Safe and prolonged survival with long-term exposure to pomalidomide in relapsed/refractory myeloma

BACKGROUND

The IFM2009-02 trial studied pomalidomide (4 mg daily, 21/28 versus 28/28) and dexamethasone in very advanced relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). We observed that 40% of patients had a prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and subsequently overall survival (OS). We sought to analyze the characteristics of these patients and study the effect of long exposure to pomalidomide.

DESIGN

We separated the studied population into two groups: 3 months to 1 year (<1 year) and more than 1 year (≥1 year) of treatment with pomalidomide and dexamethasone based on clinical judgment and historical control studies. We then analyzed the characteristics of patients according to duration of treatment.

RESULTS

The overall response rate (ORR) for the <1-year group was 43%, the median PFS 4.6 months [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 3.8-6.4] with only 6% at 12 months, and the median OS was 15 months (11.7-20.3) and 40% at 18 months. For the ≥1-year group, the response rate and survival were strikingly different, ORR at 83%, median PFS 20.7 months (14.7-35.4), median OS not reached, and 91% at 18 months.

CONCLUSION

Pomalidomide and dexamethasone favored prolonged and safe exposure to treatment in 40% of heavily treated and end-stage RRMM, a paradigm shift in the natural history of RRMM characterized with a succession of shorter disease-free intervals and ultimately shorter survival. Although an optimization of pomalidomide-dexamethasone regimen is warranted in advanced RRMM, we claim that pomalidomide has proven once more to change the natural history of myeloma in this series, which should be confirmed in a larger study.

Design and first interim analysis of a randomized phase III trial comparing imatinib versus imatinib (IM) based combination therapies in newly diagnosed chronic myelogenous leukemia patients in chronic phase

6589

Background: Despite impressive results achieved with IM 400 mg/day alone, only a minority of pts reached a complete molecular remission at 12-month. Higher dose of IM or its combination with other therapies might improve molecular remission. Design of the trial: the 3 experimental arms are IM 400mg daily in combination with Peg-IFN-α2a (Peg-IFNα2a, 90 μg weekly) or with Ara-C (20 mg/m2/day, days 15–28 of 28-day cycles) or IM 600mg daily. The reference arm is IM 400mg daily. All pts (over 18 years of age with Bcr-Abl positive CML) receive IM 400 mg/day as monotherapy days 1–14 and then start the assigned regimen for at least 12 months. The endpoints are overall survival (primary), rate and duration of hematologic, cytogenetic and molecular responses and tolerability. An interim analysis of the first 636 pts at 1 year from randomization will allow evaluation of molecular response rates, one of the experimental arm being selected for further comparison with IM 400. An experimental arm would be selected if it increased the 4 log reduction response rate at 12-month by at least 20 percentage points, (15% to 35%), with an acceptable tolerability. Results: This evaluation is based on a cohort of 370 pts with a median time of observation of 16 months, recruited between 9/2003 and 9/2005. [median age 53 yrs (18–81); Sokal distribution: 38% of pts low, 38% intermediate, and 24% high]. At 1 month 80% of pts achieved complete hematologic response. At 12 months, 138 pts (72%) achieved a major cytogenetic response, being complete in 120 pts (63%). Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity occurred in 8% of IM400 pts, 9% of IM600 pts, 41% of IM+IFN pts and 33% of IM+Ara-c pts respectively. Dose of Peg IFN was reduced in 16% of pts, 45 μg per week being well tolerated. Grade 3/4 non hematological toxicity occurred in 11% of IM400 pts, 16% of IM600 pts, 10% of IM+IFN pts (maily skin rash) and 11% of IM+Ara-c pts. Discontinuation of experimental treatment occurred in 17% of IM600 pts, 36% of IM+IFN pts and 16% of IM+Ara-c pts. Conclusion: This first analysis confirmed both feasibility of IM combinations and high response rates. However a substantial hematological toxicity requires a careful assessment of pts.

[Table: see text]

The use of recombinant factor VIIa (NovoSeven) in a patient with a factor XI deficiency and a circulating anticoagulant

A 75-year-old female known to have a chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia and an acquired FXI deficiency (FXI level, 5%) related to a FXI inhibitor (38 Bethesda units) was admitted to the hospital for acute pneumonia associated with a bulky pleural effusion. A therapeutic puncture was found to be essential for the patient. But, such a procedure is a haemostatic challenge which requires adequate preparation. A first treatment composed of intravenous immunoglobulins and immunosuppressive therapy failed to eradicate the inhibitor and to restore a normal FXI level. In this context, steroids or FXI concentrates were not recommended. Thus, small doses of recombinant activated factor VII were used to achieve haemostasis. The procedure was successful, the tolerance was good and no adverse events occurred.

A case of chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia and factor XI deficiency with a circulating anticoagulant

Inhibitors against factor XI (FXI) have been frequently described in patients who acquired inhibitors (due to auto-immune disorders, malignancies or infections), but less often in those with a congenital deficiency of this factor, who had received plasma infusions. The present report concerns one such inhibitor found in the plasma of a patient with chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia and infected by B19 parvovirus, who was neither a heterozygote nor a homozygote for FXI deficiency, and who had no bleeding tendency despite a very low FXI level. Taking this case into account, we discuss and present the clinical and biological features of acquired FXI deficiency caused by an inhibitor.

Evaluation of a new rapid D-dimer assay for clinically suspected deep venous thrombosis (Liatest D-dimer)

In previous studies, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) for plasma D-dimer analysis have demonstrated high sensitivity, suggesting their potential usefulness in excluding deep venous thrombosis (DVT). We evaluated the usefulness of a new D-dimer test (Liatest D-dimer) for suspected DVT in a prospective study of patients admitted to the hospital because of recent (not exceeding 1 week before admission) clinical signs. Contrast venography or compression ultrasonography or both were performed within 24 hours of admission. A new quantitative determination of D-dimer concentration using a suspension of microlatex particles coated with specific antibodies was tested. A standard plasma D-dimer ELISA measurement was also performed. Of 464 patients, 276 had a proven DVT (distal, 74; proximal, 202). For a cutoff level of 400 ng/mL, sensitivity of the Liatest method in the diagnosis of overall DVT was 94.6% (95% confidence interval, 92.0%-97.0%), and the specificity was 35% (95% confidence interval, 28%-42%). The sensitivity and negative predictive value were 98.5% and 95.6%, respectively, in the diagnosis of proximal DVT, but only 83.8% and 84.6%, respectively, in the diagnosis of distal DVT. This new rapid Liatest D-dimer assay seems to be highly sensitive and could replace the ELISA method in excluding patients with proximal DVT. Both methods provide lower sensitivity for distal DVT.