Polymyalgia rheumatica and giant cell arteritis following COVID-19 vaccination: Results from a nationwide survey

We conducted a national in-depth analysis including pharmacovigilance reports and clinical study to assess the reporting rate (RR) and to determine the clinical profile of polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) and giant cell arteritis (GCA) in COVID-19-vaccinated individuals. First, based on the French pharmacovigilance database, we estimated the RR of PMR and GCA cases in individuals aged over 50 who developed their initial symptoms within one month of receiving the BNT162b2 mRNA, mRNA-1273, ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, and Ad26.COV2.S vaccines. We then conducted a nationwide survey to gather clinical profiles, therapeutic management, and follow-up data from individuals registered in the pharmacovigilance study. A total of 70 854 684 COVID-19 vaccine doses were administered to 25 260 485 adults, among which, 179 cases of PMR (RR 7. 1 cases/1 000 000 persons) and 54 cases of GCA (RR 2. 1 cases/1 000 000 persons) have been reported. The nationwide survey allowed the characterization of 60 PMR and 35 GCA cases. Median time to the onset of first symptoms was 10 (range 2-30) and 7 (range 2-25) days for PMR and GCA, respectively. Phenotype, GCA-related ischemic complications and -large vessel vasculitis as well as therapeutic management and follow-up seemed similar according to the number of vaccine shots received and when compared to the literature data of unvaccinated population. Although rare, the short time between immunization and the onset of first symptoms of PMR and GCA suggests a temporal association. Physician should be aware of this potential vaccine-related phenomenon.

Identification of new risk factors for hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine retinopathy in systemic lupus erythematosus patients

BACKGROUND

Long-term hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) or chloroquine (CQ) intake causes retinal toxicity in 0.3-8 % of patients with rheumatic diseases. Numerous risk factors have been described, eg, daily dose by weight, treatment duration, chronic kidney disease, concurrent tamoxifen therapy and pre-existing retinal or macular disease. However, those factors cannot explain the entire risk of developing antimalarial retinopathy.

OBJECTIVE

This study was undertaken to identify new risk factors associated with HCQ or CQ retinopathy (QRNP) in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients.

METHODS

This case-control (1:2) study compared SLE patients with QRNP (cases) to those without (controls). Controls were matched for sex and known QRNP risk factors: HCQ and/or CQ treatment duration (±1 year) and age (±5 year) at SLE diagnosis.

RESULTS

Forty-eight cases were compared to 96 SLE controls. Multivariable logistic-regression analysis retained the following as independent determinants significantly associated with QRNP: concomitant selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) or serotonin- and norepinephrine-reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) intake (OR [95 % confidence interval] 6.6 [1.2 to 40.9]; p < 0.01); antiphospholipid syndrome (OR=8.9 [2.2 to 41.4] p < 0.01); blood hydroxychloroquine/desethylchloroquine concentration ([HCQ]/[DCQ]) ratio <7.2 (OR 8.4 [2.7 to 30.8]; p < 0.01) or skin phototype ≥4 (OR 5.5 [1.4 to 26.5]; p = 0.02), but not daily HCQ dose, blood [HCQ] or body mass index.

CONCLUSION

The results of this case-control study identified blood [HCQ]/[DCQ] ratio, concurrent SSRI/SNRI therapy, skin phototype ≥4 and antiphospholipid syndrome as new risk factors for QRNP.

Giant cell arteritis associated with scalp, tongue or lip necrosis: A French multicenter case control study

BACKGROUND

Scalp, tongue and/or lip necrosis are rare complications of GCA.

OBJECTIVES

To describe characteristics and outcome of patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA) -related scalp, tongue and/or lip necrosis.

METHODS

A retrospective nationwide multicenter study included 20 GCA patients with scalp, tongue, and/or lip necrosis diagnosed between 1998 and 2021 and 80 GCA control patients matched for age, sex and management period. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify baseline characteristics associated with scalp, tongue and/or lip necrosis.

RESULTS

Compared to controls, patients with scalp, tongue and/or lip necrosis showed significantly more cranial manifestations (headache, p=0.045; scalp tenderness, p=0.006; jaw claudication, p=0.02). No differences were observed between both groups regarding the occurrence of visual symptoms or large vessel involvement. At diagnosis, GCA patients with necrosis more likely received IV methylprednisolone infusions and higher doses of oral prednisone. There were no differences regarding vascular complications during follow up. Compared to controls, survival was decreased in GCA patients with necrosis (p=0.003). In a multivariable logistic regression model, scalp tenderness [odds ratio (OR) 4.81(95 % CI: 1.57, 14.79), p = 0.006] and cognitive disorder [OR 6.42 (95 % CI: 1.01, 40.60), p=0.048] were identified as factors associated to scalp, tongue, and/or lip necrosis.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that scalp, tongue, and/or lip necrosis is associated to higher mortality in GCA patients. Scalp tenderness and cognitive disorder were significant factors associated to this very rare complication of GCA.

Clinical features and long-term outcomes of patients with systemic polyarteritis nodosa diagnosed since 2005: Data from 196 patients

BACKGROUND

The landscape of polyarteritis nodosa (PAN) has substantially changed during the last decades. Recent data regarding causes, characteristics, and prognosis of systemic PAN in the modern era are lacking.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients with systemic PAN referred to the French Vasculitis Study Group between 2005 and 2019. Characteristics, associated conditions and outcomes were collected, and predictors of relapse and death were analyzed.

RESULTS

196 patients were included. Main clinical symptoms were constitutional (84%), neurological (59%), skin (58%) and musculoskeletal (58%) manifestations. Secondary PAN accounted for 55 (28%) patients, including myelodysplastic syndrome (9%), solid cancer (7%), lymphoma (4%) and autoinflammatory diseases (4%). No patient had active HBV infection. All treated patients (98.5%) received glucocorticoids (GCs), alone (41%) or in combination with immunosuppressants (59%), with remission achieved in 90%. Relapses were independently associated with age >65 years (HR 1.85; 95% CI1.12-3.08), gastrointestinal involvement (1.95; 95% CI1.09-3.52) and skin necrotic lesions (HR 1.95; 95%CI 1.24-3.05). One-, 5- and 10-year overall survival rates were 93%, 87% and 81%, respectively. In multivariate analyses, age >65 years (HR 2.80; 95%CI 1.23-6.37), necrotic purpura (HR 4.16; 95%CI 1.62-10.70), acute kidney injury (HR 4.89; 95% 1.71-13.99) and secondary PAN (HR 2.98; 95%CI 1.29-6.85) were independently associated with mortality.

CONCLUSION

Landscape of PAN has changed during the last decades, with the disappearance of HBV-PAN and the emergence of secondary PAN. Relapse rate remains high, especially in aged patients with gastrointestinal and cutaneous necrosis, as well as mortality.

Host-microbiota relationship in the pathophysiology of aseptic abscess syndrome: protocol for a multicentre case-control study (ABSCESSBIOT)

INTRODUCTION

Aseptic abscess (AA) syndrome is a rare disease whose pathophysiology is unknown. It is often associated with inflammatory bowel disease and characterised by sterile inflammation with collections of neutrophils affecting several organs, especially the spleen. Microbiota are known to influence local and systemic immune responses, and both gut and oral microbiota perturbations have been reported in diseases associated with AA syndrome. However, interactions between these factors have never been studied in AA syndrome. The purpose of this translational case-control study (ABSCESSBIOT) is to investigate gut and/or oral microbiota in patients with AA syndrome compared with healthy controls. Moreover, microbiota associated metabolites quantification and Treg/Th17 balance characterisation will give a mechanistic insight on how microbiota may be involved in the pathophysiology of AA syndrome.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This French multicentre case-control study including 30 French centres (University hospital or regional hospital) aims to prospectively enrol 30 patients with AA syndrome with 30 matched controls and to analyse microbiota profiling (in stools and saliva), microbial metabolites quantification in stools and circulating CD4+ T cell populations.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study protocol was reviewed and approved by an independent French regional review board (n° 2017-A03499-44, Comité de Protection des Personnes Ile de France 1) on 10 October 2022, and declared to the competent French authority (Agence Nationale de Sécurité du Médicament et des produits de santé, France). Oral and written informed consent will be obtained from each included patient and the control participant. Study results will be reported to the scientific community at conferences and in peer-reviewed scientific journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Clinical Trials web-based platform (NCT05537909).

Interest of Procalcitonin in ANCA Vasculitides for Differentiation between Flare and Infections

Procalcitonin (PCT) was established as a biomarker to discriminate bacterial infections from other proinflammatory conditions. Our objective was to determine whether PCT is effective in differentiating infection from antineutrophil-cytoplasmic-antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitides (AAV) flare. In this retrospective, case-control study, PCT and other inflammatory biomarkers of patients with AAV relapse (relapsing group) were compared to infected AAV patients (infected group). In our population of 74 patients with AAV, PCT was significantly higher in the infected group than in the relapsing group (0.2 µg/L [0.08; 0.935] vs. 0.09 µg/L [0.05; 0.2], p < 0.001). Sensitivity and specificity were 53.4% and 73.6%, respectively, for an ideal threshold of 0.2 µg/L. C-reactive protein (CRP) was significantly higher in cases of infection than in relapse (64.7 mg/L [25; 131] vs. 31.5 mg/L, [10.6; 120], p = 0.001). Sensitivity and specificity for infections were 94.2% and 11.3%, respectively. Fibrinogen, white blood cell count, eosinophil count, and neutrophil count were not significantly different. In the multivariate analysis, the relative risk of infection was 2 [1.02; 4.5] (p = 0.04) for a PCT above 0.2 µg/L. In AAV, PCT may be useful for discriminating between infections and flare in patients suffering from AAVs.

Aseptic Abscess Syndrome: Clinical Characteristics, Associated Diseases, and up to 30 Years’ Evolution Data on a 71-Patient Series

Aseptic abscess (AA) syndrome is a rare type of inflammatory disorder involving polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs), often associated with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). This study sought to describe the clinical characteristics and evolution of this syndrome in a large cohort. We included all patients included in the French AA syndrome register from 1999 to 2020. All patients fulfilled the criteria outlined by André et al. in 2007. Seventy-one patients were included, 37 of which were men (52.1%), of a mean age of 34.5 ± 17 years. The abscesses were located in the spleen (71.8%), lymph nodes (50.7%), skin (29.5%), liver (28.1%), lung (22.5), and rarer locations (brain, genitals, kidneys, ENT, muscles, or breasts). Of all the patients, 59% presented with an associated disease, primarily IBD (42%). They were treated with colchicine (28.1%), corticosteroids (85.9%), immunosuppressants (61.9%), and biologics (32.3%). A relapse was observed in 62% of cases, mostly in the same organ. Upon multivariate analysis, factors associated with the risk of relapse were: prescription of colchicine (HR 0.52; 95% CI [0.28–0.97]; p = 0.042), associated IBD (HR 0.57; 95% CI [0.32–0.99]; p = 0.047), and hepatic or skin abscesses at diagnosis (HR 2.14; 95% CI [1.35–3.40]; p = 0.001 and HR 1.78; 95% CI [1.07–2.93]; p = 0.024, respectively). No deaths occurred related to this disease. This large retrospective cohort study with long follow up showed that AA syndrome is a relapsing systemic disease that can evolve on its own or be the precursor of an underlying disease, such as IBD. Of all the available treatments, colchicine appeared to be protective against relapse.

Safety of vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 in people with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases: results from the EULAR Coronavirus Vaccine (COVAX) physician-reported registry

OBJECTIVES

To describe the safety of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 in people with inflammatory/autoimmune rheumatic and musculoskeletal disease (I-RMD).

METHODS

Physician-reported registry of I-RMD and non-inflammatory RMD (NI-RMDs) patients vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2. From 5 February 2021 to 27 July 2021, we collected data on demographics, vaccination, RMD diagnosis, disease activity, immunomodulatory/immunosuppressive treatments, flares, adverse events (AEs) and SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infections. Data were analysed descriptively.

RESULTS

The study included 5121 participants from 30 countries, 90% with I-RMDs (n=4604, 68% female, mean age 60.5 years) and 10% with NI-RMDs (n=517, 77% female, mean age 71.4). Inflammatory joint diseases (58%), connective tissue diseases (18%) and vasculitis (12%) were the most frequent diagnostic groups; 54% received conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), 42% biological DMARDs and 35% immunosuppressants. Most patients received the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine (70%), 17% AstraZeneca/Oxford and 8% Moderna. In fully vaccinated cases, breakthrough infections were reported in 0.7% of I-RMD patients and 1.1% of NI-RMD patients. I-RMD flares were reported in 4.4% of cases (0.6% severe), 1.5% resulting in medication changes. AEs were reported in 37% of cases (37% I-RMD, 40% NI-RMD), serious AEs in 0.5% (0.4% I-RMD, 1.9% NI-RMD).

CONCLUSION

The safety profiles of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in patients with I-RMD was reassuring and comparable with patients with NI-RMDs. The majority of patients tolerated their vaccination well with rare reports of I-RMD flare and very rare reports of serious AEs. These findings should provide reassurance to rheumatologists and vaccine recipients and promote confidence in SARS-CoV-2 vaccine safety in I-RMD patients.

OA01 Safety of vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 in people with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases: results from the EULAR Coronavirus Vaccine (COVAX) physician-reported registry

Background/Aims

People with inflammatory/autoimmune rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (I-RMDs) were excluded from Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccine clinical development programmes; therefore, concerns regarding the safety and effectiveness of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in this population still exist. Previous studies in people with I-RMDs were small albeit reassuring in terms of the incidence of I-RMD flares and adverse events. Our aim was to describe the safety of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 in people with I-RMD.

Methods

Physician-reported registry of I-RMD and non-inflammatory RMD (NI-RMDs) patients vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2. From 5/Feb/2021 to 27/Jul/2021, we collected data on demographics, vaccination, RMD diagnosis, disease activity, immunomodulatory/immunosuppressive treatments, flares, adverse events (AEs) and SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infections. Data were analysed descriptively.

Results

The study included 5121 participants from 30 countries, 90% with I-RMDs (n = 4604, 68% female, mean age 60.5 years) and 10% with NI-RMDs (n = 517, 77% female, mean age 71.4). Inflammatory joint diseases (58%), connective tissue diseases (18%) and vasculitis (12%) were the most frequent diagnostic groups; 54% received conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), 42% biologic DMARDs and 35% immunosuppressants. Most patients received the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine (70%), 17% AstraZeneca/Oxford and 8% Moderna. In fully vaccinated cases, breakthrough infections were reported in 0.7% of I-RMD patients and 1.1% of NI-RMD patients. I-RMD flares were reported in 4.4% of cases (0.6% severe), 1.5% resulting in medication changes. AEs were reported in 37% of cases (37% I-RMD, 40% NI-RMD), serious AEs in 0.5% (0.4% I-RMD, 1.9% NI-RMD).

Conclusion

The safety profiles of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in patients with I-RMD were reassuring, and comparable to patients with NI-RMDs. The majority of patients tolerated their vaccination well with rare reports of I-RMD flare and very rare reports of serious AEs. These findings should provide reassurance to rheumatologists and vaccine recipients, and promote confidence in SARS-CoV-2 vaccine safety in I-RMD patients.

Disclosure

P.M. Machado: None. S. Lawson-Tovey: None. A. Strangfeld: None. E. Mateus: None. K. Hyrich: None. L. Gossec: None. L. Carmona: None. A. Rodrigues: None. B. Raffeiner: None. C. Duarte: None. E. Hachulla: None. E. Veillard: None. E. Strakova: None. G.R. Burmester: None. G.K. Yardimci: None. J.A. Gómez-Puerta: None. J. Zepa: None. L. Kearsley-Fleet: None. L. Trefond: None. M.M. Cunha: None. M. Mosca: None. M. Cornalba: None. M. Soubrier: None. N. Roux: None. O. Brocq: None. P. Durez: None. R. Conway: None. T. Goulenok: None. J.W.J. Bijlsma: None. I. McInnes: None. X. Mariette: None.

Dr. Trefond et al reply

We thank Conway et al1 for their comments on our article reporting a case of giant cell arteritis (GCA) after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.2 We agree with Conway et al1 and also emphasize the interest in SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, which had a reassuring safety profile in a cohort of 1519 patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases.3

Case of Giant Cell Arteritis After SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination: A Particular Phenotype?

We read with great interest the article by Mehta et al about the similarities and discriminators between giant cell arteritis (GCA) and the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).¹ Viruses have been suspected to be implicated in the pathogenesis of GCA, especially the varicella zoster virus,² but a clear association has not been confirmed.³.

LB0002 COVID-19 VACCINE SAFETY IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATIC AND MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASE

Background:

The consequences of the COVID-19 outbreak are unprecedented and have been felt by everyone around the world, including people with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs). With the development of vaccines, the future is becoming brighter. Vaccines are a key pillar of public health and have been proven to prevent many serious diseases. However, vaccination also raises questions, especially for patients with inflammatory RMDs and/or treated with drugs that influence their immune system.

Objectives:

Our aim was to collect safety data among RMD patients receiving COVID-19 vaccines.

Methods:

The EULAR COVID-19 Vaccination (COVAX) Registry is an observational registry launched on 5 February 2021. Data are entered voluntarily by clinicians or associated healthcare staff; patients are eligible for inclusion if they have an RMD and have been vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2. Descriptive statistics are presented.

Results:

As of 27 April 2021, 1519 patients were reported to the registry. The majority were female (68%) and above the age of 60 (57%). Mean age was 63 years (SD 16), ranging from 15 to 97 years. A total of 28 countries contributed to the registry, with France (60%) and Italy (13%) as the highest contributors. The majority (91%) had inflammatory RMDs. Inflammatory joint diseases accounted for 51% of cases, connective tissue diseases 19%, vasculitis 16%, other immune mediated inflammatory diseases 4%, and non-inflammatory/mechanical RMDs 9%. The most frequent individual diagnoses were rheumatoid arthritis (30%), axial spondyloarthritis (8%), psoriatic arthritis (8%), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE, 7%) and polymyalgia rheumatica (6%). At the time of vaccination, 45% were taking conventional synthetic DMARDs, 36% biological DMARDs, 31% systemic glucocorticoids, 6% other immunosuppressants (azathioprine; mycophenolate; cyclosporine; cyclophosphamide; tacrolimus), and 3% targeted synthetic DMARDs. The most frequent individual DMARDs were methotrexate (29%), TNF-inhibitors (18%), antimalarials (10%) and rituximab (6%). The vaccines administered were: 78% Pfizer, 16% AstraZeneca, 5% Moderna and 1% other/unknown; 66% of cases received two doses and 34% one dose. Mean time from 1st and 2nd dose to case report was 41 days (SD 26) and 26 days (SD 23), respectively. COVID-19 diagnosis after vaccination was reported in 1% (18/1519) of cases. Mean time from first vaccination until COVID-19 diagnosis was 24 days (SD 17). Disease flares were reported by 5% (73/1375) of patients with inflammatory RMDs, with 1.2% (17/1375) classified as severe flares. Mean time from closest vaccination date to inflammatory RMD flare was 5 days (SD 5). The most common flare types were arthritis (35/1375=2.5%), arthralgia (29/1375=2.1%), cutaneous flare (11/1375=0.8%) and increase in fatigue (11/1375=0.8%). Potential vaccine side effects were reported by 31% of patients (467/1519). The majority were typical early adverse events within 7 days of vaccination, namely pain at the site of injection (281/1519=19%), fatigue (171/1519=11%) and headache (103/1519=7%). Organ/system adverse events were reported by 2% (33/1519) but only 0.1% (2/1519) reported severe adverse events, namely a case of hemiparesis in a patient with systemic sclerosis/SLE overlap syndrome (ongoing at the time of reporting), and a case of giant cell arteritis in a patient with osteoarthritis (recovered/resolved without sequelae).

Conclusion:

The safety profiles for COVID-19 vaccines in RMD patients was reassuring. Most adverse events were the same as in the general population, they were non-serious and involved short term local and systemic symptoms. The overwhelming majority of patients tolerated their vaccination well with rare reports of inflammatory RMD flare (5%; 1.2% severe) and very rare reports of severe adverse events (0.1%). These initial findings should provide reassurance to rheumatologists and vaccine recipients, and promote confidence in COVID-19 vaccine safety in RMD patients, namely those with inflammatory RMDs and/or taking treatments that influence their immune system.

Acknowledgements:

EULAR COVID-19 Task Force; European Reference Network on rare and Complex Connective Tissue and Musculoskeletal Diseases; European Reference Network on Rare Immunodeficiency, Autoinflammatory and Autoimmune Diseases Network; all rheumatologists contributing to the EULAR COVAX Registry.

Disclosure of Interests:

Pedro M Machado Consultant of: Abbvie, BMS, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Orphazyme, Pfizer, Roche and UCB, all unrelated to this manuscript., Grant/research support from: Orphazyme, unrelated to this manuscript., Speakers bureau: Abbvie, BMS, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Orphazyme, Pfizer, Roche and UCB, all unrelated to this manuscript., Saskia Lawson-Tovey: None declared, Kimme Hyrich Grant/research support from: BMS, UCB, and Pfizer, all unrelated to this manuscript., Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Loreto Carmona Consultant of: her institute works by contract for laboratories among other institutions, such as Abbvie Spain, Eisai, Gebro Pharma, Merck Sharp & Dohme España, S.A., Novartis Farmaceutica, Pfizer, Roche Farma, Sanofi Aventis, Astellas Pharma, Actelion Pharmaceuticals España, Grünenthal GmbH, and UCB Pharma, all unrelated to this manuscript., Laure Gossec Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Biogen, Celgene, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Samsung Bioepis, Sanofi-Aventis, UCB, all unrelated to this manuscript., Speakers bureau: Amgen, Lilly, Janssen, Pfizer, Sandoz, Sanofi, Galapagos, all unrelated to this manuscript., Elsa Mateus Grant/research support from: LPCDR received support for specific activities: grants from Abbvie, Novartis, Janssen-Cilag, Lilly Portugal, Sanofi, Grünenthal S.A., MSD, Celgene, Medac, Pharmakern, GAfPA; grants and non-financial support from Pfizer; non-financial support from Grünenthal GmbH, outside the submitted work., Anja Strangfeld Speakers bureau: AbbVie, MSD, Roche, BMS, and Pfizer, all unrelated with this manuscript., BERND RAFFEINER: None declared, Tiphaine Goulenok: None declared, Olilvier Brocq: None declared, Martina Cornalba: None declared, José A Gómez-Puerta Speakers bureau: AbbVie, BMS, GSK, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Roche and Sanofi., Eric Veillard: None declared, Ludovic Trefond: None declared, Jacques-Eric Gottenberg: None declared, Julien Henry: None declared, Patrick Durez: None declared, Gerd Rüdiger Burmester: None declared, Marta Mosca: None declared, Eric Hachulla: None declared, Hans Bijlsma: None declared, Iain McInnes: None declared, Xavier Mariette Consultant of: BMS, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi-Aventis, UCB, and grant from Ose, all unrelated to this manuscript.

Systemic Histiocytosis (Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis, Erdheim-Chester Disease, Destombes-Rosai-Dorfman Disease): from Oncogenic Mutations to Inflammatory Disorders

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Provide an overview of recent progress in decoding the pathogenesis and treatment of systemic histiocytoses.

RECENT FINDINGS

Advances in molecular techniques over the last few years, enabling the identification of several MAPK mutations in lesion histiocytes, have revolutionized our understanding of histiocytosis that led to a revised classification and new treatments. Since the 2010 discovery of the BRAF^V600E mutation in 57% of Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) lesions, several other kinase mutations have been found, mostly in the MAPK pathway, and also in other key signaling pathways, in LCH, Erdheim-Chester Disease (ECD) and, less frequently, Destombes-Rosai-Dorfman disease (RDD). Those revolutionary breakthroughs enhanced our understanding of the pathogenesis of histiocytosis and led to trials with targeted therapies that demonstrated notable efficacy.

Orbital mass in ANCA-associated vasculitides: data on clinical, biological, radiological and histological presentation, therapeutic management, and outcome from 59 patients

Objective

Orbital mass is a rare and sight-threatening manifestation of ANCA-associated vasculitides, which remains a therapeutic challenge. We aimed to describe the presentation, therapeutic management and outcome of ANCA-associated vasculitides-related orbital mass.

Methods

We conducted a French nationwide retrospective study of patients with orbital mass in the setting of ANCA-associated vasculitides according to ACR criteria and/or Chapel Hill Consensus Conference definitions.

Results

Fifty-nine patients [33 women, median age 46 (range 7–90) years] were included. Fifty-six (95%) patients had granulomatosis with polyangiitis, two eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis and one microscopic polyangiitis. Orbital mass was unilateral in 47 (80%) cases, and seemed to develop from ENT involvement in most cases. Orbital mass biopsy was available in 32 (54%) patients, showing lymphoplasmacytic infiltration in 65%, fibrosis in 55%, granulomas in 48% and vasculitis in 36%. All patients but one received glucocorticoids as first-line therapy associated with immunosuppressive agents in 82%, mainly cyclophosphamide. Response to therapy was noted in 52% of patients treated with cyclophosphamide compared with 91% of those treated with rituximab. Twenty-seven (46%) patients required a second-line therapy because of relapse (59%) or refractory course (41%). Sequelae included visual impairment in 28%, with definitive blindness in 17%. Refractory course was associated with PR3-ANCA positivity, visual loss and contiguous pachymeningitis.

Conclusion

Orbital mass is associated with refractory course and high frequency of sequelae, especially blindness. Refractory course is associated with PR3-ANCA positivity, visual loss and contiguous pachymeningitis.