Wenzel K, Selby V, Wildberger J, Lavorato L, Thomas J, Fishman M. Choice of extended release medication for OUD in young adults (buprenorphine or naltrexone): A pilot enhancement of the Youth Opioid Recovery Support (YORS) intervention.
J Subst Abuse Treat 2021;
125:108306. [PMID:
34016297 DOI:
10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108306]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2020] [Revised: 09/18/2020] [Accepted: 01/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
The Youth Opioid Recovery Support (YORS) intervention is a promising approach for the treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD) in young adults that seeks to improve adherence to extended-release medications for OUD (XR-MOUD) and reduce opioid relapse through assertive outreach techniques. YORS was previously tested with individuals seeking extended-release naltrexone (XR-NTX), but has not been tested on individuals pursuing extended-release buprenorphine (XR-BUP).
METHODS
This pilot study tested the YORS intervention among a group choosing either XR-MOUD compared to historical treatment as usual (H-TAU) and intervention conditions from a previous study. This study also tested feasibility of a stepped care approach using a protocol for transition to standard care. Twenty-two young adults (ages 18-26) with OUD intending to pursue outpatient treatment with XR-NTX (n = 11) or XR-BUP (n = 11) were recruited from inpatient treatment and received 12-24 weeks of the YORS intervention.
RESULTS
Participants in YORS compared to H-TAU received more outpatient doses at 12 weeks (1.91 vs. 0.40, p < .001) and 24 weeks (3.76 vs. 0.70, p < .001), had lower relapse rates at 12 weeks (36.4% vs.75.0%; p = .012) and 24 weeks(52.9% vs. 95.0%; p = .003), and had greater cumulative relapse-free survival over 24 weeks (HR = 2.65, 95% CI: 1.17-6.02, p < .05). Rates of continuing MOUD in a standard care setting after the intervention ended were extremely poor. Outcomes did not differ by medication choice.
CONCLUSIONS
These results are consistent with previous findings and demonstrate feasibility and efficacy of YORS with patient choice of medication. The results highlight the need for innovative strategies to sustain positive outcomes and step-down care successfully in these vulnerable young adults.
Collapse