1
|
Tikkinen KAO, Craigie S, Agarwal A, Violette PD, Novara G, Cartwright R, Naspro R, Siemieniuk RAC, Ali B, Eryuzlu L, Geraci J, Winkup J, Yoo D, Gould MK, Sandset PM, Guyatt GH. Procedure-specific Risks of Thrombosis and Bleeding in Urological Cancer Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur Urol 2017; 73:242-251. [PMID: 28342641 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2016] [Accepted: 03/03/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Pharmacological thromboprophylaxis involves balancing a lower risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) against a higher risk of bleeding, a trade-off that critically depends on the risks of VTE and bleeding in the absence of prophylaxis (baseline risk). OBJECTIVE To provide estimates of the baseline risk of symptomatic VTE and bleeding requiring reoperation in urological cancer surgery. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION We identified contemporary observational studies reporting symptomatic VTE or bleeding after urological procedures. We used studies with the lowest risk of bias and accounted for use of thromboprophylaxis and length of follow-up to derive best estimates of the baseline risks within 4 wk of surgery. We used the GRADE approach to assess the quality of the evidence. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS We included 71 studies reporting on 14 urological cancer procedures. The quality of the evidence was generally moderate for prostatectomy and cystectomy, and low or very low for other procedures. The duration of thromboprophylaxis was highly variable. The risk of VTE in cystectomies was high (2.6-11.6% across risk groups) whereas the risk of bleeding was low (0.3%). The risk of VTE in prostatectomies varied by procedure, from 0.2-0.9% in robotic prostatectomy without pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) to 3.9-15.7% in open prostatectomy with extended PLND. The risk of bleeding was 0.1-1.0%. The risk of VTE following renal procedures was 0.7-2.9% for low-risk patients and 2.6-11.6% for high-risk patients; the risk of bleeding was 0.1-2.0%. CONCLUSIONS Extended thromboprophylaxis is warranted in some procedures (eg, open and robotic cystectomy) but not others (eg, robotic prostatectomy without PLND in low-risk patients). For "close call" procedures, decisions will depend on values and preferences with regard to VTE and bleeding. PATIENT SUMMARY Clinicians often give blood thinners to patients to prevent blood clots after surgery for urological cancer. Unfortunately, blood thinners also increase bleeding. This study provides information on the risk of clots and bleeding that is crucial in deciding for or against giving blood thinners.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kari A O Tikkinen
- Departments of Urology and Public Health, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
| | - Samantha Craigie
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Michael G. DeGroote National Pain Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Arnav Agarwal
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; School of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Philippe D Violette
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Woodstock General Hospital, Woodstock, ON, Canada; McMaster Department of Surgery Division of Urology, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Giacomo Novara
- Department of Surgical, Oncological, and Gastroenterological Sciences, Urology Clinic, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Rufus Cartwright
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Imperial College London, London, UK; Department of Urogynaecology, St Mary's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Richard Naspro
- Department of Urology, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Reed A C Siemieniuk
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Bassel Ali
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Leyla Eryuzlu
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; School of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Johanna Geraci
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Judi Winkup
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Daniel Yoo
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; School of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Michael K Gould
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, USA
| | - Per Morten Sandset
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Haematology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Gordon H Guyatt
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|