The Programmed Death-1 Pathway Counter-Regulates Inflammation-Induced Osteoclast Activity in Clinical and Experimental Settings

Objective

The programmed death-1 (PD-1) pathway is essential for maintaining self-tolerance and plays an important role in autoimmunity, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Here, we investigated how membrane-bound and soluble (s)PD-1 influence bone homeostasis during chronic inflammation, exemplified in RA.

Methods

Bone mineral density and bone microstructure were examined in PD-1 and PD-L1 knockout (KO) mice and compared with wild-type (WT) mice. Receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL) was measured in serum, and the expression examined on activated bone marrow cells. Osteoclast formation was examined in cells from murine spleen and bone marrow and from human synovial fluid cells. sPD-1 was measured in chronic and early (e)RA patients and correlated to markers of disease activity and radiographic scores.

Results

PD-1 and PD-L1 KO mice showed signs of osteoporosis. This was supported by a significantly reduced trabecular bone volume fraction and deteriorated microstructure, as well as increased osteoclast formation and an increased RANKL/OPG ratio. The recombinant form of sPD-1 decreased osteoclast formation in vitro, but was closely associated with disease activity markers in eRA patients. Sustained elevated sPD-1 levels indicated ongoing inflammation and were associated with increased radiographic progression.

Conclusion

The PD-1 pathway is closely associated with bone homeostasis, and lacking members of this pathway causes a deteriorated bone structure. The immunological balance in the microenvironment determines how the PD-1 pathway regulates osteoclast formation. In eRA patients, sPD-1 may serve as a biomarker, reflecting residual but clinically silent disease activity and radiographic progression.

AB0209 PREDICTORS OF ACHIEVING STRINGENT REMISSION IN PATIENTS WITH ESTABLISHED RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS IN CLINICAL REMISSION FOLLOWING A TREAT-TO-TARGET STRATEGY

Background:

Achieving remission according to stringent criteria such as Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) and ACR/EULAR Boolean remission is associated with a better long-term outcome in patients with RA1. Possible predictors of achieving stringent remission in patients in clinical remission, following targeted treatment strategies, have not been investigated.

Objectives:

To investigate the predictive value of clinical, radiographic and MRI variables on achieving more stringent remission in RA patients in clinical remission, following MRI and conventional treat-to-target (T2T) strategies.

Methods:

In this post-hoc study, data were used from 171 RA patients in clinical remission (DAS28-CRP< 3.2 and no swollen joints) on conventional synthetic DMARDs, included in the IMAGINE-RA randomized clinical trial2, where they followed an MRI T2T strategy (targeting absence of osteitis) combined with clinical remission (DAS28-CRP≤3.2 and no swollen joints) or a conventional T2T strategy (targeting clinical remission only). Baseline contrast-enhanced MRIs of the dominant wrist and 2nd-5thMCP joints and radiographs of hands and feet were evaluated according to the OMERACT RAMRIS scoring system and Sharp/van der Heijde method, respectively, by two experienced readers. Potential clinical, radiographic and MRI baseline predictors of remission were first tested in univariate logistic regression analyses with achievement of Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), SDAI, and ACR/EULAR Boolean remission at 24 months as dependent variables. Variables with p<0.25 were subsequently tested in multivariate logistic regression analyses with backward selection, adjusted for age, gender and strategy group. Missing values of covariates were imputed using chained equations.

Results:

Based on the univariate analyses, tender joint count, patient VAS global, VAS pain, VAS fatigue, physician VAS global, HAQ, MRI osteitis, radiographic and MRI erosion and joint space narrowing scores were included in multivariate analyses (Table).

Following the MRI T2T strategy was a positive predictor and high patient VAS global a negative predictor of achieving all definitions of remission. Furthermore, high patient VAS pain was negatively associated with achieving SDAI and ACR/EULAR Boolean remission and high tender joint count negatively associated with achieving CDAI and SDAI remission.

Multivariate logistic regression analyses with backward selection, final modelsDependent variables, remission at 24 monthsCDAISDAIACR/EULAR BooleanOR95% CIp-valueOR95% CIp-valueOR95% CIp-valueCovariatesMRI T2T strategy group2.941.25-7.520.0132.461.03-6.350.0435.472.33-14.11<0.001Female0.900.36-2.250.820.800.31-2.050.640.800.32-1.970.63Age1.020.98-1.070.321.020.98-1.070.331.030.99-1.070.15Tender joint count (0-28)0.330.12-0.860.0230.290.10-0.780.013Patient VAS global0.910.88-0.94<0.0010.930.88-0.97<0.0010.930.88-0.980.003Patient VAS pain0.950.91-1.000.0490.920.87-0.980.004

Conclusion:

In RA patients in clinical remission, poor patient reported outcomes and tender joint count were associated with decreased chance of achieving stringent remission, while following an MRI T2T strategy predicted stringent remission across all definitions thereof.

References:

[1]Smolen et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2017

[2]Møller-Bisgaard et al. JAMA 2019

Disclosure of Interests:

Signe Møller-Bisgaard Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Consultant of: BMS, Speakers bureau: BMS, Celgene, Pfizer, Stylianos Georgiadis Grant/research support from: Novartis, Kim Hørslev-Petersen: None declared, Bo Ejbjerg: None declared, Merete L. Hetland Grant/research support from: BMS, MSD, AbbVie, Roche, Novartis, Biogen and Pfizer, Consultant of: Eli Lilly, Speakers bureau: Orion Pharma, Biogen, Pfizer, CellTrion, Merck and Samsung Bioepis, Lykke Ørnbjerg: None declared, Daniel Glinatsi: None declared, Jakob Møllenbach Møller: None declared, Mikael Boesen Consultant of: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Esaote, Glenmark, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Paid instructor for: IAG, Image Analysis Group, AbbVie, Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca, esaote, Glenmark, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB (scientific advisor)., Speakers bureau: Eli Lilly, Esaote, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Kristian Stengaard-Pedersen: None declared, Ole Rintek Madsen: None declared, Bente Jensen: None declared, Jan Villadsen: None declared, Ellen Margrethe Hauge: None declared, Philip Bennett: None declared, Oliver Hendricks: None declared, Karsten Asmussen: None declared, Marcin Kowalski: None declared, Hanne Merete Lindegaard: None declared, Henning Bliddal Grant/research support from: received research grant fra NOVO Nordic, Consultant of: consultant fee fra NOVO Nordic, Niels Steen Krogh: None declared, Torkell Ellingsen: None declared, Agnete Nielsen: None declared, Lone Balding: None declared, Anne Grethe Jurik: None declared, Henrik Thomsen: None declared, Mikkel Ǿstergaard Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Merck, and Novartis, Consultant of: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Hospira, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Orion, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi, and UCB, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Hospira, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Orion, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi, and UCB

FRI0019 MRI INFLAMMATION, DISEASE ACTIVITY AND FUNCTIONAL IMPAIRMENT ARE MORE EFFECTIVELY REDUCED BY ESCALATION TO BIOLOGICS COMPARED TO CSDMARD-ESCALATION IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS PATIENTS IN CLINICAL REMISSION FOLLOWING A TREAT-TO-TARGET STRATEGY: SECONDARY ANALYSES OF THE IMAGINE-RA TRIAL

Background:

The effect of different treatment escalations on MRI inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients following an MRI treat-to-target (T2T) strategy has not previously been investigated.

Objectives:

To compare the effect of different treatment escalations on MRI inflammation, physical function and disease activity in RA patients in clinical remission, following an MRI T2T strategy.

Methods:

One hundred RA patients in clinical remission (DAS28-CRP<3.2 and no swollen joints), on conventional synthetic (cs) DMARDs following an MRI T2T strategy targeting DAS28-CRP≤3.2, no swollen joints plus absence of MRI osteitis, were followed for 2 years with clinical and MRI (wrist and 2nd-5thMCP joints) evaluation every 4 months1. If target was not met, a predefined treatment escalation algorithm dictated: First: increase in csDMARDs (A), second: adding a TNF inhibitor (TNFi) (B), third and onwards: switch between biologics (C). If target was met, no change in baseline csDMARDs was done (D). Outcomes were assessed 4 months after treatment change. MRIs were evaluated with known chronology by one experienced reader. Repeated measures mixed linear models were used to express estimates of group differences on predefined co-primary outcomes (MRI osteitis, HAQ) and key secondary outcomes (MRI combined inflammation, Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI)).

Results:

Escalation to first TNFi (B) or to 2ndor later biologic (C) compared to csDMARDs (A) was consistently more effective on all outcomes (e.g. in group B osteitis was reduced with 1.8 units more than A) (Table). Unchanged (D) compared to escalation in csDMARD (A) treatment did not differ, except for HAQ-score. Escalation to a 2ndor later biologics (C) compared to the first TNFi (B) was more effective suppressing MRI inflammation. Escalation to TNFi treatment (B) or to 2ndor later biologic (C) compared to unchanged treatment (D) was more effective on all outcomes except from HAQ-score (no difference between groups).

Comparisons of treatment escalations1A: Increment in csDMARD mono/combination therapy (n=73)); B: Switch from csDMARD combination therapy to TNFi (n=39); C: Switch from TNFi to 2ndbiologic/switch between biologics (n=21); D: No change in csDMARDs from baseline (n=58)A vs BA vs CA vs DB vs CB vs DC vs DOutcomesPrimaryMRIOsteitis1.8 (1.0; 2.6) p<.00013.6 (2.3; 4.8) p<.00010.3 (−0.3; 1.0)p=.321.8 (0.8; 2.9) p=.0006−1.4 (−2.4; −0.5) p=.0045−3.3 (−4.6; −1.9) p<.0001HAQ0.081(0.033; 0.13) p=.00110.091(0.031; 0.15) p=.00320.054(0.014; 0.095) p=.00910.0092(−0.051; 0.070) p=.77−0.027(−0.082; 0.028) p=.33−0.037(−0.10; 0.031) p=.29Key secondaryMRI combined inflammationa2.5 (0.9; 4.1) p=.00185.4 (3.1; 7.7) p<.00010.4 (−0.9; 1.8)p=.522.9 (0.8; 4.9) p=.0064−2.1 (−4.0; −0.2) p=.032−5.0 (−7.5; −2.4) p=.0002SDAI2.7 (1.9; 3.5) p<.00012.4 (1.4; 3.4) p<.00010.5 (−0.2; 1.2)p=.14−0.3 (−1.3; 0.7)p=.60−2.2 (−3.1; −1.3) p<.0001−1.9 (−3.0; 0.8) p=.0006

1Estimates of group differences (least squares means (95% CI)).

aSum score of synovitis, osteitis and tenosynovitis

Conclusion:

T2T-based treatment escalations to biologics compared to csDMARD-escalations more effectively improved MRI inflammation, physical function and disease activity. Further optimization of the treatment in RA patients in clinical remission may improve long-term outcomes.

References:

[1]Møller-Bisgaard et al. JAMA 2019

Disclosure of Interests:

Signe Møller-Bisgaard Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Consultant of: BMS, Speakers bureau: BMS, Celgene, Pfizer, Kim Hørslev-Petersen: None declared, Bo Ejbjerg: None declared, Merete L. Hetland Grant/research support from: BMS, MSD, AbbVie, Roche, Novartis, Biogen and Pfizer, Consultant of: Eli Lilly, Speakers bureau: Orion Pharma, Biogen, Pfizer, CellTrion, Merck and Samsung Bioepis, Robin Christensen: None declared, Lykke Ørnbjerg: None declared, Daniel Glinatsi: None declared, Jakob Møllenbach Møller: None declared, Mikael Boesen Consultant of: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Esaote, Glenmark, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Paid instructor for: IAG, Image Analysis Group, AbbVie, Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca, esaote, Glenmark, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB (scientific advisor)., Speakers bureau: Eli Lilly, Esaote, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Kristian Stengaard-Pedersen: None declared, Ole Rintek Madsen: None declared, Bente Jensen: None declared, Jan Villadsen: None declared, Ellen Margrethe Hauge: None declared, Philip Bennett: None declared, Oliver Hendricks: None declared, Karsten Asmussen: None declared, Marcin Kowalski: None declared, Hanne Merete Lindegaard: None declared, Henning Bliddal Grant/research support from: received research grant fra NOVO Nordic, Consultant of: consultant fee fra NOVO Nordic, Niels Steen Krogh: None declared, Torkell Ellingsen: None declared, Agnete Nielsen: None declared, Anne Grethe Jurik: None declared, Lone Balding: None declared, Henrik Thomsen: None declared, Mikkel Ǿstergaard Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Merck, and Novartis, Consultant of: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Hospira, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Orion, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi, and UCB, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Hospira, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Orion, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi, and UCB

Association between MRI findings and patient-reported outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in clinical remission and at relapse

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) pathologies in the wrist/hand of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients are associated with patient-reported outcomes (PROs) at clinical remission and relapse.

METHODS

Wrist/hand MRIs and wrists/hands/feet radiographs were obtained in 114 established RA patients in clinical remission, before tapering their biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. MRIs were assessed according to the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) RA MRI score (RAMRIS) for inflammation (synovitis/tenosynovitis/bone marrow edema) and damage (bone erosion/joint space narrowing) at baseline (ie remission) and in case of a relapse (n = 70). Radiographs were assessed according to the Sharp/van der Heijde (SvH) method at baseline. These scores were assessed for associations with health assessment questionnaires (HAQ), visual analog scales (VAS global/pain), EuroQol-5 dimensions and Short-Form 36 physical and mental component summary (SF-36 PCS/MCS) using Spearman correlations, univariate/multivariable linear regression analyses and generalized estimating equations. Furthermore, MRI pathologies were assessed for association with specific hand-related HAQ items using Jonckheere trend tests.

RESULTS

Magnetic resonance imaging-assessed damage was associated with impaired HAQ and SF-36 PCS at remission and relapse (P < .01), independent of clinical and radiographic measures, and was also associated with most of the hand-related HAQ items (P < .03). In multivariate models including MRI, SvH scores were not associated with PROs. MRI-assessed inflammation was not associated with PROs at remission or relapse.

CONCLUSION

Magnetic resonance imaging-assessed wrist/hand damage, but not inflammation, in patients with established RA is associated with patient-reported physical impairment at remission and relapse. The amount of damage in the wrist/hand is associated with reduced hand function.

Dose tapering and discontinuation of biological therapy in rheumatoid arthritis patients in routine care - 2-year outcomes and predictors

Objectives

A cohort of routine care RA patients in sustained remission had biological DMARD (bDMARDs) tapered according to a treatment guideline. We studied: the proportion of patients whose bDMARD could be successfully tapered or discontinued; unwanted consequences of tapering/discontinuation; and potential baseline predictors of successful tapering and discontinuation.

Methods

One-hundred-and-forty-three patients (91% receiving TNF inhibitor and 9% a non-TNF inhibitor) with sustained disease activity score (DAS28-CRP)⩽2.6 and no radiographic progression the previous year were included. bDMARD was reduced to two-thirds of standard dose at baseline, half after 16 weeks, and discontinued after 32 weeks. Patients who flared (defined as either DAS28-CRP ⩾ 2.6 and ΔDAS28-CRP ⩾ 1.2 from baseline, or erosive progression on X-ray and/or MRI) stopped tapering and were escalated to the previous dose level.

Results

One-hundred-and-forty-one patients completed 2-year follow-up. At 2 years, 87 patients (62%) had successfully tapered bDMARDs, with 26 (18%) receiving two-thirds of standard dose, 39 (28%) half dose and 22 (16%) having discontinued; and 54 patients (38%) were receiving full dose. ΔDAS28-CRP0-2yrs was 0.1((-0.2)-0.4) (median (interquartile range)) and mean ΔTotal-Sharp-Score0-2yrs was 0.01(1.15)(mean(s.d.)). Radiographic progression was observed in nine patients (7%). Successful tapering was independently predicted by: ⩽1 previous bDMARD, male gender, low baseline MRI combined inflammation score or combined damage score. Negative IgM-RF predicted successful discontinuation.

Conclusion

By implementing a clinical guideline, 62% of RA patients in sustained remission in routine care were successfully tapered, including 16% successfully discontinued at 2 years. Radiographic progression was rare. Maximum one bDMARDs, male gender, and low baseline MRI combined inflammation and combined damage scores were independent predictors for successful tapering.

Intercentre variance in patient reported outcomes is lower than objective rheumatoid arthritis activity measures: a cross-sectional study

Objective

To assess intercentre variability in the ACR core set measures, DAS28 based on three variables (DAS28v3) and Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 in a multinational study.

Methods

Seven thousand and twenty-three patients were recruited (84 centres; 30 countries) using a standard protocol in the Quantitative Standard Monitoring of Patients with RA study. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and mixed-effect analysis of covariance models were used to model the relationship between study centre and different patient-reported and physician-reported RA activity measures. These models were built to adjust for the remaining ACR core set measure (for each ACR core set measure or each composite index), socio-demographics and medical characteristics. ANOVA and analysis of covariance models yielded similar results, and ANOVA tables were used to present variance attributable to recruiting centre.

Results

The proportion of variances attributable to recruiting centre was lower for patient reported outcomes (PROs: pain, HAQ, patient global) compared with objective measures (joint counts, ESR, physician global) in all models. In the full model, variance in PROs attributable to recruiting centre ranged from 1.53% for patient global to 3.71% for HAQ compared with objective measures that ranged from 5.92% for physician global to 9.25% for ESR; and was lower for Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (2.6%) compared with DAS28v3 (11.75%).

Conclusion

Intercentre variability in PROs is lower than objective measures of RA activity demonstrating that PROs may be more comparable across centres, and the need for standardization of objective measures.