The role of surgical management for prolactin-secreting tumors in the era of dopaminergic agonists: An international multicenter report

OBJECTIVE

First-line prolactin-secreting tumor (PST) management typically involves treatment with dopamine agonists and the role of surgery remains to be further explored. We examined the international experience of 12 neurosurgical centers to assess the patient characteristics, safety profile, and effectiveness of surgery for PST management.

METHODS

Patients surgically treated for PST from January 2017 through December 2020 were evaluated for surgical characteristics, outcomes, and safety.

RESULTS

Among 272 patients identified (65.1% female), the mean age was 38.0 ± 14.3 years. Overall, 54.4% of PST were macroadenomas. Minor complications were seen in 39.3% of patients and major complications were in 4.4%. The most common major complications were epistaxis and worsened vision. Most minor complications involved electrolyte/sodium dysregulation. At 3-6 months, local control on imaging was achieved in 94.8% of cases and residual/recurrent tumor was seen in 19.3%. Reoperations were required for 2.9% of cases. On multivariate analysis, previous surgery was significantly predictive of intraoperative complications (6.14 OR, p < 0.01) and major complications (14.12 OR, p < 0.01). Previous pharmacotherapy (0.27 OR, p = 0.02) and cavernous sinus invasion (0.19 OR, p = 0.03) were significantly protective against early endocrinological cure. Knosp classification was highly predictive of residual tumor or PST recurrence on 6-month follow-up imaging (4.60 OR, p < 0.01). There was noted institutional variation in clinical factors and outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Our results evaluate a modern, multicenter, global series of PST. These data can serve as a benchmark to compare with DA therapy and other surgical series. Further study and longer term outcomes could provide insight into how patients benefit from surgical treatment.

Crooke Cell Adenoma Confers Poorer Endocrinological Outcomes Compared with Corticotroph Adenoma: Results of a Multicenter, International Analysis

BACKGROUND

Crooke cell adenomas (CCAs) are a rare, aggressive subset of secretory pituitary corticotroph adenomas (sCTAs) found in 5%-10% of patients with Cushing disease. Multiple studies support worse outcomes in CCAs but are limited by small sample size and single-institution databases. We compared outcomes in CCA and sCTA using a multicenter, international retrospective database of high-volume skull base centers.

METHODS

Patients surgically treated for pituitary adenoma from January 2017 through December 2020 were included.

RESULTS

Among 2826 patients from 12 international centers, 20 patients with CCA and 480 patients with sCTA were identified. No difference in baseline demographics, tumor characteristics, or postoperative complications was seen. Microsurgical approaches (60% CCA vs. 62.3% sCTA) were most common. Gross total resection was higher in CCA patients (100% vs. 83%, P = 0.05). Among patients with gross total resection according to intraoperative findings, fewer CCA patients had postoperative hormone normalization of pituitary function (50% vs. 77.8%, P < 0.01) and remission of hypersecretion by 3-6 months (75% vs. 84.3%, P < 0.01). This was the case despite CCA having better local control rates (100% vs. 96%, P < 0.01) and fewer patients with remnant on magnetic resonance imaging (0% vs. 7.2%, P < 0.01). A systematic literature review of 35 studies reporting on various treatment strategies reiterated the high rate of residual tumor, persistent hypercortisolism, and tumor-related mortality in CCA patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This modern, multicenter series of patients with CCA reflects their poor prognosis and reduced postsurgical hormonal normalization. Further work is necessary to better understand the pathophysiology of CCA to devise more targeted treatment approaches.

A Multicenter, Propensity Score-Matched Assessment of Endoscopic Versus Microscopic Approaches in the Management of Pituitary Adenomas

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

There is considerable controversy as to which of the 2 operating modalities (microsurgical or endoscopic transnasal surgery) currently used to resect pituitary adenomas (PAs) is the safest and most effective intervention. We compared rates of clinical outcomes of patients with PAs who underwent resection by either microsurgical or endoscopic transnasal surgery.

METHODS

To independently assess the outcomes of each modality type, we sought to isolate endoscopic and microscopic PA surgeries with a 1:1 tight-caliper (0.01) propensity score-matched analysis using a multicenter, neurosurgery-specific database. Surgeries were performed between 2017 and 2020, with data collected retrospectively from 12 international institutions on 4 continents. Matching was based on age, previous neurological deficit, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, tumor functionality, tumor size, and Knosp score. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Among a pool of 2826 patients, propensity score matching resulted in 600 patients from 9 surgery centers being analyzed. Multivariate analysis showed that microscopic surgery had a 1.91 odds ratio (OR) ( P = .03) of gross total resection (GTR) and shorter operative duration ( P < .01). However, microscopic surgery also had a 7.82 OR ( P < .01) for intensive care unit stay, 2.08 OR ( P < .01) for intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, 2.47 OR ( P = .02) for postoperative syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion (SIADH), and was an independent predictor for longer postoperative stay (β = 2.01, P < .01). Overall, no differences in postoperative complications or 3- to 6-month outcomes were seen by surgical approach.

CONCLUSION

Our international, multicenter matched analysis suggests microscopic approaches for pituitary tumor resection may offer better GTR rates, albeit with increased intensive care unit stay, CSF leak, SIADH, and hospital utilization. Better prospective studies can further validate these findings as matching patients for outcome analysis remains challenging. These results may provide insight into surgical benchmarks at different centers, offer room for further registry studies, and identify best practices.

Defining benchmark outcomes for transsphenoidal surgery of pituitary adenomas: a multicenter analysis

IMPORTANCE

Benchmarks aid in improve outcomes for surgical procedures. However, best achievable results that have been validated internationally for transsphenoidal surgery (TS) are not available.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to establish standardized outcome benchmarks for TS of pituitary adenomas.

DESIGN

A total of 2685 transsphenoidal tumor resections from 9 expert centers in 3 continents were analyzed.

SETTING

Patients were risk stratified, and the median values of each center's outcomes were established. The benchmark was defined as the 75th percentile of all median values for a particular outcome. The postoperative benchmark outcomes included surgical factors, endocrinology-specific values, and neurology-specific values.

RESULTS

Of 2685 patients, 1149 (42.8%) defined the low-risk benchmark cohort. Within these benchmark cases, 831 (72.3%) patients underwent microscopic TS, and 308 (26.8%) patients underwent endoscopic endonasal resection. Of all tumors, 799 (29.8%) cases invaded the cavernous sinus. The postoperative complication rate was 19.6% with mortality between 0.0% and 0.8%. Benchmark cutoffs were ≤2.9% for reoperation rate, ≤1.9% for cerebrospinal fluid leak requiring intervention, and ≤15.5% for transient diabetes insipidus. At 6 months, benchmark cutoffs were calculated as follows: readmission rate: ≤6.9%, new hypopituitarism ≤6.0%, and tumor remnant ≤19.2%.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis defines benchmark values for TS targeting morbidity and mortality and represents the best outcomes in the best patients in expert centers. These cutoffs can be used to assess different centers, patient populations, and novel surgical techniques. It should be noted that the benchmark values may influence each other and must be evaluated in their own context.

QLTI-09. DEFINING GLOBAL BENCHMARK OUTCOMES FOR TRANSSPHENOIDAL SURGERY OF PITUITARY ADENOMAS: A MULTICENTER ANALYSIS OF 2862 CASES

Benchmarks are important to measure and aid in improve outcomes for surgical procedures. However, best achievable results that have been validated internationally for transsphenoidal surgery are not available. Therefore, we aimed to establish robust, standardized outcome benchmarks for transsphenoidal surgery of pituitary adenomas. A total of 2862 transsphenoidal tumor resections from 12 high-volume centers in 4 continents were analyzed. Patients were risk stratified and the median values of each center’s outcomes were established. The outcome benchmark was defined as the 75th percentile of all median values for a particular outcome as defined by Staiger et al. Out of 2862 patients, 1201 (41.9%) defined the benchmark cohort. The proportion of benchmark cases contributing to the final cohort ranged across centers between 22.1% to 59.7%. Within the benchmark cases, 928 (73.3%) patients underwent microscopic (MTS) and 263 (21.9%) patients endoscopic endonasal resection (EES). The overall postoperative complication rate was 18.9% with an in-hospital mortality between 0.0-0.8%. Benchmark cutoffs were ≤ 3.3% for reoperation rate, ≤ 4.6% for cerebrospinal fluid leak requiring intervention, and ≤ 15.3% for transient diabetes insipidus. At 6 months follow-up, benchmark cutoffs were calculated as follows: readmission rate: ≤ 7.1%, new hypopituitarism ≤ 15.5%, new neurological deficit ≤ 1.2%, tumor remnant ≤ 25.5%. This analysis defines benchmark values for transsphenoidal resection of pituitary adenomas targeting morbidity, mortality, surgical and tumor-related outcomes. The benchmark cutoffs can be used to assess different centers, patients’ populations, and novel surgical techniques.

Suction Spatula for Surgery of Vestibular Schwannomas in Supine Position: Technical Note

BACKGROUND

Resection of vestibular schwannomas with good functional outcome remains a neurosurgical challenge. In this study, we report on our initial experience with a suction spatula, which allows free bimanual dissection of small tumors in a clear, bloodless surgical field in supine position.

METHODS

Forty-one patients underwent vestibular schwannoma surgery in supine position, using a suction spatula. To analyze its feasibility, 11 aspects of the device were compared with the regular retractor.

RESULTS

The suction spatula was successfully applied in all surgeries. Compared with a common spatula, the suction spatula showed superior performance during meatotomy, microsurgical and endoscopic tumor dissection, and management of bleedings. We noted no difference in ergonomics, compatibility, instrumental conflict, costs, reusability, and sterilization issues. Minor performance was related to its thickness/size. There were no significant disadvantages according to our data. There were no surgical complications related to this device.

CONCLUSIONS

The main advantage of the suction spatula is in the treatment of small, mainly intrameatal vestibular schwannomas in supine patient position. It gives the surgeon a "third hand" while enabling a continuous bimanual dissection with 2 microinstruments without the use of a regular suction tip.

Endoscopic unilateral transethmoid-paraseptal approach to the central skull base

Objectives

The endoscopic technique in transnasal skull base surgery offers optimal visualization and free manipulation in the surgical field. However, it may cause approach‐related sinonasal injury, influencing patients' quality of life (QOL). To minimize rhinological morbidity without restrictions in surgical manipulation and tumor resection, we introduced the unilateral transethmoidal‐paraseptal approach. In this article, we analyzed the long‐term results and sinonasal outcome of this technique.

Study Design

Retrospective analysis of medical records.

Methods

Forty‐two consecutive patients underwent surgery between June 2010 and March 2014 using the transethmoid‐paraseptal approach. Perioperative work‐up included neurological, radiological, endocrinological, ophthalmological, and rhinological analysis. Patients' preoperative, 1‐month and 1‐year postoperative QOL was measured using the Sino‐Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT‐22).

Results

At all individuals, a unilateral transethmoid‐paraseptal approach was performed. Removal of the turbinates, posterior septal resection or a conversion to biportal surgery could be avoided in all cases. There were no intraoperative neurovascular complications. All patients had a notable improvement in any disease‐related symptoms, as well as by objective criteria. Complete tumor resection was aimed in 39 cases and achieved in 31 of them. The SNOT‐22 scores transiently worsened 1 month after surgery and non‐significantly improved after 1 year, compared with the preoperative status. A subgroup of 7 patients with preoperative sinonasal disease evidence showed continuous significant improvement (p < .05) of SNOT‐22 scores across time. The smell screening tests showed no significant difference across time.

Conclusion

The described approach allows safe removal of various skull base lesions without deterioration in sinonasal QOL and smell function.

Level of Evidence

4.