1
|
Lebleu J, Daniels K, Pauwels A, Dekimpe L, Mapinduzi J, Poilvache H, Bonnechère B. Incorporating Wearable Technology for Enhanced Rehabilitation Monitoring after Hip and Knee Replacement. Sensors (Basel) 2024; 24:1163. [PMID: 38400321 PMCID: PMC10892564 DOI: 10.3390/s24041163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2023] [Revised: 01/20/2024] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024]
Abstract
Osteoarthritis (OA) poses a growing challenge for the aging population, especially in the hip and knee joints, contributing significantly to disability and societal costs. Exploring the integration of wearable technology, this study addresses the limitations of traditional rehabilitation assessments in capturing real-world experiences and dynamic variations. Specifically, it focuses on continuously monitoring physical activity in hip and knee OA patients using automated unsupervised evaluations within the rehabilitation process. We analyzed data from 1144 patients who used a mobile health application after surgery; the activity data were collected using the Garmin Vivofit 4. Several parameters, such as the total number of steps per day, the peak 6-minute consecutive cadence (P6MC) and peak 1-minute cadence (P1M), were computed and analyzed on a daily basis. The results indicated that cadence-based measurements can effectively, and earlier, differ among patients with hip and knee conditions, as well as in the recovery process. Comparisons based on recovery status and type of surgery reveal distinctive trajectories, emphasizing the effectiveness of P6MC and P1M in detecting variations earlier than total steps per day. Furthermore, cadence-based measurements showed a lower inter-day variability (40%) compared to the total number of steps per day (80%). Automated assessments, including P1M and P6MC, offer nuanced insights into the patients' dynamic activity profiles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julien Lebleu
- moveUp, 1000 Brussels, Belgium; (J.L.); (A.P.); (L.D.)
| | - Kim Daniels
- Department of PXL—Healthcare, PXL University of Applied Sciences and Arts, 3500 Hasselt, Belgium;
- REVAL Rehabilitation Research Center, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hasselt University, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium;
| | | | - Lucie Dekimpe
- moveUp, 1000 Brussels, Belgium; (J.L.); (A.P.); (L.D.)
| | - Jean Mapinduzi
- REVAL Rehabilitation Research Center, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hasselt University, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium;
- Filière de Kinésithérapie et Réadaptation, Département des Sciences Clinique, Institut National de la Santé Publique, 6807 Bujumbura, Burundi
| | - Hervé Poilvache
- Orthopedic Surgery Department, CHIREC, 1420 Braine-l’Alleud, Belgium
| | - Bruno Bonnechère
- Department of PXL—Healthcare, PXL University of Applied Sciences and Arts, 3500 Hasselt, Belgium;
- REVAL Rehabilitation Research Center, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hasselt University, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium;
- Technology-Supported and Data-Driven Rehabilitation, Data Sciences Institute, Hasselt University, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|