Analysis of pesticides and PCBs in waste wood and house dust

The use of the pesticides - DDT (1,1,1-trichloro-2,2-bis(4-chlorophenyl)ethane) and lindane (gamma-hexachlorocyclohexane) - and of PCBs (polychlorinated biphenyls) has been limited or forbidden for several decades. Nevertheless, due to their persistence and bioaccumulative potentials they are still ubiquitous in the environment. Therefore, the main objective of this study was to determine analytical methods to analyse the pesticides lindane and DDT, its metabolites DDD (1,1-dichloro-2,2-bis(4-chlorophenyl)ethane) and DDE (1,1-dichloro-2,2-bis(4-chlorophenyl)ethene), and PCBs in waste wood and house dust. An ultrasonic extraction was performed followed by a sample clean up by filtration or silica gel column. The prepared samples were measured by GC/MS. Quantification through internal standard calibration delivered low limits of detection. Specific amounts of the target compounds were detected in all analysed dust samples. The comparison of the contamination between dust samples of eastern Germany (former German Democratic Republic - GDR) and western Germany partly revealed significant differences of the contamination levels. Furthermore, it was examined whether older wooden material might cause a constant volatilisation of pesticides in apartments. Waste wood samples of different contamination categories were analysed. Apparently, these samples are potentially responsible for a constant DDX (Σ(DDT, DDD, DDE)) and lindane volatilisation, but not for PCBs.

Phthalates in house dust

The main objective of this study was to generate a fast analytical method to determine the five phthalates benzylbutylphthalate (BBP), dibutylphthalate (DBP), di-(2-ethylhexyl)-phthalate (DEHP), di-isodecylphthalate (DIDP), and di-isononylphthalate (DINP) in house dust. To achieve this liquid chromatography electrospray tandem mass spectrometry (LC-ESI-MS/MS) was used for measurement. The risk of lab- and cross-contamination was nearly eliminated completely as a very short and fast sample preparation including a sieving step and an ultrasonic extraction for the analytes from the dust samples was used. Quantification through internal standard calibration resulted in low limits of determination (DEHP 4 mg kg(-1) to DBP 14 mg kg(-1)). A potential interaction between the analytes DIDP and DINP during chromatographic measurement could be excluded while performing a two level factorial design. Furthermore it was examined to what extend carpet and plastic materials respectively have influence on the total amount of phthalates in dust. It could be shown that apartments in which a minimum of both of these sources appeared revealed the lowest total amount of sum of phthalates in dust (median 362 mg kg(-1)).