further investigation, and a randomized trial to compare this regimen with a standard carboplatin/etoposide combination is underway.

Carcinoma of unknown primary site: treatment with 1-hour paclitaxel, carboplatin, and extended-schedule etoposide

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of a novel chemotherapy combination that includes paclitaxel, carboplatin, and extended-schedule etoposide in the treatment of patients with carcinoma of unknown primary tumor site.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty-five patients with carcinoma of unknown primary tumor site were treated with the following regimen, administered every 21 days: paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 by 1-hour intravenous (I.V.) infusion on day 1, carboplatin at an estimated area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of 6.0 on day 1, and etoposide 50 mg alternated with 100 mg orally on days 1 through 10. Responding patients received a total of four courses of treatment. The following histologies were included: adenocarcinoma, 30 patients; poorly differentiated carcinoma (PDC) or poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma (PDA), 21; poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma, three; and squamous carcinoma, one.

RESULTS

Twenty-five of 53 assessable patients (47%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 33% to 61%) had major objective responses to treatment (seven complete responses). Response rates were similar in patients with adenocarcinoma versus PDC (45% and 48%, respectively). The actuarial median survival time for the entire group was 13.4 months. The regimen was well tolerated, with only seven hospitalizations for treatment of neutropenia and fever (4% of courses) and no treatment-related deaths.

CONCLUSION

The combination of paclitaxel, carboplatin, and extended-schedule etoposide is highly active and well tolerated in patients with carcinoma of unknown primary tumor site. Response rates and survival in this multicenter community-based trial compare favorably with all previously studied empiric regimens. In addition, this regimen is substantially less toxic and easier to administer than the cisplatin-based regimens previously used in this setting. If this level of efficacy is confirmed, this treatment should be considered standard first-line therapy in patients with carcinoma of unknown primary tumor site.

Randomized, double blind, dose-response trial across four oral doses of dolasetron for the prevention of acute emesis after moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Oral Dolasetron Dose-Response Study Group

BACKGROUND

This double blind parallel group study assessed the acute antiemetic efficacy of four oral doses of dolasetron mesylate in cancer patients receiving their first course of intravenous chemotherapy with doxorubicin and/or cyclophosphamide.

METHODS

Patients were randomized to receive 25, 50, 100, or 200 mg of dolasetron mesylate 30 minutes prior to chemotherapy and were monitored for nausea and emetic episodes for the next 24 hours.

RESULTS

Three hundred and nineteen cancer patients at 32 sites completed the study. Most patients were female (81%); of this group, 69% had breast carcinoma. A highly statistically significant linear trend demonstrating improved response with higher doses was detected for complete response (no emetic episodes and no rescue medication) (P < 0.001), for complete plus major response (0-2 emetic episodes and no rescue medication) (P < 0.001), and for patient visual analog scale assessments of nausea (P = 0.001) and general satisfaction with antiemetic therapy (P = 0.001). No serious adverse events were noted. The most frequent adverse event was mild, self-limiting headache, which has been reported with other drugs in this class.

CONCLUSIONS

Single oral doses of dolasetron mesylate were found to be effective in preventing acute emesis in cancer patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.

Improved control of cisplatin-induced emesis with high-dose metoclopramide and with combinations of metoclopramide, dexamethasone, and diphenhydramine. Results of consecutive trials in 255 patients

A series of consecutive trials were undertaken to determine whether higher doses of intravenous metoclopramide and combinations of metoclopramide, dexamethasone, and diphenhydramine would improve antiemetic control or decrease treatment-related side effects in patients receiving cisplatin at 120 mg/m2. Metoclopramide and dexamethasone were studied because of their proven efficacy as single agents and their differing mechanisms of action and side effects. Diphenhydramine was used because of its possible antiemetic properties and its ability to control acute dystonic reactions. Two hundred fifty-five patients who had never received chemotherapy or antiemetics were observed in the hospital for the 24 hours following cisplatin administration. The addition of dexamethasone or dexamethasone plus diphenhydramine to intravenous metoclopramide 2 mg/kg produced both improved antiemetic control and a decrease in treatment-associated diarrhea (P = 0.002). The use of metoclopramide alone at a dose of 3 mg/kg for only two doses appeared as effective as 2 mg/kg for five doses. When dexamethasone and diphenhydramine were given with metoclopramide 3 mg/kg for two intravenous dosages, 81% of patients experienced no emesis and 93% had two or fewer vomiting episodes. The antiemetic results of this 2-hour "short-course" regimen were superior to metoclopramide 2 mg/kg, with (P = 0.002) or without (P = 0.0001) dexamethasone and diphenhydramine. It was concluded that combinations of metoclopramide plus dexamethasone plus diphenhydramine improve antiemetic control, facilitate the usage of higher doses of metoclopramide, and decrease the incidence of treatment-related side effects.

Phase I trial of PCNU

In a phase I trial, 28 patients with advanced solid tumors were given PCNU daily for 5 days by iv infusion over 20 minutes at 6-week intervals. The total dose for each course ranged from 25 to 150 mg/m2 in six escalation steps. Myelosuppression was dose-limiting, with a platelet count depression regularly observed at doses of greater than or equal to 82.5 mg/m2. Leukopenia occurred only at higher doses. Nausea was uncommon, and vomiting did not occur. There were no adverse drug-related effects on renal or hepatic function. No antitumor activity was observed. A dose range of 100-125 mg/m2 iv for each 5-day course (20-25 mg/m2/day) is recommended for phase II studies.