1
|
Ju A, Wiltink L, Walker J, White K, Rutherford C. Supportive care interventions for managing gastrointestinal symptoms following treatment for colorectal cancer: a systematic review. J Cancer Surviv 2023:10.1007/s11764-023-01403-3. [PMID: 37280309 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-023-01403-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Colorectal cancer (CRC) is prevalent in the developed world, with unhealthy lifestyles and diet contributing to rising incidence. Advances in effective screening, diagnosis, and treatments have led to improved survival rates, but CRC survivors suffer poorer long-term gastrointestinal consequences than the general population. However, the current state of clinical practice around provision of health services and treatment options remains unclear. PURPOSE We aimed to identify what supportive care interventions are available to manage gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms for CRC survivors. METHODS We searched Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and CINAHL from 2000 to April 2022 for resources, services, programs, or interventions to address GI symptoms and functional outcomes in CRC. We extracted information about characteristics of supportive care interventions, the study design, and sample characteristics from included studies, and performed a narrative synthesis RESULTS: Of 3807 papers retrieved, seven met the eligibility criteria. Types of interventions for managing or improving GI symptoms included two rehabilitation, one exercise, one educational, one dietary, and one pharmacological. Pelvic floor muscle exercise may help to resolve GI symptoms more quickly in the post-operative recovery phase. Survivors may also benefit from rehabilitation programs through improved self-management strategies, especially administered soon after completing primary treatment. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Despite a high prevalence and burden of GI symptoms post-treatment, there is limited evidence for supportive care interventions to help manage or alleviate these symptoms. More, large-scale randomized controlled trials are needed to identify effective interventions for managing GI symptoms that occur post-treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Ju
- School of Psychology, Sydney Quality of Life Office, The University of Sydney, Sydney, 2006, Australia.
| | - Lisette Wiltink
- School of Psychology, Sydney Quality of Life Office, The University of Sydney, Sydney, 2006, Australia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Jared Walker
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Kate White
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Cancer Care Research Unit (CCRU), The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia
| | - Claudia Rutherford
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Cancer Care Research Unit (CCRU), The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rutherford C, Ju A, Kim B, Wiltink L, Acret L, White K. How consequences of colorectal cancer treatment are managed: a qualitative study of stakeholder experiences about supportive care and current practices. Support Care Cancer 2023; 31:255. [PMID: 37041401 PMCID: PMC10090022 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-07713-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2023] [Indexed: 04/13/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors experience treatment-effects such as symptoms and functional impairments. There is limited evidence about how these are managed and what services or supports are available in the community. We aimed to identify current practice and available supports for managing consequences of treatment from clinician and CRC survivor perspectives. METHODS This qualitative study, informed by an interpretivist constructionist paradigm, included semi-structured interviews. Clinicians with experience of treating CRC patients and adult CRC survivors were recruited across Australia. Interviews explored experiences about problems experienced after CRC treatment and how these were managed. Data collection and analysis, using thematic analysis, was iterative whereby emergent themes during analysis were incorporated into subsequent interviews. RESULTS We interviewed 16 clinicians and 18 survivors. Survivors experienced a range of consequences of treatment amendable to support including allied health, information, and self-management. Barriers to support access included clinicians' worry about patient out-of-pocket expenses, long waitlists, lack of awareness about existing supports, and perception no therapeutic options were available. Healthcare professionals with expertise in CRC were often difficult to identify outside of cancer settings. Survivorship care could be improved with individualised timely information and identification of pathways to access healthcare providers with expertise in managing consequences of CRC treatment within primary care. CONCLUSIONS To improve CRC survivor lives posttreatment, routine assessment of consequences of treatment, individualised care planning involving relevant healthcare professionals, access to supportive care when needed, and improved information provision and engagement of a range of health professionals in follow-up care are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Rutherford
- Cancer Care Research Unit (CCRU), Susan Wakil School of Nursing, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
- University of Sydney, Faculty Science, School of Psychology, Quality of Life Office, Sydney, Australia.
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Angela Ju
- University of Sydney, Faculty Science, School of Psychology, Quality of Life Office, Sydney, Australia
| | - Bora Kim
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia
| | - Lisette Wiltink
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Louise Acret
- Cancer Care Research Unit (CCRU), Susan Wakil School of Nursing, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kate White
- Cancer Care Research Unit (CCRU), Susan Wakil School of Nursing, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia
- Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Stacchiotti S, Dürr HR, Schaefer IM, Woertler K, Haas R, Trama A, Caraceni A, Bajpai J, Baldi GG, Bernthal N, Blay JY, Boye K, Broto JM, Chen WWT, Dei Tos PA, Desai J, Emhofer S, Eriksson M, Gronchi A, Gelderblom H, Hardes J, Hartmann W, Healey J, Italiano A, Jones RL, Kawai A, Leithner A, Loong H, Mascard E, Morosi C, Otten N, Palmerini E, Patel SR, Reichardt P, Rubin B, Rutkowski P, Sangalli C, Schuster K, Seddon BM, Shkodra M, Staals EL, Tap W, van de Rijn M, van Langevelde K, Vanhoenacker FMM, Wagner A, Wiltink L, Stern S, Van de Sande VM, Bauer S. Best clinical management of tenosynovial giant cell tumour (TGCT): A consensus paper from the community of experts. Cancer Treat Rev 2023; 112:102491. [PMID: 36502615 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2022.102491] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2022] [Accepted: 11/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Tenosynovial giant cell tumour (TGCT) is a rare, locally aggressive, mesenchymal tumor arising from the joints, bursa and tendon sheaths. TGCT comprises a nodular- and a diffuse-type, with the former exhibiting mostly indolent course and the latter a locally aggressive behavior. Although usually not life-threatening, TGCT may cause chronic pain and adversely impact function and quality of life (QoL). CSFR1 inhibitors are effective with benefit on symptoms and QoL but are not available in most countries. The degree of uncertainty in selecting the most appropriate therapy and the lack of guidelines on the clinical management of TGCT make the adoption of new treatments inconsistent across the world, with suboptimal outcomes for patients. A global consensus meeting was organized in June 2022, involving experts from several disciplines and patient representatives from SPAGN to define the best evidence-based practice for the optimal approach to TGCT and generate the recommendations presented herein.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvia Stacchiotti
- Department of cancer medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy.
| | - Hans Roland Dürr
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Inga-Marie Schaefer
- Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, USA
| | - Klaus Woertler
- Department of Radiology, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Rick Haas
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Annalisa Trama
- Evaluative Epidemiology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Augusto Caraceni
- High-Complexity Unit of Palliative Care, Pain Therapy and Rehabilitation, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Jyoti Bajpai
- Department of Medical Oncology, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | | | | | - Jean-Yves Blay
- Department of Medical Oncology, Université Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Kjetil Boye
- Department of Medical Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Javier-Martin Broto
- Oncology Department, Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Wei-Wu Tom Chen
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital and Cancer Center, Taiwan
| | | | - Jayesh Desai
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre/Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Mikael Eriksson
- Department of Medical Oncology, LUCC - Lund University Cancer Centre, Lund, Sweden
| | - Alessandro Gronchi
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Hans Gelderblom
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Jendrik Hardes
- Department of Orthopaedic Oncology, Uniklinik Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Hartmann
- Gerhard-Domagk-Institute for Pathology, Uniklinik Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - John Healey
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, USA
| | - Antoine Italiano
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - Robin L Jones
- Sarcoma Unit, The Royal Marsden, London, United Kingdom
| | - Akira Kawai
- Department of Muscoloskeletal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital (NCCH), Tokyo, Japan
| | - Andreas Leithner
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Medizinische Universität Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Herbert Loong
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Eric Mascard
- Department of Paediatric Orthopaedic Surgery, Clinique Arago, Paris, France
| | - Carlo Morosi
- Department of Radiology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Emanuela Palmerini
- Department of Osteoncology, Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcomas and Innovative Therapies, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Peter Reichardt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Brian Rubin
- Robert J. Tomsich Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Institute and Department of Cancer Biology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, USA
| | - Piotr Rutkowski
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Claudia Sangalli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Beatrice M Seddon
- Department of Oncology, University College Hospital London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Morena Shkodra
- High-Complexity Unit of Palliative Care, Pain Therapy and Rehabilitation, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Eric L Staals
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
| | - William Tap
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, USA
| | | | | | | | - Andrew Wagner
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA
| | - Lisette Wiltink
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sydney Stern
- Patient Representative, Life Raft Group, and Pharmacokinetics, University of Maryland Baltimore, USA
| | | | - Sebastian Bauer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sarcoma Center, Uniklinik Essen, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|