Biomechanical evaluation of medial patello-femoral ligament reconstruction: comparison between a double-bundle converging tunnels technique versus a single-bundle technique

BACKGROUND

Several MPFL reconstructions are commonly performed for recurrent patellar dislocation, but misleading data are currently available in the literature on the ability of the different techniques to re-create a functioning ligament.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this study, we showed the biomechanical properties of two different procedures for MPFL reconstruction using a natural orientation during uniaxial tensile testing. Eighteen fresh-frozen human knees were randomly assigned to two groups of nine each. In the group A, the reconstruction was performed using a double converging tunnels technique and in the group B was used a single-tunnel technique with semitendinosus autograft. The specimens were loaded in natural orientation using an Instron tensile test machine, and the stiffness and ultimate load were determined.

RESULTS

The ultimate load was 213 ± 90 and 171 ± 51 N using our double-bundle technique (group A) and the single-bundle technique (group B), respectively. One (11 %) specimen failed at the patellar side due to patellar fracture in the group B. There was no statistical significant difference (p > 0.05) between the two groups in terms of stiffness and ultimate load.

CONCLUSION

This study is the first biomechanical evaluation of the MPFL reconstructions in natural orientation. Both the procedures achieved safe fixation of the graft at the femoral attachment; however, the single-bundle technique reported 11 % of failure at the patellar side due to patellar fracture. In addition, the double-bundle technique can better restore the anatomy of the native ligament.

Diagnostic value of the clinical investigation in acute meniscal tears combined with anterior cruciate ligament injury using arthroscopic findings as golden standard

INTRODUCTION

The main purpose of our study was to evaluate the accuracy of clinical investigation for meniscal tears associated with ACL injuries. We hypothesized that combined ACL injury can decrease the accuracy of clinical examination in acute onset.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred and thirty-seven patients with a mean age of 28.5 years (from 12 to 55) were prospectively examined for acute combined ACL and meniscal injuries, between March and November 2012 at our department. For meniscal tears, clinical examination was performed using McMurray test, Apley test and medial and lateral joint line tenderness. The diagnoses of ACL tear were made using Lachman test, jerk test and pivot-shift test, anterior drawer test and KT-2000 side-to-side difference. Each patient was examined using X-ray and MRI. All the patients underwent arthroscopic surgery performed by the same surgeon within 6 weeks after the injury. Finally, using the arthroscopic findings as gold standard, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of clinical investigation and MRI were evaluated.

RESULTS

The specificity of clinical investigation was 63.5 and 46.0 % and the sensitivity was 74.4 and 77.3 % for the medial meniscus and the lateral meniscus, respectively. Overall, the accuracy of the clinical investigation was 70.3 % for the MM and 65.5 % for the lateral meniscus. The accuracy of MRI investigation was 76.4 and 69.5 % for medial and lateral meniscus, respectively.

DISCUSSION

In combined acute ACL injury and meniscal tears, we have found a decreased accuracy of the clinical investigation. The remnants of the torn ACL and the synovitis increased the rate of false positives, and it could simulate meniscal tears. However, clinical investigation can provide sufficient information for the treatment decision and MRI can be avoided as a routine diagnostic tool.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, prospective study.

Shape and size of the medial patellofemoral ligament for the best surgical reconstruction: a human cadaveric study

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate the shape and the attachments of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) in cadaver specimens to determine an anatomical basis for the best MPFL reconstruction.

METHODS

Twenty fresh-frozen knees were used. Dissection protocol implied performing dissections from within the knee joint. We investigated the shape and the attachments between the MPFL and the quadriceps tendon, the patellar and femur insertions, and all the other relationships with the medial soft tissues of the knee.

RESULTS

The distal fibers of MPFL were interdigitated with the deep layer of the medial retinaculum. All isolated ligament had a sail-like shape with the patellar side bigger than the femoral side. The femoral insertion, distinct both from medial epicondyle and adductor tubercle, was located at 9.5 mm (range 4-22) distal and anterior respect to adductor tubercle and proximal and posterior to epicondyle. The medial third of the thickness of patella was involved in the insertion. The proximal third of the patella is always involved in the MPFL attachment; in 45% of the cases, it was extended to the medial third and in one case, an extension at the distal third was found. Additionally in 35% (7 cases), it extended to the quadriceps tendon and it were inconstantly attached at the vastus medialis obliques (VMO) tendon and at the vastus intermedius (VI) tendon in an aponeurotic structure.

CONCLUSIONS

The MPFL is a distinct structure that goes from patella to femur with a sail-like shape; its patellar insertion, that mostly occur via an aponeurosis tissue with VMO and VI, is at the proximal third of the patella but it may extend in some cases to the medial third patella or to the quadriceps tendon, or very rarely to the distal third of the patella. In the femoral side, the MPFL is inserted in its own site, in most cases distinct both from epicondyle and adductor tubercle, located on average at a 9.5 mm distance distally and anteriorly in respect to the adductor tubercle. Its lower margin was difficult to define. Given the importance of this structure, it must be reconstructed as anatomically as possible in its insertion and in its shape. Many attempts have been made to make functional reconstructions with less than excellent results.