Combination gemcitabine plus S-1 versus gemcitabine plus cisplatin for advanced/recurrent biliary tract cancer: the FUGA-BT (JCOG1113) randomized phase III clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC) is the standard treatment of advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC); however, it causes nausea, vomiting, and anorexia, and requires hydration. Gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS) reportedly has equal to, or better, efficacy and an acceptable toxicity profile. We aimed to confirm the non-inferiority of GS to GC for patients with advanced/recurrent BTC in terms of overall survival (OS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We undertook a phase III randomized trial in 33 institutions in Japan. Eligibility criteria included chemotherapy-naïve patients with recurrent or unresectable BTC, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status of 0 - 1, and adequate organ function. The calculated sample size was 350 with a one-sided α of 5%, a power of 80%, and non-inferiority margin hazard ratio (HR) of 1.155. The primary end point was OS, while the secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), response rate (RR), adverse events (AEs), and clinically significant AEs defined as grade ≥2 fatigue, anorexia, nausea, vomiting, oral mucositis, or diarrhea.

RESULTS

Between May 2013 and March 2016, 354 patients were enrolled. GS was found to be non-inferior to GC [median OS: 13.4 months with GC and 15.1 months with GS, HR, 0.945; 90% confidence interval (CI), 0.78-1.15; P = 0.046 for non-inferiority]. The median PFS was 5.8 months with GC and 6.8 months with GS (HR 0.86; 95% CI 0.70-1.07). The RR was 32.4% with GC and 29.8% with GS. Both treatments were generally well-tolerated. Clinically significant AEs were observed in 35.1% of patients in the GC arm and 29.9% in the GS arm.

CONCLUSIONS

GS, which does not require hydration, should be considered a new, convenient standard of care option for patients with advanced/recurrent BTC.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

This trial has been registered with the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm), number UMIN000010667.

Use of circulating tumor cells to predict response to chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer

43

Background: The purpose of this study was to quantify circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in advanced gastric cancer (AGC) patients, and to demonstrate the role of CTCs in cancer therapy. The purpose of this study was to identify CTC threshold proposal for determining response to chemotherapy in AGC.

Methods: From November 2007 to June 2009, fifty-two patients with AGC were enrolled into a prospective study. All patients were enrolled using institutional review board-approved protocols at the Cancer Institute Hospital and provided informed consent. The study population consisted of patients of aged 18 years or older with histologically proven AGC. Other inclusion criteria were Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 2; adequate organ function. The subjects were five patients treated with S-1 (40 mg/m2, twice daily, days 1-28, repeated every 6 weeks), twenty-six patients treated with S-1 plus CDDP (S-1 40 mg/m2, twice daily, days 1-21, CDDP 60 mg/m2, day 8, repeated every 5 weeks), and twenty-one patients treated with paclitaxel (80 mg/m2, weekly). CTCs of whole blood at baseline, two weeks and four weeks after initiation of chemotherapy, were isolated and enumerated using immunomagnetics.

Results: Patients with ≥4 CTCs at two-week points and four-week points had a shorter median PFS (1.4, 1.4 months, respectively), than those with the median PFS of <4 CTCs (4.9, 5.0 months, respectively) (p<0.001, p<0.001, respectively). Patients with ≥4 CTCs at two-week points and four-week points had shorter median OS (3.5, 4.0 months, respectively) than those with the median PFS of <4 CTCs (11.7, 11.4 months, respectively) (p<0.001, p=0.001, respectively). In univariate analysis, PS, treatment regimen, Line of chemotherapy, and CTC levels at 2 weeks and 4 weeks predicted PFS and OS. In order to evaluate the independent predictive effect of chemotherapy, multivariate Cox regression analysis was carried out. CTC levels at 2 weeks and 4 weeks were the strongest predictors.

Conclusions: A threshold of lower than 4 CTC/7.5 ml at 2 weeks and 4 weeks was a significant predictor of the outcome for AGC patients treated with S-1 based regimen or paclitaxel regimen.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Effect of the addition of bevacizumab to first-line FOLFOX on efficacy, including response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival, in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

588

Background: Bevacizumab (BV) is a recombinant, humanized monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor. Used in combination with chemotherapy, BV has been shown to improve survival in both first- and second-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, it was reported that addition of BV to FOLFOX conferred only little survival benefit (Saltz et al. JCO2008). The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of addition of BV to FOLFOX in first-line treatment for patients with mCRC.

Methods: Bevacizumab was approved for mCRC in July 2007 in Japan. This study was conducted at a single institution and comprised 217 consecutive patients receiving first-line treatment for mCRC between 2005 and 2009. The primary objective was to compare survival benefit in patients treated with FOLFOX4 (FF) between 2005 and 2007 with that in patients receiving FOLFOX4+BV 5 mg/kg (FF+BV) between 2007 and 2009.

Results: Total number of patients in the FF and FF+BV groups was 132 and 85, respectively. Characteristics of patients were as follows (FF vs. FF+B): median age, 62 yrs (range 28-76 yrs) vs. 60 yrs (range16-74 yrs); ECOG PS0, 98.8% vs. 81.8%; and median follow-up time, 20.8 months vs. 24.4 months. Median progression-free survival (PFS) in the FF and FF+BV groups was 10 months (95% CI, 8.7-11.3) and 17 months (95% CI, 10.2-14.1), while median overall survival (OS) was 21 months (95% CI, 17.9-24.1) and not reached, respectively. Response rate was 46% (95% CI, 37- 54) in FF, and 62% (95% CI, 51-73) in FF+BV. Addition of BV to FOLFOX4 significantly improved PFS (p=0.002) and OS (p<0.001).

Conclusions: The additive effect of BV for first-line FOLFOX was reconfirmed. These data indicate potential survival benefits from the addition of BV to FOLFOX in first-line treatment of mCRC. In addition, PFS may be a sensitive indicator of outcome prior to post-treatment.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Coagulo-fibrinolytic activity as a predictor of efficacy in bevacizumab-combined chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer patients

533

Background: The combination of bevacizumab (BV) and chemotherapy in the first-line and second-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has been shown to improve survival. Bevacizumab is a recombinant, humanized monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor. However, the relationship between coagulo-fibrinolytic activity factors and treatment efficacy remains to be clarified. The aim of this study was to determine potential coagulo-fibrinolytic activity markers impacting survival.

Methods: Among 119 consecutive patients included in the study, 85 received first-line FOLFOX4 plus BV 5 mg/kg and 34 received second-line FOLFIRI plus BV 5 mg/kg until progression of disease or unmanageable toxicity occurred. Coagulo-fibrinolytic activity factors, including D-dimer, thrombin antithrombin complex (TAT) and carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) encoded by the MUC16 mucin gene were evaluated as candidate predictors of outcome.

Results: In first-line treatment, overall response, median progression-free survival (PFS) and two-year survival rate were 61.9%, 518 days and 67.3%, respectively. In second-line treatment, overall response, median PFS and median overall survival (OS) were 23.5%, 248 days and 651 days, respectively. The outcomes of the univariate analysis were as follows: normal D-dimer and CA125 levels at baseline were associated with better PFS and OS in first-line treatment; normal TAT and CA125 levels at baseline were associated with better PFS and OS in second-line treatment. According to the results of the multivariate analysis, normal D-dimer level was associated with longer PFS in first-line treatment, and only CA125 level at baseline was an independent predictor of both PFS and OS in second-line treatment.

Conclusions: The results suggest that coagulo-fibrinolytic activity factors such as TAT, D-dimer or CA125 may be useful predictors of outcome in mCRC patients receiving BV in combination with chemotherapy.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.