Minimum Volume Standards: An Incentive To Perform More Radical Cystectomies?

Background

Minimum volume standards (MVS) for hospitals and/or surgeons remain a subject of debate. Opponents of MVS emphasize the possible negative effects of centralization, such as an unwanted incentive to perform surgery.

Objective

To evaluate whether the introduction of MVS for radical cystectomy (RC) in the Netherlands resulted in more RCs outside guideline-recommended indications.

Design setting and participants

All RCs performed for bladder cancer in the Netherlands between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2017 were identified in the Netherlands Cancer Registry. During this period, two MVS were sequentially implemented for RC. RCs in intermediate-volume hospitals (hospitals that approximated the MVS) were compared with RCs in high-volume hospitals (hospitals exceeding the MVS by ≥5 RCs/yr) in a period before and a period after implementation of each of the two MVS.

Outcomes measurements and statistical analysis

Descriptive analyses were performed to evaluate whether hospitals performed more RCs outside the recommended indication (cT2-4a N0 M0) and whether an increase in the number of RCs towards the end of the year could be observed.

Results and limitations

After MVS implementation, no clear shift towards disease stages outside the recommended indication for RC was observed in comparison to the period before the MVS. Results for high-volume and intermediate-volume hospitals were similar. In addition, no increase in RCs towards the end of the year was evident.

Conclusions

We did not find evidence indicating an unwanted incentive to perform more RCs as a result of MVS in the Netherlands. Our results further strengthen the case for MVS implementation.

Patient summary

We evaluated whether criteria for the minimum number of radical cystectomies (surgical removal of the bladder) that hospitals have to perform caused urologists to perform more of these operations than necessary in order to meet the minimum level. We found no evidence that minimum criteria led to such an unwanted incentive.

Non-metastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer: the role of age in receiving treatment with curative intent

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate which patient and tumour characteristics are associated with remaining untreated in patients with potentially curable, non-metastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), and to compare survival of untreated vs treated patients with similar characteristics.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

For this cohort study, 15 047 patients diagnosed with cT2-T4aN0/xM0/x urothelial MIBC between 2005 and 2019 were identified in the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Factors associated with remaining untreated were identified using logistic regression analyses. Interhospital variation was assessed using multilevel analysis. Using a propensity score, the median overall survival (mOS) of untreated and treated patients was evaluated. Analyses were stratified by age (<75 vs ≥75 years).

RESULTS

One-third of patients aged ≥75 years remained untreated; increasing age, worse performance status, worse renal function, cT4a stage and previous radiotherapy in the abdomen/pelvic area increased the odds of remaining untreated. One in 10 patients aged <75 years remained untreated; significant associations were only found for performance status, renal function and cT4a stage. Interhospital variation for remaining untreated was largest for patients aged ≥75 years, ranging from 37% to 69% (case-mix-adjusted). Irrespective of age, mOS was significantly worse for untreated patients: 6.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.1-7.3) vs 16.0 months (95% CI 13.5-19.1) for treated patients.

CONCLUSION

On average, one in five patients with non-metastatic MIBC remained untreated. Untreated patients were generally older and had a more unfavourable prognostic profile. Untreated patients had significantly worse overall survival, regardless of age. Age alone should therefore not affect treatment decision-making. Considering the large interhospital variation, a proportion of untreated patients might be wrongfully denied life-prolonging treatment.

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on bladder cancer care in the Netherlands

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted regular health care with potential consequences for non-COVID diseases like cancer. To ensure continuity of oncological care, guidelines were temporarily adapted. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on bladder cancer care in the Netherlands. METHODS: The number of bladder cancer (BC) diagnoses per month during 2020-2021 was compared to 2018-2019 based on preliminary data from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR). Additionally, detailed data were retrieved from the NCR for the cohort diagnosed between March 1st-May 31st 2020 (first COVID wave) and 2018-2019 (reference cohort). BC diagnoses, changes in age and stage at diagnosis, and time to first-line treatment were compared between both periods. Changes in treatment were evaluated using logistic regression. RESULTS: During the first COVID wave (week 9–22), the number of BC diagnoses decreased by 14%, corresponding with approximately 300 diagnoses, but increased again in the second half of 2020. The decline was most pronounced from week 13 onwards in patients≥70 years and patients with non-muscle invasive BC. Patients with muscle-invasive disease were less likely to undergo a radical cystectomy (RC) in week 17–22 (OR = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.40–0.97). Shortly after the start of the outbreak, use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy decreased from 34% to 25% but this (non-significant) effect disappeared at the end of April. During the first wave, 5% more RCs were performed compared to previous years. Time from diagnosis to RC became 6 days shorter. Overall, a 7% reduction in RCs was observed in 2020. CONCLUSIONS: The number of BC diagnoses decreased steeply by 14% during the first COVID wave but increased again to pre-COVID levels by the end of 2020 (i.e. 600 diagnoses/month). Treatment-related changes remained limited and followed the adapted guidelines. Surgical volume was not compromised during the first wave. Altogether, the impact of the first COVID-19 outbreak on bladder cancer care in the Netherlands appears to be less pronounced than was reported for other solid tumors, both in the Netherlands and abroad. However, its impact on bladder cancer stage shift and long-term outcomes, as well as later pandemic waves remain so far unexamined.

Low Risk of Severe Complications After a Single, Post-Operative Instillation of Intravesical Chemotherapy in Patients with TaG1G2 Urothelial Bladder Carcinoma

BACKGROUND: EAU guidelines recommend a single instillation (SI) of intravesical chemotherapy (e.g. Mitomycin C) within 24 hours after transurethral resection of a bladder tumour (TURBT) in patients with low- to intermediate risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer without (suspected) bladder perforation or bleeding requiring bladder irrigation. However, remarkable variation exists in the use of SI. The risk of severe complications is likely to contribute to this variation, but evidence is limited. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the absolute severe complication and mortality risk after SI in low- and intermediate risk bladder cancer. METHODS: In this observational, historic cohort study, data on 25,567 patients diagnosed with TaG1G2 urothelial bladder carcinoma (UBC) between 2009 and 2018 who underwent TURBT were collected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Data were supplemented with information on cause of death and severe complications after cancer treatment by re-examining the electronic health records and the 14-day complication risk and the 30-day mortality risk were evaluated. RESULTS: On average, 55% of patients had a SI after TURBT, varying from 0–>80% between hospitals. The 30-day mortality risk was 0.02% and the 14-day risk of severe complications was 1.6%. CONCLUSIONS: As the absolute risk of mortality and severe complications is very low, SI after TURBT can be considered a safe treatment in patients with low- to intermediate UBC without contraindications for SI. These results imply that a part of eligible patients is denied effective treatment.