Safety and efficacy results of a randomized trial comparing adjuvant toremifene and tamoxifen in postmenopausal patients with node-positive breast cancer. Finnish Breast Cancer Group

PURPOSE

In this multicenter trial, toremifene 40 mg/d was compared with tamoxifen 20 mg/d, both given orally for 3 years to postmenopausal, axillary node-positive women after breast surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The first 899 patients (toremifene, n = 459; tamoxifen, n = 440) of the total of 1,480 patients accrued to the trial were included in this scheduled safety analysis. The mean follow-up time was 3.4 years.

RESULTS

The two treatment groups were well balanced with respect to patient and disease characteristics. The subjective side-effect profile was similar in both treatment groups. Slightly more vascular complications (deep vein thromboses, cerebrovascular events, and pulmonary embolisms) were seen among tamoxifen-treated patients (5.9%) as compared with toremifene-treated patients (3.5%) (P: =.11), whereas bone fractures (P: =.09) and vaginal leukorrhea (P: =.05) were more common in the toremifene group. The number of subsequent second cancers was similar. The breast cancer recurrence rate was 23.1% (n = 106) in the toremifene group and 26.1% (n = 115) in the tamoxifen group (P: =.31). When only patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive cancer were considered (n = 556), the risk for breast cancer recurrence was nonsignificantly lower among the toremifene-treated women, with a hazards ratio of 0.74 (90% confidence interval, 0.52 to 1.04; P: =.14). The mean time to breast cancer recurrence and overall survival were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION

The side-effect profile of toremifene resembles that of tamoxifen. The efficacy of toremifene seems to be no less than that of tamoxifen. The trend for fewer breast cancer recurrences in the ER-positive subgroup is encouraging, but a longer follow-up is needed to confirm this.

Treatment results of nasopharyngeal cancer--a nationwide survey from Finland

The nationwide experience of treating nasopharyngeal cancer in Finland during the period 1980-1989 was reviewed. Of the 107 patients included in the present analysis, 13 were treated palliatively only, and three had metastatic disease at their first clinical presentation, whereas the rest (n = 91) were treated with radical radiotherapy, of whom, 8 patients received adjuvant chemotherapy after radiotherapy. The 5-year actuarial survival rates of these 91 patients was 52%, and by the UICC stage they were classified as follows: stage I 75% (n = 12), stage II 60% (n = 5), stage III 59% (n = 34), and stage IV 38% (n = 40). According to the Cox's stepwise proportional hazard model the most important factors influencing favourable survival were the total dose of radiotherapy expressed in terms of Biologically Effective Dose (BED) with a time factor, a small size of the primary tumour and a high performance status according to the WHO scale, whereas the most important factors influencing the local control analysis were the total dose of radiotherapy (expressed in BED) and the cervical lymph node status.

Rheumatic Infection in Childhood: Observations on the Sedimentation Rate and the Schilling Count

Images