The effects of total intravenous and inhalation anesthesia maintenance on tissue oxygenation in coronary artery bypass graft surgery

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) and inhalational anesthesia techniques on tissue oxygenation in cardiac surgery. We compared the effects of midazolam-based TIVA and sevoflurane-based (SEVO) inhalation anesthesia maintenance on intraoperative central and regional tissue oxygenation parameters.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 104 adult patients who were scheduled for elective isolated coronary bypass surgery were included in the study. All patients were divided into two groups: the TIVA group consisted of total intravenous anesthesia maintenance patients (n=52) and the SEVO group consisted of patients with inhalation anesthesia with sevoflurane maintenance (n=52). Tissue oxygenation values were observed with left-right cerebral and somatic left forearm Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS) sensors. The hemodynamic parameters, NIRS StO2, central (ScvO2) and peripheral venous oxygen saturations of the patients were recorded at six intraoperative time points.

RESULTS

The effects of midazolam-based TIVA and sevoflurane-based inhalation anesthesia maintenance on intraoperative central and peripheral tissue oxygenation parameters were compared and it was found that in the left forearm NIRS StO2 and ScvO2 values were higher in the SEVO group than the TIVA group. Although not significantly different, forearm regional venous oxygen saturation was also higher in the SEVO group.

CONCLUSIONS

The effects of anesthetic drugs on regional tissue oxygenation can become important in critical patients and challenging surgeries. Sevoflurane-based anesthesia provides better tissue oxygenation than TIVA in patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery.

Comparison of applying particulate demineralized bone matrix (DBM), putty DBM and open flap debridement in periodontal horizontal bone defects. A 12-month longitudinal, multi-centre, triple-blind, split-mouth, randomized, controlled clinical study. Part 2 - evaluation of the interdental soft tissue

To date, there have been many studies clinically evaluating periodontal regenerative procedures by the help of routinely used hard and soft tissue parameters; however, these parameters are not capable of assessing interdental soft tissue located above the regenerative periodontal surgery area. The purpose of this study was to assess interproximal soft tissue changes following application of (i) particulate form demineralized bone matrix (DBM), (ii) putty form DBM and (ii) open flap debridement (OFD, control), using modified curtain technique in the treatment of interproximal suprabony (horizontal) defects located in anterior maxillary region, as previously reported. Twenty-five chronic periodontitis patients with 125 interproximal surgery sites (radiologically >or=4 mm horizontal bone defect) were also participate in this second stage of the triple-blind, split mouth, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Surgery sites were assessed by (i) plaque index (PI), (ii) gingival index (GI), (iii) the presence of interdental soft tissue clefts or craters and (iv) the loss of interdental papilla height by using papilla presence index (PPI), during the healing period. At the baseline and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after the operations, these measurements were repeated. In all groups, there is a significant increase in the prevalence of soft tissue cleft and crater formation (P < 0.01), with increase in PI and GI scores at interdental soft tissue defect areas (P < 0.001), 3 months after the operations. There was also an increase in PPI scores after the operations in all treatment groups (P < 0.01). Three procedures affected the interproximal soft tissues similarly. There was no significant difference among groups in terms of all parameters (P > 0.05). Particulate DBM, putty DBM and OFD demostrated similar interproximal soft tissue changes especially increasing interproximal PI and GI scores in 3 months follow-up.

Comparison of applying particulate demineralized bone matrix (DBM), putty DBM and open flap debridement in periodontal horizontal bone defects. A 12-month longitudinal, multi-center, triple-blind, split-mouth, randomized, controlled clinical study. Part 1 - clinical and radiographic evaluation

Putty form graft materials may have additional favourable effects when compared with particulate ones in periodontal bone defects. The purpose of this study was to assess clinical and also radiographic changes following application of (i) putty form demineralized bone matrix (DBM), (ii) particulate form DBM and (iii) open flap debridement (control), using modified curtain suturing technique in the treatment of interproximal suprabony (horizontal) defects. Twenty-five chronic periodontitis patients with 125 sites (radiologically >or=4 mm horizontal bone defect) were selected to participate in this triple-blind, split mouth, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Putty and particulate form DBM grafts were placed at experimental sites. Clinical measurements included probing depth (PD), relative attachment level (RAL), gingival recession and bone probing depth (BPD) were made at baseline and repeated 12 months after the operations. Standardized digital radiographs were also taken to measure radiographic bone level (RBL) at baseline and 12 months later to be compared in a software. Probing depth reductions and RAL gains were significantly improved in all treatment groups (P < 0.001). No significant differences in soft tissue parameters were found among three groups (P > 0.05). Bone probing depth measurements indicated comparable significant bone gain in graft applied groups (P < 0.01) and a significant bone resorption in open flap debridement group (P < 0.01). Radiographic evaluation did not show any significant bone gain or resorption in all treatment groups (P > 0.05). The results of this study indicate that either putty or particulate DBM demonstrates similar enhancements in soft and hard tissue parameters. Applying putty or particulate form DBM results with slight bone formation when compared with open flap debridement in horizontal bone defects at 1-year post-operative examination according to BPD measurements.