1
|
Nair SS, Luu PL, Qu W, Maddugoda M, Huschtscha L, Reddel R, Chenevix-Trench G, Toso M, Kench JG, Horvath LG, Hayes VM, Stricker PD, Hughes TP, White DL, Rasko JEJ, Wong JJL, Clark SJ. Guidelines for whole genome bisulphite sequencing of intact and FFPET DNA on the Illumina HiSeq X Ten. Epigenetics Chromatin 2018; 11:24. [PMID: 29807544 PMCID: PMC5971424 DOI: 10.1186/s13072-018-0194-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2018] [Accepted: 05/21/2018] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Comprehensive genome-wide DNA methylation profiling is critical to gain insights into epigenetic reprogramming during development and disease processes. Among the different genome-wide DNA methylation technologies, whole genome bisulphite sequencing (WGBS) is considered the gold standard for assaying genome-wide DNA methylation at single base resolution. However, the high sequencing cost to achieve the optimal depth of coverage limits its application in both basic and clinical research. To achieve 15× coverage of the human methylome, using WGBS, requires approximately three lanes of 100-bp-paired-end Illumina HiSeq 2500 sequencing. It is important, therefore, for advances in sequencing technologies to be developed to enable cost-effective high-coverage sequencing. Results In this study, we provide an optimised WGBS methodology, from library preparation to sequencing and data processing, to enable 16–20× genome-wide coverage per single lane of HiSeq X Ten, HCS 3.3.76. To process and analyse the data, we developed a WGBS pipeline (METH10X) that is fast and can call SNPs. We performed WGBS on both high-quality intact DNA and degraded DNA from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue. First, we compared different library preparation methods on the HiSeq 2500 platform to identify the best method for sequencing on the HiSeq X Ten. Second, we optimised the PhiX and genome spike-ins to achieve higher quality and coverage of WGBS data on the HiSeq X Ten. Third, we performed integrated whole genome sequencing (WGS) and WGBS of the same DNA sample in a single lane of HiSeq X Ten to improve data output. Finally, we compared methylation data from the HiSeq 2500 and HiSeq X Ten and found high concordance (Pearson r > 0.9×). Conclusions Together we provide a systematic, efficient and complete approach to perform and analyse WGBS on the HiSeq X Ten. Our protocol allows for large-scale WGBS studies at reasonable processing time and cost on the HiSeq X Ten platform. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13072-018-0194-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shalima S Nair
- Genomics and Epigenetics Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, NSW, 2010, Australia.,St Vincent's Clinical School, UNSW, Sydney, NSW, 2010, Australia
| | - Phuc-Loi Luu
- Genomics and Epigenetics Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, NSW, 2010, Australia.,St Vincent's Clinical School, UNSW, Sydney, NSW, 2010, Australia
| | - Wenjia Qu
- Genomics and Epigenetics Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, NSW, 2010, Australia
| | - Madhavi Maddugoda
- Genomics and Epigenetics Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, NSW, 2010, Australia.,St Vincent's Clinical School, UNSW, Sydney, NSW, 2010, Australia
| | - Lily Huschtscha
- Cancer Research Unit, Children's Medical Research Institute, University of Sydney, Westmead, NSW, 2145, Australia
| | - Roger Reddel
- Cancer Research Unit, Children's Medical Research Institute, University of Sydney, Westmead, NSW, 2145, Australia
| | | | | | - James G Kench
- Department of Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.,Central Clinical School, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Lisa G Horvath
- Central Clinical School, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.,Clinical Prostate Cancer Research, The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia.,Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Vanessa M Hayes
- Genomics and Epigenetics Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, NSW, 2010, Australia.,St Vincent's Clinical School, UNSW, Sydney, NSW, 2010, Australia.,Central Clinical School, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Phillip D Stricker
- Department of Urology, St. Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia
| | - Timothy P Hughes
- Cancer Theme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, SA, Australia.,Australian Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group, Melbourne, Australia.,Discipline of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.,Department of Haematology, SA Pathology, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Deborah L White
- Cancer Theme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, SA, Australia.,Australian Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group, Melbourne, Australia.,Faculty of Health Science and Faculty of Science, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.,Australian Genomic Health Alliance, Melbourne, Australia
| | - John E J Rasko
- Gene and Stem Cell Therapy Program, Centenary Institute, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia.,Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.,Cell and Molecular Therapies, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, 2050, Australia
| | - Justin J-L Wong
- Gene and Stem Cell Therapy Program, Centenary Institute, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia.,Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.,Gene Regulation in Cancer Laboratory, Centenary Institute, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia
| | - Susan J Clark
- Genomics and Epigenetics Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, NSW, 2010, Australia. .,St Vincent's Clinical School, UNSW, Sydney, NSW, 2010, Australia. .,Epigenetics Research Program, The Garvan Institute of Medical Research, 384 Victoria St, Darlinghurst, Sydney, NSW, 2010, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Singh R, Kalra RS, Hasan K, Kaul Z, Cheung CT, Huschtscha L, Reddel RR, Kaul SC, Wadhwa R. Molecular characterization of collaborator of ARF (CARF) as a DNA damage response and cell cycle checkpoint regulatory protein. Exp Cell Res 2014; 322:324-34. [PMID: 24485912 DOI: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2014.01.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2013] [Revised: 01/06/2014] [Accepted: 01/21/2014] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
CARF is an ARF-binding protein that has been shown to regulate the p53-p21-HDM2 pathway. CARF overexpression was shown to cause growth arrest of human cancer cells and premature senescence of normal cells through activation of the p53 pathway. Because replicative senescence involves permanent withdrawal from the cell cycle in response to DNA damage response-mediated signaling, in the present study we investigated the relationship between CARF and the cell cycle and whether it is involved in the DNA damage response. We demonstrate that the half-life of CARF protein is less than 60 min, and that in cycling cells CARF levels are highest in G2 and early prophase. Serially passaged normal human skin and stromal fibroblasts showed upregulation of CARF during replicative senescence. Induction of G1 growth arrest and senescence by a variety of drugs was associated with increase in CARF expression at the transcriptional and translational level and was seen to correlate with increase in DNA damage response and checkpoint proteins, ATM, ATR, CHK1, CHK2, γH2AX, p53 and p21. Induction of growth arrest by oncogenic RAS and shRNA-mediated knockdown of TRF2 in cancer cells also caused upregulation of CARF. We conclude that CARF is associated with DNA damage response and checkpoint signaling pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rumani Singh
- Cell Proliferation Research Group and DBT-AIST International Laboratory for Advanced Biomedicine, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Central 4, 1-1-1 Higashi, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8562, Japan
| | - Rajkumar S Kalra
- Cell Proliferation Research Group and DBT-AIST International Laboratory for Advanced Biomedicine, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Central 4, 1-1-1 Higashi, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8562, Japan
| | - Kamrul Hasan
- Cell Proliferation Research Group and DBT-AIST International Laboratory for Advanced Biomedicine, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Central 4, 1-1-1 Higashi, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8562, Japan
| | - Zeenia Kaul
- Children׳s Medical Research Institute, 214 Hawkesbury Road, Westmead, New South Wales 2145, Australia; Department of Molecular Virology, Immunology and Medical Genetics, 960 Biomedical Research Tower, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Caroline T Cheung
- Cell Proliferation Research Group and DBT-AIST International Laboratory for Advanced Biomedicine, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Central 4, 1-1-1 Higashi, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8562, Japan
| | - Lily Huschtscha
- Children׳s Medical Research Institute, 214 Hawkesbury Road, Westmead, New South Wales 2145, Australia
| | - Roger R Reddel
- Children׳s Medical Research Institute, 214 Hawkesbury Road, Westmead, New South Wales 2145, Australia
| | - Sunil C Kaul
- Cell Proliferation Research Group and DBT-AIST International Laboratory for Advanced Biomedicine, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Central 4, 1-1-1 Higashi, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8562, Japan.
| | - Renu Wadhwa
- Cell Proliferation Research Group and DBT-AIST International Laboratory for Advanced Biomedicine, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Central 4, 1-1-1 Higashi, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8562, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
The mechanism of cell death, apoptosis or necrosis, was determined morphologically and by DNA gel electrophoresis in 3 human leukaemic T-cell lines (CCRF-CEM.f2, CCRF-HSB and MOLT.4) after treatment with cytotoxic drugs. These include one hormone, dexamethasone (DXM); the DNA damaging agents, melphalan, cisplatin, bleomycin, mitomycin C and mithramycin; inhibitors of DNA synthesis, aphidicolin, cytosine arabinoside (Ara-C), methotrexate (MTX), 5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine (FUdR) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU); and other metabolic inhibitors, bromo-2'-deoxy-2'-uridine (BUdR), actinomycin D, 5-azacytidine (5-AC), cycloheximide, vincristine, etoposide and adriamycin. When cell death was assessed morphologically apoptotic cell death was apparent in the three cell lines 48 hours after all drug treatments. However, a distinct pattern of DNA breakdown was observed for each cell line. A smear of DNA on agarose gels was seen for CCRF-CEM.f2 with 5-FU and mithramycin treatments whilst CCRF-HSB cells showed a similar DNA profile after 5-FU and MTX treatments. All drug treatments of MOLT.4 cells produced a necrotic pattern of DNA degradation. Cycloheximide, an inhibitor of protein synthesis reduced DNA fragmentation of CCRF-CEM.f2 cells treated with DXM, MTX and FUdR indicating that protein synthesis is required for cytotoxicity by apoptosis. However, the extent of DNA fragmentation caused by 5-FU was not significantly affected by cycloheximide. These results indicate that at least morphological and electrophoretic criteria should be used to avoid differing conclusions about modes of cell death.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Huschtscha
- LINKOPING UNIV HOSP,DEPT ONCOL,S-58185 LINKOPING,SWEDEN
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|