Comparing outcomes of transperineal to transrectal prostate biopsies performed under local anaesthesia

Objectives

Patients and methods

Results

Conclusion

Transitioning to robotic partial nephrectomy with a team-based proctorship achieves the desired improved outcomes over open and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy

Proctoring may facilitate a safe transition to robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for centres performing open (OPN) and laparoscopic partial nephrectomies (LPN). This study compared the 5-year outcomes of RAPN, initiated with a team-based proctorship, with OPN and LPN. Following an observation course at the proctor's institution and a 3-surgeon performance of proctored RAPN in August 2014, a review of 90 RAPN, 29 LPN and 43 OPN consecutively performed by the same team from 2013 to 2019 at National University Hospital, Singapore was conducted. Peri-operative data, functional and oncological outcomes were compared amongst the three groups. Most cases were performed robotically after 2015 with comparable baseline characteristics in all groups. Median RENAL Nephrometry Score was not significantly different between RAPN (8 [IQR 6, 9]) and OPN (9 [IQR 7, 10]) (P = 0.12) but was significantly lower for LPN (7 [IQR 5, 8]) compared to RAPN (P = 0.002). RAPN achieved the lowest blood loss (226 ml vs.348 ml and 263 ml for OPN and LPN respectively, P = 0.02), transfusion rate (3% vs.21% and 17% respectively, P = 0.003) and median length of stay after surgery (4 vs.6 and 5 days respectively, P = 0.001). Complication rates, warm ischemic times were similar between the three approaches with no differences in 1-year and long-term renal function. The rate of positive surgical margin was 8%, 8% and 3% for RAPN, LPN and OPN, respectively (P = 0.76), with a single recurrence in each arm. Despite modest hospital volume, a team-based proctorship facilitated the transition to the Da Vinci robotic platform to perform partial nephrectomies of equivalent complexities as open surgery, achieving improved perioperative outcomes, while maintaining oncological and kidney functional results.

Implementation of a Ureteric Colic Telemedicine Service: A Mixed Methods Quality Improvement Study

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effectiveness of a telemedicine service for ureteric colic patients in reducing the number of unnecessary face-to-face consultations and shortening waiting time for appointments.

METHODS

A telemedicine workflow was implemented as a quality improvement study using the Plan-Do-Study-Act method. All patients presenting with ureteric colic without high-risk features of fever, severe pain, and hydronephrosis, were recruited, and face-to-face appointments to review scan results were replaced with phone consultations. Data were prospectively collected over 3 years (January 2017 to December 2019). Patient outcomes including the reduction in face-to-face review visits, time to review, reattendance and intervention rates, were tracked in an interrupted time-series analysis, and qualitative feedback was obtained from patients and clinicians.

RESULTS

Around 53.2% of patients presenting with ureteric colic were recruited into the telemedicine workflow. A total of 465 patients (46.2%) had normal scan results and 250 patients (24.9%) did not attend their scan appointments, hence reducing the number of face-to-face consultations by 71.1%. A total of 230 patients (22.9%) required subsequent follow-up with urology, while 61 patients (6.1%) were referred to other specialties. Mean (SD) time to review was 30.0 (6.2) days, 6-month intervention rate was 3.4% (n = 34) and unplanned reattendance rate was 3.2% (n = 32). Around 93.1% of patients reported satisfaction with the service.

CONCLUSION

The ureteric colic telemedicine service successfully and sustainably reduced the number of face-to-face consultations and time to review without compromising on patient safety. The availability of this telemedicine service has become even more important in helping us provide care to patients with ureteric colic in the current COVID-19 pandemic.

Postoperative risk of chronic kidney disease in radical nephrectomy and donor nephrectomy patients: a comparison and analysis of predictive factors

INTRODUCTION

To compare baseline renal function and identify predictive factors in patients undergoing radical nephrectomy (RN) or donor nephrectomy (DN) and their risk of subsequent chronic kidney disease (CKD) after surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of patients with no baseline CKD undergoing RN (n = 88) and DN (n = 58) from 2000 to 2008 was performed. Baseline and postoperative renal function (eGFR) was determined using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula. CKD was defined as eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 according to the National Kidney Foundation guidelines.

RESULTS

Before surgery, patients undergoing RN and DN had a mean eGFR (+/- SD) of 83.5 +/- 17.4 and 92.9 +/- 17.0 mL/min/1.73 m2 respectively (p = 0.002). Patients with RN had significantly greater morbidities including hypertension (47.7%), diabetes (14.8%) and ischemic heart disease (12.5%) than DN (5.2%, 0% and 1.7% respectively) (all p < 0.05). Median follow up was 3.5 years. The relative hazard of developing CKD post RN compared with DN was 1.91 (95% CI 1.01 to 3.61, p = 0.040). The median time to CKD was 77 months (range 2-107) for RN and 100 months (range 11-105) for DN. Age, gender, comorbidities, radical nephrectomy and baseline kidney function were individual risk factors for CKD post nephrectomy. However, preoperative eGFR was the only independent prognostic factor on multi-variable analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing RN are distinctly different from kidney donors in terms of age, renal function and comorbidities. RN is not an independent predictive factor for CKD but the lower baseline renal function in RN patients significantly accelerates renal senescence in the uninephrectomy state.

Predictors of axillary lymph node metastases in women with early breast cancer in Singapore

INTRODUCTION

The presence of axillary lymph node metastases is an important prognostic factor in breast cancer. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is an emerging method for the staging of the axilla. It is hoped that with SLNB, the morbidity from axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) can be avoided without compromising the staging and management of early breast cancer. However, only patients found to be SLNB negative benefit from this procedure, as those with positive SLNB may still require ALND. Our objective is to study the various clinico-pathological factors to find predictive factors for axillary lymph node involvement in early breast cancer. It is hoped that with these factors, we will be better able to identify groups of patients most likely to benefit from SLNB.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 380 early breast cancer cases (stage T1 and T2, N0, N1, M0) in women treated in the Department of General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, between January 1999 and August 2002, was conducted. Incidence of nodal metastases was correlated with clinico-pathological factors, and analysed by univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Approximately 35 percent of the 380 cases of early breast cancer had nodal metastases. Multivariate analyses revealed four independent predictors of node positivity: tumour size (p-value equals 0.0001), presence of lymphovascular invasion (p-value is less than 0.0001), tumours with histology other than invasive ductal or lobular carcinoma (p-value equals 0.04), and presence of progesterone receptors (p-value equals 0.05).

CONCLUSION

We have found independent preoperative predictive factors in our local population for the presence of nodal metastases. This information can aid patient selection for SLNB and improve patient counselling.