Favipiravir for Treatment of Outpatients With Asymptomatic or Uncomplicated Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 2 Trial

BACKGROUND

Favipiravir, an oral, RNA-dependent RNA polymerase inhibitor, has in vitro activity against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Despite limited data, favipiravir is administered to patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in several countries.

METHODS

We conducted a phase 2, double-blind, randomized controlled outpatient trial of favipiravir in asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic adults with a positive SARS-CoV-2 reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction assay (RT-PCR) within 72 hours of enrollment. Participants were randomized to receive placebo or favipiravir (1800 mg twice daily [BID] day 1, 800 mg BID days 2-10). The primary outcome was SARS-CoV-2 shedding cessation in a modified intention-to-treat (mITT) cohort of participants with positive enrollment RT-PCRs. Using SARS-CoV-2 amplicon-based sequencing, we assessed favipiravir's impact on mutagenesis.

RESULTS

We randomized 149 participants with 116 included in the mITT cohort. The participants' mean age was 43 years (standard deviation, 12.5 years) and 57 (49%) were women. We found no difference in time to shedding cessation overall (hazard ratio [HR], 0.76 favoring placebo [95% confidence interval {CI}, .48-1.20]) or in subgroups (age, sex, high-risk comorbidities, seropositivity, or symptom duration at enrollment). We detected no difference in time to symptom resolution (initial: HR, 0.84 [95% CI, .54-1.29]; sustained: HR, 0.87 [95% CI, .52-1.45]) and no difference in transition mutation accumulation in the viral genome during treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data do not support favipiravir at commonly used doses in outpatients with uncomplicated COVID-19. Further research is needed to ascertain if higher favipiravir doses are effective and safe for patients with COVID-19.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

NCT04346628.

Cisplatin (CDDP) and radiation versus cetuximab (Cx) and radiation in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell cancer (SCHNC): A retrospective review

e16009

Background: SCHNC is a common malignancy and approximately 60% of patients present with locally advanced disease. There is paucity of data directly comparing Cx and CDDP with concurrent radiation in locally advanced SCHNC. We retrospectively reviewed charts of patients treated with CDDP and/or Cx along with radiation in locally advanced SCHNC comparing efficacy and outcomes in an academic cancer center. Methods: Ninety-five patients with locally advanced SCHNC were treated with concurrent CDDP (100 mg/m2 day 1, 22, 43) or Cx (400mg/m2 on day -7 and 250mg/m2 weekly) at our institution between January 2006 and June 2011. Forty-four patients were treated with CDDP (group A), 24 with Cx (group B) and 27 were initially started on CDDP but were switched to Cx secondary to toxicity (group C). All patients received concurrent radiation treatments (66-70 Gy, 2.0 Gy/fraction). The selection of CDDP versus Cx was largely based on ECOG performance status (PS) and baseline renal function of the patients. Chi-square test, analysis of variance, and log-rank test was used for analysis. The three groups had similar baseline characteristics except for mean age of 61, 56 and 55 years in group A, B and C respectively; T4 tumors consisted of 44%, 75% and 41% in groups A, B and C respectively. Groups A, B and C had a combined ECOG 0 and I (PS) of 93%, 75% and 92%. Patients with ECOG III PS were excluded. Results: Oropharynx was the most common treated site (38%) followed by Larynx (35%). Complete response (CR) was seen in 77%, 17% and 67% in groups A, B and C respectively (P<0.001). Median progression free survival (PFS) was 16.6, 4.3 and 22.8 in groups A, B and C respectively (P<0.001) and median overall survival (OS) was >35, 11.6 and >32 months in groups A, B and C respectively (P<0.0001). Conclusions: Concurrent CDDP with radiation leads to better response rate PFS and OS as opposed to Cx though many patients treated with CDDP could not complete treatment due to toxicity. Randomized trial comparing the two should be considered.

Eukaryotic initiation factor 4E overexpression in triple-negative breast cancer predicts a worse outcome

BACKGROUND

Triple-negative (estrogen receptor [ER], progesterone receptor [PR], and HER2/neu receptor negative) breast neoplasms are typically high grade and portend a higher risk for relapse. Not being amendable to ER, PR, or HER2-targeted therapy, adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy remains the only option. High eukaryotic Initiation Factor 4E (eIF4E) overexpression in tumor specimens is an independent predictor for relapse in breast cancer, perhaps secondary to tousled-like kinase 1B upregulation and subsequent doxorubicin resistance. In this prospective study, eIF4E elevation in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) specimens was studied to determine its effect on cancer outcome.

METHODS

A prospective study of 103 TNBC patients was initiated. Tumor specimens were quantified for eIF4E expression using Western blots. Clinical outcomes data were collected after standardized adjuvant treatment and surveillance protocols. Primary end points were cancer recurrence and cancer-related death. The eIF4E levels in cancer specimens were quantified as x-fold over benign samples from noncancer patients. Statistical procedures performed include survival analysis by Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, Cox proportional hazards regression model, and the chi-square test.

RESULTS

Levels of eIF4E were categorized into 3 tertiles. Among 103 patients, 36 were in the low group (< or =7.5-fold), 40 were in the intermediate group (7.5- to 15-fold), and 27 were in the high group (> or =15-fold). Patients with triple-negative neoplasms that were in the high eIF4E group had greater rates of cancer recurrence (P = .04) and cancer-related death (P = .02) than the low eIF4E group. Among patients with node-negative disease, high eIF4E overexpression in tumor specimens continues to portend a greater rate of cancer recurrence (P = .02), and a higher rate of cancer death (P = .03) than those in the low eIF4E group.

CONCLUSION

TNBC patients with high eIF4E overexpression are more likely to recur and die from cancer recurrence. High eIF4E seems to be a significant prognostic marker, even in TNBC patients.

Race/Ethnicity has no effect on outcome for breast cancer patients treated at an academic center with a public hospital

BACKGROUND

African American women have a higher breast cancer mortality rate than Caucasian women. To understand this difference, socioeconomic status (SES) needs to be controlled, which can be achieved by evaluating outcome within a population that is underinsured or low SES. We elected to examine the effect of race/ethnicity on outcome of patients with operable breast cancer by evaluating outcome in a population with low SES and similar access to care.

METHODS

From a prospective breast cancer database created in 1998, we examined outcome for 786 patients with stage 0 to III breast cancer treated up to September 2008. Patients were treated at Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center in Shreveport and E.A. Conway Hospital and the majority received standard definitive surgery as well as appropriate adjuvant treatment. Primary endpoints were cancer recurrence and death. Statistical analysis performed included Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, log-rank test, Cox proportional hazards model, independent-samples t test, and chi(2) test. P <or= 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Sixty percent of patients were African American and over two thirds of patients were classified as either free care or Medicaid. The 5-year overall survival (OS) for African American and Caucasian patients was similar (81% and 84%, respectively; P = 0.23). On multivariate analysis, race/ethnicity was not an independent predictor of OS (P = 0.5); OS for the entire cohort was comparable with what was reported in the National Cancer Data Base.

CONCLUSION

In a predominantly indigent population, race/ethnicity had no effect on breast cancer outcome.

Predictive value of eIF4E reduction after neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

Initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) overexpression has prognostic significance in breast cancer. Up-regulation of downstream gene products associated with high eIF4E overexpression has been linked to chemoresistance. We hypothesize patients whose tumors had eIF4E reduction after neoadjuvant chemotherapy will have lower cancer recurrence compared with those who did not.

METHODS

Seventeen locally advanced breast cancer patients were accrued, and tumor specimens were obtained before and after neoadjuvant therapy. eIF4E was quantified by Western blots. Primary end-point was cancer recurrence.

RESULTS

Low eIF4E was defined as < or =7.5-fold elevation and high eIF4E was >7.5-fold elevation. Of 17 patients, six tumors remained low after neoadjuvant therapy, six dropped from high to low eIF4E, and five remained high. With a median follow-up of 29 mo, four of five patients with tumors that remained high have recurred while only three of 12 patients in the low eIF4E post-therapy group have recurred (P=0.05, chi(2)). Survival analysis using the Kaplan-Meier method showed a higher rate of cancer recurrence in patients with post-treatment high eIF4E overexpression (P=0.026, log rank test).

CONCLUSIONS

Breast cancer patients whose tumors had low eIF4E overexpression after neoadjuvant chemotherapy had lower cancer recurrence compared with those who did not.

High chemokine receptor CXCR4 level in triple negative breast cancer specimens predicts poor clinical outcome

INTRODUCTION

Basal-like tumors or triple negative breast cancers are those that lack hormone-receptor and HER-2 expressions. They are considered to be aggressive tumors, and molecular mechanism to account for this is poorly understood. CXCR4 is a chemokine receptor that has been linked to breast cancer invasion and metastasis. We postulate that high CXCR4 overexpression level in cancer specimens predicts a poor outcome in patients with triple negative breast cancers.

METHODS

One hundred fifty-one patients with triple negative breast cancers were prospectively accrued and analyzed. All had undergone standardized treatment and surveillance protocols. From each specimen, CXCR4 levels were detected using Western blots. Results were quantified against 1 microg of HeLa cells (positive controls). CXCR4 expression was defined as high (>or=6-fold) or low (<6-fold). Primary endpoints were cancer recurrence and death. Statistical analysis performed included Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazard model.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up of 37 mo, patients whose tumors had high CXCR4 overexpression (>or=6-fold) had a significantly higher incidence of cancer recurrence (P=0.014) and cancer-related death (P=0.026) than those in the low CXCR4 group (<6-fold). After adjusting for tumor size and nodal status, the relative risk for cancer recurrence and death in the high CXCR4 group was 2.1-fold (P=0.007; 95% CI: 1.22 to 3.8) and 2-fold (P=0.047; 95% CI: 1.01 to 4.06) higher than those in the low CXCR4 group, respectively.

CONCLUSION

High CXCR4 overexpression in cancer specimens predicts a worse outcome in patients who have triple negative breast cancer.